blind spot [35]. An expert identifies the type of problemwith ease and without conscious thought [36]. Because problem identification occurs so easilyand naturally, the expert may never mention that they first had to identify the problem type norexplain how they made that identification. Instead, the expert immediately starts to implementthe general procedure for solving that type of problem. In this way, the procedure is notexplicitly mentioned or taught and it is not associated with the type of the problem. Instead it ispresented implicitly so that the student is left to (a) generalize the steps in the solution processfrom watching the expert apply them and then (b) associate those steps with that particularproblem type. Some experts describe
should be able to: (a) design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze andinterpret data; (b) communicate effectively; and (c) implement formal practices of projectplanning and management.Curricular Context and DesignIn 2002, the biological engineering program at Oregon State University joined the Department ofChemical Engineering (CHE) at Oregon State University. Five years later the environmentalengineering program was incorporated, and the department renamed the School of Chemical,Biological, and Environmental Engineering (CBEE). Since this time, CBEE has worked towarda common curricula for these three “process engineering” degree programs where appropriate.Figure 1 summarizes the student distribution from the past 3 years, showing also
Introduction to Engineering Course Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28915 7. Mallouk, K., & Oestreich, B. D., & Streiner, S., & Dahm, K. D., & Bodnar, C. A. (2019, June), Fostering Curiosity, Creating Value, and Making Connections in First-Year Students Through Product Archaeology Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32857 8. Jensen, M. J., & Schlegel, J. L. (2017, June), Implementing an Entrepreneurial Mindset Design Project in an Introductory Engineering Course Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https
demonstrate the utility of WISE as an assessment tool to identify misconceptions.Figure 1 shows a screen shot of the problem 1 . This problem was adapted from the Thermal andTransport Science Concept Inventory developed by Ron Miller and coworkers .16 The assignedproblem had 4 multiple choice options. However, unlike the Concept Inventory tests, nojustification is given for each choice. Rather, students are asked to provide their own justificationin a short answer text box that accompanies the problem (see Appendix B). We term this activity,a “short answer follow-up”. The use of short answer follow-ups offers students the opportunityto practice reflection on their selection of multiple choice answers. It has been shown thatdescriptions of one's
for 20% of the students’ grade in the course.Some sample Gizmos from this project are shown in Figures 1 and 2. You can also get asense of the expo from these images, which is held in a large dining hall on campus. Page 22.746.7A) Rube-Goldberg Energy Conservation B) Impact Tester, as used C) Electrical Circuit Puzzle,Demonstration, with Bucknell Engineers. by Girl Scout attendees. A with ENGR 100 students.A ball moves down an incline, into a cup sample, held with The Gizmo is a simple circuitthat tips another incline, catapulting a
temperature as a function of time. From this information, theytested various scaling laws until they arrived at the one that seemed to work the best. A largegroup share was conducted during the last ten minutes of class to discuss the various results fromeach group. Note that three professors and a graduate student were used during this class toprovide guidance and general coaching directions, where required, to each group.Class 3: Why Am I Taking the Classes I am Taking / Math DayThe first part of this class was devoted to answering the generic question “Why do I have to take to become a chemical engineer?” At the beginning of class, the motivating questionwas asked, “I want to make chemical C by mixing chemical A and B. All I need to worry about
. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. W. 2002. Impact of undergraduate research experience inengineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(2), 151-157.8. Seymour, E., Hunter, A-B., Laursen, S. L., & Deantoni, T. 2004. Establishing the benefits of research experiencesfor undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88, 493-534.9. Lopatto, D. 2007. Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBELife Sciences Education, 6, 297-306.10. Yoder, B. L. 2013. Engineering by the Numbers. American Society for Engineering Education. 37 pp.http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/14_11-47.pdf11. URSSA, Undergraduate Research Student Self
-158. 5. A. Elby, American Journal of Physics, 1999, S52. 6. R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, 57-72. 7. C. Crouch, J. Watkins, A. Fagen and E. Mazur, Research-Based Reform of University Physics, 2007. 8. A. Fagen, C. Crouch and E. Mazur, The Physics Teacher, 2002, 206-209. 9. M. D. Koretsky and B. J. Brooks, Chemical Engineering Education, 2012, 46, 289-297. 10. E. M. Rogers, Addictive behaviors, 2002, 27, 989-993. 11. M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd and T. Simin Hall, Journal of Engineering Education, 2010, 99, 185. 12. M. Borrego, S. Cutler, J. Froyd, M. Prince and C. Henderson, in Australasian Association for Engineering
each student will write their individual memo based on some or all of the results from that brainstorming session and the resultant HAZOP table. You may prepare your HAZOP analysis on a reactor, separator, distillation tower, tank or other unit in your process.”An additional individual assignment the instructor assigns to the students include a quiz on anassigned CSB video, with questions listed here [7]:Process safety video quiz “A. What was the original chemical hazard (flammability, reactivity, or toxicity) in this accident? What was the chemical that posed this hazard? B. What actions did the operators perform that were directly linked to the explosion? C. Which Risk-Based Process Safety (RBPS) pillar or
: Anker Publishing.2. Link, A.N., A time allocation study of university faculty. Econ. of Educ. Rev., 2008. 27(4): p. 363-374.3. Mitchell, T.R., The academic life: Realizing changes needed for business school students and faculty. Acad. Manag. Learning Educ., 2007. 6(2): p. 236-251.4. Kuhn, T., Padak, G., Is academic advising a discipline? NACADA J., 2008. 28(2): p. 2-3.5. Collins, M.A., Zinskie, C. D., Keskula, D. R., Thompson, A. L., Institutional responsibilities and workload of faculty in baccalaureate dental hygiene programs. J. Dental Educ., 2007. 71(11): p. 1403-1413.6. McCormick, C.B., Barnes, B. J., Getting started in academia: A guide for educational psychologists. Educ. Psych. Rev., 2008
, “Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 63–85, 2000.[5] K. W. McElhaney, H.-Y. Chang, J. L. Chiu, and M. C. Linn, “Evidence for effective uses of dynamic visualisations in science curriculum materials,” Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 49–85, 2015.[6] B. J. Reiser, “Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 273–304, 2004.[7] R. D. Pea, “The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 423–451, 2004.[8] I. Roll et al., “Understanding the
. explosive material for use in to dampen any explosive force, Company B. The two companies and we used a feedback control “The temperature of material X in are nearly 500 miles apart, and the system to maintain the tank the tank is measured by a high material must travel between the temperature at 17°C. sensitivity thermocouple and two locations. The temperature of transmitted via a negative the liquid material leaving “The temperature set point is feedback loop to the PID 17°C
Education, 34(1), 2018, 88-96. [10] Patton, M, Q, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, California, 2002. [11] Miles M, B, and Huberman A, M, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 1994. [12] Creswell J, W, and Clark V, L, P, Designing and Conducting Mixed methods Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 2007.
