top three criteria when choosing a place to publish your scholarly work? o #1 ________________________________________________ o #2 ________________________________________________ o #3 ________________________________________________5 When starting as a graduate student or new faculty member, how were you advised about publishingchoices? How do you advise undergraduate or graduate students on publishing scholarly outputs?6 When considering dissemination of scholarly activity, have you considered other options outside oftraditional publishing formats?7 Do you think publishing choices change over an academic career? If so, how?8 Do you think that promotion and tenure guidelines relate to scholarly publishing? o Yes o
appropriateness of students’ selected information sources tothe question they have chosen to research, specific to their majors.The actual incorporation of the information into the students’ own rhetorical purposes,synthesizing disparate information sources as they write the analytical report, can also beobserved qualitatively. One new assignment feature this year asked students to log their visits tovarious databases, describe which were useful, and track the keywords they employed. Librarianand faculty partnerships will next year consider appropriate means for documenting indicators ofinformation fluency through bibliographic examination.For an example of graduate-level assessment, the University of X Librarians, in a graduatechemistry course
Paper ID #26918Quick Understanding Our Engineering Faculty Research Needs Using TopicModelingMs. Qianjin Zhang, University of Iowa Qianjin (Marina) Zhang is the Engineering & Informatics Librarian at the Lichtenberger Engineering Library, The University of Iowa. As a subject librarian, she manages collection and provides instruction, reference and consultation services for the engineering faculty and students. Her work also focuses on data management education and outreach to engineering students through presenting Data Management topic to an Engineering Ethics course and library workshops. She holds a MA in
. This more personalized approach with an emphasis on students' individualresearch topic is considered to be better suited for graduate students [10].Until Winter 2014, the professor taught the critical analysis of a scientific paper. In Fall 2014, atthe professor's request, this part was transferred to the librarians, who have been in charge of allthe pedagogical contents of the workshop ever since. However, at Polytechnique Montréal, onlya professor can be the coordinator of a credited course or workshop. Thus, the professor remainsin charge of the workshop, but he plays more of an advisory role and intervenes only in the eventof a disagreement or specific problems, such as issues regarding grading.ING6900 continued to be mandatory for
on Schol- arly Communications for faculty, developing a FabLab, and developing a methodology for evaluating the resonance of UT Arlington faculty and graduate students publications. She also chaired the Research Ser- vices Advisory Group (RSAG) which provided advice and made recommendations on policies pertaining to research and reference services to the UT Arlington Libraries Leadership Group. She was also the Engineering Librarian at Clemson University before moving to UT Arlington. Page 26.882.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015If You Build It, Will They
shaping and supportingstudents’ group-learning experiences.6 While faculty practices are important in all group-learningapproaches, they can be particularly important for supporting under-represented students, whooften experience marginalization in such settings. Both faculty and peers can marginalizeindividual students in a variety of ways, including through assignment of work tasks, validationof work tasks, validation of ideas or perspectives, and the nature of the group task itself.First, at the onset of an activity, task assignment biases can often result from unconsciousexpectations about who may be more (or less) suited to certain tasks.7, 8 While each team isdifferent, with a different set of identities and personalities, there is also
skills insummer 2021, and develop pre and post assessments for a more rigorous study on studentsdevelopment of professional skills. We are also working to pilot an additional program with the2021 Summer Undergraduate Research participants to explore how building electronic researchportfolios may reinforce professional development. Lastly, our work with undergraduatesindicates that many graduate students may be entering Masters and PhD programs lacking in avariety of research and professional skills. We are currently working with members of theengineering faculty to transition some of our workshops towards graduate students, with the hopeof designing a multiyear study on the impact of professional skill development on graduatestudent
topInformation school that has been dedicated to training new librarians since 1928. The authorswill present their experience working with student librarians at the engineering library, which onseveral occasions has led to graduate student workers who return for full-time professionalpositions – a testament to the mutual benefits of the relationship.The authors will also discuss the ongoing mentoring of the newest engineering librarians on theirteam. These efforts include invitations to meetings with engineering faculty to facilitatenetworking, involvement in a variety of decision making processes, and careful training for ahost of new responsibilities. The team’s more experienced librarians impart their expertise andact as coach and counsellor
the research process for students unfamiliar with navigating the librarydatabases.Finally, the development and use of the credible source checklist is part of a larger effortbetween MSL and the UWP to encourage writing instructors to integrate topics on libraryresearch into their lesson plans and assignments, which will complement and reinforceinformation sessions led by library faculty. By discussing and modeling effective library researchon a regular basis in the classroom, we hope to emphasize the importance of information literacyin engineering practice and encourage students to embrace effective research skills as an integralcomponent of their future careers. In addition, we hope that these resources will provide lessexperienced UWP
interviews taking place in the years following.For example, it was found that of the original 20 graduate students interviewed, only five weremaster’s degree candidates, which is not representative of the larger population in whichmaster’s students make up over 60% of the engineering and textiles graduate students. Toaddress this, five more master’s students were interviewed in the spring of 2012. An additionalthree PhD students offered to speak to us at that time, so they were interviewed as well. Deeperanalysis of the faculty interviews revealed early-career faculty as users that the library might beable to better support, and so additional interviews of faculty in this category were conducted inthe spring of 2013 to acquire more data from this
