impacts into their assignments. Theassessment and survey results of the course indicated students became more aware of the impactsof their projects and became prepared for the workforce [16]. A research study in an electricaland computer engineering program indicated that the entrepreneurial intention of a student canbe influenced by linking entrepreneurship to activities and research in education programs [8].Another study researched students’ perceived entrepreneurial self efficacy for a group ofbiomedical engineering students in a senior design course. They found an increase in students’abilities to accomplish entrepreneurial tasks after exposing students to EML [14]. A differentgroup, teaching material science classes, incorporated self
Paper ID #48745Enhancing self-efficacy among civil engineering undergraduates using hand-onpedagogyMr. Michael Oluwafemi Ige, Morgan State University Michael Ige is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Morgan State University, Maryland, where he is pursuing his M.Sc. in Civil and Environmental Engineering with a concentration in Construction Management and Transportation Engineering. He earned his B.Tech. in Building Structure from the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. Michael has extensive professional experience managing large-scale heavy
teams, a final course grade for each team was calculated by averaging the finalgrades for individual students within a team. While this was not the main research question,engaging in self-reflection can affect self-efficacy and therefore contributed to our understandingof the results of this study.3.4 Analysis MethodsThe primary method used to determine the relationship between PSSE, abstraction level, andperformance is Pearson correlation coefficient. This coefficient is a dimensionless measure of thecovariance between two variables, normalized between -1 and 1 [19]. These extremes representexact linear relationships between the variables. As a result, interpretation of this coefficient canlead to some inferences about the relationship between
that visits to engineering schools had an impact on thestudents’ decision to enter engineering [3]. Phelps et al. [4] showed that many factors across lifestages are associated with engineering major choices, and highlighted the importance of pre-collegeexperiences in guiding students in that choice. This demonstrates that interactions with undergraduateprograms have a measurable influence on major selection, which provides a great argument for STEMoutreach from engineering schools to middle and high-school students. STEM interest in middle and high-school students is sometimes difficult to predict. It relies onmany socio-economic variables, as well as academic settings in schools. Some studies have attemptedto link these variables to
, Biological Engineer, Analytical Cell Biologist, and Engineering Education Researcher to tackle complex engineering education problems across the learner life span.Dr. Jeremy A. Magruder Waisome, University of Florida Dr. Jeremy A. Magruder Waisome is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida (UF). Her research focuses on self-efficacy and critical mentoring. She is passionate about broadening participation in engineering, leveraging evidence-based approaches to improve the engineering education environment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 "Visualizing and Modeling a Growth Mindset in an AutoCAD course."AbstractThis Work-in
extrapolating these subgroup results. Greatersample sizes would yield more solid proof of the effects on a diverse learner’s body.According to [22], there is a high practical significance and potential for real-world impact dueto the very large effect size (d=1.03). However, depending solely on self-report measures has itslimitations due to its potential for bias. The conclusion that effects are meaningful would bestrengthened by the inclusion of objective competence measures. Long-term monitoring is alsorequired to ascertain whether effects endure over time [21]. All things considered, thispreliminary study offers a promising foundation for future research on self-efficacy andexperiment-centric pedagogy.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that
. Surveys included Likert-scale questions on self-efficacy, identity, and intent to persist that are supported by pre-existingliterature [13]–[15]. Additional questions on motivators, relevance of design challenges, andengineering skills were added for general instructor interest.Self-Efficacy Measured Across the Semester-Long CourseFour questions were asked to gauge self-efficacy (how certain are you that you can: identify adesign need, develop a design solution, evaluate and test a design, recognize changes needed fora design solution to work). Responses were collected on a Likert-scale, where 1 indicated“completely uncertain” and 7 indicated “completely certain.” Table 1 shows that responses to allfour questions could be grouped into one self
(survey questionnaires) were collectedsimultaneously, and the analysis of those data was completed separately.Participants completed pre-test and post-test surveys. The pre-test survey, completedprior to their departure to Brazil, was a 30 minute online instrument that used a five-pointrating scale to evaluate baseline values of the measures studied: (1) research self-efficacy; (2) research skills; (3) knowledge of water management issues; (4) attitudestoward technology and sustainable development; (5) global competency and interculturalknowledge, attitudes, skills, and awareness; (6) teamwork skills; (7) perceptions ofenvironmental engineering community relevance; (8) attitudes toward interdisciplinaryresearch; and (9) behavioral intentions for
, depression, and anxiety) and personal resources (self-efficacy, engagement, and motivation) using an online survey. Students also provided permissionto record their grades on course assignments for analysis. Following the end of the semester,participating students’ scores were recorded for the following: (1) Average of scores forhomework assignments; (2) Average of scores on quizzes; (3) Average of scores for each of threephases of the term project; (4) Average of scores for three midterm exams; (5) Score for classparticipation. Data will be analyzed using multiple regression models. The proposed paper willdescribe the course structure and design of the course assignments, which differ in their level offlexibility, as well as the results and
thelearning process have been shown to enhance academic performance [13][16]. The benefits ofmetacognition include improved performance [17]-[23], amount and depth of student thinking [24],sustained focus of learning [25], and the development of reflective and responsible professionalism[26]. With increased learning outcomes and confidence through academic performance,engineering students’ self-efficacy might be positively correlated. [27][28] Consequently, multiplemetacognitive interventions were integrated along with the teamwork activity to achieve thedesired learning outcomes.This paper details the implementation of professionalism and metacognition interventions in alarge Statics course during Fall 2024. The study aims to address two research