Paper ID #11522Comparing Pedagogical Strategies for Inquiry-Based Learning Tasks in aFlipped ClassroomDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly
. 3, pp. 1– 30, 1994. [9] W. G. Rieger, “Directions in Delphi developments: Dissertations and their quality,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 195–204, 1986, doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(86)90063-6. [10] W. L. Stitt-Gohdes and T. B. Crews, “The Delphi Technique: A Research Strategy for Career and Technical Education,” Journal of Career and Technical Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 55–67, 2004. [11] “AIChE CareerEngineer Job Board.” [Online]. Available: https://careerengineer.aiche.org/. [Accessed: 26-Jan-2020]. [12] “Chemical Engineering Magazine Job Board.” [Online]. Available: https://jobs.chemengonline.com/. [Accessed: 26-Jan-2020]. [13] “The Chemical
: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.[2] “Graduate Attributes,” Engineers Canada. https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/Graduate-Attributes.pdf (accessed Mar. 10, 2020).[3] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020 | ABET.” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering- programs-2019-2020/ (accessed Mar. 10, 2020).[4] B. Frank, D. Strong, and R. Sellens, “The professional spine: Creation of a four-year engineering design and practice sequence,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc., 2011.[5] W. Clark, D. DiBiasio, and A. Dixon, “A project-based, spiral curriculum for introductory courses in ChE: Part 1. curriculum design,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 222
. Thathaving been said, the practical knowledge of how a feedback controller functions, and how theyare used in an industrial setting, can be imparted in a couple of lecture hours, although not withany real understanding of control theory. The student is left with a technician’s understanding ofcontrollers, adequate to use and design with them, but not a deep understanding.The processes that are found in the process industries have hundreds of simple feedback loops,but few with dynamics that both a) difficult to control, and b) tackled well by linear controltheory. It is useful for a chemical process control engineer to understand how to deal withprocesses with significant dead time using some form of model predictive control, and how torecognize and
AC 2007-3086: SCALING ANALYSIS AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL IN TEACHINGTRANSPORT AND REACTION PROCESSESWilliam Krantz, National University of Singapore William B. Krantz is the Isaac Manasseh Meyer Chair Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the National University of Singapore, Rieveschl Ohio Eminent Scholar and Professor Emeritus at the University of Cincinnati, and President’s Teaching Scholar and Professor Emeritus at the University of Colorado. He received a B.A. in chemistry in 1961 from Saint Joseph’s College (Indiana), a B.S. in chemical engineering in 1962 from the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign), and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering in 1968 from
AC 2011-1130: TEACHING CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CONCEPTS TONONCHEMICAL ENGINEERS: INDIGO: A WORLD OF BLUESPolly R. Piergiovanni, Lafayette College Polly R. Piergiovanni is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engi- neering at Lafayette College. She teaches the introductory engineering and chemical engineering courses, as well as process control. Her research interests include process control, biochemical engineering and the dyeing process. Page 22.1375.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Teaching Chemical Engineering Concepts to Nonchemical
PolyethyleneGlycol and Salt: The Partitioning of Small Neutral Organic Species. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. , 41,1892-1904, 2002.[24] Walter, H., Brooks, D. E and Fisher, D. Partitioning in Aqueous Two-Phase Systems: Theory, Methods, Usesand Applications to Biotechnology. Orlando: Academic Press, 1985.[25] Masschalck, B. and Michiels, C.W. Antimicrobial Properties of Lysozyme in Relation to Foodborne VegetativeBacteria. Critical Reviews in Microbiology , 29 (3), 191-214, 2003.[26] Butun, E., Erkin, H.C. and Altintas, L. A New Teamwork-Based PBL Problem Design for Electrical andElectronic Engineering Education: a Systems Approach, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education,45 (2), 110-120, 2008.[27] Collen A., Persson, J., Linder, M., Nakari-Setala
13 We believe that our experiences can be useful to several groups. First, our choices ofPSE topics for required and elective courses can be used as a reference by departments indesigning their programs, specifically the required PSE material. Second, departmentsconsidering streams can use the ideas here, for example, the use of course options to strengthen astream, when designing streams in other technical areas. Finally, a few departments will beconsidering a strong undergraduate program in PSE, and the program that we have implementedcan serve as a guide for their decisions.References1. Edgar, T., Ogunnaike, B., Downs, J., Muske, K., and Bequette, B.W. (2006) Renovating the Undergraduate Process Control Course, Comp. Chem
