Conference Session

Successful Outcomes of Student Entrepreneurship

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stuart Kellogg, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

reliable and has both internal and external validity. Thesecond, and more important reason, is that the model lends itself to a more holisticapproach to open ended problem solving, which, in turn should help to promote morecomplex thinking skills.A second objective of the program is increase creative and complex problem solvingskills as measured through gains in cognitive development. The department has had over70 hours of training on the steps for better thinking model. Student work is scored usingthe Steps for Better Thinking Rubric12 and preliminary data suggests that students aregradually making cognitive gains. Baseline data utilizing the Reflections on CurrentIssues16 (RCI) instrument was collected in 2006 as a means of supporting these

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Jane Grigg, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

students are led through a discussion of heuristics and errors from cognitivebiases. They then self-reflect on their own failures in judgement and self-assess factors thatinfluence their behavior. While students seemed to engage with the content more on commentedfavorably about the content in this module being exciting and relevant, the reduction in emphasisof critical thinking theory coupled with the reduced emphasis on the practice of evolution peersanalyses likely reduced the potential learning gains in critical thinking.2017-2018 – This year brought two more modifications: 1) Digital Storytelling was introduced toimprove communication of innovative ideas and 2) the (PREP)ARE modular structure [16] wasintroduced into the online course

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group; Alan R. Peterfreund, SageFox Consulting Group; Leticia C. Britos Cavagnaro, Stanford University; Humera Fasihuddin, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

(Entrepreneurship, Political Science, History) 9% Academic status Undergraduate 83%** Graduate 11% Post-doc/Working/Neither a student nor working 5%* Percentages reflect some rounding error.** Nearly 70% of undergraduate respondents were juniors or seniors.Sponsors are a more diverse group in terms of department and position. Table 4 provides anoverview of the Sponsor demographics. Sponsors oversee 1 to 9 Fellows, but the mean andmedian are both 3. Table 4: Sponsor demographics* n=66 Department Engineering/Computer Science 41% STEM (Not Engineering/Computer Science) 11% Business

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

J. Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University; Kelsey Z. Musa, Saint Louis University; Shannon M. Sipes, Indiana University, Bloomington; Scott A. Sell, Saint Louis University; Michelle B. Sabick, Saint Louis University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

reflection techniques are used. A widely used application of Kolb’s work is to use learningcycles where the students interact with content in both physical and abstract ways, successivelycompleting 1) a concrete experience, 2) reflective observation, 3) abstract conceptualization, and4) active experimentation [9]. One of the most common methods is to use an actual project,where students must produce a final artifact, regardless of whether it takes the form of somethingphysical or virtual. The advantages of physical artifacts are rooted in constructionism, whichsays that physically building something will trigger new thoughts and creativity, creating newknowledge that may otherwise lay dormant and unused [10].Project Significance This project

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

phases or activities; other elements spanned the entire innovation process.In general, learning in this theme extended beyond realization of the importance of thesecomprising elements. Instead, learning came from a place of personal experience, as studentsembraced or internalized an approach or mindset. There were, however, some differences in thedegree to which participants accepted and inhabited these elements. For example, Let go ofselfish innovation was typically an important realization for participants, but one they oftenstruggled to persistently embrace.Table 4. Elements Comprising the Approaches and Mindsets Theme Elements Description Apply critical thinking Critical and reflective thinking are essential at key

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University; Ian Derk, Arizona State University; Stephanie Sowl, Arizona State University; Natalie Nailor

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

cohered assignments include, a weekly reflection assignment that asks students to reflectupon how they have applied what they’ve learned in both classes to their project; a projectplanning assignment; and a final design presentation that addresses both an audience that has thetechnical background and a non-technical audience. There are other various project deliverablesthat are designed to help students work through the design process. For example, in theintroduction to engineering class, students submitted problem definition, project proposal, andfinal report deliverables. In the intercultural communication class, students submitted a culturereport about the community at the beginning of the semester that focuses on the culture’s valuesand rules

