majors elected to take the credentialing course as one of only three electives that areavailable to them under a normal academic load.Research QuestionThis paper seeks to understand to what extent the course delivers on expectations set by thecourse creators and what mechanisms there are to provide industry feedback that support oradjust the balance of course content between teaching sustainability concepts (theory) andfocusing on credentialing (specific skills). It will examine if perceived value of the credentialsand knowledge gained in the course is (a) generally positive or negative, (b) consistent across jobdescriptions (field of practice) (c) stable over time, and (d) consistent with employers’ view.Specifically, this paper looks at the
. Caswell, Body language for competent teachers. 1993, London ; New York: Routledge. xvii, 206 p.19. Hartley, G. and M. Karinch, I can read you like a book : how to spot the messages and emotions people are really sending with their body language. 2007, Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press. 287 p.20. Matsumoto, D., Culture and nonverbal behavior, in The SAGE Handbook of Nonverbal Communication, V.L. Manusov and M.L. Patterson, Editors. 2006, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, Calif. p. 219-236.21. Neill, S.C., Chris, Body language for competent teachers. 1993: Routledge.22. Pease, A. and B. Pease, The definitive book of body language. Bantam hardcover ed. 2006, New York: Bantam Books. xiii, 386 p.23. Riggio, R.E. and R.S
communities. In the associated lab, students would build on the previousweek’s audio processing topic and implement a MATLAB model of the cochlear implantultimately allowing them to process audio and listen to an approximation of what a user of theimplant would hear. 3.2 Data Collection 3.2.1 Contemporary Issue Report assignment and InterventionIn the assignment students wrote a research paper in which they were to: a) Investigate and describe a contemporary issue related to electrical and computer engineering or computer science, b) Discuss the issue in terms of problem, possible solutions, and trade-offs, and c) Discuss any ethical issues or societal impacts of the issue or solutions. Students were provided with a handout
a global and social context 4 Participate in various roles of a team D-Function on multidisciplinary teams Prepare and present accurate and well- 5 organized written and oral engineering G- Communicate effectively solutions Recognize and respond to ethical, economic, 6 environment, health, safety, and social J- Knowledge of contemporary issues factors Determine the life-cycle cost of a process B- Design as well as analyze and interpret 7 and perform economic analysis of
models were fostered prior to travel through a series of pre-trip meetingsbetween the students, the faculty advisor of the student chapter, and the Bridges to Prosperitystaff. Through these meetings, the students developed a shared set of goals to be accomplishedduring the trip, created a detailed construction schedule, designated task leaders for eachconstruction task, and discussed and planned for various scenarios that might be encountered inthe field. Interdependence was high due to the complex and high-stakes nature of the project. Forexample, quality control naturally required certain team members to check the work of others,which was described by one student as follows: [B]efore we could back fill you must be 100% sure of your
unclear or designed for so everything they confusing mentioned is addressed B Very helpful. They pointed out some Very detailed. We now know the exact flaws that we will have to correct direction our team needs to go… C Pretty helpful; the other group caught The clients feedback was even more some errors … which ended up helpful because it gave us better insight changing our layout quite a bit. as to what he wanted. D I believe it was helpful but not to the Very helpful! The clients feedback extent that looking at another teams helped enforce the basic
civil engineering curricula. Considering specifically the BOK2, acoordinated list of 24 outcomes is presented within three outcome categories: Foundational,Technical and Professional. The outcomes identify the desired level of achievement definedaccording to Bloom’s Taxonomy for the cognitive domain3,4. Additionally, the BOK2 hasrecommended outcome achievement targets for each portion of the fulfillment pathway: for thebaccalaureate degree (B), post-baccalaureate formal education (M/30), and pre-licensureexperience (E). The emphasis herein is on those outcomes and achievement targets for thebaccalaureate degree.The BOK2 Outcomes Rubric, using Bloom’s Taxonomy, is graphically presented in Figure 1.The reader is cautioned that this is a simple
