Paper ID #33919Exploration of a Nontraditional Assessment Method Using a ParticipatoryApproachDr. Tamara Floyd Smith, Tuskegee University Dr. Tamara Floyd Smith is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Tuskegee University. She has been a faculty member at Tuskegee University for 18 years. She currently teaches Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer. Those courses integrate well with her scientific research portfolio. She is also actively engaged in engineering education research. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Exploration of a Non
level after required textbook readings, a passive learning method, isacceptable because of the observations previously made that such learning methods are bettersuited for understanding at lower Bloom’s levels. Additionally, having most of the paragraphwritten in the beginning tier will allow students to observe paragraph structure and the use oftechnical phrases—circling back to the psychological phenomenon of learning through imitation. Circle the correct term for each space in the paragraph describing pressure versus distance for incompressible flow through the venturi meter displayed below: From points A to B, where the cross-sectional area decreases, pressure will increase/decrease due to flow work/kinetic
R Bako, Ahmadu Bello University Raymond B Bako obtained a PhD in Educational Psychology from the University of Jos, Nigeria in 2007.He was a Fulbright scholar to the University of Maryland recently.He is married with two children.Paul Golter, Washington State University Paul Golter, Washington State University Paul B Golter obtained an MS from Washington State University and is presently pursuing his PhD while working as the Laboratory Supervisor in the Chemical Engineering Department at WSU.He is married with two children.Jerome Babauta, Washington State University Jerome T Babauta is currently a Senior in Chemical Engineering at Washington State University and has been accepted into a
Paper ID #29057The Design and Impact of a Combined Makerspace, Wet Lab, andInstructional Design Studio for Chemical Engineering CurriculumProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Associate Professor (Lecturer) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory, capstone laboratory, first year design laboratory, and the introduction to chemical engineering. His research interests focus
., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.013Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., … Zhang, H. (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2004.tb00809
students using this zyBook correlated with the averagereading scores. Additionally, statistically significant higher textbook reading scores were observedfor students earning A and B final course grades compared to C, D, and F final grades as well asfemale students compared to male students. New data relating final course grades and book readingwill be presented. One new feature, challenge activities, are personalized, auto-graded homeworkwith scaffolded questions across 3 to 6 levels per activity. The increasing difficulty was verifiedby student success rates.IntroductionTextbooks became a standard tool for higher education, and specifically engineering education, inthe 20th century. However, the ubiquity of smart phones, tablets, and laptops has
AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT., June 2004. Page 24.220.97. Moor, S., Keyser, D., and Piergiovanni, P., “Design-Build-Test: Flexible Process Control Kits forthe Classroom,” ASEE Conference Proceedings (2003).8. Bequette, B.W., Aufderheide, B., Prasad, V., and Puerta, F., “A Process Control Experiment Designed for aStudio Course”, AIChE Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, November 2000.9. Smith, C.A., Corripio, A.B., Principles and Practice of Automatic Process Control, Second Edition, p. 566(1997
Sciences Education 14, no. 3, 2015[7] B. D. Jones, J. M. Watson, L. Rakes, and S. Akalin, “Factors that impact students’ motivation in an online course: Using the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation,” Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42–58, 2012.[8] B. D. Jones and G. Skaggs, “Measuring Students’ Motivation: Validity Evidence for the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation Inventory.,” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 10, no. 1, p. n1, 2016.[9] W. C. Lee, C. Brozina, C. T. Amelink, and B. D. Jones, “Motivating Incoming Engineering Students with Diverse Backgrounds: Assessing a Summer Bridge Program’s Impact on Academic
