Paper ID #19683Geographically Distributed Teams in Engineering Design: Best Practices andIssues in Cases of International Teams Working from Different ContinentsDr. Constanza Miranda Mendoza, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile Constanza Miranda holds a PhD in design with a focus in anthropology from North Carolina State Uni- versity. While being a Fulbright grantee, Constanza worked as a visiting researcher at the Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering Department, at Stanford. Today she is an assistant professor at P.Universidad Cat´olica de Chile’s Engineering School. There, she directs the DILAB: the
through Engineering DesignGraduates that can frame problems and use a design-oriented approach with inquiry-based learning are needed in order to adapt to a rapidly changing society. Workforcedemands that students are able to diagnose and identify problems and design working Page 12.505.6solutions for ill-defined problems. The demand is magnified as disciplines merge andproblems become interdisciplinary, such as within the field of biotechnology, thuscreating a need for more inquiry-based learning at the undergraduate level. In order toprepare graduates for the global workforce, it is critical to develop a method to teachstudents creativity and
occasional meetings with the sponsor were important and invited him to attend. At this point we all felt that we could help the world and so we were willing to take therisks involved in this project.Sharing royalties In many universities, graduate students that are sponsored by research projects do notshare royalties obtained from intellectual property. The research work is considered to be “partof what they are paid for”. In this project, I took a different approach: I decided to share a portionof my potential royalties with the students, since I felt that this teaming and appreciationapproach was a better one. Indeed, it has made the students very thankful and more ambitious tomake things happen.About the design While learning
base and insightfulquestions.”6Liberal ArtsThe Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology’s [ABET] 2000 Criteria have a veryclear set of expectations for engineering degree programs related to the integration of technicaland non-technical disciplines. For employers, a drawback of the engineering graduate is a lack ofbreadth in terms of their ability to communicate, both verbally and in writing. In addition,graduates are lacking in background knowledge relating to public policy and political sciencesissues. Goldberg’s research states that current engineering curricula are not designed to providethe kind of breadth that is necessary to apply engineering concepts of design and analysis in non-traditional settings, and that breadth is
thecompetitive position of the School for applied research opportunities in the current environmentfor research and development; helps promote the general economic development of the region;expedites and simplifies the acquisition and utilization of research contracts; improvestechnology transfer; and links applied scientific research and technological advancements togrowth in the industries that employ graduates of the School.Examples:SET and its Center enhance Institutional Outreach through ongoing efforts to connect its mostcreative ideas and share its best practices with the industries it serves, the professional societies itsupports, the competitions it enters, and the region it respects in an engaging partnership formutual improvement. There have
campus and be of financial benefit to the offering institutions.In the context of these guiding principles, considerable effort was spent developing the strategicgoals and objectives for the academic programs offered at RELLIS. Following is a statement ofeach of the strategic goals for academics at RELLIS. Goal 1–State of the Art Campus: Develop a state-of -the-art campus supporting the collaborative mission of the RELLIS Initiative. The RELLIS Campus is envisaged to be a premier high-tech, high-impact innovative research and education campus integrating smart campus and state-of-the-art technologies, practices, and processes to effectively and efficiently manage shared campus resources and assets, and to
systems development and central computing support with a staff of 125. Page 12.1429.1 Jacqueline earned her BA from University of California at Santa Barbara in German Literature, and her MA and PhD from Yale University in German Literature. She is a Fellow of the National Academy of Public Administration.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007Kristen Waters, University of Maryland As a research assistant for the University of Maryland's Office of Executive Programs (OEP), Kristen Waters co-authored an economic impact analysis of changes to Maryland's historic tax credit
