Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Issues Part One

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University; Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

does not see this aspectAddressing as an issue. Should you:Ethics in the a. Go with your supervisor’s opinion.Workplace b. Document the problem and your discussion. File it as proof that you attempted to address the problem. c. Document the problem and your discussion. Discuss the issue with your supervisor’s superior. d. Document the problem and your discussion. Discuss the issue with a safety officer within OSHA or a similar organization.Multiple Why are Ethical Codes important to engineers?Choice 2: a. Only valid way to make an ethical decision.Ethical Codes b. One way to evaluate an engineering decision/design.Importance c

Conference Session

Awareness, Expectations, and Recognition of Ethics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, University of Michigan, Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute; Joanna Ruth Sessford, The Sino-British College, USST; Longfei An, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China; Yan Ge, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

engineering-related position, e.g., in a summerjob or internship, have you ever encountered an engineering-related deed, practice, or policy thatyou considered morally questionable or wrong?” (If you have never had such a position, write“NA.”) (Y/N/NA)2. Sources – “Who or what has had the most significant influence on the ethical/moral values,attitudes, ideals, or approach to making ethical judgments that you call upon when faced with adifficult situation? Please circle one and only one: A. Religion B. Teachers C. Parents D. FriendsE. Other – please specify: _________________________________________”Assuming the cultivation and maintenance of an ethical frame is based on expectations of facingethical issues and the importance of being ethical, our

Conference Session

Industrial, Professional, and Practical Contexts of Engineering Ethics

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dayoung Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Shiloh James Howland, Brigham Young University; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

ofCivil Engineering Education, vol. 146, no. 4, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000021[10] B. A. Burt, D. D. Carpenter, M. A. Holsapple, C. J. Finelli, R. M. Bielby, J. A. Sutkus, andT. S. Harding, “Out-of-classroom experiences: Bridging the disconnect between the classroom,the engineering workforce, and ethical development,” International Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 714-725, 2013.[11] M. C. Loui, “Ethics and the development of professional identities of engineering students,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005.[12] G. Rulifson, and A. R. Bielefeldt, “Influence of internships on engineering students’attitudes about socially responsible engineering,” Proceedings of the 2018

Conference Session

Ethical Design

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amy Schroeder, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

class, with learning acquisition levels tested at themidpoint of the term and then after the completion of the course. When surveyed at the midtermabout their exposure to ethics education prior to the course, 73.33% of students expressed havingeither “little” or “none.” When then questioned about their sense of improvement in anunderstanding of ethical theory, nearly 88% expressed having an above-average understanding,with the remaining 12% reporting an average understanding.The students take one midterm and one final in this course, and those testing instruments clearlydemonstrate an increased understanding in ethics by the end of the course. The average midtermgrade for all students over all six semesters of the course is a B. But marked

Conference Session

Professional and Regulatory Issues in Ethics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan D Watts, Purdue University West Lafayette; Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

toward IRB approval as early as possible. Thiswill make future capstone design projects more efficient and successful as well as giveengineering students a guide for ethical decisions regarding testing human subjects in their futuredesign projects.AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to thank and acknowledge the generous contribution of initial literature reviewby Joshua B. Rager and Peter H. Schwartz through a TREX Consultation from the IndianaUniversity Center for Bioethics.ReferencesAntes, G., & Chalmers, I. (2003). Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical. TheLancet, 361(9362), 978-979.Blustein, J. (2004). Should capstone course activities undergo human subjects review?. Journalof Policy Analysis and Management, 23(4), 921-927

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics V

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Jordan, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

thecompany’s fundamental goals include more than just making a profit the company’s leaders aremore likely to make ethical decisions that will be to the benefit of the local people. Thecompany still needs to be profitable to be sustainable, but profitability is not the only goal.References1 EPICS national web page, epicsnational.ecn.purdue.edu/public/conferences/conferences.php2 Benjamin Kelley, Walter Bradley, and Brian Thomas, Student-Aimed Appropriate Technology EngineeringProjects in Kenya, presented at the ASEE Gulf Southwest Conference, Baton Rouge, 2006, in CD basedproceedings, no page numbers.3 Jordan, W., Ballard, B., Morton, A., Sanders, B., and Wakefield, J.K., Implementing a Service LearningEngineering Project in East Africa, presented

