Paper ID #6164Development of a materials science course to serve diverse constituenciesDr. Melissa Eblen-Zayas, Carleton College Melissa Eblen-Zayas is an associate professor of physics in the Physics and Astronomy Department at Carleton College in Northfield, MN. She completed her BA in physics from Smith College in Northamp- ton, MA and her PhD in physics at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. She an experimental con- densed matter physicist interested in the electronic and magnetic properties of correlated electron materi- als as well as physics education
AC 2012-3501: CRITERION 2: A DISCUSSION OF ABET PROGRAM ED-UCATIONAL OBJECTIVESDr. Michael De Antonio, New Mexico State University Michael DeAntonio is a College Associate Professor at New Mexico State University. He is Past Chair of the Physics Division of ASEE, and he is currently a member of the Engineering Physics ABET committee at NMSU. Page 25.365.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Criterion 2: A Discussion of ABET Program Educational ObjectivesIntroductionABET has made a change in its definition of Criteria 2: Program Educational Objectives for the2011-2012
Society for Engineering Education, 2014 SAGE off Stage: Teaching Electromagnetics with a Symbolic Computation Tool Yumin Zhang, David K. Probst Department of Physics and Engineering Physics Southeast Missouri State University Cape Girardeau, MO 63701AbstractElectromagnetics is often considered the most challenging undergraduate course for manystudents, and there are several challenges: mathematics, imagination, as well as new conceptsand approaches. Instructors and students alike have trouble in dealing with so many new issuesin a short period of time. Among these challenges
Paper ID #20479Research and Education Enabled by a High Performance Computing Clusterat a Predominantly Undergraduate InstitutionDr. Evan C. Lemley, University of Central Oklahoma Professor Lemley teaches thermo-fluid engineering and works with undergraduates to perform fluid dy- namics research that is mostly focused on small scale flow problems. He is currently an Assistant Dean of Mathematics and Science and a Professor of Engineering and Physics at the University of Central Oklahoma, his home institution for more than fifteen years. Previously, Professor Lemley worked as a mechanical engineer in the power industry. His
Paper ID #8735A New Teaching Approach for Ancient Engineering Physics: Master Physicsvia Mastering Physics! A Study and SurveyDr. Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University 367 Snell Engineering Center College of Engineering 360 Huntington Ave. Boston, MA 02115 ma- hes@coe.neu.edu Page 24.79.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A New Teaching Approach for Ancient Engineering Physics: Master Physics via Mastering Physics! A Study and
. Steyn-Ross and A. Riddell, “Standing waves in a microwave oven,” The Physics Teacher 28, 474 (1990).7. National Institute of Standards and Technology Atomic Spectra Database: http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/asd.cfm8. R. B. Kidd and S. L. Fogg, “A Simple Formula for the Large Angle Pendulum Period,” The Physics Teacher 40,81 (January 2002)9. D. S. Lemons, Perfect Form, Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press (1997)10. C. W. Wong and K. Yasui, “Falling Chain,” American Journal of Physics 74, 490-496 (2006).11. A. S. Green, P. R. Ohmann, N. E. Leininger, and J. A.Kavanaugh, “Polarization Imaging and Insect Vision,” ThePhysics Teacher 48, 17 (January 2010).12. K. J. Braun, C. R. Lytle, J. A.Kavanaugh, J. A.Thielen, andA. S. Green, “A Simple
alloowed while doingthe experiment in thee virtual ph b the expeeriment in tthe end has to be perfoormed hysics lab, butindividuallly. Group discussions area encouraged because tthey stimulaate innovativve thinking. Aftercompletin ng the experriment, a po ost test is conducted c oon the samee topic. Thee time periood forconducting the post teest is 20 minutes. On an n average, sstudents havve 2 minutess for solvingg eachquestion. The levell of difficultty of the pre--test is comp parable to thhat of the posst-test. The qquestions aree almost id dentical but not
AC 2008-2083: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF USING PERSONAL RESPONSESYSTEMS (CLICKERS) IN A CONCEPTUAL PHYSICS COURSEDavid Probst, Southeast Missouri State University David Probst is a Professor in the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics at Southeast Missouri State University who regularly teaches conceptual physics.Margaret Waterman, Southeast Missouri State University Margaret Waterman is a Professor of Biology at Southeast Missouri State University who specializes in science education. Page 13.994.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Preliminary Results of Using
