Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Ferrar, Temple University; Dustyn Roberts P.E., Temple University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering- programs-2019-2020/. [Accessed: 31-Jan-2019].[3] “KEEN - The Framework.” [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset- matters/framework.aspx. [Accessed: 31-Jan-2019].[4] A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers, 1st edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2010.[5] S. Blank and B. Dorf, The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company, 1 edition. Pescadero, Calif: K & S Ranch, 2012.

Conference Session

Best Practices in Interdisciplinary Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programs

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Birmingham, Grove City College; Blair Allison, Grove City College; James Dupree, Grove City College

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Engineering Education Annual Conference andExposition.[10] Cockayne, W.R. J. M. Feland III, and L. Leifer, “Teaching the “how” of engineering innovation,” InProceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.† By Entrepreneurial thinking we mean “the process of a) identifying opportunities others do not see, b) assessingthose opportunities – identifying necessary human, financial, and other resources necessary to exploit theopportunity, c) evaluating and managing the inherent risk in the new opportunity and d) persisting in pursuing of theopportunity to realization.” Page 12.681.12

Conference Session

Exploring the Entrepreneurial and Innovation Mindset

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tuuli Maria Utriainen, Aalto University; Ville Taajamaa, University of Turku; Raghu Ram Movva, SAFM - College des Ingenieurs Italia; Joona Kurikka, Aalto University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

formation in a multicultural and interdisciplinarysetting coupled with hands-on doing based on repetitive do-test-learn cycles that areconstantly assessed and communicated by the teaching team.Design, whether as design science or design thinking has been with us for quite some time.Already in the 1950´s B. Fuller, a renowned scientists and inventor described design scienceas: “…the effective application of the principles of science to the conscious design of ourtotal environment in order to help make the Earth’s finite resources meet the needs of allhumanity without disrupting the ecological processes of the planet” Buckminister Fuller [17].There is relevant criticism to be considered as well. The three perspectives, based on Kimbell2011, are that

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Division Poster Sessions

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Stephens, Lawrence Technological University; Mariam Iskandarani, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

industries outside of software? Are thereconnections between types of financing used and the business cycle of the firms? Is there a linkbetween information and business savvy of the entrepreneurs and the type of financing beingused? All of these questions and many more seem to be the next logical step for the study ofbootstrap financing and will be explored as the techniques become better understood and Page 11.1172.5recognized by researchers. Bibliography1. Carter, Richard B. “Bootstrap Financing and Owner’s Perceptions of Their Business Constraints and Opportunities.” Entrepreneurship and Regional

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Vincent Huerta, Arizona State University; Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University; Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University; Marvyn Arévalo Avalos, Arizona State University ; Wen Huang, Arizona State University; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

eleven of ABET’s studentoutcomes (i.e., B and C) (“Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs,” 2017). Thus, ininformal, formal, and policy levels, there seems to be a shared understanding of the importanceof engineering design. While design is here to stay, emerging trends permeate the engineering educationecosystem. One of the trends that has gained a lot of traction over the years is the increasedemphasis on entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurial mindset. There are many indicators of itsincreasing prominence. The opportunity for engineering students to obtain entrepreneurship-related credentials (via minors, certificate programs, etc.) through their engineering programs is arelatively new phenomenon (e.g., at University of

Conference Session

Institutionalizing Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claude Lague P.Eng., University of Ottawa; Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa; Richard Jean L'Abbé

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

were put in place starting in 2015: Engineer/Entrepreneur/Executive-in-Residence (E3iR – description of the position in Appendix B): A part-time professional appointment currently held by Mr. Trevor Wilkins. One (1) new regular faculty position in the area of technological entrepreneurship currently held by Dr. David Knox. One (1) new regular faculty position in the area of engineering design currently held by Dr. Patrick Dumond.2.3 Brunsfield Group Engineering Student Projects and Entrepreneurship Centre (the Brunsfield Centre)In 2010, a $250,000 ($50,000 per year during five (5) years) donation by another uOttawaEngineering Alumnus and recipient of a University of Ottawa Honorary Doctorate and by thecompany that he leads, the

