Experience: A Critical Race Study - ProQuest,” 2014. https://www.proquest.com/openview/be21b170607fa38fe2937b190967ba0f/1?cbl=18750&p q-origsite=gscholar&parentSessionId=0e19Gk%2BrNimRzwLAuw8Iu6TZAFOrxSQK6Cq D%2BU90XDY%3D (accessed Sep. 06, 2022).[10] T. Strayhorn, F. Bie, L. Leroy, and B. Blossom, “African American and Hispanic STEM students’ engagement at predominantly White institutions | Request PDF,” 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289745511_African_American_and_Hispanic_ST EM_students%27_engagement_at_predominantly_White_institutions (accessed Aug. 26, 2022).[11] M. M. Camacho and S. M. Lord, The Borderlands of Education: Latinas in Engineering. Lexington Books, 2013.[12] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P
DecisionThe distribution of Extent knowledge- Independent-Samples Mann- .217Retain the nullsharing among students is important is Whitney U Test hypothesis.the same across categories of Prog. L.a. The significance level is .050.b. Asymptotic significance is displayed. Figure 15. Extent knowledge-sharing is important Mann-Whitney U-Test by program level6. Conclusions and RecommendationsUsing a survey design, students’ experiences and perceptions of remote-learning during theCOVID-19 pandemic across multiple engineering as well as architecture and construction projectmanagement programs are assessed. Finding results of a non-parametric statistical analysissuggest no significant differences between MSU
overall goal of the project was to determine thedifferential settlement between the North side and the South side of the Tower of Pisa usingsome simplified assumptions appropriate for the class level. The groups were required to presenttheir findings in the form of a) a written report or b) an oral video presentation. This flexibilitybuilt into the term project assignment allowed the groups to choose their preferred mode to bestexpress their learning based on their unique strengths and challengesResults and DiscussionsStudents in these three courses were invited to participate in an anonymous survey aftercompleting their projects to share their feedback about different aspects of PBL practicesimplemented. The same survey was administered for all
engineering education and practice, 1997.[2] R. F. Herrera, J. C. Vielma, y F. M. La Rivera, Impact of microteaching on engineering students’ communication skills. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2018.[3] R. Saleh, I. Widiasanti, y H. Hermawan, Development of communication competency for civil engineering students., vol. 1402, 2 vols. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019.[4] J. L. Klosky, S. M. Katalenich, B. Spittka, y S. F. Freyne, Inspiring student engagement through two-minute follies. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[5] C. Bello, «Comunicación efectiva desde la gerencia educativa», EPISTEME KOINONIA, vol. 2, n.o 3, pp. 24-40, 2019.[6] M. A. Guerra, H. Murzi, J. Woods Jr, y A. Diaz
students' overall experience of the mindfulness activities. During theseinterviews, students were given the opportunity to express their unbiased experience along withany benefits they gained and challenges they faced. The interviews were recorded andtranscribed using NVivo, a qualitative data analysis tool. SFG leaders then identified generalthemes/sub-themes in the transcripts. In their final report , the results were written only accordingto themes, with deidentified quotes to retain confidentiality.Measures of Mindfulness: The FMI survey was used to measure mindfulness and presence(attention to the present moment) in this study (see Appendix B for FMI survey questions)[4,25]. Readers are referred to [26] and [27] for comprehensive analysis and
. (2013). Testing the flipped classroom with model-eliciting activities and video lectures in a mid-level undergraduate engineering course. In 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 161-163). October 2013. IEEE.[3] Kerr, B. (2015). The flipped classroom in engineering education: A survey of the research. In 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 815-818). September 2015. IEEE.[4] Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334-345.[5] Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of college science teaching, 42(5), 62-66.[6] Cabı, E
unit exam or final exam. The number of KSquestions and sample questions from each unit of instruction are shown in Table 1. Importantly,each KS question gives the level of Bloom’s taxonomy to aid the students in determining thecognitive effort required [23].Table 1: KS question summary for each of the four units of instruction. # of KS Response options for all Unit Questions Sample KS Question: KS questions: (Lesson 6, Bloom Level 3 – Apply) I can a) I am unable to perform the 1 22 calculate forces on horizontal planar task. surfaces. b) I can