weir at two differentunknown pump settings. Then they were asked to find the flow rate in the channel andcompare among the weirs. Page 14.58.3Figure 2. One cubic foot desktop learning module with open channel ontop. (a) (b) (c)Figure 3. (a) Underflow weir and hydraulic jump (b) 45o V-notch weir (c) rectangular Page 14.58.4weir.Assessment Methods:Concepts inventories were prepared according to the instructor’s choice of conceptualquestions. Two slightly different sets of questions
, etc.). Thequestionnaire used in the Fall 2013 semester is included as Appendix A with answers andexplanations and reflections of the authors. Continued improvement of the questionnaire wasconducted with the help of sustainability teaching colleagues across the U.S. leading to animproved questionnaire included as Appendix B, but not used in the assessment. The assessmentwas conducted by having students complete the questionnaire prior to AND after completing allthe module elements. The results from the Fall 2013 semester are reported next.ResultsOf the 24 students invited to complete the literacy questionnaire in the Fall 2013 semester, 17submitted full responses for both the pre- and post-module instances. The average score on thepre-module
were designed to assess student learning andthe effectiveness of the new course design. In order to evaluate the student background inLLL (step 1), a survey was administered at the beginning of the semester. A copy of thesurvey is presented in Table 1. Page 23.223.4Table 1. Survey questions used to evaluate the student background and understanding of Life-long learning. Q-1 From the following four options, select the one that describe your personal knowledge of the concept of “Life-long learning”? A. Extensive B. Moderate C. Limited D.No idea Q-2
’ finalpresentations in which students presented a comprehensive overview of the problems, thecommunity stakeholders they engaged, their process for addressing the problem, and their finalsolution. The two evaluators agreed on final scoring while applying the rubric and viewing thepresentation together.Table 1. Grand Challenge Scholars (GCS) Rubric for Evaluating Student WorkGCS Program Rubric Criteria RefCompetency a. Identify the problem1. Hands-on b. Collect data with supporting methodologyProject/ Research 16,17Experience c
, testing and publicity. Therefore, in addition toresearch objectives, a whole new set of “campus objectives” has emerged. Figure 1 shows thecompleted rubble house next to a student residence building.The overall research objectives were: (a) Evaluate current construction techniques and propose cost-effective improvements (b) Perform static load testing on a full-scale Rubble-House (c) Create computer models for static and dynamic analyses (d) Make recommendations for future seismic shake table experiments (e) Draft construction and design guidelines based on experimental and numerical findings,and the campus objectives were; (a) Increase awareness of the rubble house project amongst the students and the local community
field as they fabricate their steel frame specimens; (ii) understand differences inseismic response of SMF, SCBF, and BRBF systems based on their experimental testobservations and data analysis; as well as (iii) develop project management, teamwork, andcommunication skills to function in a large team with varied design, construction, experimentaltesting, and reporting tasks. Appendix B details the FE and PE exam objectives as well as ABETcriteria met by the new ARCE 372 course. The remainder of this paper will detail the learningactivities associated with the ARCE 372 course projects and student feedback from the first twoundergraduate student authors as well as data collected through end-of-quarter course surveys.Project OverviewTable 1
: Draw deflected shape Indicate side of the beam in tension, top or bottom (at designated points A, B, C) Indicate magnitude of bending moment diagram (at location of pink bands) Indicate magnitude of shear force diagram (at location of pink bands) a) Draw Deflected Shape b) Indicate Location of Tension c) Indicate Magnitude of Shear Force Figure 1: Samples of Beam Hotspot QuestionsMultiple choice questions that involve selection from three image choices (toggle button). Indicate direction of rotation at various points along beam Indicate bending moment + = sagging, – = hogging, or zero at various points
students (grades) in either sections usingdescriptive analyses employing one variable and two variable relationships. The relationshipsconsidered include: (a) for one variable: comparing the grade distribution across the sectionswith and without mixed-mode, gender, ethnicity, student level, and prior GPA (b) for twovariables: grade performance by gender and mixed-mode, and ethnicity. Further, we build on thedescriptive analyses by developing individual level models of student grade performance whilecontrolling for several covariates simultaneously. The modeling approach controls for severalstudent characteristics and is more likely to offer stable model attribute impacts on gradecompared to descriptive analysis where the analyst has no control