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; David Reeping, Ohio Northern University; Heather Sapp, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

performance under a particular criterion is found to be either above or below thestated standards, then the blank space in the appropriate cell is used to provide either typed orhandwritten feedback specific to what has been observed. Additionally, the single point rubrichelps to underline the concept that meeting the expected performance is not equal to a grade of‘A’; instead, a 5-4-3-0 weighting factor is employed, thereby placing a display of consistentproficiency at the cusp of the ‘B’-‘C’ boundary of 80%, a value empirically derived from thetypical scores observed to be assigned to the average term project.With respect to creating value through the example behavior of persisting through and learningfrom failure, the clients reviewed the post

Conference Session

Entrepreneurial Leadership and Non-traditional Ways to Engage Students in Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Coyle, Purdue University; Nancy Clement, Purdue University; Joy Krueger, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

computer and sensor networks, signal and image processing, and engineering education. He was a co-recipient of both the Myril B. Reed Best Paper Award from the 32nd Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems and the 1986 Best Paper Award for Authors under 30 from the Signal Processing Society of the IEEE. He has served as an associate editor of the IEEE Transactions on Circuits and systems and was an elected member of the Board of Governors of the IEEE Circuits and Systems Society. He was the general chair of the 1997 IEEE/EURASIP Workshop on Non linear Signal and Image Processing. Dr. Coyle is a Fellow of the IEEE and in 1998 was named an Outstanding Engineering Alumnus

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Teaching Methods and Assessment

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

R. Radharamanan, Mercer University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Styrene (ABS) was assembled and made operational. It converts a 3D model to ausable physical object. Alterations such as reducing idler wheel thickness, using a higher gradematerial for the insulation between the heater barrel and the rest of the extruder, and fabricating aremovable heat source were made to the machine to ease maintenance and improve reliability. (a) (b) Figure 1. Tabletop CNC lathe: (a) Retrofitted and functional; (b) Artifact made [22]The MakerBot consists of a wooden frame, a build platform with X and Y pulleys for movement,and a Z platform on which the extruder sits. The extruder, and the X, Y, and Z stepper motors allhave a circuit board which is connected to

Conference Session

Assessing Entrepreneurship Programs

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Akash Choudhary, University of Missouri; Donald Myers, University of Missouri; Halvard Nystrom, University of Missouri; Mihir Gokhale, University of Missouri

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

) (B) (A/B) 1980-1986 61 149 40.94% 1987-1992 18 39* 46.15% 1993-1998 50 120 41.67% 1999-2004 105 236 44.49% Total 234 544 43.01%*- The course was not offered in any semester for academic years 1988-89 and 1989-90. Table 2. Survey Respondents by Time Period when they graduated Percent Percent of

Conference Session

National and Multi-university Initiatives

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Owe G. Petersen, Milwaukee School of Engineering; William M. Jordan, Baylor University; R. Radharamanan, Mercer University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

this case they must also do more than meet the normal expectations perthe ABET outcome. The KEEN outcomes also must be met.Overlapping MissionsThe ABET Student Outcomes are defined as [1]: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of

Conference Session

Opportunities for Entrepreneurship Programs

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi Neck, Babson College; John Bourne, Olin College; Stephen Schiffman, Olin College

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

engineers of tomorrow.References1 Cohen, A., “Transformational Change at Babson College: Notes From the Firing Line,” Academy of ManagementLearning & Education, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 155-180, 2003.2 Barefoot, B., “Babson College Strategic Plan 2003 Summary,” Babson Park, MAhttp://www3.babson.edu/Offices/President/StrategicPlan/default.cfm, 20033 Bourne, J., R., Schiffman, S., Berbeco, H., Rao, A., Marram, E., Overlan, L., Wientraub, J., Frey, D., and Crisman,J., “Building an Integrated Technology Entrepreneurship Curriculum at Olin College: Design of the First TwoYears. Paper Presentation ASEE Annual Convention, Nashville, TN, June, 2003.4 Olin College of Engineering, see http://www.olin.edu/about_olin/overview.asp5 ABET, Criteria for

