Paper ID #8617Forming a Coalition to Decrease Freshout Rampup Time in the EngineeringWorkplace: A Business Plan for an Academic, Industry, and GovernmentPartnershipDr. Steven W Villachica, Boise State University Steve Villachica is an Associate Professor of Instructional and Performance Technology (IPT) at Boise State University. His research interests focus on leveraging expertise in the workplace in ways that meet organizational missions and business goals. He is currently working on an NSF grant to increase engineer- ing faculty adoption of evidence-based instructional practices [NSF #1037808: Engineering Education
wirelessly through aportable device to a base station for analysis and storage. The data is transmittedwirelessly through a modem, received by a personal computer, and analyzed through theuse of different software programs. The paper also presents test results of a practicalexample.IntroductionData logger units are versatile equipment used in today’s industry and is being taught inmany engineering and engineering technology curricula [1-4]. Such units provide usefulinformation that allows an analyst to perform a variety of tasks, including: (a) Creatingmodels, testing prototypes, analyzing results, and adapting to changing test andmeasurement needs, (b) Validating product concepts and ensuring product durability,functionality and safety, (c
Arab GulfStates. Proceedings, 2005 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education.[8] Al-Sammik, A., Al-Shehabi, H. (2006) Special Issue: From Region to Countries: Engineeringeducation in Bahrain. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 25. 2. Pg. 12-17.[9] Akili, W. (2005). Active Learning: A Range of Options Intended for Engineering Faculty in the Arab GulfStates. Proceedings, 2005 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education.. Page 15.739.12[10] (2009) Education City Enrollment. TAMUQ Internal Document. 12-9-2009.[11] Oberst, B., Jones, R. (2006) Today and Tomorrow: Engineering Education
%+/*!! :.;" ?8" )$%" !!!" !!" ($%" '$%" &$%" #$%" *+,,-./"0"1+.,-23"*3343.2" 1+.,-23"*3343.2" *+,,-./"*3343.2" 5678393.2"" CD-E"5FGHD-E":15I" CJ8K7"5FGHD-E":15I" !!! CD-E"5FGHJ8K7":15I" CJ8K7"5FGHJ8K7":15I" !,A$#%B"!!,A$%)B"!!!,A$%#B"!!!!,A$%%#" Figure 7. The Role of Motivation by APCM GroupAs shown in Figure 7, students who ultimately graduated in engineering indicated that EGR 101increased their motivation to study engineering more strongly than students who ultimately didnot graduate, which is consistent with the results of Figure 3. The statistically significantdifference was for the Purpose Seekers
Electronic Communications courseThis paper discusses one of the projects in ElectronicCommunications II course which gives students the opportunity tothink and apply their knowledge in electronics, communicationsand mathematics to design, build and test frequency modulatedcommunication transmitter. The course is also designed to meetABET general criteria 3: Student Outcomes (b, d, e). Thetransmitter consists of four blocks. There is audio source blockwhich is a computer to provide the audio signal that needs to bemodulated, a frequency modulator circuit that is used to combineboth the audio and the high frequency carrier, a high frequencyoscillator circuit that generates above 88MHz and below 108MHzcarrier, a power amplifier to
) 0 0 0 0 0Total (18) 2 5 2 9 3 Page 25.1075.8Table 2: Industrial Chromatography Pre-test ScoresQuestion Student Scores (points) Student A Student B Student C Student D Student E 1 (2) 2 2 1 0 0 2 (5) 1 2 1 1 0 3 (1) 0 0 1 0 0 4 (2) 0 0 0 0 0 5 (5
% 4% 5% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree Agree Disagree (a) (b)Figure 1: Changes in participant beliefs that active learning and conceptual
least 15 years old, with some dating back as far as 1986 in essentially thesame form. In Fall 2010 the course was taken over by instructor B, but otherwise retained thesame format, lab experiments, and project.It was clear at the end of Fall 2010 that the lab handouts were extremely dated and confusingto the students. For example, the handouts instructed students to bring a floppy disk to lab,despite the fact that this technology is clearly out of date and no longer used. Because of thisand in response to student feedback, instructor B kept the same lab experiments for Spring2011, but completely rewrote and updated the lab handouts in order to clarify objectives andanalysis questions. Instructor B also increased the number of active lecture
. Page 14.413.6Sensor Installation:Mounting devices (see Figure 8) were designed with SolidWorks® to attach the two pieces (one slidingpiece and one fixed) of the linear displacement sensor to the plunger and the syringe case, respectively.An “L”-shaped bracket holds the sliding bar of the displacement sensor and attaches it to the plunger(Figure 8 (b)); a sheath device holds the fixed part of the displacement sensor to the syringe case (Figure8 (a)). The force sensor is glued to the upper surface of the L-shaped device (see Figure 8 (c)). Force (b) (a) (c