Conference Session

Entrepreneurial Leadership and Non-traditional Ways to Engage Students in Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Coyle, Purdue University; Nancy Clement, Purdue University; Joy Krueger, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

higher education, or community service program, and with the community; and (iii) helps foster civic responsibility; and(B) that- (i) is integrated into and enhances the academic curriculum of the students, or the educational components of the community service program in which the participants are enrolled; and (ii) provides structured time for the students or participants to reflect on the service experience.Service Learning thus embodies teaching and learning strategies that integrate communityservice with instruction and reflection to enlighten the learning experience, teach civicresponsibility, and strengthen communities. The National Service Learning Clearinghouse [11]provides a timeline for the development of Service

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Faculty Development

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas E. Allen, Bucknell University; Steven B. Shooter, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

extemporaneous narratives lastingas long as 15 to 20 minutes. A few insights could be gleaned from this initial exercise.First, the diversity in terms of intellectual cultures was clearly reflected in the stylisticapproaches to the assignment. As a result of this diversity, it became obvious that freereign would have to be given to the group, and the organizers could not exercise toomuch control over the timing and flow of discussion. Also, it was clear that such anexercise broke the ice among participants and allowed people to relate to one another.An overall sign of the extent of camaraderie that evolved early on was the fact that by theend of the day, people were referring to the entire collectivity and project using thepronoun “we,” instead of using

Conference Session

New Methods and Tools

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Donald Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University; Melissa Grunow, Lawrence Technological University; Katie Hayes, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

). 2. identify and develop their personal leadership philosophy and approach using written self-reflection and peer assessment. 3. be able to work in teams and use creative problem-solving to develop a project for the purpose of creating positive and sustainable change. 4. be introduced to the concepts of leadership beyond their academic studies (whether professional or personal), including entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship.The primary course topics include: ≠ History of leadership theories ≠ Currently practiced leadership models (e.g., relational, shared, situational, etc.) ≠ Individual responsibility and ethics ≠ Diversity and globalization ≠ Team building, working in groups, and inclusive practices

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University; Ville Mikael Taajamaa, University of Turku; Christopher Andrew Parlier, Stanford University; Mona Eskandari, University of California, Riverside

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

something new; 3) shifting norms of leaders involved in entrepreneurial-minded action; and 4) developing teaching methods with a storytelling focus in engineering and science educa- tion. Founder of the Design Entrepreneuring Studio: Barbara helps teams generate creative environments. Companies that she has worked with renew their commitment to innovation. She also helps students an- swer these questions when she teaches some of these methods to engineering, design, business, medicine, and law students. Her courses use active storytelling and self-reflective observation as one form to help student and industry leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to prototyping

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Entrepreneurship and IP

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Thomas M. Katona, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

onstudents.This paper reflects a study on curricular pedagogical methods used to teach engineering studentsparticipating in entrepreneurial programs and ventures about failure and the research being doneto advance the community’s understanding of how to positively teach students about and throughfailure. We conducted a systematic literature review of student failure in the overlapping contextof engineering education, entrepreneurship, and psychology. The primary research questionbeing explored is: How is failure studied in the engineering entrepreneurship educationliterature? This research question is broken down into several sub-questions: 1) Whattheoretical frameworks are used to study entrepreneurial failure in this literature?, 2) How hasfailure been

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Shelly Gulati, University of the Pacific; Mehdi Khazaeli, University of the Pacific; Jeremy S. Hanlon, University of the Pacific

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

foundationalengineering concepts and EML [9]. In particular, incorporating entrepreneurship and businessconcepts together with a design experience when training lower division engineering studentscan lead to higher retention rates and GPAs [10].Emphasizing the EM concept of curiosity among first year engineering students may be welltimed [11]. Design projects at this stage enable students to explore their creativity and practicetheir engineering skills early in the curriculum [12]. Additionally, reflective practice activitiesrevealed that first year engineering students resonated most with the concept of curiosity whenreflecting on themselves as learners, relating it most frequently as a motivator of their learning,part of their learning identity, and a path to