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Epicenter Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria Matthew, VentureWell; Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group; Ari Turrentine, VentureWell; Angela Shartrand, VentureWell; Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

quantitative and qualitative data is that neither issufficient on its own to capture the information necessary to answer the research questions.A brief online survey was created to gather data about both research questions 1 and 2. Thesurvey questions were designed to capture entrepreneurially focused Capstone practicesidentified by Shartrand and Weilerstein (see Appendix B).6 The survey also drew from the“importance” versus “practice” framework used in the National Survey of Engineering FacultyCommittees, Department Chairs, and Deans described in ASEE’s Innovation with Impactreport.24Participants were contacted by email. The email invitation included a brief description of thestudy and served as the consent form. Participants who agreed to

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University; Mary Fraley, Michigan Technological University; Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

- neering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Ms. Mary Fraley, Michigan Technological University Mary Fraley is a Sr. Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include online/blended learning methods, entrepreneurial mindset, and applying LEAN to the process of teaching and learning.Ms. Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University Ms. Kemppainen is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals. Her research inter- ests include the improvement of STEM education, mental toughness, growth mindset, and online/blended learning methods. c American Society for

Conference Session

Leadership, Design, and Entrepreneurship

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahad Ali, Lawrence Technological University; Donald M. Reimer, Lawrence Technological University; Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

creating entrepreneurial organizations and entrepreneurial thinking.However, strong leadership skills may not necessarily result in venture creation. Leadershipskills are a key ingredient in building the entrepreneurial mindset. 50% School A School B School C School D 45% 40% 35% Response % 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1 2 3 4 5

Conference Session

Classes in Entrepreneurship

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nihad Dukhan PhD, University of Detroit Mercy; Nassif E Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

the KernEntrepreneurship Education Network.Bibliography1. Palmer, B., Terenzini, P., McKenna, A., et al., “Design Context: Where do the Engineers of 2020 Learn ThisSkill?” Proceeding, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26-29, 2011.2. ____The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET): www.abet.org, acceded June 30, 2012.3. Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M. and McGoury, J., “The ABET “Professional Skills”- Can They Be Taught?Can They Be Assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 4, January 2005, pp. 41-55.4. ____The National Academy of Engineering, “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the NewCentury,” National Academic P, Washington D.C., 2004.5. ____ News and Notes

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Aadityasinh Rana, University of New Haven

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

the x-axis is an identifier with thefollowing structure:  A B, M or D is used as the first letter to denote programs that offer baccalaureates, master’s or doctorates as the highest degree.  The two digits following the first letter is a numeric code assigned to each institution.  The two digits and optional letter between the two dashes is a code assigned to the instructor. If the same instructor deployed a module in multiple sections or courses, then the letter code “a”, “b”, … is used to denote the different sections/courses”.  The letters at the end denotes the e-learning module (e.g., TC = Thinking Creatively). In addition to the ratings assigned to student performance, the magnitude of the EML

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #23135Critical Incidents in Engineering Students’ Development of More Compre-hensive Ways of Experiencing InnovationDr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University Nicholas D. Fila is a postdoctoral research associate in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Industrial Design at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, design thinking, and instructional design

Conference Session

Faculty Development

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kirsten S Hochstedt, Pennsylvania State University, University Park ; Elizabeth C. Kisenwether, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Page 25.631.7of entrepreneurship (a) define the entrepreneurial mindset, or the characteristics necessary to bean entrepreneur; (b) if they believe that the entrepreneurial mindset is innate, can be developed,or both; (c) and if there is a relationship between faculty beliefs and entrepreneurial teachingmethods. Specifically, the purpose of the survey was to collect information to determine howvariation in faculty entrepreneurial beliefs may influence their respective pedagogy. The initialsurvey was constructed based on a qualitative analysis of interview data garnered fromentrepreneurial faculty during of this study.23 Expert feedback from an advisory board, and fromother faculty members who teach entrepreneurship, was used to refine the