by a team of five graduate studentinstructors enrolled in PhD programs in civil engineering at Purdue.Pre-college engineering programs have been integral to the engineering pipeline for decades.Many student participates in these programs have gone on to become successful engineeringstudents including underrepresented students [2], [3]. More than just increasing representation,these programs can also help students develop a sense of engineering identity [4], self-efficacy[5], [6], [7] and persistence in engineering programs [8], [9]. Nevertheless, several studies alsosaw limited to no increase in student achievement with participation in these programs [3], [10],suggesting that merely offering a program does not translate to the program being
student will complete the Felder/Soloman Indexof Learning Styles Questionnaire [13]. (See Appendix F.) Finally, it is not enough to understandthe definitions for diversity, equity, inclusion, and social justice. The authors attempt to measurethe feeling of diversity, equity and inclusion by measuring self-efficacy as it relates to impostersyndrome. A first attempt will include having students assess their performance on the activitiesthrough a reflection exercise. NVivo will be used to assess the student reflections for commonthemes. These evaluations will be conducted in the upper level courses with the scaled upactivities.TreatmentsWater Filtration Activity including Water Infrastructure EquityThere is a global and national disparity in access
that self-efficacy and learners' achievement goals significantly impact STEMcollege students' motivation, according to a study conducted in Canada [8]. Another studyestablished that reinforcing learners' self-belief and peer collaboration increased motivationamong students studying mathematics [19]. Therefore, this study explores how experiment-centric pedagogy, a hands-on learning approach, influenced undergraduates' motivation incivil engineering at one of the historically black universities and colleges, building onpreliminary research. Two research questions guided the study:(i) Is there a significant difference between the motivation of civil engineeringundergraduates pre- and postimplementation of experiment-centric pedagogy?(ii) Does
ofcommunication and leadership skills, and increased engagement in the learning process.Additionally, they discuss the importance of faculty being a part of the student’s preparation toimprove self-efficacy and quality of the content.From 2020 to 2022, a faculty who specializes in Geotechnical Engineering at The Citadel, ateaching-focused institution in the Southeast United States, utilized four peer teaching techniquesin Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering laboratory, andMechanics of Materials (Table 1).Table 1. Peer teaching methods used in this study. Peer Teaching Method Course Reciprocal Teaching Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering
wereadopted by the faculty in 2020 and approved by the university soon thereafter.The sensing threadThe new sequence includes a holdover fluid mechanics lab and three new courses that prioritizepractical, hands-on experiences, with a focus on the inquiry process, sensing, and data analysis.By centering the principles of self-efficacy and knowledge transferability, we aspire for ourstudents to apply these skills to solve cross-cutting problems. These courses also explicitlyacknowledge underlying shifts in CEE practice that demand an understanding of sensing andcomputing. The three courses are: (1) CEE Infrastructure in Action: a second year fall coursefocused on local excursions to learn about CEE applications in our community; (2) Sensing andData
adaptation recommendations.Pre-module and post-module anonymous surveys were administered through Qualtrics todetermine prior student climate literacy and engagement with the topic, measure the studentlearning and engagement due to the climate module, and seek their feedback on how the teachingmethods and content in the module promoted their understanding of and ability to take action toaddress climate change. This paper reports the details of the development of the learning module,the assessment of student learning, and the results of the pre- and post- module surveys. Thepurpose of this paper is to measure how the learning module influences student beliefs,knowledge, and self-efficacy with respect to understanding of climate science and ability
studentswith greater mindfulness (trait mindfulness) and was more evident when the task demandedsignificant working memory resources [15]. Another study [16], including 75 students in anintroductory solid mechanics course, measured students' self-reported trait mindfulness at thetime of completing the mindfulness instruments. This study did not conduct mindfulness trainingwith the students. However, the self-reported mindfulness measures revealed that traitmindfulness does not correlate with students' final grades or mechanics self-efficacy butpositively correlates with business skills self-efficacy. The study further suggests thatmindfulness-based classroom activities may help broaden the engineering education experience.Some research results suggest
) isuseful in first-year engineering courses by helping students develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills while making the learning process more engaging [5]. PBL in this context has beenshown to improve student’s understanding of how their engineering education fits within theirworldview. Similarly, in another study [6], integrating hands-on activities with practicalapplications enhances learning and helps students build higher levels of self-efficacy. This helpsstudent’s sense of belonging to the profession, increasing their commitment to staying in theengineering program. Student retention is highly related to the level of engagement, both social and academic.Helping students obtain a sense of belonging within their academic
)developed by Pintrich, Smith, García, and McKeachie in 1991 was used to measure keyconstructs associated with students' success, such as motivation, epistemic and perceptualcuriosity, and self-efficacy. Signature assignments were developed to measure student successoutcomes from adopting the pedagogy. The results of the MSLQ administered to 44 studentsimpacted by the pedagogy reveal a significant increase in the students' key constructs associatedwith success. The pedagogy reveals better knowledge gain and classroom engagement than thetraditional teaching approach.IntroductionHistorically, concepts in engineering fields have been taught using traditional methods ofinstruction [1]. In this method, the instructor is the sole provider of knowledge
students’ learning and self- efficacy,” Act. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 119–132, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1469787415574053.[39] J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 2. ed. Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE Publ, 2013.[40] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, 2013.[41] T. Ringeisen, S. Lichtenfeld, S. Becker, and N. Minkley, “Stress experience and performance during an oral exam: the role of self-efficacy, threat appraisals, anxiety, and cortisol,” Anxiety Stress Coping, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 50–66, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1528528.