include a separatecourse on this topic, different programs may be influenced by the CEPC requirement to “preparegraduates to apply probability and statistics to address uncertainty [1], [2],” and may be using acourse in probability and statistics to meet the requirement and to fulfill credit hour requirementsof Criterion 5. The remaining 28% of programs likely cover probability and statistics in othercourses. Twenty three percent of programs require students to take a course in linear algebra.(a) Distribution of total credit hours required for graduation by programs (b) Cumulative percent of total credit hours required for graduation Figure 1. Summary of total credit hours required for graduation (a) Distribution of credit hours of
(1929–1982) Carlo Castigliano (1847–1884) Eugene C. Figg (1936–2002) Friedrich Engesser (1848–1931) Charles H. Thornton (b. 1940) Robert Maillart (1872–1940) Ray W. Clough (b. 1920)Figure 1 - Suggested famous structural engineersThurston(3) notes that only a small percentage of groups presented a satisfactory visualdemonstration. In order to increase the number of groups that satisfactorily fulfill thedemonstration requirements, students are shown a PowerPoint(7) presentation of past vis-ual demonstrations with examples of excellent and sub-par demonstrations. This presen-tation is shown to the students during the first week of class with the intent of giving thestudents a better understanding of the expected
are then removed from the sandbox andplaced in front of a whiteboard. Students take photos of each board which are then used tocomplete the follow-up tasks. (a) (b)Figure 2. Plexiglas inserts to cut a profile (a) and cross section (b) in the sandbox during Module1 on elevation data and views.Assignment: The follow-up assignment requires use of the photos taken at the sandbox, placing alarge emphasis on calculating and applying scale in addition to how the various views ofelevation data are related. Students are told that the sandbox represented a scaled physical modelof the area where the new road will be built. Instructors can specify any reasonable
, (2008).18. Slaughter, G., T. Harris, K. Ngandu, K. Williamson, K. Adom. Undergraduate research experience: A tool for students pursuing a graduate degree in engineering. American Society for Engineering Education, June 14- 17, (2009).19. Dahlberg, T., T. Barnes, A. Rorrer, E. Powell, and L. Cairco. Improving retention and graduate recruitment through immersive research experiences for undergraduates. Proceedings of the 39th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 466-470, (2008).20. Seymour, E. A., B. Hunter, et al., Establishing the Benefits of Research Experiences for Undergraduates in the Sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, Vol. 88: 493-534, (2004).21
theory and/or analytical techniques that demonstrate a mastery of engineering science and/or design principles from one or more supporting engineering courses. B Complete all project deliverables and objectives. Effectively communicate (via written, oral, engineering drawings, etc.) project deliverables to your project manager and/or external sponsor. Exhibit strong team and individual performance in terms of project deliverables and objectives as well as laboratory safety, team skills, record keeping, punctuality, etc. Do all of the work you are asked to do. Develop solutions by applying theory and/or analytical techniques. Complete all project deliverables and
Submit revised 26- should a proposal include? team Text: 6 individual g Jenn Jan Presentations-a lot more than qualifications Chapter 3 resumes talking about your "numbers".? . Marketing of Professional 31- Team/Company 7 Services: Qualifications, b, e LDR Jan
and Figure 4b) are provided throughout the module to assist students asneeded. Figure 4c shows the hints when the “Help” link under “Damping Ratio (𝜉)” in Figure 4bis tapped. (a) (b) (c) Figure 4. Vibration – Analysis ComponentThe objectives of the Analysis component are as following, which are targeted to fulfil courseobjectives 1 and 4:• To identify and compute the characteristics of the structural components on a SDOF structure.• To analyze and determine the system equation of motion and transfer function of a SDOF structure numerically.Simulation ComponentAfter learning the necessary theory, students are given the opportunity to verify the
math course that you have completed? Do you have an engineer in your family? When were you exposed to Civil Engineering? The figures below indicate the freshmen student's to the survey. It is clear from the resultsthat a majority of the students surveyed were mainly interested in structural engineering andindicated minimal understanding and/or knowledge of the other sub-fields within the CivilEngineering profession as shown in Figure A. In addition, most students became engineersbecause they liked the sciences or liked to construct things as shown in Figure B. Since manystudents are from first generation college families, they had limited opportunities to meet withother engineers, practitioners, or mentors. This was clearly