was allowed to work on this assignment inpairs (same as the 2018 cohort in the redesigned course), while the 2016 cohort was required towork on this assignment individually. This difference in performance further motivates the moveto incorporate more collaborative assignments into this course. A BFigure 2. Assessment of Student Achievement on Major Course Assignments. (A) Students’performance on a major midterm project (as rated on a four-point scale) is presented as thepercentage of students who achieved a grade in each category for the ’16 (black), ’17 (grey), and’18 (white) offerings of the course. (B) Students’ performance on the final course examination ispresented as the raw average score for the cohort
desktop experiments in the literature that may be used to teach the fundamentals of fluid mechanics and heat transfer through hands-on activities [6,9], but these experiments do not attempt to look like miniaturized industrial process equipment. One of the advantages of LC-DLMs compared to other inexpensive learning tools is that LC-DLMs are designed based on industrial equipment. In Figures 2(a) and 2(b) we contrast the design of the double-pipe heat exchanger LC-DLM with a stacked industrial double-pipe heat exchanger used for heating sludge [16]. Figure 2(c) and 2(d) compare the venturi meter desktop learning module to a municipal venturi unit [17]. (a) (b
choice to use theaforementioned equipment or their own, with the stipulation that the final product be in highdefinition. At [B], the faculty member made a number of iPads available to the students, alongwith tripods and microphones. Students who used the iPads were able to edit video directly onthe device using iMovie. A number of other apps, including TouchCast, Explain Everything, andStop Motion Studio were also made available but used less frequently that iMovie. At [C],students were given access to semiprofessional cameras and editing software on dedicatedmachines with either iMovie or Adobe Premiere installed, though most students used theirpersonal devices and editing software which came with their device or was provided byUniversity site
MathCad. b. to demonstrate how properties, such as offset in proportional-only control (P control) and the removal of offset with the inclusion of integral control (PI) control, carry over to processes higher than first order. (With MathCad, I also demonstrate the solution of 3 simultaneous first-order differential equations as in the treatment of an actuator, process and sensor model applied to a CST thermal mixing tank –see example 3.1 of “Chemical Process Control”1.)4. Modeling of dynamical systems was restricted to lumped systems.5. The number of demonstrations that were held in the classroom was reduced; demonstrations are held at the start of a lab session
thelist above) included: a) The problem statement and significance of the project were clearly explained. Related theory and works in the literature were presented and cited (Outcomes 2, 4, 5, and 6). b) Potential environmental impacts, societal impacts, and safety hazards were detailed (Outcomes 2, 3, and 4). c) Potential process schemes were evaluated, including different combinations of raw materials, different reaction pathways, and configurations of unit operations. Criteria that would be used to assess these alternatives were also discussed (Outcomes 2 and 6). d) Potential profitability of the process was assessed based on raw material selection and I/O analysis. The
) 1 from these two oils how many ounces of the second must be added to 10 ounces of the first in order for the dressing to have 14 % saturated fats.Table 1 (continued). Analysis of individual problems from chemical engineering 4. One thousand kilograms per hour of a mixture of benzene (B) 9.3 12.5 p=0.0169 and toluene (T) containing 50% benzene by mass is separated by (n=21) (n=34) distillation into two fractions. The mass flow rate of benzene in the top stream is 450 kg B/h and that of toluene in the bottom stream is 475 kg T/h. The operation is at steady state. Calculate the unknown component flow rates in the output streams. 5. Two methanol-water mixtures are contained in separate flasks. 4.8 11.88 p=0.0014
pharmacokinetics for chemicalengineers. Chemical Engineering Education. 2010;44: 262-266.22. Erzen, F. C. a. B., Gulnor, and Cinar, A. Development and implementation of an educationalsimulator: GLUCOSIM. Chemical Engineering Education. 2003;37: 300-305.23. Yerrick, R., Lund, C., Lee, Y. Exploring simulator use in the preparation of chemicalengineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2013;22: 362-278.24. Nicodemus, G., Falconer, J. L., Medlin, W., McDanel, K. P., Knutsen, J. S. Improvingstudent interaction with chemical Engineering learning tools: screencasts and simulations. ASEEAnnual Conference. Indianapolis, 2014.25. Finlayson, B. A. Introduction to Chemical Engineering Computing. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons, 2014.26. Davies