work to achieve their individually targeted grade. Typically, thisresults in homework grade averages around 80% and median homework grades around 90%.Junior Level Introduction to Environmental Engineering Course:Initial submission with immediate assessmentAs students progress through the engineering curriculum, they should take more ownership oftheir time management and learning. Accordingly, the metacognitive-informed dual-submissionhomework method adjusts to scaffold for higher expectations and student independence forlearning outcomes by shifting to initial submission with immediate assessment implementation.Appendix B provides an example for this implementation in a junior level course. During thejunior year, once the metacognitive
Degree Guide.” Accessed: Feb. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.collegefactual.com/majors/engineering/civil-engineering/structural-engineering/[3] Zippia, “Civil/Structural Engineer Demographics and Statistics [2024]: Number Of Civil/Structural Engineers In The US.” Accessed: Feb. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.zippia.com/civil-structural-engineer-jobs/demographics/[4] J. L. Plass, B. D. Homer, and C. K. Kinzer, “Foundations of Game-Based Learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 258–283, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533.[5] J. Krath, L. Schürmann, and H. F. O. von Korflesch, “Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in
also asked aboutincreased stress and anxiety caused by retrieval practices. Twenty-two percent of surveyrespondents said their grades on the retrieval practices increased their stress or anxiety over thesemester.Table 4. The percentage of students with test letter grades higher than, equal to, or lower thanhomework (HW) and retrieval practice (RP) grades where grades were defined by a typicalgrading scale (80-82=B-, 83-86=B, 87-89=B+, and so on) 2020 2021 2022 2023 AVERAGE TEST > HW 33% 0% 7% 13% 13% TEST = HW 42% 64% 36% 31% 43% TEST < HW 25% 36% 57% 56% 44% TEST > RP
adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 113–132, Jan. 1993, doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(93)90011-N.[9] J. L. Plass, D. M. Chun, R. E. Mayer, and D. Leutner, “Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 90, pp. 25–36, 1998, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.25.[10] S. Turkay and C. Kinzer, “The Effects of Customization on Game Experiences of a Massively Multiplayer Online Game’s Players," in Proc. of GLS 9.00: Games C Learning C Society Conf., C. Williams, A. Ochsner, J. Dietmeier, & C. Steinkuehler, Eds. Pittsburgh, PA. 2013, pp. 330-337.[11] B. Hoffman and L. Nadelson
. D. Lapitan, A. L. A. Chan, N.S. Sabarillo, D. A. G. Sumalinog, and J. M. S. Diaz, “Design,Implementation, and Evaluation of an Online Flipped Classroom with Collaborative Learning Model in anUndergraduate Chemical Engineering Course. Education for Chemical Engineers 2023, 43, 58–72.[9] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2), 2006 Pages 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa[10] B. Sharma, B. Steward, S. K. Ong, and F.E. Miguez, “Evaluation of Teaching Approach and StudentLearning in a Multidisciplinary Sustainable Engineering Course,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 142, Pages4032–4040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.046.[11] https
support mental wellness. Focus on what brings you joy and actions such as exercise, socializing, relaxing. Think about improving your time management, getting ahead. • If you consulted any online resources, videos, etc. summarize what you learned, key messages. {include a reference} Select 1 of 3 documentation options: (a) write 250-500 words total; (b) 3-5-min video / vlog; (c) visit Prof to discuss (Zoom or in-person)Figure 1. Assignment associated with mental health, wellness, and resiliencyResultsIn-class clicker questions (for attendance) associated with the mental health lecture askedstudents to report their current mental health and main type of self-care (given clicker limitationsonly 5 of the 8 dimensions of wellness were provided as
, and background knowledgeThe six faculty narratives have been anonymized. Faculty A, D, E, and F are male while FacultyB and C are female. Further, all but Faculty B teach in STEM departments. Faculty B teaches inthe School of Social Sciences.Faculty A’s mentoring methodology - novice undergraduate researchers progress towards a levelof independence gingerly as they experience the varying aspects of the scientific process. Self-sufficiency cannot be abruptly taught, nor developed. However, the confidence and capabilitiesof the mentee increase as the mentee engages in experimental design, conducting experiments,interpreting results, and communicating their work to others. As the mentee encounters eachaspect of research, they develop some
illustrated. Learners are alsoactively participating in the activity. Finally, the instructor asks the same sets of questions toassess how well students comprehend the experiment. ECP Module Instructional Design Template Module Information Synoptic/Purpose of Instructional Instructor Module Process Reflection a. Developers/Instructors a. Essential Questions a. Materials needed/Expected Reflection Institution for use. b. Module Objectives b. Mobile Title/Topic b. Procedures c. Placement within