environmental impact – A study was conducted that applied oursprinkling algorithm to historical data to estimate the percentage of water that would have beensaved using our system. Dealing with water restrictions – Many municipalities restrict days and times thatsprinkling can occur. We needed to research how strictly these are enforced and if anyaccommodations could be made with governmental agencies. Addressing reliability issues – Beyond the prototyping stage of the project, we needed tocontinually test our system for reliability, since this is a major consideration when going tomarket. Understanding that “time is money” – Whenever possible, we have tried to use the“official” university channels to purchase necessary equipment
the design process. Design increasinglyincludes the voice of the customer, financial considerations and production and supplychain issues. The role of the engineer in the cross functional teams that do new productand process development is greatly facilitated when that engineer understands the overallpicture from idea conception to an adequate number of satisfied customers.There are also other practical incentives for the engineer’s bag of tools to includeentrepreneurial skills. Employment in Fortune 500 companies has been going down fordecades, and engineers are increasingly finding themselves in small and medium sizedenterprises. Most new jobs have been occurring in small and medium sized companies,especially those that are young and
AC 2011-740: CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION: A COMPARATIVE ANAL-YSIS OF DEFINITIONS AND ASSESSMENT MEASURESGeoff Wright, Brigham Young UniversityTyler Lewis, Brigham Young UniversityPaul Skaggs, Brigham Young University Paul Skaggs is an associate professor and program chair of industrial design at Brigham Young University. He joined the faculty at BYU after twenty-two years experience in industry. Fourteen years of which he operated his own full-service design consulting firm. Clients included Kodak, Fisher-Price, Federal Ex- press, Motorola, AT&T, Xerox and Hewlett-Packard, to name a few. Paul also taught conducted creativity seminars for in house engineering groups. Paul received his BFA from Brigham Young University
higher education. She has designed, developed and managed degree, and certificate programs, and has experience as an online instructor, and mentor and trainer of other online instructors.Dr. Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group Thema Monroe-White is a senior evaluation and research consultant at SageFox Consulting Group. Prior to joining SageFox, Thema worked as a researcher and evaluator in the areas of mental health, STEM education and commercialization. She has taught in the K-12 environment, served as an instructor and invited guest lecturer for courses in leadership, statistics and cross-cultural psychology at the undergradu- ate and graduate levels. Thema completed her Master’s Degree in Developmental
have strongentrepreneurial interests. These students want to develop their design projects into commercialproducts. One venue for commercializing design at our institution, Grove City College (GCC), isthe annual on-campus business plan competition. For the last four years, business andentrepreneurship students often partner in writing a business plan. Students received writtenfeedback from practicing technology entrepreneurs on their plans. That students report thecompetition as a favorable experience fostered the idea for what we called the High TechVenture Start-up course.The business plan competition, however, lacked several essential elements to be a fullyintegrated and maximally valuable educational experience. As important as business
employees for a new project or ventureConvince a customer or client to try a new product for the first timeConvert a useful scientific advance into a practical applicationDevelop your own original hypothesis and a research plan to test itGrasp the concept and limits of a technology well enough to see the best ways to use itDesign and build something new that performs very close to your design specifications
instructional practices. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.9. Calkins, S. & Harris, M. (2017). Promoting critical reflection: An evaluation of the longer-term impact of a substantial faculty development program. The Journal of Faculty Development. 31(2): 29-36.10. Clayton, P. & Ash, S. (2005). Reflection as a key component in faculty development. On the Horizon. 13(3): 161-169.11. Gorlewicz, J. L. & Jayaram, S. (2019). Instilling Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value in Entrepreneurial Minded Engineering: Concepts for a Course Sequence in Dynamics and Controls. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy. 3(1), 60-85.12. Oswald Beiler, M. R. (2015
”Intellectual Property Law for Engineers and Scientists,” IEEE and John Wiley & Sons, Publishers (2004) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Online Course on Intellectual Property for Undergraduates and Graduate Engineers and ScientistsIntroduction It can be said with a very high degree of confidence that all of the engineers and scientistsin our technology University classrooms at some point in their professional careers, will comeinto direct contact with the Intellectual Property Laws of this or other countries, and these lawswill have an impact on their extant projects. Whether using these Intellectual Property Laws toobtain exclusive rights covering their