Conference Session

Ethical Issues II: Academic Integrity and Student Development

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isaac W. Wait, Marshall University; Armin Eberlein P.E., American University of Sharjah

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

indicatethat they copy homework assignments 16.8% of the time). Table 1 - Comparison of student attitudes about academic integrity Question Response1 USA INTL N % N % p Sig. Diff a) Time 335 46.6 69 68.1 0.00 Yes b) Material difficulty 335 42.1 69 46.4 0.26 No When you cheat, MOST OFTEN it is c) Opportunity 335 3.9 69 4.3 0.44 No because of

Conference Session

Case and Scenario in Engineering Ethics Instruction

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida; Justin L Hess, IUPUI, Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

. Our focus throughout the case is on two core issues of (a) 3allocation of risk and (b) stakeholder impact. This is exemplified through the videos we havedeveloped, selected readings, discussion prompts, quick checks, and the group case reportprompt. Naturally, many case-specific facts and issues that we do not explicitly prompt arisethrough in-class discussion, the group case reports, and the asynchronous on-line posting whichis driven by student interest.One of the strengths of the pedagogical strategy we utilized is that students must work togetherto justify their responses based off each student’s knowledge and interests, collectively

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics Decision-Making

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dayoung Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

intention to express emotions (e.g., “I felt…”). Weextracted each excerpt from the whole transcript with the original question the interviewer askedand kept the context of the interviewee’s answer. We then generated initial codes and searchedfor themes in the collected excerpts in an inductive way, i.e., we conducted inductive thematicanalysis within the collected excerpts [29]. Table 1. Demographic information of the selected students (n = 11) for this paper Pseudonym Gender Race/Ethnicity Institution Alex Male N/A Univ. A Benson Male White Univ. B Brody Male

Conference Session

Ethical Cases and Curricula

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Russell Capelli, Virginia Tech; Estela Patron Moen, Virginia Tech; William N. Collins, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

.[8] Luegenbiehl, H. S. “Themes for an International Code of Engineering Ethics,” Proceedings of the 2003ASEE/WFEO International Colloquium, Nashville, TN., 2003.[9] Downey, G. L.; Lucena, J. C.; Moskal, B. M.; Parkhurst, R.; Bigley, T.; Hays, C.; Jesiek, B; Kelly, L.; Miller, J.;Ruff, S.; Lehr, J. L.; and Nichols-Belo, A. "The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with PeopleWho Define Problems Differently," Journal of Engineering Education, V. 95, No. 2, April 2006, pp. 107-122.[10] Ghaly, A. M. “Professional and Ethical Implications of Engineering Globalization,” Proceedings of the 2003ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN., June 2003.[11] Lucena, J.; Mitcham, C.; Leydens, J.; Munakata-Marr, J.; Straker, J.; and

Conference Session

Topics in Engineering Ethics IV

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brent Nelson, Northern Arizona University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

advanced environmental surveys will be used to increase statisticalsignificance of the results. While the long term goal is to incorporate explicit discussion ofsustainability and environmental impacts, the preliminary results described here demonstrate thatBID holds promise as an approach for improving environmental ethics of engineering students,and further examination of the subject is recommended. Page 14.1221.6Bibliography1 Frank G. Splitt, "Environmentally Smart Engineering Education: A brief on a paradigm in progress," Journal of Engineering Education 91, 447-450 (2002).2 B. Berkovski and C. M. Gottschalk, "Strengthening human

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alireza Bolhari, Islamic Azad University, Tehran; Azadeh Bolhari P.E., Angelo State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

ethical conducts in an IT context. Accordingly, an interventional research(pre-post study) is designed and data were gathered from 347 computer stations in an IT-centric company in Iran. Due to the company's codes of ethics, six categories of unethical IT-related behaviors were defined as a) surfing social media, b) checking personal emails, c)sending organizational documents without authorized tools, d) sharing video or music files inlocal network, e) stockbroking, and f) installing non-job-related software on computers. Twonon-simultaneous phases with duration of three months were examined. In the first phase, atotal number of 906 unethical behaviors were observed by means of company-wide log-systems. Subsequently, for the second phase, every