”. (a) (b) Figure 1 Schematic Diagram Showing (a) Calorimeter Cross-section3 (b) Oxygen Bomb2Experimental ProcedureThe experimental process consists of the steps recommended and outlined in detail in theInstruction Manual2 of this apparatus. The procedure is briefly described here.1. PreparationsThe preparation for this experiment consists of the following steps carried by students underproper supervision: (i) Fuel Sample and Fuse Wire: A sample of solid fuel in powder form is pressed to form a pellet in a pellet press. The mass of the fuel sample should be about 1 gram (maximum 1.5 gram). The fuel pellet is carefully placed in a combustion capsule in
beliefs about their calculus class (either a Project CALCclass or a regular calculus class). In its original form, the Project CALC survey consists of 40closed-ended 4-point Likert scale questions with response categories ranging from StronglyAgree (“A”) to Strongly Disagree (“D”). Somewhat Agree (“B”) and Somewhat Disagree (“C”)are provided as intermediate choices. Response options A through D are provided in alphabeticalorder, left to right. For the purpose of the study, we tailored the original survey in several ways. Weexpanded the scale of each question to a 7-point scale in order to provide for sufficient variabilityin responses as well as a designate a true midpoint and thus allow a neutral selection. Wechanged the A-D response
for comparison with a phenomenological model, as well as a meansof gaining further physical insight into the process. Moreover, the comparison of these twotechniques provides an opportunity to explore a different pedagogy to this classic fluidmechanics experiment. In this work, the authors develop a model for predicting the pressure and temperature ofair charging into or discharging out of a tank. The model incorporates compressible flow in bothchoked and subsonic flow, and models the air as a general polytropic process of power n. Themodel is applied to two scenarios: (a) an initially pressurized tank discharged to atmosphere, and(b) an initially evacuated tank being charged from atmosphere. The polytropic exponent, n, isfound
) G v + (G − G )E , if v ≥ E . b R a b 1 R 1Although the schematic of Figure 1 is drawn in a fashion such that it is easy to comprehend how (1)and (2) arise from the shown interconnections, it is not obvious how to physically realize the circuitsince some components may not be readily available off-the-shelf, e.g., the nonlinear component ofthe circuit, the Chua’s diode. Moreover, as previously indicated, the implementation of an inductor-gyrator is preferred in lieu of an inductor. We implement the Chua’s diode schematic presentedby Ref. 7 and the inductor-gyrator presented by Ref. 5 as shown in Figure 2. In most literature,the instructions for building a
, variable flow velocities. With that goal in mind, the next step was todefine the requirements that would define a successful water flume design. The followingobjectives were identified at the outset of the project: A. The construction costs should be less than $3500. B. The construction can be carried out by undergraduate. C. The water flume will provide “low velocity” flow-rates up to 2 ft/s in the test section to replicate tidal and river flows. D. The water flume will fit in a laboratory with limited space. For this particular laboratory, this meant a maximum 7’ x7’ footprint and having the ability to relocate the experiment easily.The basic layout of the resulting design is shown in Figure 2. Each of the key components
of thepaper.VEX Robotics KitThe VEX standard kit was selected for the laboratory experiments. This kit includes motors, geartrains, metal frames and shafts, basic sensors, controller and program modules. The VEXcontroller is composed of two PIC 18F8520 μCs. The sensors include two light sensors, twolimit switches and two bumper switches. The programming hardware includes an USB-to-SerialCable, a VEX programming module, and a RJ11 phone cable. For the software, a MPLAB C18compiler for the VEX system provides a true C programming environment. The USB-to-SerialCable, VEX programming module, and phone cable are to be connected together as shown inFigure 1 (a). Figure 1 (b) shows the downloading of a program into the VEX controller. (a
in Fig. 1. The circuit thatthe students are intending to test, called a device-under-test (DUT – A in Fig. 1), is inserted into atest board, called the device-interface-board (DIB – B in Fig. 1). Depending on the lab, the DUTwill be a comparator, a DAC, or an ADC. The DIB contains circuits that will allow the DUT to beplaced into different configurations for different specification tests (e.g. input bias current, offsetvoltage, linearity, propagation delay, etc.). The DIB circuits may be as simple as load structures(output resistors and/or capacitors) or input resistors to gain up input current measurements, or ascomplicated as negative feedback servo-loops to force the device into a known state. Relays areactivated to change the DIB
