and to conduct additional research on student learning benefits thatresult from participation. Continued research also aims to increase the number of surveyparticipants in order to achieve a greater degree of statistical power in the results.References[1] Glenda D. Young, David B. Knight, Lee M. Warburton, and Christopher D. Ciechon, “Developing Student-centered Partnerships: Professional Socialization and the Transition to Industry,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016, p. 14.[2] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 361– 376
, no. 1, p. 78, 2008.[7] A. M. Brandenburger and B. J. Nalebuff, Co-opetition, New York: Doubleday, 1996.[8] H. Jackson, K. Tarhini, A. Zapalska and S. Zelmanowitz, “Strategies to Infuse Global Perspectives and Industrial collaboration in Engineering Education,” in ASEE /IEEE Frontiers in Education, Washington, DC, 2010.[9] M. A. King, “A Strategic Assessment of The Higher Education Industry: Applying the Porter's Five Forces for Industry Analysis,” in Southeastern Decision Sciences Institute Annual Conference, Blacksburg, 2009.[10] Q. T. Univeristies, “QS World University Rankings 2015/2016,” [Online]. Available: http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2015. [Accessed
Paper ID #8648The Effect of Cooperative Education, Contextual Support, and Self-Efficacyon Male and Female Student RetentionProf. Joseph A Raelin, Northeastern University JOE RAELIN is an internationally-recognized scholar in the fields of work-based learning and leader- ship. He holds the Asa S. Knowles Chair of Practice-Oriented Education at Northeastern University’s D’Amore-McKim School of Business in Boston where is he also professor of management.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is the Principal Investigator (PI) for the Dr. Bailey is a Professor
-university collaboration. (2010).8 Santoro, M. D. & Betts, S. C. Making industry-university partnerships work. Research-Technology Management 45, 42-46 (2002).9 Edmondson, G., Valigra, L., Kenward, M., Hudson, R. & Belfield, H. Making industry-university partnerships work: Lessons from successful collaborations. Science Business Innovation Board AISBL (2012).10 Perkmann, M. et al. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy 42, 423-442, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 (2013).11 Mutter, B. V. & Pruett, R. in Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education conference
Paper ID #32314Academic and Industry Collaboration: A Literature ReviewDr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring the performance and attributes of engineering technology students and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies. This often includes their interaction in the classroom as well as their transition to industry.Dr. Diane L. Peters
universities? A review of the literature," Industry and Higher Education, vol. 19, pp. 221-229, 2005.[7] M. Perkmann and K. Walsh, "University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda," International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 9, pp. 259-280, 2007.[8] K. T. Marosi and B. Steinhurst, "Increasing the Retention of Under-Represented Students in Engineering Through Connections with An Industry Advisory Committee," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 2012.[9] M. D. Santoro, "Success breeds success: The linkage between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in industry–university collaborative ventures," The Journal of High Technology Management Research
Paper ID #21476Theory into Practice: A Collaboration between Lipscomb and TraneMiss McKenzie Caroline Lawry, Lipscomb University McKenzie Lawry is a senior mechanical engineering student at the Raymond B. Jones College of Engi- neering at Lipscomb University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Theory into Practice: A Collaboration between Lipscomb and TraneThis executive summary details a poster to be presented at the ASEE 2018 Annual Conference in theCollege Industry Partnership division.AbstractThe Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University is currently building a
, three articles listed what the authors expressed as thenecessary competencies for engineering jobs 3,5,17. Among the competency lists presented bythese studies, some common competencies are identified. The common competencies includewritten and oral communication 3,5,17, teamwork and capacity for co-operation 3,17, andadaptability (or ability to cope with work pressure and stress) 3,17. Ivanova 17 also mentionednetworking as an important engineering competency, but no other articles referred to anythingcomparable as a potential competency. Nair, et al. 3 offered additional competencies to considerincluding: a. Interpersonal skills with colleagues and clients, b. Capacity to analyze and solveproblems, c. Ability to develop new or innovative
