the individual, leadership curriculaoften utilizes one or more instruments, such as MBTI, True Colors, or DISC, to provide studentswith insights to their own personality and/or behaviors in groups or teams. Recently, the KleinGroup Instrument for Effective Leadership and Participation in Teams (KGI)®, which providesan individual with a set of skills to promote social growth, has shown initial success withengineering students.12 A new assessment tool to “measure leadership, change, and synthesisabilities” has been proposed in the work of Ahn, B., Cox, M.F., London, J., Cekic, O., and Zhu,J.13 Developed on a holistic set of leadership skills, their instrument, the Personal Leadershipprofile, “helps each student to focus on what courses will be
scheduling meetingswith a representative from marketing, system architecture, supply chain and customer facingactivities such as service or sales and, if possible, a real customer. The final task is a contestamongst students to see who can set up a meeting with the highest-ranking person in theirorganization and interview them on leadership.Appendix B Background: Description of the ExercisesThe following sections describe the specific modules given out to students, roughly at 4-weekintervals.B.1 Introduction to NetworkingThis module is an overview of techniques for developing a networking profile and to improveawareness of existing networks in the student’s discipline and industry.“Intro to Networking • If you do not have a business card – get
. This is a very important point to emphasize, especially for engineeringstudents who are drawn to quantitative data and who tend to be less comfortable with qualitativedata and analyses. Hence, this “set up” for a discussion on analyzing the stories they receivedfrom their respondents is critical to a successful implementation of this exercise. Otherwise,students will take the “path of least resistance” and base most of their paper on the quantitativeassessments described below.When I introduce this phase, I spend a few minutes describing how strengths are holisticallydefined in this exercise (summarized on a PowerPoint) 16. Strengths are an integration of our (a)self-identities, which is how we express ourselves in a given situation, (b
Paper ID #17096LEADing The Way: A Review of Engineering Leadership Development Pro-gramsMr. Joshua C. Palmer, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale Joshua Palmer is a Ph.D. student in the Organizational Behavior and Human Resources program at Florida State University. He received his M.A. from Southern Illinois University, Carbondale (2016), and his B.A. from Florida Gulf Coast University (2014). His primary area of interest is investigating how contextual factors (e.g., organizational and individual differences) affect the relationship between dark personality (e.g., narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy
Society (APICS) and a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE). She is a licensed Professional Engineer in Kansas.Dr. Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology Cheryl B. Schrader became Chancellor of Missouri University of Science and Technology, formerly the University of Missouri - Rolla, in 2012. Prior to her current leadership position she served as Associate Vice President for Strategic Research Initiatives and as Dean of the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Schrader has an extensive record of publications and sponsored research in the systems, control and STEM education fields. She received the 2005 Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and
), 61-69.2. Hartmann, B. L., & Jahren, C. T. (2015). Leadership: Industry Needs for Entry-Level Engineering Positions.Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 13-19.3. Cox, M. F., Cekic, O., & Adams, S. G. (2010). Developing Leadership Skills of Undergraduate EngineeringStudents: Perspectives from Engineering Faculty. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(3-4),22-33.4. Gonzalez, V. Roger. et. al. (2015). Engineering Leadership: A new Engineering Discipline, Paper #26.635.1.ASEE PEER. Seattle, Washington.5. Crumpton-Young, L., McCauley-Bush, P., Rabelo, L., Meza, K., Ferreras, A., Rodriguez, B., & ... Kelarestani, M.(2010). Engineering Leadership Development Programs a Look at What Is Needed and
. (2012). Engineering Professionals’ Expectations of Undergraduate Engineering Students. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 12, 60–70.[5] Farr, J., & Brazil, D. (2009). Leadership Skills Development for Engineers. Engineering Management Journal, 21(1), 3. http://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2009.11431792[6] Hartmann, B., Stephens, C., Jahren, C. (2015). Surveying industry needs for leadership in entry-level engineering positions. American Society for Engineering Education.[7] Male, S. a. (2005). Generic Engineering Competencies : A Review and Modelling Approach. Education Research and Perspectives, 37(1), 25–51.[8] Nair, C. S., Patil, A., & Mertova, P. (2009). Re-engineering graduate skills – a case
leadership and teamwork,either (a) that maybe the students thought they were better at these skills than they turned out tobe when forced to take on specific leadership and team member roles, or (b) that the studentsactually got worse in these roles as a result of one semester of college and this particular class.The authors would like to believe that the former is most likely.Looking at specific questions in Table 2, the individual values question with the most significantchange was “Change is a smooth and easy process for me.” At the end of the semester, studentsrated themselves lower on this question than at the beginning. Student self-ratings alsosignificantly decreased for the interpersonal values questions “I can acknowledge when I amwrong and
Paper ID #17388Developing the Global Engineering Leader at a Leading Engineering Institu-tion in the SoutheastDr. Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy’s research, teaching and professional activities focus on civil infras- tructure decision making to promote sustainable development. She studies complex real-world systems and develops infrastructure decision support systems to promote sustainable development. Kennedy earned a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (Structures) from Stanford University in 1994, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering (Transportation