engineering graduateprograms. The course is now being promoted in two departments as a valid substitution for onetechnical content course in their M.S. curricula, and the College of Engineering has requestedthat the course be modified and recorded for use in its distance education M.S. Engineering andM.S. Operations Management graduate programs. Unfortunately, interest in the course by thescience graduate programs’ administrations has not yet appeared.The impact of the course in µEP students has been difficult to quantify, but anecdotal evidencefrom µEP alumni provide illustrative examples of how the course content has affected theirprofessional decisions: • One Ph.D. student started his own company based on his Ph.D. research upon
’ self-confidence. Infact, without self-confidence, it is difficult for a person to do any of these things.While there are all of these positive impacts of a high level of self-confidence, it is also possible tobecome over-confident, or to have a false confidence or bravado that is not based on truecompetence or mastery of one’s profession. If self-confidence becomes over-confidence, theengineer may lose the ability to accept criticism that improves the design or product. Thisbehavior may occur in design team meetings when engineers, in their zeal to promote and selltheir innovation, blind themselves to valid concerns or valuable modifications regarding theconcept or product that could make it even better. For recent engineering graduates, who
program (SATOP), Technology Research and Development Authority ofthe State of Florida (TRDA), the Alumni Entrepreneur Alliance, The Space Coast EDC and otherlocal organizations, have seen increasing attendance and have become an increasingly importantnetworking and discussion forum for local entrepreneurs, inventors, business service providers,investors, students and faculty.Two NCIIA grants, totaling about $40K for Florida Tech have been central to the rapid increasein entrepreneurial participation by undergraduates in the College of Engineering. One of thegrants funded entrepreneurial multi-university wireless senior design projects, while the othersupported a series of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department senior design teams
entrepreneurship education to examine: (a)the extent and nature of faculty involvement in undergraduate IP; (b) issues confronting facultyas they relate to undergraduate IP; (c) indicators of success; (d) future changes for promotingstudent involvement in IP generation; and (e) best practices. Most faculty members indicated thatunclear policies, a lack of information, and questions around ownership of inventions were themost significant obstacles when guiding and teaching students. This research contributes to bestpractices for undergraduate IP generation to minimize challenges for faculty, students, andacademic institutions.Running Head: FACULTY VIEWS OF UNDERGRADUATE IP POLICIES Faculty Views of Undergraduate Intellectual Property Policies and
practical and valid outcome measure that we can repeatedlyassess over time. Outcome measures useful for our program evaluation must possess severalfeatures such as the properties of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.However, measuring the ultimate impact sought from the entrepreneurial education programs(i.e., the creation of entrepreneurial mindset among the students) is neither clear nor straight-forward. In order to measure whether the program create entrepreneurial mindset among thestudents properly, researchers perhaps need to measure multiple outcomes. Entrepreneurshipeducation programs include a large range of topics including knowledge, skills, and attitudes aswell as impacts of such programs go beyond classrooms. Because of
teaching entrepreneurship.According to a Cornell University study by Debra Streeter1 Lehigh’s entrepreneurshipmodel is classified as a magnet program centered in the business school and primarilyMBA-oriented. Lehigh has made a substantial commitment to our entrepreneurship-oriented graduate MBA program, including an entrepreneurial option and a Ventureseries certificate program.Recently Lehigh has invested heavily in several new programs that promote campus-wideteaching, research and outreach in technical entrepreneurship at the undergraduate level,including a year-long experiential capstone course for majors in Integrated Business andEngineering, Computer Science and Business, Bio Engineering, Design Arts and a catchall campus wide program in
will bedeveloped from practicing innovation stage development projects and observing and recordingbest practices from successful outcomes.Rose-Hulman Ventures, a technology commercialization program, is described where corporatepartners bring concepts, research results, and intellectual property and teams of faculty, staff, andstudents develop designs, models, and prototypes as part of the commercialization process. Overten years of operation, the program has worked with hundreds of industrial clients in a broadrange of industry segments. These projects come after the research stage and fall in the criticalinnovation stage of development where technologies are prepared for success in the marketplace.Through these projects, several guiding