show areas in Mississippi where (a) there is Fixed Broadband Deployment of3Mbps/768kbps, (b) percentage of residents below the poverty level, (c) percentage of minorityresidents, (d) high school graduate rates, and (e) medically served communities. There is a clearcorrelation between communities with limited resources for technology and healthcare, poverty,low graduation rates, and underrepresented groups. As a result, the groups where the opportunitybest exists to address the STEM deficit are the same groups that lack access to entry into thepipeline. Fig. 2: Correlation of Technology, Medically Underserved, Poverty, Race, and High School Graduation Rate in Mississippi as of 2016.Consider the case of the Leland High
is in it’sexclusively industry orientation. The framework is also targeted only on educational aspectsof cooperation. Among the potential future improvements the case of research cooperation canbe reviewed, as well as the possibility of initiating cooperation from the university side can beadded.REFERENCESAnderson, M. S. 2001. “The complex relations between the academy and industry: Views from the literature,” Journal of Higher Education (72:2), pp. 226–246.Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., and Salter, A. 2010. “Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university– industry collaboration,” Research Policy (39:7), pp. 858–868.Cerych, L., and Frost-Smith, B. 1985. “Collaboration between higher education and industry: an overview
AC 2012-3271: A COLLEGE-INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIP: THE MULTI-DISCIPLINARY MASTER’S OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERINGDr. James G. Ladesic P.E., Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach James Ladesic is the Associate Dean of Industry Relations and Outreach and Professor of Aerospace En- gineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He has been with Embry-Riddle for 38 years, serving in many different capacities as faculty member and engineer. He is the recipient of the 1993 University Research Achievement Award, the 2001 Outstanding Teacher Award, and the 2009 Outstanding Service Award at ERAU. A registered Professional Engineer in Florida and FAA structures designated engineering representative. He is a recognized
.” Larry continued, “I’m looking for attitude because training isalways available,” and shared the following example: Let’s just say a forklift driver will sometimes will sometimes have an attitude and what I mean by that and I keep using that word but if they’re driving with the forklifts and something falls off going from point A to point B and I need ID on that item then someone needs to get out and pick it up and that’s not their primary function but that’s part of it, but sometimes you see the attitude.This statement also had implications for employees who demonstrate initiative in the AMworkplace.Adaptability/Flexibility/Multi-Tasker. Employers expressed that they needed employees who areadaptable, flexible, and
, B. L. (2009). University researchers working with private companies. Technovation, 29(2), 142-153.Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. [journal article]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1-67. doi: 10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694-707.Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., & Blumenthal, D. (2002). Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. Jama, 287(4), 473-480
. Respondents rated the importance of twenty competencies in their current work on afive-point scale, from 0=“not important” to 4=“extremely important.” Shown in Table 6, thesecompetencies came from the 2011-2012 ABET Criterion 3 a-k student outcomes1 and the keyattributes listed in the NAE Engineer of 2020 report2.Table 6. ABET and Engineer of 2020 measuresMath a Global/societal context dScience a Economic issues dPlanning/conducting experiments b Environmental context dAnalytical skills b Life-long learningDesign Engineering techniques
each switch to theirrespective next room (we numbered the rooms) for a three-minute conversation with the nextmentor. After the students were with their second mentor, we broadcasted the next conversationprompt. We did a total of five rounds, so that by the end of the session, each student had spokento five mentors. We used the following conversation prompts for each round: 1) Which would you choose? And, why? ● Option A: one year with Oprah ● Option B: one year with Bill Gates ● Option C: $1,000,000 2) Exchange your career hopes. 3) Share about an academic or professional experience you are proud of. 4) In what positive way(s) have you grown and changed during the shelter-at-home experience? (The kickoff
professional relationship - Goals: to be agreed upon by each mentor:mentee pairOnce all expectations were introduced and discussed, the mentors and mentees were guided through ashort tutorial of the MentorCity platform and features they might be able to use to elevate theirmentorship experience. One required feature for each mentor:mentee pair, to be completed that eveningbefore their departure, was discussion and submission of the Mentorship Program Agreement, which wasavailable on the platform and contained questions/topics for discussion as follows: - (A) Meeting Formats - How would you like to meet? Would you like to have some meetings in- person and some over the phone/video conference? (B) Frequency of meetings - Would you like