Paper ID #7647BYOE: Mobile Experiment for Signals and Systems - Analysis of a GuitarStringDr. Bonnie Ferri, Georgia Institute of Technology Bonnie Ferri is a Professor and Associate Chair for Undergraduate Affairs in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Georgia Tech. She received her BS in EE from Notre Dame, her MS in MAE from Princeton, and her PhD in EE from Georgia Tech. She spent two years working for Honeywell, Inc. as a controls engineer. She has spent 10 years working on hands-on education and has won several awards including the Harriet B. Rigas Award from the IEEE Education Society.Dr. Aldo A
involved must be invested in the concept and practice of inquiry- based laboratory education. Methods must exist for assessing student performance in regard to previously- established course objectives. Course grades and student enjoyment, though useful, are not commensurate with assessing student performance.ReferencesAbdulwahed, M. and Nagy, Z.K., 2009, “Applying Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle forLaboratory Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 98, No. 3, pp 283-293.Allen, J. B., Barker, L. N., & Ramsden, J. H., 1986, “Guided inquiry laboratory,” J. Chem. Educ,63(6), 533.Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., Lundberg, B., & Tibell, L., 2003, “Benefiting from anopen-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to
the simplicity to be built by students over the course offive semesters. The research is designed to test two hypotheses: 1. A long-term design project that integrates knowledge from multiple courses strengthens student knowledge retention. 2. A large-scale design project requiring tools from many courses improves student problem-solving and design skills.By integrating five semesters of the mechanical engineering curriculum into a cohesive whole,this project has the potential to transform the way undergraduate education is delivered. Beforeand after testing is being conducted to assess: a) Change in retention between courses and b)Change in student problem-solving and design skills.The centerpiece of the hybrid powertrain is
(See Appendix 2): a. How does the waveform generator work? b. How is the cycling time of the alternation achieved? c. How does the brightness of the two LEDs alternate? d. What are the changes need to be made in order to drive a heavier load? ib2 vo v- v1 v+ ib1 Figure 2. An alternatingly fading LED circuitProject AssessmentReferring to a validated Pittsburg Engineering Freshman Attitude Survey [12], the two hands-onprojects
s s approximately 30 deg . separate speed control loop implemented on the vehicle. Table 1: Model parameter values for the Traxxas EMaxx vehicle The students are then required to design a controller to achieve the following control objectives: a) Closed-loop stability. b) Steady state error is zero for a step heading reference command of ref 90 . c) The vehicle must exhibit a settling time of approximately Ts 5.0 sec and an overshoot of approximately %OS 2% for a step heading reference command of ref 90 . d) The control algorithm must not request more
commands to the devicewhich causes it to make the transition from one state to another while the device gives feedbackto the PLC with the device’s current state. An example of a state diagram is shown in Figure 2.The state diagram describes a device with two states, A and B. A transition of signal“PLC_Output_1” from low to high causes the state machine to transition from state A to state Band perform any actions in the simulation defined by that transition. The system is then at state B.A transition of signal “PLC_Output_2” from low to high causes the state machine to transitionfrom state B to state A and perform any actions in the simulation defined by that transition. Figure 2: PLCStudio state diagramThe PLC
Biomaterials. Liverpool: Liverpool UniversityPress; 1999.2. Polymer Characterization Techniques.247-56.3. Ratner B, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. Biomaterials Science: AMultidisciplinary Endeavor. Biomaterials Science: A Introduction to Materials in Medicine. SanDiego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 1-9.4. Moss A. Use of Selected Medical Device Implants in the United States. Hyattsville, MD:National Center of Health Statistics, 1988.5. Black J, Shalaby SW, LaBerge M. Biomaterials Education: An Academic Viewpoint.Journal of Applied Biomaterials. 1992;3:231-6.6. Vanderbilt N, Texas, and Harvard-MIT Engineering Research Center.http://www.vanth.org/curriculum/curr_bio_domains.asp.7. Saterbak A, editor Laboratory