Conference Session

Engineering Social and Human Ethical Impacts

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

L. Eric James, University of Southern Maine; Alexander Curry Smith, University of Southern Maine

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

historical analysis”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 205-222. 2. Haws, D. R. (2001). Ethics instruction in engineering education: A (mini) meta- analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(2), 223. 3. Fleddermann, C. B. (2004). Engineering Ethics (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. 4. Harding, T. S. (2008). “The psychology of ‘ought’,” 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY. 5. Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(02), 243-262.6. Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three- domain approach. Business ethics quarterly

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Greg Rulifson, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Page 26.643.8Table 3: Interview Questions - End of Sophomore Year 1. Are you still a _______ major? (If not: why did you switch? [Move to SWITCHER set of questions]) How is the second year going? What are some big events that occurred in the last year? What are some things you have enjoyed? Found difficult or frustrating? 2. Why do you like engineering? What is motivating you through the tough classes? a. What are your particular interests within _______ engineering? 3. What is your ideal career now? Why? 4. What are some specific qualities of a job and company that you are looking for? Why are these qualities important? a. Do you already know of companies where you’d like to work? If so, which ones? b. Which quality is the most

Conference Session

Teaching Approaches for Ethics

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bradley J. Brummel, The University of Tulsa; Jeremy S. Daily P.E., The University of Tulsa

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

videotaped for future study and assessment.ConclusionThe authors plan to continue to develop and evaluate new expert witness role play scenarios andformats to maximize the potential benefits of this pedagogy within the specific needs andconstraints of different educational environments. The formative assessment of the expertwitness role play approach appears promising, but it did not capture learning outcomes orcomparisons with other approaches to teaching engineering education. Creative professorsshould be able to adopt this technique to teach engineering ethics within a realistic, engaging,and involving way.Bibliography1. Brummel, B. J., Gunsalus, C. K., Anderson, K. L., & Loui, M. C. (2010). Development of role-play scenarios forteaching

Conference Session

Assessing Social Responsibility & Sustainability

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Gannon, Montana State University; Ryan Anderson, Montana State University; Justin W Spengler, Montana State University; Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Page 26.725.3facilitate that discussion, each group identified a scribe who would take notes on themajor/common findings of the group. These ‘nuggets’ of information within each topic wereuploaded to the course website. After the discussion, students again responded to the same seriesof questions. Anonymous student responses were recorded via i-clickers (large class) or bubble-sheets (smaller class).Table 1. Questions posed to students before and after the activity. Question Response Options1) I Understand What Fracking Is……………………….. A = Strongly Agree B = Agree Somewhat

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics IV

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Norma Mattei, University of New Orleans

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

, “Engineering students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards cheating,” Jnl. Of Engrg. Ed., July issue; 1-14.[4] Whitley, B., “Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review”, 1998, Research in Higher Ed., Vol.39, #3, 235-277.[5] Lipson, A.; McGavern, N.; 1993; “Undergraduate Dishonesty at MIT”; Office of Undergraduate Affairs, MIT (ERIC Document No. ED 368 272). Page 13.312.13

Conference Session

Interactive Approaches to Ethics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Craig E. Beal, Bucknell University; James G. Orbison Ph.D., P.E., Bucknell University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

engineering education. Springer, 10(2), 343–351.Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. (1986). Report to the president by the presidential commission on the space shuttle challenger accident (Tech. Rep.).Richards, L. G., & Gorman, M. E. (2004). Using case studies to teach engineering design and ethics. Proceeedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M., & Tice, D. M. (2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active intiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Conference Session