-textbooks and the comments about their future use of e-textbooks.Literature ReviewStudents’ perceptions of preferred features in e-books Page 23.1109.2Foote & Rupp-Serrano conducted a study in which they found that graduate students desiredfeatures where they could save a PDF of the e-book, search within the e-books, highlighting, andtaking notes. They also noted that graduate students desired more advanced features such asvideo and data files, and improved graphics7. Brahme & Gabriel conducted a study in which theyfound that 63% of their participants lamented the inability to take notes and highlight in an e-book3.Several studies found
Social Thought and a bachelor’s degree in anthropology from Dickinson College.Dr. Matthew Frenkel, New York University Matthew Frenkel is the engineering librarian at NYU’s Bern Dibner Library, and an adjunct faculty in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon. He is a member of the ASEE Engineering librarian division (ELD). Matthew’s background is in the experimental study of optical whispering gallery sensors, but his current research interests are in how undergraduate and graduate engineering students develop their professional skills.Mr. Mikolaj Wilk, New York University Engineering Reference Associate at Bern Dibner Library c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
probably intheir career. In partnership with the Faculty Innovations in Teaching and Learning Center (FITL),the Dibner Library built an interactive multimedia library online module that was integrated into aportion of the school’s new student orientation that was hosted online in the university LearningManagement System.The process unfolded in multiple stages. It began with the conception of the module in thelibrary and evolved into a partnership with the department of Undergraduate and GraduateAcademics to design and implement it (FITL and First-year Students & Academic Initiatives,which hosted the module, are under this department). The module represents thetransformation of library content and delivery format in an effort to increase the
Yale University, he returned to Pratt to become head of thelibrary’s Applied Science Reference Department. The Pratt was a hybrid library, serving as botha public library for residents of Brooklyn and an academic library for the students and faculty ofthe Pratt Institute, which offered courses in, among other things, engineering, architecture, andlibrary science. Stevens had become a SPEE member in 1908, along with ten other Pratt facultyand staff, probably in anticipation of the 1909 meeting, which was held at Columbia University,the Pratt Institute and the United Engineering Societies Building. Stevens was the firstprofessional librarian to join SPEE.The reaction of Stevens and other SPEE members to the committee’s report was not positive
quickly thanthrough traditional ILL methods. Jong and Nance [7] also explored alternative methods of fillingpatron requests for materials such as direct purchasing, although they found these alternativemethods were not greatly used.Tolppanen and Derr [8] conducted an analysis of ILL activity at Eastern Illinois University,finding that graduate students and faculty submitted the most borrowing requests and 67% ofloans were borrowed only once. Munson and Savage [9] focused on Interlibrary Loan as a meansto provide students with textbooks specifically, finding that students used ILL because textbookswere too expensive but also required for their coursework. Students reported being satisfied withthe ILL service, although the study found that the fill
-semester rush and latch onto a solutionwithout fully exploring existing solutions and competing ideas.Figure 3: Sample reminder slide for all Design I sectionsChallenges in Scheduling the Reinforcement LessonThe most difficult point of consideration, both for interviewed faculty and the research team, isthe placement of the reinforcement lesson within the course schedule. The assignment needs tobe properly placed to help students get maximum benefit. All of the interviewees had an opinionon the timing of the reinforcement lesson. Both control faculty would like to see the lessonplaced approximately halfway through the course, a week or two prior to the subsystems report.This is where the fall 2019 reinforcement pilot was located. According to one
how the assignments fit together in service of theoverarching goals of the program. A handout will be created to provide engineering faculty withan at-a-glance overview of the categories and assignments to help them choose appropriateassignments for their students. See Appendix 5 for the list of assignments grouped by thematiccategory.Future stepsThis project is an ongoing process with several major steps that are either currently underway orwill be soon. As discussed in the previous section, promoting the portfolio to engineering facultyis of the utmost importance. Without faculty endorsement, students will be unlikely to completeany of the IL assignments. Outreach to the key faculty members and program administrators inCOE will be used to
inproviding transformational educational experiences for students, and that it is an excellent way toattract and retain diverse students to STEM disciplines. It is also one of the best places to embedinformation literacy education; PBL is an established method of bringing both disciplinary skillsand lifelong learning skills together in ways that are engaging for students, and in the case ofservice learning, impactful to communities or individual stakeholders.4,5 WPI, as well as otherinstitutions aiming to graduate future engineers across specializations, use student projectoutcomes to support professional as well as technical skills development for a wide variety ofaccreditation standards, including but not limited to those of ABET in the U.S.A
librarian without engineering expertise can successfully navigate a new career with theassistance of the proper tools and support. This paper will delineate the process for gaining botha “common knowledge” vocabulary and an understanding of engineering research specialties. Asin liaison librarianship across the spectrum, building relationships with faculty andadministrators in engineering departments is paramount. The authors will recommend steps andactions to help build and sustain partnerships.The DisciplineThe types of typical assignments that engineering students have in their classes varies bydiscipline and university, potentially adding even more confusion for the new librarian. One ofthe authors has observed that her engineering students
electroniccomponents into a course called Victorian Media Studies. In these cases, the library serves theinteresting role of ‘gap-bridger’, bringing these more engineering-friendly tools into practice inthe humanities.The low barrier to entry of the MaKey MaKey (which is essentially ‘plug-and-play’) combinedwith library support, enabled a Communications faculty member, Nicholas Taylor, to develop aclass assignment using MaKey MaKey in collaboration with a librarian, Brendan O’Connell, forhis Communications and Technology course. Students produced videos in which they builtphysical representations of intellectual concepts from the course using MaKey MaKey. Theyused the MaKey MaKey as an experimental communications medium, learning about both self