-Dependent Cytotoxicity of Anti-Cancer Drugs. Lab Chip 2009, 9, 1385-1394.7. Agarwal, D. P.; Goedde, H. W., Alcohol metabolism, alcohol intolerance, and alcoholism: biochemical andpharmacogenetic approaches. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1990.8. Chick, J.; Gough, K.; Falkowski, P.; Hore, B.; Mehta, B.; Ritson, B. R., R.; Torley, D., Disulfiram Treatment ofAlcoholism. British Journal of Psychiatry 1992, 161, 84-89.9. Umulis, D. M.; Gurmen, N. M., A physiologically based model for ethanol and acetaldehyde metabolism inhuman beings. Alcohol 2005, 35, 3-12.10. Derr, R. F., Simulation Studies on Ethanol-Metabolism in Different Human-Populations with a PhysiologicalPharmacokinetic Model. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1993, 82, 677-682.11. Lands, W. E. M
paragraphbased on questions that prompted them to think about: what they thought they learned, how theylearned, what was their inspiration to learn, and how reflective writing helped them through theprocess. We then evaluated the quality of reflection paragraphs and looked into any relationshipswith course grades. We found a statistically significant correlation between this quality and finalcourse grades5. For the spring of 2013, we continued the promotion of metacognition in chemicalprocess control and safety, another undergraduate chemical engineering core course using amodified assignment. Students were given one technical problem and then assigned the followingfour activities each week: a) solve the problem, b) personalize the problem, c) integrate
tocomplete optional tasks that are designed to encourage them to improve their experimental dataand analysis (relating to ABET objective B) and to promote their exploration of the broaderimpacts of the experiments they are performing (relating to ABET objectives H and I).Completing these tasks would increase a students’ team’s total of common, uncommon, and/orrare points, depending on the specific task completed. These points allow students to berewarded for performing these extra tasks, but the rewards are not grade points, which does notdiminish the importance of required coursework. A summary of these tasks and the pointsawarded is shown in Table 1. Note that some tasks award two types of points. This designchoice was made thinking that it would
offered during the spring semester of the sophomore year. As can be observed from Figure 1A, the performance of students in the MEB course follows a general bell curve; however the Figure 1. Sophomore course statistics. Grade distributions for percentage of students with a students enrolled in the (A) Material & Energy Balance course and failing grade or a grade of W (B
. However, itbecame clear within the first week of lab that a) it was necessary to prevent the masks from beingexposed to individuals using the PPE table and b) students needed somewhere to place theirreusable / cloth masks after removing them. To address this, the instructor began placing eachmask in a plastic bag. Students could then remove and don the mask inside and place their clothmask into the empty bag.Compliance with mask requirements was excellent. There was only one occasion during the twosemesters in which the lab operated under COVID-19 policies when a student failed to complywith mask requirements. That case was early in the first semester, and the student had simplyforgotten to wear / bring a mask to lab.Despite requiring the viewing
. 112.27. Denoyelles, A., J. Raible, and R. Seilhamer, Exploring Students' E-Textbook Practices in Higher Education. Educause Review, 2015.28. Liberatore, M.W., Material and energy balances zybook, 2016, Zybooks.com.29. Lepek, D. and M.-O. Coppens. Nature-Inspired Chemical Engineering: Course Development in an Emerging Research Area. in the Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Meeting. 2016. New Orleans, LA.30. Mazur, E., G. King, B. Lukoff, and K. Miller. Perusall. 2016 [cited 2016 August]; Available from: http://perusall.com/.31. Liberatore, M.W., Active Learning and Just-in-time Teaching In a Material and Energy Balances Course. Chemical Engineering Education, 2013. 47: p. 154–160.32. Liberatore, M.W., C.R. Vestal
, I., and Thornton, R. 2010. Use of interactive lecture demonstrations: A ten year study. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 2, 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020119.[16] Koretsky, M., Falconer, J., L., Brooks, B., Gilbuena, D., Silverstein, D., Smith, C., and Miletic, M. 2014. The AIChE Concept Warehouse: A web-based tool to promote concept- based instruction. Advances in Engineering Education. 4(1), 1-27.