project demonstrates that a battery system canbe used to effectively address the challenge of intermittency. The high-tech batterysystem smooths out fluctuations in solar power output caused by clouds, and it storesexcess energy that can be shifted or dispatched when it is most needed.Through a partnership with PNM, Northern New Mexico College (NNMC), a Hispanicand Native-American serving institution, has played an active role in the project. In thiscollaboration, the Department of Engineering and the Math Department have: a)improved the curriculum for two engineering bachelor programs; b) contextualizedassignments for developmental math courses; c) provided access to state-of-the-art solardata for undergraduate research; d) developed an outreach
opportunities experienced by the students, using their own words from theirportfolios and feedback forms. We consider the following issues: a) the significance of askingstudents to construct arguments about their own preparedness and b) the benefits of constructinge-portfolios in interactive workshops with peer review. We also briefly consider c) the potentialbenefits to industry partners of having students document their experiences in e-portfolios, and d)the opportunities and constraints associated with institutionalizing e-portfolios within existingexperiential learning programs.COE’s Experiential Learning ProgramsThe University of Washington College of Engineering Experiential Learning and StudentLeadership Programs comprise Engineering Co-op
three most downloaded TOP 100 papers on the IEEE XploreTM among millions of publications in Sept, 2012, June 2012, and Sept. 2009 (ranked #80, #88, and #21, respectively). His research interests are: (1) power-efficient RF/Analog IC and System-on-a-Chip (SoC) design and test; and (2) interdisciplinary and clinical research on medical electronics, biosensors, and biosignal processing.Dr. Richard O Gale P.E., Texas Tech UniversityRon CoxDr. Stephen B. Bayne, Texas Tech University Page 24.1298.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 University-Industry Partnership in
Paper ID #25172Are We Teaching What They Want? A Comparative Study of What AM Em-ployers Want versus What AM Frameworks RequireDr. Faye R. Jones, Florida State University Faye R. Jones is a Senior Research Associate at Florida State University’s College of Communication & Information. Her research interests include STEM student outcomes and the exploration of student pathways through institutional research.Dr. Marcia A. Mardis, Florida A&M University/Florida State University Marcia A. Mardis is a Professor and Associate Dean at Florida State University’s College of Communica- tion & Information and Associate
Paper ID #8101Engineering Educators in Industry: a Case Study of a Doctoral InternshipMs. Meagan C Pollock, Purdue University Meagan Pollock is a doctoral candidate at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University and is a recipient of a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. She received a B.S. in Computer Science from Texas Woman’s University, and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Texas Tech University. Prior to beginning her doctoral studies, she worked as a microelectromechanical-systems (MEMS) engineer for Texas Instruments
growingimportance for engineering practice, but the engineering profession seems to be held in lowregard compared to other professions and industry tends to view engineers and technologists asdisposable commodities2.An Associate of Science in Engineering Technology prepares graduates with knowledge skillsand technical problem-solving abilities necessary to success in a wide range of engineeringtechnology disciplines3. The specific ABET ETAC student outcomes for Associate of Science inEngineering Technology are3: a. an ability to apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to narrowly defined engineering technology activities; b. an ability to apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology
center of each of each ofthe front suspension strut towers, as shown in Figure 9a. The rear strut towers weremodeled to behave as ball joints. For the bending simulations, the major vertical loadsacting on the BIW represent the gravitational loads of six occupants with 75 kg placed ateach of the seating locations. The four strut towers were fixed and modeled as ball joints,as illustrated in Figure 9b. (a) Loads and Boundary Conditions for Torsional Stiffness Simulation (b) Loads and Boundary Conditions for Bending Stiffness SimulationFigure 9. Loads and Boundary Conditions for Determining Static Torsional and Bending StiffnessThe torsion and bending simulations were conducted to identify the