Innovative Approaches to Ethics Instruction

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vivian Liang, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Zach Jasensky, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Melvin Moore III; Jake Francis Rogers; Geoff Pfeifer, Worcester Polytechic Institute; Kristen Billiar, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

engineering programs due to ABET accreditation criteria. Frontiers in Education Conference 2011: p. S1B-1-S1B-6.8. Eisen, A., Berry, R., The Absent Professor: Why we don't teach research ethics and what to do about it. The American Journal of Bioethics, 2002: p. 38-49.9. Newberry, B., The Dilemma of Ethics in Engineering Education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2004. 10: p. 343-351.10. Corey, G., Student workbook for Ethics in Action. Pacific 1 Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1998.11. Duncan, J., Case Study: Public Access to Government Data. GISProfessional Ethics Project, 2009.12. Hamilton III, J., The Seven Step Method for Analyzing Ethical Situations. 1990.13. Jersey, T., Procedures for Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas. 2001.14. Pimple, K., Using

Conference Session

Approaches to Teaching Ethics

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College, Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

way or another it should engage the studentin the perennial questions of philosophy. There are many ways of achieving this goal. There is aneed to bring together relevant practice, and there is a need to experiment. In terms of theorganization of the curriculum and the need for mixed learning communities the need fordivergent visioning is great.Acknowledgements.I am deeply indebted to Dr Alec Martin who introduced me to the works of John Macmurraywhen he was the responsible official in the UK Employment Department for our project on theanalysis of jobs done by engineers. I am very grateful to Dr‟s Alan A. Cheville and Mani Mina,and Ms Sarah Heywood for their perceptive comments on the draft of this textNotes and references[1] Koen, B. V (2003

Conference Session

Integration of Liberal Education into Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vassilios Tzouanas, University of Houston, Downtown; Lea Campbell, University of Houston, Downtown

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

some excuse as to why he has beenunable to complete his assignment. J. T.‟s lack of follow-through has placed the group seriouslybehind schedule on at least two sub-components.In your analysis of this case, discuss the impact that J. T.‟s behavior is having on the group.What factors may be impacting J. T.‟s ability to complete his tasks? Below are several optionsfor how the group might deal with J. T.‟s behavior. Discuss the pros and cons of each. Describewhat you feel might be the most effective approach and provide justification. a) Complain to the project manager about J. T.‟s behavior and ask her to talk to J. T. b) Ask that the project manager replace J. T. on the team. c) Ignore J. T.‟s behavior and reassign his work to another

Conference Session

New Media for Ethics Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joshua Gargac, University of Mount Union

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

and ethics trainings (question 2),thoughts about morality (question 3), and the ethical dilemma presented in the episode (question4). Table 1: Personal Reflection Work Sheet The Office "Business Ethics" Personal Reflection Questions. 1. At the start of the episode Holly implies that her meeting won’t be interesting because she’ll have to read from a binder. a. What are your expectations for our ethics module? b. What do you think we’ll talk about? c. Are you excited? How would you rate your excitement on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high) 2. Dunder Mifflin initiates the ethics seminar after misconduct from its corporate leaders. a. Are you familiar with real-life

Conference Session

Ethics Integration in Engineering Design

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brooke Odle, Hope College; Greg Bassett, Hope College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

engineers work with different types of resources, which exist on a spectrum ofessential/non-essential resources as well as a spectrum of scarcity. Ethical distribution ofresources was also addressed. The discussion prompts and questions for this topic were asfollows: 1. Come up with an example of each of these: a. An essential resource- very important or perhaps even necessary to common ideas about a flourishing life in contemporary society- that engineers might use. b. An inessential resource- perhaps useful or pleasant but unimportant to common ideas about a flourishing life in contemporary society- that engineers might use. c. A resource that engineers might use, that is somewhere in

Conference Session

Graduate Ethics Education & Professional Codes

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nael Barakat, Grand Valley State University; Nadia Sunny, Grand Valley State University; Md Mehedi Hasan, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

of the Technology and Society (T & S) Division and as the ASME district B leader. He also serves as the treasurer and secretary for the ASEE Engineering Ethics Dvision.Ms. Nadia Sunny, Grand Valley State University Nadia Sunny is pursuing a Master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering at Grand Valley State University, Michigan. She received her Bachelor’s in Chemical Engineering from Bangladesh University of En- gineering and Technology in 2004 and Master’s in Business Administration from Institute of Business Administration, Dhaka University in 2008. She has a diverse work experience in mechanical fabrication company, urea process plant, telecommunication equipment vendor and bank. She received excellence awards