as a whole, students from 1990 would find much that they recognize in the chemicalengineering curricula of today, while they might not recognize the classroom activities or co-curricular opportunities as familiar.. In discussion of these results at the AIChE 2016 AnnualMeeting, it was observed that a stable curriculum is a sign of a stable body of knowledge and amature field, rather than a sign of stagnation.Works Cited1. Pintar, A., B. Aller, T. Rogers, K. Schulz, and D. Shonnard. “Developing an Assessment Plan to Meet Abet Ec2000.” Paper presented at the American Association for Engineering Education, Charlotte, NC, 1999.2. ABET. 2017. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2017-2018. http://www.abet.org/accreditation
Engineers Talk about the Importance of Talk: A Report on the Role of Oral Communication in the Workplace.” Communication Education 52 (1), 1-16 (2003).3. M. Miceli, “Say What?: The Importance of Effective Communication in Engineering.” JOM 63, no. 12 (December 10, 2011): 25.4. B. L. Shwom, K. P. Keller, “The Great Man Has Spoken. Now What Do I Do?” Communication Insight 1 (1), 3–6 (2003).5. E. R. Tufte, The Cognitive Style of Powerpoint: Pitching Out Corrupts Within, p. 9-14. Cheshire: Graphics Press, 2006.6. M. Alley, The Craft of Scientific Presentations: Critical Steps to Succeed and Critical Errors to Avoid, New York: Springer Science, 2013.7. J. Tapper and W. E. Cole, “EET Graduate Survey Results.” Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE
entrepreneurship content? b. How did senior chemical engineering students view entrepreneurship? 2. After completion of Nephrotex, were there any changes in senior chemical engineering students’ involvement in and viewpoint of entrepreneurship?MethodsNephrotex Epistemic Game OverviewWith Nephrotex, students serve as interns for a product design company focused on thedevelopment of kidney dialysis membranes. The goal for the students is to design a new kidneydialysis membrane based upon the technical material provided while also meetingrecommendations provided to them by internal consultants within the company. During thisdesign process, students are tasked with selecting the design materials, including the membrane
convince themselves that a) they’ve tried everything they want to try and b) there are no hidden tricks. In order to engage students’ well-‐known misconceptions, most of the activities contain a real or simulated version of a situation from one of the concept inventory questions. In this way, the activity engages the students’ interest by having a surprising result. Because there are at least five questions in each concept area, we can also examine how well students transfer their understanding to new situations they have not directly observed. These activities’ effectiveness has been assessed with the concept inventory for
20 y = 0.86x + 31.77 20 R² = 0.04 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 10 20 30 40 50 RSPQ-2F Deep Approach RSPQ-2F Surface ApproachFigure 6. Correlation of CLASS-Chem conceptual % favorable and R-SPQ-2F deep approachscores (a) and surface approach scores (b).Influence of Attitudes and
]conditions. The WeBWorK Brayton Air Cycle 2 [9]created for the course gives Rankine Steam Cycle 2 [7]students the opportunity to Vapor Compressionpractice and analyze problem (Refrigeration) Cycle 1 [4]sets over various topics, as a Topics in bold font were selected for quizzes.shown in Table 1. b Total number of answer blanks are provided in brackets.Many of the problems designed for the course involved multiple answer inputs. Some problemswere
% 0%Figure 8. Concepts that students struggle with in the first MEB course for 2010-2011 asreported by instructors.Chemical engineering programs are likely to use this course for ABET outcomes assessment.The fraction of reporting programs using this course for ABET a-k outcomes is shown in Figure9. Page 25.703.11 (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering, (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data, (c) an ability to design a chemical
beds have small threaded ports on the sides that can be closed with plugs, or have pipesconnected to them to allow for flow in or out, depending on the treatment systems that studentsdesign. All river bed systems hold between 100 and 150 liters of water, depending on whether thetwo-tiered system or the larger river bed systems are being used. (a) (b) (c)Figure 3 a-c. A river in progress of being constructed in a larger river bed. In (a), the students areseen using large bricks, plastic dividers, large stone and duct tape to create a path for the water toflow through. In (b) and (c), the bed has been filled in with sand, rocks, and bricks for the bottomof the river. In the bottom right corner of (b