around the development of an “Introduction to Mechatronics” course1-5. For thisproject, we have identified the following goals: (a) to address the need of industrial partners tohave engineers educated in the principles and applications of mechatronics, (b) to improve Page 11.162.2student competencies in communication skills, teamwork, and project management through theincreased use of team-oriented, project-based, interdisciplinary approaches to instruction inmechatronics, (c) to increase in engineering students an appreciation for lifelong learning bydelivering instruction in mechatronics to this population, and (d) to increase the participation
inductors and capacitors) that allows students to samplethe voltage waveform at discrete tie points along the line. This simulated transmission line wasdesigned at the University of Virginia, and we can make the plans and manufacturing documentsavailable to other universities. This experimental platform was used for a wide variety of mini-projects that explored standing waves. Figure 21 (b) shows the set-up for characterizing loads byobserving the reflection on a 100 foot long 50 Ω coaxial cable. (a) (b)Figure 21 (a) Photograph of an artificial transmission line implemented for investigating wave propagation in ECE 3209. (b) Test set-up for
laboratory instruction a virtual experimentat the very last must include: (a) hands-on activities (interactivity), and (b) a realistic simulationof the experiment in a laboratory like environment (immersion). It should be noted that bench-type physical experiments have drawbacks of high capital cost, limited (one time) exposure toexperiments and limited students’ interaction with experiments due to large student group sizes.As a result student learning does not always reach expected levels [11-12]. Bourne has stated that Page 25.724.3student learning achieved through online virtual experiments may be comparable to learningachieved through bench
Anatomy, Biology, Environmental Science, and even Spanish. Participantsreceived 20 hours of professional development credit.The program was structured into two workshop sessions. The first session, during the summer of2012, consisted of three days of hands-on instruction. It focused on several instructional topics,including (a) Overview of Cloud Services, (b) Storing and Sharing Data in the Cloud, (c) Cloudsin Education and Collaboration in and out of the Classroom, (d) Cloud-based Tools for Real-timeCollaboration, (e) Course Management using Piazza, (f) Standards-based Lesson Planning andPost-workshop Assignment, (g) Creating a Lesson Plan, and (h) Using Public Data SetsAvailable in Amazon’s Cloud. At the end of the three-day workshop
identifier. The version of CAN 2.0B extends to a 29-bitidentifier. Figure 5 shows the CAN 2.0 protocol layers for A and B. The CAN module for theM16C29 microcomputer is a communication controller implemented with a CAN 2.0B protocol.CAN 2.0B has application, data link and physical layers. The application layer generates orinterprets data and actually sends and receives messages. The object layer is responsible forhandling messages, such as selecting a transmitted or received message, working as an interfacebetween the transfer layer and the application program running on the CPU. The transfer layerensures that messages adhere to the protocol. The physical layer defines the physical (hardware)implementation and the electrical (signal level
directions. You may note that the flames arerelatively higher and the smoke less opaque than observations in the actual fire. Both of theseeffects are likely due to scale. The openings in the model are concentrated in the middle of eachface to simplify adding ventilation at the appropriate time. If the flames were distributed overthe entire face, shorter flames would have been observed. It should also be noted that becausethe opacity of the smoke is a function of the path length, the smoke from the small scale modelwill appear less opaque even for similar smoke density. Figure 10 shows post-burn photographsof the scale model. Figures 10 (a) and (b) show complete burn out of the wood cribs. Figure 10(c) shows that soot produced in the fire remained
proteins and nucleic acids. Hydrophobic interaction is thefoundation for the existence of life. b. Microcapsulation and smart paper: The objectives of this lab were to introduce themicroencapsulation technology used in “smart” paper and to understand the different methodsused to break microcapsules and benefit from nanotechnology.Both carbonless copy paper and thermal paper are called “smart” paper. Carbonless copy paperis coated with a variety of chemicals. The coated back sheet has a layer of microcapsules thatcontain an invisible ink. The coated front sheet has a coating of a co-reactant, which whenexposed to the colorless ink in the microcapsules reacts with them to produce color.Microcapsules keep the reactants away from each other until