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Town Hall Meeting: Supporting University Priorities

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martin Grimheden, Royal Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

three phases. First the students focus on the creative design of anairplane based on assorted candy and small office supplies. Secondly, the instructors announcethat the design phase is over and a manufacturing phase starts. The students are now tasked withmanufacturing as many planes as possible, identical to the first prototype while constantly beinginterrupted by process upsets such as loss of raw materials, employee injury etc. The third phaseinvolves reflection and feedback.2. Spelling TestWeaver and Muci-Küchler have reviewed a large amount of literature in the area of creativityexercises and developed a series of exercises proven to be effective in providing distinct teachingpoints that can result in a student’s ability to apply a

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Innovation Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Marquette University; Brooke K. Mayer, Marquette University; Patrick McNamara, Marquette University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

than simply an “obedient engineer”. The framework proposes that theentrepreneurial mindset of students is increased by promoting curiosity, encouragingconnections, and creating value. The results from this work provide insight into the impact andimplications resulting from applying the KEEN framework to the engineering classroom viaonline discussions.Keywords: writing, journals, reflections, assessment, KEEN, curiosity, connections, creatingvalue.1 IntroductionThe entrepreneurial mindset is a “growth-oriented perspective through which individualspromote flexibility, creativity, continuous innovation, and renewal” [1]. While theentrepreneurial mindset can be useful in starting a new company, this mindset is also critical toexisting

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark V. Huerta, Arizona State University; Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

well with their desire to have their studentsthinking about customer needs, making an impact, and reflecting on the consequences of theirwork. Dean A at a primarily undergraduate-focused institution remarked: I think as our engineering students think about how they're going to solve world problems and how they're going to make a difference in the world, how do they do that with an entrepreneurial mindset, and how to think about what does it really mean to create value, how do we do that and what are the things that you think about. It's not about just for the technology but really understanding customer needs, and what is the real need. It's not just about developing a really cool hammer and then not looking

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pritpal Singh, Villanova University; Teresa Genevieve Wojcik, Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

used avariety of methods. First, a survey was developed and sent out to all 96 alumni/ae who had 4graduated from the engineering entrepreneurship minor program over the period 2011 to 2016.There was about a 30% response rate to the survey. The survey questions were similar to theones that had been used in a previous survey to assess how well the program was succeeding ininstilling the entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students. Details of that research effortincluding the questions used in the survey instrument were presented in [1]. The questions usedin the present survey were updated to reflect the KEEN student outcomes [2].Survey data

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chad S. Korach, University of Mount Union; Joshua Gargac, University of Mount Union

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

and out of class. The presentationserves as an elevator or rocket pitch of their idea and is purposely very short for students to learnabout being concise and the importance of selling their design ideas, which may be moreimportant than the design itself. This is also a great exercise for prototyping and creating aworking prototype.Fear of FailureThis activity is part individual exercise and part class collective in nature, where the activecomponent becomes a collaborative reflection. The exercise was adapted from “Fear of Failure”by Yamakawa and Neck [3]. The first part of the exercise involves an individual assessmentwhere students score themselves on nine questions (provided on a handout) designed to evaluatetheir risk tolerance and fear

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne-Marie Jacob Job, Tulane University; Rebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group; Alan R. Peterfreund, SageFox Consulting Group; Donald P. Gaver, Tulane University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Fellows matriculatedthrough the FDA along a path of relatively unstructured discovery, wherein they learned aboutthe agency and the processes and issues associated with product regulatory practices. Likewise,the agency came to realize the value of an exploratory approach to orientation and training that iscurrently under consideration for new FDA analysts.The FDA internship has also proven to be influential to the professional growth of the graduatefellows. They found particular value in their role as “active witnesses” to the agency’s SignalReview Meetings, where they were able to observe, reflect and follow up with professionals onthe decision making process associated with the adverse effects of a medical device. Theseinteractions taught them