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Research Technical Session 7

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Wendy C. Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Eden Fisher, Carnegie Mellon University; Paula Gangopadhyay, The Henry Ford (museums); James Edwin Cawthorne Jr., Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sridhar S. Condoor, Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology, Saint Louis University; Edward J. Coyle, Georgia Institute of Technology; Donald Wroblewski P.E., University of California, Berkeley; Cornelia Huellstrunk, Princeton University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

), while others were sublimated in papers aboutinnovation (I).In summary the articles referenced in Table 6 discussed the definition of entrepreneurship (ED),the existence of various stages of entrepreneurship (ES), and students’ experiences in variousentrepreneurship programs (EP). Almost all papers resulted in a discussion of the characteristics,or competencies, associated in developing innovative behaviors (B), skills (S), knowledge (K),and/or motivations (M) in engineers.Findings from the Georgia Tech focus group discussionsAs a result of the preparation, discussions and debates at the Georgia Tech focus group meetingseveral outcomes were obtained. First, the stages of innovative engineering were defined and areshown in Table 7. Second

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado - Denver; Heather Underwood, Inworks; John K. Bennett, Inworks; University of Colorado - Denver

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Hyperloop Competition, and a topic-focused campus/off-campus groupfocused on the emerging area of “DYI Bio.”1. Duncan, A. Educating Every Student for College and Career Success. (2013). at 2. Obama, B. State of the Union 2016. (2016). at 3. Radcliffe, D. F. Innovation as a Meta-Attribute for Graduate Engineers. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 21, 194–199 (2005).4. Committee on the Engineer of 2020. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. (The National Academies Press, 2005). doi:10.1115/ESDA2008-593245. Members of the National Academies. Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5. (The National Academies Press, 2005). doi:10.5810/kentucky

Conference Session

Student Entrepreneurial Skills and Mindset I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Reid, Ohio Northern University; Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Page 22.622.7Discussion and Future Plans:The question of any effect of the entrepreneurial interventions remains: did the interventionsthemselves have an effect on the changes in fixed or growth mindset of first-year engineeringstudents?To investigate this, two comparison populations are participating in the survey at the beginningand end of the academic year. The two populations will serve as control groups, in that they willnot receive an intentional entrepreneurial intervention in their first year of study. All freshmenengineers in comparison samples A and B will be sampled with the validated Dweck mindsetinstrument at the beginning and end of their freshmen year.The first comparison sample, school A, is a college in the upper Northeast

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University; John M. Santiago Jr., Freedom Institute of Technology; Pamela Allison Phillips, Colorado Technical University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

skills.References[1] J. M. Santiago and J. Guo, "Online Delivery of Electrical Engineering Courses Using the Online Flipped Classroom Approach," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OHIO, 2017.[2] K. M. S.-L. J. R. Y. Andrea L. Welker, "Weaving Entrepreneurially Minded Learning Throughout a Civil Engineering Curriculum," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[3] S. E. Zappe, R. M. Leicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger and H. W. Lee, "flipping" the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2009.[4] B. Kerr, "The flipped classroom in engineering eductation: A survey of research," in Internation Conerence on

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Evaluating Student Behaviors and Attitudes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd M. Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Genisson Silva Coutinho, Purdue University, West Lafayette; M. D. Wilson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Stephen R Hoffmann, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #11693Development of Entrepreneurial Attitudes Assessment Instrument for Fresh-man StudentsMr. Todd Mathew Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette Todd is a PhD Student in Engineering Education at Purdue University who’s research is focused on en- trepreneurship education and entrepreneurship education as a component of modern engineering educa- tion efforts.Prof. Genisson Silva Coutinho, Purdue University, West Lafayette Genisson Silva Coutinho is a Ph.D. student at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is a CAPES grantee and also professor in the Department of Mechanical and

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven; Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