of Business at ASU.The Technology Venture Clinic (TVC) serves as a teaching laboratory but is run as a robust"market-focused" enterprise that leverages the intellectual capital of the ASU student body.Some of the university's brightest students, from several disciplines, including law, business,engineering and science, are recruited to work as members of this technology transfer team,gaining first hand knowledge of what works best in bringing new ideas to market. The studentswork in all aspects of technology venturing including patent investigation, business modeling,deal structuring, and market assessment and research. Twenty graduate students andundergraduate honor students are selected each semester to participate in a very competitive
asset of the Program developed for this phase is its simplified single contract. Inresearching impediments to investment in University IP, VA surveyed venture capital firms andtheir counsel. The results of this research showed that professional investors are very leery aboutentering into discussions with companies that have licensed IP from a University with whichthey are unfamiliar. The concern is that the work and expense of understanding and, in manycases restructuring, contracts issued by Universities outweighs the commercial opportunitiesavailable.To overcome this perception, the program has spent considerable time and effort creating asingle contract with the newly formed company that conforms to investment best practices in theareas of
the next year [26]. Similarly, one reviewer’s comment on the draft manuscript for thispaper pointed to one aspect of the broader impact of the research contained herein: “thatentrepreneurial outcomes can be achieved in existing engineering curricula through revisiting theexisting outcomes or minor modifications.” The research contained within this paper hasdemonstrated a connection between entrepreneurial mindset and the ABET Student Outcomes.An appropriate selection of performance indicators can thus be used to help focus attention onthe entrepreneurial mindset aspects of one’s program. Subsequent course-level tweaks made tohelp students attain the outcomes associated with these indicators, such as through the adoptionof various educational
AC 2012-4303: OPEN PROCESS FOR ENTREPRENEURING TEAM COL-LABORATION: PARALLELS FROM AN ACADEMIC RESEARCH TEAMTO THE START UP THEY STUDIEDProf. Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. teaches graduate design methods and a new REVS class on the car experi- ence in the College of Engineering at Stanford University, using applied psychology and art for story- telling to facilitate student progress from the idea and prototyping phases to delivery. With a focus on entrepreneurial leadership, Karanian makes productive partnerships with industry and forms collaborative teams from the areas of engineering, design, psychology, and communication. She was the Michael T. Anthony Professor at Wentworth
experience.Results Each student was encouraged to thoroughly describe their most memorable, importantexperiences and the impacts of those experiences. A thematic analysis was completed on theseexperiences and impacts. The research design naturally produced two main themes: (1)entrepreneurship experiences and (2) impacts. The main experiences students decided to discusswere related to participating in funding competitions, developing their project, experiencingchallenges and failures, taking entrepreneurship classes, and networking. The main impacts thatwere discussed were related to the development of an entrepreneurial mindset, new knowledgeand skills, and modified personal and project goals. These experiences and impacts are discussedin detail in
she conducted research in transportation and sustainability as part of the Infrastruc- ture Research Group (IRG). In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil En- gineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed
Paper ID #20567Setting the Foundations for International and Cross-disciplinary Innovation:The U.S.-Denmark Summer School ”Renewable Energy: In Practice”Dr. Tela Favaloro, University of California, Santa Cruz Tela Favaloro received a B.S. degree in Physics and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Univer- sity of California, Santa Cruz. She is currently working to further the development and dissemination of alternative energy technology; as project manager of a green building design initiative and researcher with the Center for Sustainable Engineering and Power Systems. Her background is in the development of
understanding innovation in engineering professionals and students, and she is collaborating with a team at Purdue to create a tool to measure innovativeness among engineers.Dr. Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME. Dr. Jablokow is the architect of a unique 4