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Karl D. Schubert, University of Arkansas; Kristie Neff Moergen, University of Arkansas; Carol S. Gattis, University of Arkansas; Wen-Juo Lo, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the U of A and has served on the industrial engineering faculty since 1991.Dr. WENJUO LO, University of Arkansas Dr. Wen-Juo Lo is an Associate Professor in the Educational Statistics and Research Methodology (ESRM) program at the University of Arkansas. His research interests involve methodological issues related to analyses with a focus on psychometric methods. The recent research agenda concentrates statis- tical methods for the detection of bias in psychological measurement, especially measurement invariance on latent factor models. In addition, he also conducts research to develop effective latent variable model and instrument that reflects the factors of college students

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division New Ideas Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christy L. Bozic, Purdue University; Nathan W. Hartman, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

not encourage creativity or innovation[1]. Innovation can bedefined as a new and valued product, process, or concept that has been introduced to the marketor society[2]. Engineering educators should better prepare students for careers in innovation. Indoing this, they must “undermine their students’ blind commitment to the engineering paradigm”[3] which is centered around the scientific approach to knowledge making. To accomplish thischallenge, the exploration of paradigms such as ones used in the schools of business,communications, and political science is suggested. Incorporating this exploration will allow theengineering and technology student to critically reflect on and debate the beliefs, practices, andvalues of their paradigms and

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Giersch, Broad-based Knowledge; Flora P. McMartin, Broad-based Knowledge, LLC; Elizabeth Nilsen, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA); Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Phil Weilerstein, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA)

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

promising models and practices that could guide thedesign and implementation of the Pathways program, specifically on the topics of facultydevelopment and change in higher education. Since then, Epicenter staff members haveincorporated the recommendations from the literature review into the design of the Pathwaysprogram, which plans to launch in January 2014.This paper reports findings and recommendations from the literature review, synthesizes therecommendations with design decisions, and provides examples of how the decisions have beenrealized in components of the Pathways program. Finally, the conclusion offers reflections on thedesign process from Epicenter staff members as they balance implementing the (sometimesoverwhelming number of

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Abdullah Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus; Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus; Kathleen Marie Hauser P.E., Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus; Marietta R. Scanlon, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

frequently complain about this problem. They claim that the elevator waiting time is too long because the elevator is too slow. How can we reduce the elevator waiting time? Provide a solution.”In the in-person delivery, the instructor referred to these test problems during the workshopsession and asked participants to explain their approaches to the problems. This reflective aspectof the workshop was key to effectively delivering workshop topics while engaging participants.Participants were also asked to reflect on why they could not solve the problems. We should alsonote that only a few participants were able to solve the problems correctly. Afterward, theinstructor pointed out the cognitive biases that made each problem challenging to

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Assessment Tools and Practices

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University; Siddharthsinh Jadeja, Rowan University; Elise Barrella P.E., Wake Forest University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, Serving others, persistence, resilience, Achievement the box thinking, overcoming question, reflection, barriers, persistence, resilience / research, self-authorship, tenacity, question, research, breakdown barriers, Reflection, self-authorship, intentions breakdown-barriers, intentionsStep 5: Adjustment and Final Category ListAll three authors met and discussed each of the categories and concept distributions and madeiterative changes until consensus was reached. In total, we identified 237 distinct concepts in24 categories that help describe EM, including those

Conference Session

Assessing Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Craig G. Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Diane Evans, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, wheregraduates take jobs in finance (10-17%), consulting (7-11%), law (12-17%), and medicine (12-16%), or go on to graduate school (8-9%)3. If our best and brightest inspire to attend eliteschools and upon graduation take jobs, rather than create businesses, one may ask if ourinstructional approach to teaching entrepreneurship is changing mindsets. Upon reflection, wemust ask ourselves, “Does an educational experience infused with entrepreneurship create moreentrepreneurial minded people?”, and more specifically, “How can we assess if a change inmindset is occurring on our campus?”There are two macroscale approaches to conducting research on the subject of entrepreneurship,with one focusing on the impact of entrepreneurship in the economy and how