theLafayette students.Table 1. Average, standard deviation, and range of quantitative Equitable Infrastructure conceptmap metrics School Nodes Cross Links Highest Overall score Total words Hierarchy L (n=12) 23±10 (10-40)a 8±9 (0-32)a 5±2 (2-10)a 129±36 (21-377)a 59±30 (21-116)a G (n=18) 16±6 (8-31)a 2±3 (0-7)b 5±2 (3-9)a 62±29 (24-10)b 36±24 (11-117)b C (n=21) 11±5 (3-20)b 5±5 (0-19)a 4±1 (2-7)b 78±52 (23-217)a,b 36±24 (12-111)bConditions with the same superscripts are not significantly different (e.g., a and a) whiledifferent superscripts (a vs b) represent p < 0.05 in a 2-tailed t-test. For example, the number ofnodes
Values, vol. 39, pp. 42-72, 2014.[13] J. A. Leydens and J. Deters, Confronting intercultural awareness issues and a culture of disengagement: An engineering for social justice framework, Madison, WI, 2017.[14] D. Kim, P. W. Odom, C. B. Zoltowski and B. K. Jesiek, Investigating Moral Disengagement Among First-Year Engineering Students, San Jose, CA, 2019.[15] K. Kadir, "Lecture on Social Justice and Engineering," Seattle.[16] J. Giacomin, "What is Human Centered Design?," The Design Journal, 28 April 2017.[17] G. Baura and L. Kallemeyn, "An Integrated Social Justice Engineering Curriculum at Loyola University Chicago," 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 15 June 2019.[18] L. Dodson, D. DiBiasio, P. Quinn, J. Bergendahl, K
Lecture,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 4, 2016,http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Personal-Lecture/238559, [Accessed March 22, 2019].[12] A. F. Chávez and S. D. Longerbeam, Teaching Across Cultural Strengths: A Guide toBalancing Integrated and Individuated Cultural Frameworks in College, Stylish Publishing, LLC,2016.[13] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Published by Allyn and Bacon, 1956.
Francisco Jossey-Bass., 2005[2] Rusli, M., Degeng N, Setyosari, P. Sulton, Peer Teaching: Students teaching students toincrease academic performance. Teach Theol Relig 24:17-27, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12549.[3] Bohmbach, K.G., Teaching Students by Having Students Teach, 3 (3) 170-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9647.00083, 2004.[4] Isenbyt, P., Mandou, B., Vergaumen, L., Behets, D., 2011, Effects of Peer MediatedInstruction with Task Cards on Motor Skill Acquisition in Tennis, Journal of Teaching inPhysical Education, 30, 31-50, 2011.[5] Attarzadeh, F, Gurken, D., Moges, M., Gallardo, V., Mehrubeoglu, M., Sameei, M., “MentorTraining Program for a Peer-to0Peer Learning Environment: Leadership vs. CurriculumBalance,” Proceedings of the
review.Approximately 415 practitioners participated in the 2016 survey and approximately 515 did so in2021. Well-seasoned engineers with over 21 years of experience were very well represented inboth years. The great majority (~70%, each) had at least 11 years of experience, as shown in Fig.1. The majority of respondents worked primarily on buildings in both surveys. (a) Experience Level (b) Region of Primary Practice Figure 1 - 2016 and 2021 NCSEA Practitioner Survey Demographics, [12] and [13]Structural Analysis CoursesUsing the 2019 NCSEA Curriculum Survey, [15], the NCSEA BEC developed a suggestedstructural engineering curriculum, [16], which contained a detailed description of many coursesincluding
, October 21-24, 2015, IEEE,2015, pp. 1-8. [4] D.C. Bishop, “More than just listening: The role of student voice in higher education, anacademic perspective,” IMPact: The University of Lincoln Journal of Higher EducationResearch, vol. 1, no. 1, 2018.[5] J. Bron and W. Veugelers, “Why we need to involve our students in curriculum design,”Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, vol. 16, no. 1 & 2, pp. 125-139, 2014.[6] R. Hämäläinen, C. Kiili, and B. Smith, “Orchestrating 21st century learning in highereducation: A perspective on student voice,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 48,no. 5, pp. 1106-1118, 2017.[7] S. Brooman, S. Darwent, and A. Pimor, “The student voice in higher education curriculumdesign: is there value in listening
the National Science Foundation, TargetedInfusion Grant (Award no. 2106571) This article focuses on the introductory-level CUREs (I- B. MaterialsCUREs) part of this project. The I-CUREs model will provide 1) Questionnairestudents with a foundational understanding of STEM degrees In order to examine whether I-CUREs have an impact onthrough lecture classes, lab tours, etc., including the curriculum, students' interests in CEE, two questionnaires were designedcutting-edge technologies, and potential career paths. and tested before and after program
beyond the current scope(time and budget) of the current work. Future proposals will consider how to implement longterm career tracking.This project is still ongoing and learning modules will be made publicly available through theauthor’s website, the MarTREC website, and the University of Arkansas ScholarWorks researchrepository for further utilization by any university and/or workforce center equipped with adriving simulator to organize their own outreach events.References[1] D. Zelnio and K. Medeiros, ‘Nebraska Trucking Association 1701 K Street Lincoln NE 68508’.[2] P. Sherry, R. Chao, B. Hedman, and J. Mantia, ‘National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness’, 2016.[3] B. Stoesz, ‘Design of a Freight