Paper ID #21245AAS Controls Technology Stackable Degree Education Requirements for Em-ployees by Highly Automated Manufacturing Companies Drives a Collabora-tive Pathway at Weber State UniversityMs. Julanne K. McCulley, Weber State University Julanne K. McCulley possesses a master’s in engineering from Arizona State University and a bachelor’s of science degree in electronics engineering technology and a bachelor’s of science degree in mathematics teaching from Weber State University. McCulley is an Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator for the Electronics Engineering Technology program in the Engineering Technology
topics: A. How technical work is accomplished B. Corporate culture C. Professional dress code D. Ethical behavior E. Reporting structure F. Teamwork G. Appreciation of diversity 5. Did the internship provide you with a team or community of practice (ie. your work team consisted of your supervisor or other personnel such as managers, engineers, technicians, etc.)? Please describe the membership of your “team” or “community”. 6. If so, how did this community help with your learning at work? 7. Did the internship provide opportunities to engage in company events such as retreats, strategic planning, socials, etc.? Please describe. As this is a descriptive case
-future-of-work/generation-z-entersworkforce.html: Sept 19, 2017.[20] D. Pistrui, J. Layer and S. Dietrich, “Mapping the Behaviors, Motives and ProfessionalCompetencies of Entrepreneurially Minded Engineers in Theory and Practice: An EmpiricalInvestigation,” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, ASEE Special Issue, Vol. 4, No. 1,Winter 2013, pp. 39-54.[21] S. Dietrich, “A Critical Examination of the Construct Validity of the TTI PerformanceDNATM Survey for the Purpose of Differentiating the Entrepreneurially-Minded Engineer”Doctoral Dissertation, College of Technology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, 2012.[22] D. Pistrui, R. Bonnstetter, B. Bonnstetter and C. Fry “Creating, Educating and Assessing aNew Class of Entrepreneurial
AC 2011-1822: INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE AND PERSPECTIVE: A SUR-VEY OF ADVICE BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY CAPSTONE ALUMNISHARE WITH INCOMING STUDENTSTaylor Halverson, Brigham Young University Taylor Halverson earned a double major PhD at Indiana University in Instructional Technology and design and Judaism and Christianity in antiquity. He earned Master’s degrees from Indiana University and Yale University. His Bachelor’s degree was earned at BYU. Dr. Halverson spent several years working for Cisco in Silicon Valley where he designed creative learning experiences for thousands of customer service agents spread across the globe. Dr. Halverson currently works as a Teaching and Learning Consultant at BYU, assisting faculty
organizationalperformance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of management, 31(5),758775.Gao, Jian-Bo, Zhang, Bao-Wen, & Chen, Xiao-Hua. (2015). A WordNet-based semanticsimilarity measurement combining edge-counting and information content theory. EngineeringApplications of Artificial Intelligence, 39:80-88.Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., Cardy, R. L., Dimick, D. E., & Templer, A. J. (2001).Managing Human Resources, 3rd Canadian edn,Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. W. (2011). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). Belmont, CA:Cengage South-Western.Holton III, E. F., & Baldwin, T. T. (2003). Improving learning transfer in organizations. JohnWiley & Sons.Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training
Paper ID #7727A Successful Engineering Program-Corporate PartnershipDr. Scott Danielson, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Scott Danielson is the associate dean for Academic Programs in the College of Technology and In- novation at Arizona State University’s Polytechnic campus. Before assuming that role, he had been the interim chair of Engineering Department for half a year and the chair of the Engineering Technology Department for over twelve years. He has been active in ASEE in the Mechanics Division and the En- gineering Technology Division. He has also been active in ASME; awarded the Ben C. Sparks Medal
aviation training program as well.Recognizing the heterogeneous nature of job skills for aviation maintenance and inspectionevidenced in the previous example, we realize one-size-fit-all type of framework is not practical.Therefore, we will follow a multiple-job approach, which offers the dual advantages of a commonconceptual framework and customization for individual jobs.The framework of the training will include a) a database comprising of the identifiedcompetencies; b) a presentation layer to conceptualize the specific skill for the user, and c) amapping engine to link up the user-context to the appropriate competency.ConclusionsIn this paper, we have proposed a concept map based paradigm to help aviation industry conductcompetency mapping and