. Page 22.1717.6(a) (b) FIGURE 3. A 2-D x-ray CT image of gravel: a) original image as imported into ImageJ and corresponding histogram, b) image after Bandpass Filter processing and corresponding histogram. FIGURE 4. Screen shot for suggested initial settings for Bandpass Filter option. Page 22.1717.7Step 3.For an 8-bit image, there are 255 different pixel intensity values ranging from gray scaleintensity 255 to gray scale intensity 0. Image thresholding, also called binarization, is asegmentation process in which the gray scale boundary between particles of solid matter andvoid space is
theimplementation of a peer mentoring program (Pascarella and Terenzini, 2005). A large studyinvestigating the effects of a PLTL program across 16 universities found that the percentage ofstudents scoring an A, B, or C in a course increased by up to 20% compared to a non-PLTLimplementation of the same course (Gafney and Varma-Nelson, 2008). In one of the 16universities studied, standardized test scores (American Chemical Society Organic Chemistrystandardized exams) improved from the 36-43 percentile nationally prior to the use of PLTL to the83 percentile nationally after the introduction of PLTL (Gafney and Varma-Nelson 2008). In theLA model context, significant improvements in learning gains have been documented acrossscience disciplines. Significantly
currently serves as an editorial advisory board member of Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, an editorial board editor of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, an associate editor for the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine (an international peer-reviewed journal), a handling editor for the Transportation Research Record and is a member of the Transportation Research Board’s Committee on Traffic Flow Theory and Characteristics (AHB 45), where he serves as a paper review coordinator. He has been recognized with multiple awards for his research and teach- ing activities, including the Dwight D. Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship, Gordon F. Newell Award for Excellence in
quarters or semesters. Table 4. Faculty survey questions included in on-line Qualtrics Survey Survey Question1. How many activities did you implement in your course this semester? (type in answer)2. Which activities did you implement? (bulleted list included for selection)3. In general, students responded to these activities a. Positively b. Mixed c. Negatively4. If you have taught soil mechanics before, the frequency at which you previously incorporated active learning was: a. Never b. In some classes c. In about half of the classes d. In most of the classes e. In every class f. This is my first time teaching soil
needed for a given situation solve complex engineering problems b) Formulate the problem and identify key by applying principles of engineering, issues/variables, model real world situation science, and mathematics c) Solve complex engineering problems 2. an ability to apply engineering design a) Identify problem, criteria, constraints to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of b) Define the problem, review possible solutions, public health, safety, and welfare, as select design well as global, cultural, social, c) Design, assess, refine and conclude the model environmental, and economic factors or prototype
-681.10. Felder, R. M. (1993), “Reaching the Second Tier – Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education,” Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5):286-290.11. Bloom, B. S. and Krathwohl, D. R. (1964). The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Handbook of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. McKay, New York.12. Engineering Accreditation Commission (2004). “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD. Table 1. ABET outcomes originally covered in the course and those improved by the addition of physical beam tests. ABET Outcome Covered Improved(a) an ability to apply knowledge of
Triangle and Index are best used as a basicscreening level tool to compare alternatives. If no clear, best alternative exists, one might haveto re-evaluate the 0-100 values for each P, or even develop additional alternatives for evaluation.To help demonstrate these challenges (the third lesson objective), two more detailed alternativesare provided to students: Alternative A is a paved surface lot adjacent to campus on purchasedprivate land after the removal of residential homes, and Alternative B is a paved surface lot oncampus (directly across the street from Alternative A) which displaces an athletic soccer practicefield and recreation area. Students are individually asked to “Take a few minutes to considerif/why these new alternatives are more