. Meas., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 258–275, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0013164410391581.[14] E. Pommier, K. D. Neff, and I. Tóth-Király, “The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale,” Assessment, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 21–39, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1073191119874108.[15] F. Raes, E. Pommier, K. D. Neff, and D. Van Gucht, “Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale,” Clin. Psychol. Psychother., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 250–255, May 2011, doi: 10.1002/cpp.702.[16] T. Özge, “Development of Social Justice Awareness Scale: Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory (CFA) Factor Analysis,” Int. Online J. Educ. Teach. IOJET, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1603–1622, 2021.[17] S. R. Torres-Harding, B. Siers, and B. D
: 10.1002/jee.20190.[6] G. Potvin et al., “Gendered interests in electrical, computer, and biomedical engineering: Intersections with career outcome expectations,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 298–304, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TE.2018.2859825.[7] J. DeWaters and B. Kotla, “Using an open-ended socio-technical design challenge for entrepreneurship education in a first-year engineering course,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, no. May, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1198161.[8] C. A. Roberts and S. M. Lord, “Making Engineering Sociotechnical,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2020-Octob, pp. 15–18, 2020, doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273957.[9] V. Svihla et al., “The Educative Design Problem Framework
. Since then, there have beennumerous adapted definitions proposed and used by various researchers and educators [1]. Thedefinition used in this paper was proposed by Bringle, et al. in 2006: Service learning is a credit-bearing educational experience in which students (a) participate in an organized service activity that meets identified community needs and (b) reflect on the service activity in such a way as to gain further understanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, and an enhanced sense of personal values and civic responsibilityThis definition of service learning works well for engineering classes because it explicitlydescribes the goal of students both identifying and working
ABET Criteria,” ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 132, no. 2, Apr. 2006.[9] D. Gallarta-Saenz, J. Rico-Azagra, and M. Gil-Martinez, “Learning Enhancement of Control Engineering: A Competition-Based Case,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 38240– 38250, 2023.[10] D. Elton, D. Shannon, B. Luke, F. Townsend, and M. Roth, “Adding Excitement to Soils: A Geotechnical Student Design Competition,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1325–1336, Mar. 2006.[11] S. Khorbolty and K. Al-Olimat, “Engineering Student-Design Competition Teams: Capstone or Extracurricular?,” in ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC: IEEE
] What outcome resulted from the method used for studying the biases? [RQ5] What populations were studied?3.2 CriteriaThe criteria for this literature review are shown in Figure 1 and listed here: a) Search all selected databases for keywords Sustainability AND Cognitive Biases for all years including 2022 and 2023. (See section 3.3.1) (retrieved 345 papers) b) Manually remove all duplicated papers. (See section 3.3.2) (excluded 4 papers) c) Screen the titles for relevance within sustainability, civil engineering, and cognitive biases. (See section 3.3.2) (excluded 318 papers) d) Screen abstracts for further relevance within the scope of this literature review. (See section 3.3.2) (included 5 papers) e) Use
engineering is the ability to meet basic needs while not compromisingthe needs of future generations, in a way that incorporates social, economic, andenvironmental perspectives (Mihelcic et al. 2006). If this perspective of “sustainability asa luxury or privilege” is in any way widespread among students at any level, there maybe a need to adjust the approaches used to teach sustainability at the K-12 and universitylevels.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1827251.REFERENCESBell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science
whoused AI in their water resources classes versus those who did not. This comparison is intendedto realistically denote whether the use of AI influences the improvement of water resourceclasses, thus visualizing whether the use of AI allows for a better overall understanding of thesubject.References [1] George, B., and Wooden, O., 2023, “Managing the Strategic Transformation of Higher Education through Artificial Intelligence,” Adm. Sci., 13(9), p. 196.[2] Sadiku, M. N., Musa, S. M., and Chukwu, U. C., 2022, Artificial Intelligence in Education, iUniverse.[3] Padilla, R. D. M., 2019, “La Llegada de La Inteligencia Artificial a La Educación,” Rev. Investig. En Tecnol. Inf. RITI, 7(14), pp. 260–270.[4] Haleem, A., Javaid, M., and Singh