6 Cultural 7 Travel to site B 8 Hospital/clinic 3 9 Service learning 10 Service learning 11 Cultural 12 Return travelThroughout the field experience, the students and faculty visited clinical care facilities, such aslarge regional hospitals and local clinics. These visits were arranged by contacts in Guatemala,and approval was obtained from the facility administrators prior to the visits. During the visits,the students conducted a needs assessment by interviewing and surveying administrators,healthcare workers, and patients at the
and fundamental engineering concepts.AcknowledgmentsWe are extremely grateful for the contributions of our colleagues to this book, especially KarenChristman, Adam Engler, Noah Goshi, Craig Simmons, Wujing Xian, and Peter Zandstra.References1. Bell, E., B. Ivarsson, and C. Merrill. 1979. Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76 (3):1274-8.2. Davey, R. E., K. Onishi, A. Mahdavi, and P. W. Zandstra. 2007. LIF-mediated control of embryonic stem cell self-renewal emerges due to an autoregulatory loop. FASEB J 21 (9):2020-32.3. DeQuach, J. A., V. Mezzano, A. Miglani, S. Lange, G. M. Keller, F. Sheikh, and K
why. i. An implantable artificial pancreas. Assume the device is made up of a semi- permeable membrane enclosing pancreatic islet cells, and that the encapsulated cells respond to glucose levels in the surrounding body fluids and secrete insulin as needed. ii. A silicone breast implant that serves a primarily aesthetic function. b. List three properties of an implant that may contribute to the development of chronic inflammation or a foreign body response, and briefly explain how each may contribute to prolonging the inflammatory response. c. For each of the following medical devices, state the category in Table 1 that it would fall under (by specifying body contact type and contact
practice the Four A’s strategy through a homeworkassignment in which they were asked to apply the Four A’s to a particular laboratory situation(Appendix B). The proposed case was based on a real-life example.Assessment ResultsReflective Assignment: The main goal for this assignment was to provide students with thechance to reflect on the material discussed and place it into context. Students were evaluated onwhether they provided a well-developed reflection on the implications and a personal evaluationof the proceedings (Appendix A). For the most part, students were able to synthesize theinformation presented and put it into the context of their own lives or future career goals. Withthe majority of students, obvious effort was put into
AC 2012-3771: DEVELOPING A SMALL-FOOTPRINT BIOENGINEER-ING PROGRAMDr. Alisha L Sarang-Sieminski, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Alisha Sarang-Sieminski is an Assistant Professor of bioengineering at Franklin W. Olin College of En- gineering. Her research interests include how cells respond to and influence chemical and mechanical aspects of their surroundings and how people respond to and influence the schemas and power dynamics in their surroundings.Prof. Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Debbie Chachra is an Associate Professor of materials science at the Franklin W. Olin College of Engi- neering. Her engineering education research currently focuses on self-efficacy in first-year
AC 2012-4464: INTEGRATION OF A COMPUTATIONAL LAB SEQUENCEINTO A JUNIOR-LEVEL QUANTITATIVE PHYSIOLOGY COURSEKurt A. Thoroughman Ph.D., Washington University, St. Louis Kurt A. Thoroughman, Ph.D., is the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies and an Associate Profes- sor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. Thoroughman has joint appointments in the departments of Anatomy & Neurophysiology and Physical Therapy.Mr. Ranjan Patrick Khan, Washington University, St. Louis Department of BMEMs. Haoxin Sun, Washington University, St. LouisPatricia L. Widder, Washington University, St. Louis Patricia Widder serves as Teaching Lab Coordinator in the Biomedical Engineering
subtasks for implementation. down project into - Demonstrate an understanding for reasonable goals, the need of a multidisciplinary team to linear scheduling solve a biomedical engineering design problem. - Educate, respect, and compromise with individuals from different perspectives to solve a biomedical problem.Human and Animal (b), (j) - Outline a directed approach to ComposingStudies explore concepts or hypotheses
teaching responsibilities comprises the biomedical engineering laboratory courses. His previous research interests included small- molecule organic synthesis, intelligent hydrogels for controlled drug delivery, pulmonary drug delivery, and materials characterization.Mr. William Liechty, University of Texas, Austin William B. Liechty is a NSF Graduate Research Fellow in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Texas, Austin, conducting research under the direction of Prof. Nicholas Peppas. He re- ceived a B.S.E. in chemical engineering from the University of Iowa in 2007 and studied at the University of Cambridge as a Gates Scholar until 2008. His research interests include responsive materials, RNA
completed the final student perception survey, used as the main metric for this study.Questions resulting in a statistical difference compared to either control or experimental sectionsin 2007 are shown in figures 1 and 2. Fig 1. Final survey examining student perception of course structure in (i) allowing students to conduct self-‐directed inquiry and (ii) facilitator’s ability to allow team to make their own decision, where A, B, and C, and the control, experimental, and revised groups, respectively. The frequency of responses is shown as grayscale bars on a 5 point Likert scale, where ‘‘strongly agree
, and programming, (b) stark variations in the core interests of thestudents, and (c) cultural disparities between engineering departments regarding reasonablelevels of assignment difficulty and commensurate time investments. To help address some ofthese issues in a junior-level Introduction to Biomedical Engineering course, the author haschosen (for four recent Spring course offerings) to set aside two to three weeks of each 16-weekcourse for discretionary topics chosen by the students. Each student or student pair then takes onthe role of the instructor and teaches that topic to the rest of the students in the format of a 25-minute seminar. Students must assign homework to their peers and grade the results; thesegrades are then entered into
the worst and should be deleted? Explain. 4. Do you have general suggestions for improvement of the module? Explain. 5. Please select the answer that best describes the amount of times you attended tutoring or used an online help tool. A. Never B. A few times C. Frequently D. Very FrequentlyResults from the long-term follow-up data will be available until the end of the Spring 2012semester. The first offering of Module 2 and Module 3 are currently underway. Module 2 isentitled: Math Applications in Disease Epidemiology – Modeling the spread of contagiousdiseases, with 31 students, and Module 4 is entitled: Math Applications in Health Hazards fromElectric Current