” methods [11,15]. Active frameworks have many benefits suchas: student preference [16], self-efficacy [17], and student engagement [18]; all of which contribute to theclassroom climate. Perhaps the most popular method for active learning in recent engineering educationliterature is the inverted or flipped classroom where lectures are moved outside the class time [12-13]. Ameta-analysis by Lo and Hew [19] involving 29 engineering education studies concluded that flippedclassrooms promote student achievement with evidence suggesting that self-paced learning before classand increased problem-solving during class were the predominant reasons [20]. Another systematic reviewby Karabulut-Ilgu et al. [21] on the flipped classroom highlighted the following
. Different example methods can be seen in the faculty narratives. (2) Mentors should listen to the ideas and concerns of their mentees. This was uniformly important throughout the faculty narratives. All faculty mentioned methods to increase student interest in the project/field and support their self-efficacy as researchers. Further, the student survey, regardless of student gender, emphasized the importance of mentor “personal consideration.” (3) Mentors should provide career support, particularly for female mentees. While all undergraduate students should receive some level of career support, the female students surveyed indicated this as the most important role of the faculty research mentor
Science: Self-Efficacy Drives Performance Gains with Active Learning. CBE Life Sci. Educ., 16(4), Winter 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344.[14] Chowrira, S. G., Smith, K. M., Dubois, P. J., & Roll, I. (2019). DIY productive failure: boosting performance in a large undergraduate biology course. Nature Science of Learning, 4(1), 1.[15] Brand, C., Hartmann, C., Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2023). Do students learn more from failing alone or in groups? Insights into the effects of collaborative versus individual problem solving in productive failure. Instructional Science, 1-24.[16] VanDerLinden, B. K. (2021). Effectiveness of Using Productive Failure Pedagogy in Undergraduate Mathematics Courses (Doctoral dissertation, Grand
of service learning and presents two senior capstone projects indetail: designing and building a zipline tower and two timber bridges for a local community. Thispaper outlines the entire design and build process from conception to completion, with emphasison problem definition, development of design ideas, communications and interactions withstakeholders, detailed designed improvement, and construction issues. Based on the learningoutcome assessments and feedback from the local community, these successfully providedprojects successfully provided vehicles to enable students to develop their technical skills andenhance their social self-efficacy and employability.IntroductionService learning was first pedagogically defined by Sigmon in 1979
. Theobald et al., (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 117(12), pp. 6476–6483, Mar. 2020, doi: 0.1073/pnas.1916903117.[7] S. Freeman et al., (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 111(23), pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[8] C. J. Ballen, C. Wieman, S. Salehi, J. B. Searle, and K. R. Zamudio, (2017). Enhancing Diversity in Undergraduate Science: Self-Efficacy Drives Performance Gains with Active Learning. CBE Life Sci. Educ., 16(4), Winter 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344.[9] Chowrira
needed to solve problems. Competitions provide an avenue to learnmany other ‘soft skills’ that are not the focus in most engineering curricula [16, 17, 9]. Inaddition, competition projects provide intrinsic benefits such as an increased sense of belongingand community, increased sense of self-efficacy and accomplishment, broadening participationof underrepresented groups (particularly women), increased self-drive, and improvedmanagement skills [18]. Furthermore, participation in innovative competitions has shownincreases in creativity, initiative, leadership, and entrepreneurial spirit [19]. Students enjoy theopportunity to gain recognition for the work they have done and receive feedback fromprofessional engineers [17]. Many students also have
” environment in engineering classrooms, much of which wasrelated to student-faculty interaction. Several studies through the 1990s and early 2000sevaluated the retention issues in engineering as related to interactions and experiences in theclassroom [9] [10]. Most students reported the learning environment as a significant reason forleaving engineering disciplines [11]. Findings from Vogt’s [12] research linked poor facultyinteractions to low retention rates among engineering students. Additionally, the study concludedthat negative experiences with faculty significantly impacted students' self-efficacy andconfidence. The results of negative rapport are consistently shown to be severe and should beconsidered detrimental to classroom engagement and