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division - WIP Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; William M. Marcy P.E., Texas Tech University; Lakshmojee Koduru; John Richard Schumacher, Texas Tech University ; Micah Iserman, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

government the consequences can be detrimental to both the public and the company itself. There are many more concepts not outlined in this paper an engineer must abide by. The NSPE Code of Ethics, IEEE Code ofEthics, and ACM Code of Ethics all outline some of those topics as well as topics that are specific to different industries. These expectations also hold for students and anyone else that is involved with the engineeringworld. Since the development of these Code of Ethics, more schools have adopted and required ethical courses as a countermeasure for unethical decisions made in the workplace and for that I think the future looks a little brighter. B. Low Probable Post-Course Essay According to Naïve Bayes Prediction It is not

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division - WIP Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Indiana-Purdue University; Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany; Thomas De Pree, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

engineeringethics” was observed (a) in situations where interview subjects articulate initiatives entailing engi-neering ethics intervention and their respective involvement in the process, or (b) in general whensubjects remark on engineering and its ethical and societal implications. This umbrella code rep-resenting various justifications or rationales of engineering ethics then probed further to identifynuances of “why engineering ethics” in each case. The low level codes, finally were integrated intoarguments used to rationalize promotion of engineering ethics education.3.1 Compliance Argument: Meeting RequirementsABET Engineering Criteria (EC) 2000, as well as the recent revisions modifying or clarifyingrequirements, explicitly mention ”an ability

Conference Session

Approaches to Teaching Ethics

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael H.G. Hoffmann, Georgia Institute as Technology; Jason Borenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

[15-22]. This strategy aims to increase student engagement, provide opportunities for peer-to-peer (P2P) learning, stimulate creativity, and improve student-faculty interaction, communication skills, and critical thinking4) An interactive and web-based software tool (AGORA- net) that (a) challenges students to develop the rational reconstruction of an argument that stakeholders might provide to justify their position, which offers the students a means through which they can Page 25.300.5 understand the stakeholders‘ needs, interests, beliefs, and values, and (b) provides system-generated step-by-step guidance to create those

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics Decision-Making

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Harold W. Walker, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #27666Behavioral Ethics and Engineers: Factors Affecting Decision Making in CasesInvolving Risk and Public SafetyProf. Harold W. Walker, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Professor Walker is the Schwaber Professor of Environmental Engineering at WPI. Prior to coming to WPI, Professor Walker was the Founding Chair and Professor of Civil Engineering at Stony Brook Uni- versity (SUNY). He started his academic career as a faculty member in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Geodetic Engineering at Ohio State University. He has taught concepts in engineering ethics for over 10 years c

Conference Session

Understanding Students' Authentic and Reflective Experiences of Ethics Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Luan M. Nguyen, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Cristina Poleacovschi, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Kasey M. Faust, University of Texas at Austin; Kate Padgett Walsh, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Michaela Leigh LaPatin P.E., University of Texas at Austin; Scott Grant Feinstein; Cassandra Rutherford

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

, 2020.[3] Y. Lambrinidou and M. Edwards, "Learning to Listen: An Ethnographic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education," ASEE, p. Paper ID#8224, 2013.[4] J. R. Herkert, "Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 7, p. 403–414, 2001.[5] N. Gabiam, The Politics of Suffering: Syria's Palestinian Refugee Camps, Indiana University Press, 2016.[6] C. Baillie and M. Levine, "Engineering Ethics from a Justice Perspective: A Critical Repositioning of What It Means to Be an Engineer," International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10-20, 2013.[7] H. L. Brown-Liburd and B. M. Porco, "It's

Conference Session

Technology and Design in Engaging and Analyzing Ethics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University; Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University; William M. Jordan, Baylor University; John Edward Miller, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #19158Helping Engineering and Computer Science Students Find Joy in Their WorkDr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom and returned to the USAF Academy to teach heat transfer and propulsion