Paper ID #15521Achieving Excellence in Master of Engineering Education: A Case Study ofNational University of Defense Technology’s PracticeProf. Fu zhongli, National University of Defense Technology FU,zhongli is deputy director of the Center for National Security and Strategic Studies, National Univer- sity of Defense Technology (NUDT).In this role, he manages NUDT’s continuing education reform and leads excellent engineer training research projects. He has conducted research on engineering education as a visiting scholar in Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in 2013. His research interests are in engineering
Paper ID #17467Leadership, Entrepreneurship, Management, Policy: Intersections or Sepa-rate Domains?Dr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is particularly interested in the role of liberal education in developing engineering leaders. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
Paper ID #15081Integrating a Capstone Leadership Project and the S-Triangle Pedagogy toGuide Engineering Leadership Development EducationDr. David Bayless, Ohio University Dr. Bayless is the Gerald Loehr Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of Ohio Uni- versity’s Coal Research Center, part of Ohio University’s Center of Excellence in Energy and the Envi- ronment. He is also the director of the Robe Leadership Institute and director of the Center for Algal Engineering Research and Commercialization (an Ohio Third Frontier Wright Project) He is engaged in the development of energy and environmental
Exploratory Study of Factors Affecting Undergraduate Employability. Education + Training, 55(7), 681–704. http://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2012- 0077[5] Jackling, B., & De Lange, P. (2009). Do Accounting Graduates’ Skills Meet The Expectations of Employers? A Matter of Convergence or Divergence. Accounting Education, 18(4-5), 369–385. http://doi.org/10.1080/09639280902719341[6] Kelley, C. a., & Gaedeke, R. M. (1990). Student and Employer Evaluation of Hiring Criteria for Entry-Level Marketing Positions. Journal of Marketing Education, 12(3), 64–71. http://doi.org/10.1177/027347539001200309[7] Wellman, N. (2010). The employability attributes required of new marketing graduates. Marketing Intelligence
quantitative methodologies to study group processes: An illustrative study of a corporate board of directors. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 5-36.6. Conger, J. A. (1998). Qualitative research as the cornerstone methodology for understanding leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 9, 107-121.7. McCall, M. W., & Bobko, P. (1990). Research methods in the service of discovery. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 381-418). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.8. Corley, E. A., Boardman, P. C., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies. Research
section, taught by an academicresearcher with experience in engineering leadership education (Instructor B), was recentlyadded. Although the instructors collaborate, their pedagogical approaches and some of thecontent in their respective sections differ. The creation of a new version of the course providedan opportunity to conduct a comparative assessment of the course’s influence on students’understanding of leadership.PurposeThe purpose of this study was two-fold: 1. To evaluate the effects of an engineering leadership course on students’ perceptions of leadership, as measured by the Leadership Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (LABS- III),1 and 2. To compare the two instructors’ sections, with the goal of identifying
is a 1993 West Point graduate. He retired from 20 years of active duty as an Air Force Bioenvironmental Engineer officer engaged in industrial hygiene, environmental health, and emergency response. His final assignment was leading a Flight of 44 military and civilian professionals to protect the occupational and environmental health of a depot base population of over 25,000 people. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Values-Congruent vs. Values-Artifact Leadership: How are they Different?AbstractWith leadership being the topic of many conference presentations, we see more and moreinstitutions saying they are ‘values-driven.’ They have signs
. 5 We adopted categories used by the National Survey of Student Engagement to define our ethno-‐cultural identity variable. 6The blue box in one of the activity types is for the review process only. We have temporarily removed the name ofour leadership program. 8 F IGURE 1 : P ARTICIPATION R ATES B Y A CTIVITY T YPE 7 40.0 35.0 % of sample 30.0
on life support, whether patient is able to walk, and the patient ID number) (see Appendix B for example of patient records), • emergency supply box which was hidden somewhere in the room and contained some water, a flashlight and batteries.Participants used a Windows messaging app Lync to communicate with the CentralCommunications Center C3 (managed by ROTC cadets). Participants were able to direct theirmovement and activities of staff and patients by contacting the C3. If they wanted to dosomething with the patient (evacuate, move to different area of hospital, provide treatment, etc.),participants had to study their patient records, and then read off the patient ID number andprovide C3 with specific instructions on what
Paper ID #17141Impact of an Extracurricular Activity Funding Program in Engineering Ed-ucationMs. Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary Emily Marasco is a Ph.D. student at the University of Calgary. Her research focuses on creativity and cross-disciplinary curriculum development for engineering students as well as for K-12 and community outreach programs.Robyn Paul, University of Calgary Robyn is a Master’s student researching engineering leadership education at the University of Calgary. She graduated from Manufacturing Engineering in 2011 and worked in industry for a few years before returning to school.Ms
Paper ID #15201Charting the Landscape of Engineering Leadership Education in North Amer-ican UniversitiesMr. Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is a Leadership Programming Consultant with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto where he develops leadership programs and industry partnerships for engineers. His research interests include engineering leadership, organizational culture, and higher education. Mike has a Graduate Diploma in Social Innovation from the University of Waterloo and a BASc in
Paper ID #14911Engineering Leadership: Faculty Perceptions and ProfilesDr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University Dr. William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engineering from Montana State University (MSU). He is an Assistant Professor in Industrial and Man- agement Systems Engineering at MSU with research interests in engineering education and the role of leadership and culture in process improvement and serves as an Associate Editor for both the Engineer