AC 2009-1696: INCORPORATING SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS ANDPROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS INTO A PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING SUMMERCOURSEJennifer Franck, California Institute of Technology Jennifer Franck is a Ph.D. candidate in Mechanical Engineering at the California Institute of Technology studying computational fluid dynamics. She received her M.S. in Aeronautics from Caltech and her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at the University of Virginia. She is a co-director for the outreach program Caltech Classroom Connection, and was a YESS instructor for two years before becoming physics and engineering curriculum coordinator in 2008.Ted Yu, California Institute of Technology Ted Yu is currently a Ph.D
AC 2009-455: SUPPORTING STUDENTS IN PHYS 111: A CRITICAL GATEWAYTO ENGINEERING CAREER PATHSReagan Curtis, West Virginia University Reagan Curtis, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Educational Psychology in the College of Human Resources and Education at West Virginia University.Braxton Lewis, West Virginia University Braxton Lewis is a graduate student in the Industrial Hygiene and Safety Program of the College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University.Wathiq Abdul-Razzaq, West Virginia University Wathiq Abdul-Razzaq, Ph.D., is a Professor of Physics in the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University.Gary Winn, West Virginia University Gary L
Paper ID #18123Using Antenna Modeling Software and an RF Analyzer - A Study for StudentOriented Helical Antenna ProjectsDr. Paul Benjamin Crilly, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Paul Crilly is a Professor of Electrical Engineering at the United States Coast Guard Academy. He re- ceived his Ph.D. from New Mexico State University, his M. S. and B.S. degrees at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, all in Electrical Engineering. He was previously an Associate Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering at the University of Tennessee and was a Development Engineer at the Hewlett Packard Company. His areas of interest include
Paper ID #15311Revisiting the One-Dimensional Elastic Collision of Rigid Bodies on a Fric-tionless Surface Using Singularity FunctionsDr. Aziz S Inan, University of Portland Dr. Aziz Inan is a professor in Electrical Engineering at the University of Portland (Portland, OR), where he has also served as Department Chairman. He received his BSEE degree from San Jose State Uni- versity in 1979 and MS and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Stanford University in 1980 and 1983 respectively. His research interests are electromagnetic wave propagation in conducting and inhomogeneous media. He is a member of Tau Beta Pi
Paper ID #15634Physics Jam, a Physics Preparation Program to Increase Student Performanceand Success in Introductory Physics Courses ˜Dr. Courtney Hadsell, Canada College I graduated with my PhD in Physics from The University of North Carolina in 2013. I am currently a physics instructor and physics program services coordinator at Ca˜nada College. I have a deep passion in promoting understanding and success for physics students thought pre-semester and continuing academic support. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Physics Jam, a Physics Preparation
Paper ID #12758RESISTANCE IS FUTILE: A NEW COLLABORATIVE LABORATORYGAME BASED LAB TO TEACH BASIC CIRCUIT CONCEPTSDr. James G. O’Brien, Wentworth Institute of Technology James G. O’Brien is an associate professor of Physics at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, MA. James is currently pursuing educational pedagogies in engineering education through game-ification of education and the design of competitive table top games which engage students in an exciting atmo- sphere to help facilitate learning of essential physics concepts. Aside from a love of gaming and its role in education, James is also the Vice President