; Exposition, Salt Lake City,Utah, June 2018.[8]. C. Q. Li, R. S. Harichandran, N. O. Erdil, M. Carnasciali, and J. Nocito-Gobel, “Assessingthe Growth in Entrepreneurial Mind-set Acquired through Curricular and Extra-curricularComponents,” in Proceedings of 126th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida,June 2019.[9]. S. R. Brunhaver, J. M. Bekki, A. R. Carberry, J. S. London, and A. F. McKenna,“Development of the Engineering Student Entrepreneurial Mindset Assessment (ESEMA),”Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 1, p. n1, 2018.[10]. W. J. Schell, A. Kwapisz, K. Aytes, S. E. Bryant, B. J. LaMeres, and E. B. Varnes, “UsingEntrepreneurial Mindset Constructs to Compare Engineering Students and Entrepreneurs,” inProceedings of

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Evaluating Student Behaviors and Attitudes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Philip Reid Brown, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Shannon M. Sipes, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #12796Assessment of the Rose-Hulman Leadership AcademyMr. Philip Reid Brown, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Philip Brown is a PhD candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, and was part of the Rising Engineering Education Faculty Fellowship program at Rose-Hulman in the Fall of 2014.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assess- ment & Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Assessment Tools and Practices

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laine E. Rumreich, Ohio State University; Faith Logan, Ohio State University; Zachary Dix, Ohio State University; Nicholas Rees Sattele, Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

://keenwarehouseprod.blob.core.windows.net/keen- downloads/KEEN_Framework_spread.pdf.5. J. B. Hylton, D. Mikesell, J.-D. Yoder, and H. Leblanc, “Working to Instill the Entrepreneurial Mindset Across the Curriculum,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–106, 2019.6. N. Sattele, K.M. Kecskemety, and K.A. Parris, “Analysis of the Entrepreneurial Mindset Elements in Established First-year Engineering Labs: Analysis Process and Lessons Learned and Changes for the Future,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.7. M.T. Azim and A.H. Al-Kahtani, “Entrepreneurship Education, and Training: A Survey of Literature” Life Science Journal, vol. 11, no. 1s, 2014.8. A. R. Peterfreund, E. Costache, H. L. Chen, S. K

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Simon Jakob Barth, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Not URM 483 86.4 % FGC FGC 79 14.1 % status Not FGC 476 85.2 % Total 559 100 %4.2 Industry and business unit-where are they working?Our data allow us to say a few things about where these early-career graduates are working,which gives a hint on the future development of the engineering workforce. These findingsalso complement data on the overall engineering workforce presented in the report onUnderstanding the Educational and Career Pathways of Engineers by the National Academyof Engineering [1]. a) b)Figure

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, no. 4, pp. 357–366, 2014.[5] S. Sheppard et al., “Exploring what we don’t know about entrepreneurship education for engineers,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., 2015.[6] J. A. Katz, “The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education 1876-1999,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 283– 300, 2003.[7] K. H. Vesper and W. B. Gartner, “Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 403–421, 1997.[8] P. a Gompers, “The Rise and Fall of Venture Capital,” Bus. Econ. Hist., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1–26, 1994.[9] K. Kobe, “Small business GDP: update 2002–2010,” Rep. Small Bus. Adm., 2012.[10] T. Turner and P. Gianiodis, “Entrepreneurship

Conference Session

Student Entrepreneurial Skills and Mindset II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory W. Davis, Kettering University; Craig J. Hoff, Kettering University; William J. Riffe, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

value can bemade. Page 22.845.10References1 Carlson, C., and Wilmot, W. “Innovation: The Five Disciplines for Creating What Customers Want,” CrownBusiness, ISBN 13:978-0-307-33669-9, 2006.2 Thursby, M., Fuller, A., and Thursby, J., “An Integrated Approach to Educating Professionals for Careers inInnovation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 8, No. 3, 389–405, 2009.3 Sager, B., Fernandez, M., and Thursby, M., “Implications of a Multidisciplinary Educational and ResearchEnvironment,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18, pp. 57-69, 2006.4 Kingon, A. I., Thomas, R., Markham, S. K., Aiman-Smith, L., Debo, R.. “An