Teacher, 1992, 141-158.5. A. Elby, American Journal of Physics, 1999, S52.6. R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, 57-72.7. Merit Review Broader Impacts Criterion: Representative Activities: 2007, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/gpg/broaderimpacts.pdf.8. Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5741, Accessed January 1, 2013, 2013.9. C. Crouch, J. Watkins, A. Fagen and E. Mazur, Research-Based Reform of University Physics, 2007.10. A. Fagen, C. Crouch and E. Mazur, The Physics Teacher, 2002, 206-209.11. M. Koretsky and B. Brooks, Chemical Engineering Education, 2012, 46, 1, 289-297.12. E. M
presentation, critical thinking, and independent learning.5-7 Theorists have notedthat these beneficial characteristics are likely due to the social nature of the learning that occurs(following Vygotsky’s social constructivist theory), in which the task involves activeengagement, authentic tasks, application of knowledge in multiple representations, and learningcommunities.8-9 Furthermore, project-based learning methods compare favorably with the skillsnecessary for graduating engineers, as identified by the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) in outcomes (a)-(k) of Criterion 3.10 For example, outcome (b) is written as“an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data”, whichconnects directly
in the ways hands-on activities such as making, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Amy F. Golightly, Bucknell University Amy Golightly is an associate professor of education at Bucknell University. She earned her B. A. in psychology from the University of Saint Thomas, and her Ph.D. in school psychology from the University of Iowa. Her main research interests lie in understanding factors that facilitate or hinder learning and conceptual change in undergraduate students, and in development of assistive technology to help college students with disabilities. She is currently involved in collaborative research projects focused on these topics in chemical and electrical engineering
% 20% 10% 0%Figure 9. Coverage of modern topics in KRD courses for 2009-2010 as reported byinstructors.Chemical engineering programs are likely to use this course for ABET outcomes assessment.The fraction of reporting programs using this course for ABET a-k outcomes is shown in Figure10. Page 22.788.12 (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering, 100% (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data
AC 2007-1551: A SWEET PROGRAM REVIEWRichard Zollars, Washington State University Dr. Zollars is a professor in, and director of, the School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering at Washington State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado. He has been teaching engineering for 28 years. His interests are colloidal/interfacial phenomena, reactor design and engineering education.Donald Orlich, Washington State University Don Orlich graduated from the University of Montana in 1953 with a B.A. in Education. He received a Masters of Science Education in 1959 from the University of Utah and an Ed.D. in 1963 from the University of Montana. He taught five years as an
active nanostructured interfaces, nanocatalytic conversion of biorenewables to commodity chemicals and fuels, and nanoscale production of hydrogen on demand.Robert B. Barat, New Jersey Institute of Technology Robert Barat is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at NJIT, where he has been a faculty member for over 20 years. He earned his PhD in Chemical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1990. His current research involves reaction catalysis by fluorinated phthalocyanines.Norman W. Loney, New Jersey Institute of Technology Norman W. Loney is Professor and Chair of the Otto H. York Department of Chemical, Biological and Pharmaceutical Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has
Page 22.27.4 A and b are constants of the least squares fit.Students were asked to identify their sample as “strong”, :”normal” or “weak” by comparingtheir experimentally determined slope to reference values for “strong”, “normal” or “weak”coffee previously measured and included in the handout.A blind procedure, in which the lecturer did not know whether students were performing theexperiment virtually or “hands on” was not possible in this experiment because the instructorsknew in advance which type of procedure (actual or virtual) each section was doing. Laboratorylimitations prevented having dual setups for both experiments.Another consideration is student interest in the use of simulations in experiential learning.Would students
questions). A translation of this survey is depicted in Table 1. This not only yielded data onhow students prepared for the exam, but also on each student’s curricular background in highschool.Question (a) (b) (c) (d)1. Did you attend all classes? Yes, or mostly Yes, but I didn’t Not often, no Not (with few stay the whole at all exceptions) time (90 min)2. Did you buy the book Yes, I bought it Yes, I have a Partially, I have a No,(Potting, “Stromingsleer”), or (new or 2nd hand) digital version of digital version of nototherwise
level. Thereafter gender diversity increases to 17.7% at the faculty level. Therefore, thebottleneck for gender diversity in chemical engineering education appears to be correlated to thedoctoral level. Based on this data, we believe it is vital for the chemical engineering communityto take efforts to recruit and retain higher number of women students in doctoral programs. (a) (b)(c) (d)Figure 1. Gender Diversity within the Chemical Engineering Field. (a) Chemical EngineeringDivision membership (total of 536 members); (b) Engineering Faculty; (c) Engineering DoctoralStudents; (d) Engineering Baccleaurate Students.Even with some favorable diversity in