instruments for infrared astronomy. His educational activities include mastery learning, tutorial learning, and the application of online resources and assessment in physics and astronomy courses, both for STEM students and non-majors.Prof. Arie Bodek, Departmente of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Prof. Bodek received his B.S. in Physics (1968) from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and his Ph.D. in Physics (1972) also from MIT. He was a postdoctoral associate at MIT (1972-74) and a Robert E. Millikan Fellow at Caltech (1974-77). Prof. Bodek joined the University as an Assistant Professor of Physics in 1977. He was promoted to Associate Professor in 1980 and to Professor in 1987. Prof. Bodek was
Paper ID #20204A Summer Camp in Engineering Physics for Incoming Freshman to ImproveRetention and Student SuccessDr. Hector A. Ochoa, Stephen F. Austin State University Hector A. Ochoa received his Ph.D. in computer engineering from The University of Texas at El Paso in 2007. He received his M.S. in Physical Sciences from The University of Texas at El Paso in 2004. He joined The University of Texas at Tyler as a visiting professor at the department of electrical engineering on Fall of 2007. In fall of 2008, he started working as an assistant professor at the same university. On the Spring of 2016 he Joined Stephen F
AC 2012-3390: HOW MUCH PHYSICS THE FIRST-YEAR ENGINEER-ING STUDENTS REALLY NEED: A STUDY AND SURVEYDr. Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University Bala Maheswaran, College of Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115. Page 25.701.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 1 How much Physics the First Year Engineering Students really need: A Study and Survey AbstractFreshmen engineering courses are the eye opener for engineering students in
Paper ID #9687Optical filter design, fabrication and characterization; A multifaceted ap-proach to project based curriculumDr. Scott Ryan Kirkpatrick, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Scott Kirkpatrick is an Assistant Professor of Physics and Optical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Insti- tute of Technology. He teaches physics, semiconductor processes, and micro electrical and mechanical systems (MEMS). His research interests include heat engines, magnetron sputtering, and nanomaterial self-assembly. His masters thesis work at the University of Nebraska Lincoln focused on reactive sput- tering process control. His doctoral
AC 2008-2378: PHYSICS FUNDAMENTALS, ENGINEERING DESIGN, ANDRESEARCH: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ATHREE-WEEK SHORTCOURSEWinston Jackson, California Institute of Technology Winston Jackson received his BS in Civil Engineering from Southern University and A&M College and his MS degree in Applied Mechanics at the California Institute of Technology, where he is currently continuing his PhD work. His research is in the area of experimental solid mechanics, and he has been a teaching assistant for a course in solid mechanics as well as the Physics Curriculum Coordinator for the 2007 YESS Program.Jennifer Franck, California Institute of Technology Jennifer Franck is currently a
AC 2010-1185: EXPLORING THE STUDENTS’ ATTITUDE, MOTIVATION ANDSELF-EFFICACY IN PHYSICS LEARNING: A STUDY IN THE UNIVERSITIESOF TECHNOLOGY IN TAIWANChih-Hsiung Ku, National Dong-Hwa University, Taiwan(R.O.C.)Wen-Cheng Chen, National Dong-Hwa University, Taiwan(R.O.C.) Page 15.565.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Exploring the Students’ Attitude, Motivation and Self-efficacy in Physics Learning: A study in the Universities of Technology in TaiwanAbstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the reality of physics curriculum/learning in theuniversities of technology in Taiwan. It should be noticed, university of technology (UT) inTaiwan is
Paper ID #8865Examining the diffusion of research-based instructional strategies using so-cial network analysis: A case study of SCALE-UPMr. Xaver Neumeyer, Western Michigan University Xaver Neumeyer is currently a research associate at Western Michigan University, working on diffusion mechanisms of research-based instructional strategies. In his dissertation work, he examined the effect of team conflicts on students’ perceptions of effective teamwork. He received his Master of Science from the Illinois Institute of Technology. He has worked on research projects related to team learning, the role of team conflict in
Paper ID #8819Laboratory Exercises as an Assessment Tool in an Upper Division Electro-magnetic Fields Class – Lessons LearnedDr. Jeffrey A. Jalkio, University of St. Thomas Jeff Jalkio is currently a physics professor at the University of St. Thomas. Jeff worked for thirteen years in industry in the fields of optical sensor design and process control. In 1984, he co-founded CyberOp- tics Corporation, where he led engineering efforts as Vice President of Research. In 1997 he returned to academia, joining the engineering faculty of the University of St. Thomas and has taught courses in elec- tronics, digital system design