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

subservience noted from either side. Projects of an altruisticnature like this one have been shown to be heavily valued by females on design teams.18In the early years, the best assessment tool was a 1-page free-form reflection that each studentwrote at semester’s end. Each student also kept a daily log and the group prepared a final reportthat included a particular tables field product manual. Almost all wrote that 1) they learned a lotof new hands-on skills and how to read schematics; 2) they had a different view of those withdisability; 3) they liked working on a real problem and doing so as a team; and 4) a good numbersaid that it was the best class that they took at the university (the last comment makes me wonderwhere the joy resides in other

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michael R. Ladisch, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Soohyun Yi, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

 Effective communication for different audiences (scientific versus business)  Formats for presentations and pitches Success as an entrepreneur is  Oral versus written communication determined in large part to one’s ability to communicate. 14. Leadership  Skillset associated with being an Entrepreneurship requires inspiring the inventor/innovator versus CEO team with vision, energy, and insight to  Identifying and attracting talent achieve a common goal.Grades are based on attendance and class participation, two reflection papers, and a team projectconsisting of a

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Design and Entrepreneurship

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara A. Karanian A., Stanford University; Ateeq Junaid Suria, Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Jonathan Summers

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

that they can use again and again on future projects. She also helps students answer these questions when she teaches some of these methods to engineering, design, business, and law students. Her courses use active storytelling and self-reflective observation as one form to help graduate students and leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to prototyping, to prototyping some more - and to delivery. Barbara likes to paint pictures.Mr. Ateeq Junaid Suria, Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA Ateeq Suria is currently a fifth year Ph.D. candidate in the Mechanical Engineering program at Stanford University located in Stanford, CA. He is

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Freddy Solis, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Joseph Victor Sinfield, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

byproducts, among other types of outcomes [19, 24]. These use-inspiredframeworks can help support evidence-based decision making, address practice-related issues ofhigh concern, stimulate reflective practice, enhance teaching [26] as well as create newdirections in research and practice [19]. It is “serious, disciplined work that seeks to interpret,draw together, and bring insight to bear on original research” and aims to fit one’s own researchand the research of others into larger patterns [18] (p. 19).In this study, the scholarship of integration aims to create a framework that illustrates themindset, processes, and behaviors of the entrepreneur for uses beyond business-centric contexts,and in particular for design and problem-solving purposes

Conference Session

Opportunities for Entrepreneurship Programs

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi Neck, Babson College; John Bourne, Olin College; Stephen Schiffman, Olin College

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Management, the Babson Entrepreneurship Research conference, and the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, and has several refereed publications and book chapters. Dr. Neck is the Faculty Coordinator of REFLECT, a reunion program for alumni of the Price-Babson Symposium for Entrepreneurship Educators and is currently designing a NSF-funded education program to help engineering educators infuse entrepreneurship into schools of engineering. At Babson, she teaches Entrepreneurship & New Venture Creation and the Foundation Management Experience, an introductory course that requires students to create, start, manage and liquidate a business.John Bourne, Olin

Conference Session

Case Studies in Entrepreneurship

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Chingnam Goh, University of Southern Queensland

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

contribution towards effective innovative solutions and practices in SMEs.This research is an exploration and reflection of the innovation experience of a regionalmicro-manufacturer through embedment of the researcher in a specific micro-manufacturing firm as a case-officer from a regional university. The case studyinvolved learning and discovering the obstacles and barriers for innovation, seeking andproposing ways to reduce them, and improving the overall innovation process withinmicro-manufacturers in regional areas. The firm was founded and owned by anindividual based at the regional township located within a 50km radius fromToowoomba in Queensland, Australia. The operation started off as a commercial flowergrowing business focusing on organic and