learningBenford and Lawson (2001) conducted a quantitative study to test the hypotheses: a) teacher’scientific reasoning positively relates to an effective use of inquiry-based learning, and b) aneffective implementation of inquiry-based learning fosters the development of scientificreasoning in students. Both hypotheses were accepted, meaning scientific reasoning works as apredictor of an effective implementation of inquiry-based learning and students improve theirscientific reasoning when effectively using inquiry-based learning.Scientific reasoning and problem solvingAguilar et al. (2002) conducted a quantitative study to determine the relationship betweenproblem solving skills and different levels of scientific reasoning. In this study, 78 high
- questionnaires.TABLE 1: Multiple–choice results collected from questionnaires given before theworkshop. The results indicate the percent value for each answer.1. A car is moving along a horizontal highway in astraight line at a constant rate of 25 m/s. Itsacceleration is 47 [A][A] 9.8 m/s2 0 [B][B] 9.8 m/s. 41 [C] – correct answer[C] zero. 12 [D][D] 25 m/s.2. A ball is thrown straight upward. What is theacceleration of the ball at the highest point?[A] zero 53 [A][B] 9.8 m/s2 , upward 12 [B][C] 9.8 m/s2, downward
y a x3 b x2 c x (30)where a , b , and c are presumed to be positive constants. This particular equation, referred toas the cubic law, is selected because its graph has the following additional properties, beyond theproperty described above, which qualify it to be a suitable approximation for an actual trajectoryof a projectile: 1. The graph has an intercept at the origin (corresponding to the projection point). 2. The graph has a relative maximum (i.e., an apex for the projectile trajectory) at b 2 3a c b x (31
this paper,we argue that there can be a trade-off between emphasizing mathematical sense-making andemphasizing traditional problem-solving, both of which we define more carefully below.Our data come from the first-semester physics course taken by almost all engineering majors atBig University. One section, taught by an experienced, well-regarded professor, emphasized“traditional” quantitative problem solving (Instructor A). Two other sections, one taught by anovice instructor (Instructor B) and the other taught by an instructor experienced with “active-learning” pedagogy (Instructor C), emphasized mathematical sense-making. Our evidence showsthat traditional problem solving and mathematical sense-making do not automatically reinforceeach other
preconception more than students with an alternativepreconception. Meanwhile, students with the alternative preconception are helped more by a secondmode of instruction. Such a situation is illustrated in Figure 1D and will be referred to as a crossover Page 23.1169.2interaction. A. Main Effect of Instruction B. Main Effect of Preconception C. Main Effects of Instruction & D. Crossover Interaction of Preconception Instruction & Preconception Figure 1: Plots showing the possible effects of instruction on differing preconceptions. In
of x, (b) Calculate 𝑍!" at 𝜆! /8 away from the load, (c)Calculate Γ! , (d) Calculate VSWR and (e) Calculate the transmitted power and reflected power as apercentage of incident power 𝑃!"Solution: (a) 𝑍! = 0, 𝑍! = 50 Ω. !! !!! Γ! = = -1 = 𝑒 !!"# => Γ! = 1 50 Ω 𝑍! !! !!! Φ = 180 ! !/! Applying this for 𝑉(𝑥) , we get ( 𝑉(𝑥) = 𝑉! (1 + Γ! )! − 4 𝑠𝑖𝑛! (𝛽𝑥
G 1 ρ G G μ J V ( R) = ∫ 4πε R ' dV ' A( R) = 4π ∫ R ' dV ' G G 1 ρ G G G μ J × Rˆ ' E ( R) = ∫ Rˆ ' 2 dV ' 4π ∫ R '2 4πε R' B( R) = dV
uncertainty in measurement (“GUM”).Students advance through a rotation of experiments that involve topics from mechanics, optics,electronics and quantum optics. The course follows a progressive structure by starting withconceptually simpler experiments designed to show the effects that the design of the experimentcan have on the final result and its uncertainty. These early labs allow students to focus onconcepts including Type A and Type B uncertainties; systematic errors; standard uncertainty andcombined standard uncertainty; coverage factor; and the propagation of uncertainty. Studentsalso begin to track uncertainty with a rudimentary uncertainty budget. For the rest of the course,the experiments become more open-ended and complex, and the