Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Tuesday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julian Ly Davis, University of Southern Indiana; Arthur L. Chlebowski, University of Southern Indiana; David J. Ellert PE, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

that students were asked to design a Rube Goldberg machine thatconducts 90+ steps to complete a simple task. The insights they found through the use of theRube Goldberg machine will hopefully be a starting point for students to hone their design,communication, and teamwork skills such that they can design, communicate, and work onteams effectively in their Senior Capstone and beyond.References1. Javdekar, C. N., Ph, D. & College, M. C. Designing Freshman Engineering Experiences. (2001).2. Andersson, S. B., Malmqvist, J., Wedel, M. K. & Brodeur, D. B. A systematic approach to the design and implementation of design-build-test project courses. Int. Conf. Eng. Des. 1–15 (2005).3. Chlebowski, A. L., Davis, J. L. & Jr, Z

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Focusing on Student Success

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University; Laurel Whisler, Clemson University; Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University; Bridget Trogden, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

reflect on their perceivedconfidence level in their understanding of the content and their preparation in each of thecohorted courses through a daily reflection. Additionally, students were instructed to track theirtime throughout the day in thirty-minute increments, taking note of study sessions, class sessions,meal times, and sleep, for the week leading up to the exams in the form of a time trackinglearning journal (Appendix A). Following exams, students noted and described their mosteffective study session and evaluated their confidence levels.Upon receiving exam scores, students completed an exam wrapper survey (Appendix B), whichincluded learning outcomes from units covered on the exam and an evaluation of exampreparation behaviors for the

Conference Session

Bridge Programs Connecting to First-Year Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amanda Simson, The Cooper Union; Laura C. Broughton, City University of New York, Bronx Community; Elizabeth J. Biddinger, City College of the City University of New York

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Pre-College Engineering Education

, "Beginning an engineer's journey: A narrative examination of wow, when, and why students choose the engineering major," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 556-582, 2018.[16] J. L. DeGrazia, J. F. Sullivan, L. E. Carlson, and D. W. Carlson, "A K-12/University partnership: Creating tomorrow's engineers," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 557-563, 2001.[17] P. Cantrell and J. Ewing-Taylor, "Exploring STEM career options through collaborative high school seminars," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 295-303, 2009.[18] H. M. Doerr, J. B. Ärlebäck, and A. Costello Staniec, "Design and effectiveness of modeling-based mathematics in a summer bridge

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Collection

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James A. Middleton, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Kara L. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. (2016). “Connections Among University Faculty Engaged in the First Two Years of Engineering, and Their Impact on Faculty Attitudes and Practice.” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference. New Orleans, LA: ASEE, 2016.4. D. Ebert-May, T. L. Derting, J. Hodder, J. L. Momsen, T. M. Long, and S. E. Jardeleza. "What we say is not what we do: effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs." BioScience, vol 61.7, pp. 550-558, 2011.5. M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and T. Simin Hall. "Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99.3, pp. 185-207, 2010.6. A. F. McKenna, B. Yalvac, and G.J. Light. “The role of

Conference Session

First Year Programs Division Poster Session: The Best Place to Really Talk about First-Year Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica E S Swenson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Marya H Schnedeker, Center for Engineering Education and Outreach, Tufts University; Sarah Marie Coppola, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Leonardo Andres Madariaga, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach / Federico Santa Maria Technical University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

   5) A user evaluation plan  a) Test for effectiveness  b) Test for efficiency  c) Test for satisfaction  Data Collection  Six groups of students consented to participate in this study. Students were required to post all  14​deliverables on Interactive Learning and Collaboration Environment (InterLACE).​  For the purposes of this study, only two deliverables were examined: list of user needs and list of product specifications (including materials).    Page 26.705.5

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 2: Design in the First Year: Challenges and Successes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill S. K. Nakatsu, University of Hawaii at Manoa

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

communicated to you? 3. Were you able to connect/get along with your student organization mentors? 4. a. Do you feel more connected to the engineering college by making meaningful relationships with Freshmen Peers 4. b. Do you feel more connected to the engineering college by making meaningful relationships with Student Mentors 4. c. Do you feel more connected to the engineering college by making meaningful relationships with Faculty/Staff 5. Would you have liked to meet with your mentor more often? 6. Did participating in this program and working with your mentors help you with your studies and/or school life

Conference Session

FPD and DEEDs Joint Postcard Sessions

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University; Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University; Lauren Corrigan, Parker School Hawaii

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, First-Year Programs

Paper ID #23254Work in Progress: Introduction of Failure Analysis to a First-year RoboticsCourseDr. Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics and engineering education departments. She is

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Retention & Bridge Programs #2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Aysa Galbraith, University of Arkansas; Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

the data for this paper.References[1] Chingos, M. “What Matters Most for College Completion?” Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and Third Way Institute. Retrieved from http://www.aei.org/publication/whatmatters-most-for-college-completion-academic- preparation-is-a-key-predictor-of-success/[2] Allensworth, Elaine and Kallie Clark, “Are GPAs an Inconsistent Measure of College Readiness across High Schools? Examining Assumptions about Grade versus Standardized Test Scores.” University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. Chicago, IL. 2019 (Revised, Initially Published April 2018).[3] French, B. F., J. C. Immekus, and W. C. Oakes. 2005. “An examination of the indicators of engineering

Conference Session

FPD12 -- Novel Approaches to First Year Programs

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Rowe, Vanderbilt University; Stacy Klein-Gardner

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Student: __________________ Midterm RubricQuestion 1 a) What assumption is made about the statistics of a random sample compared to the statistics of a population? How does sample size affect this assumption?Student displays understanding of sampling through 1 2 3 4 5explanation of sample vs. population assumptionsStudent displays understanding of sample size through 1 2 3 4 5explaining the value of a larger sample size b) Report 3 measures of center, 1 measure of spread, and 1 measure of variance for the provided data.Student displays understanding of a measure of center through 1 2 3 4 5choosing 3 correct answersStudent displays understanding of

Conference Session

FPD VII: Innovative Curriculum Elements of Successful First-Year Courses

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara Elizabeth Carruthers, The Ohio State University; Paul Alan Clingan, The Ohio State University - EEIC

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Society of EngineeringEducation, 2010.2. Integration of Simulation into the Undergraduate Fluid Mechanics Curriculum Using FLUENT.Bhaskaran, R. and Collins, L. s.l. : American Society of Engineering Education , 2003.3. A Three-Semester Interdisciplinary Educational Program in Microsystems Engineering. Ameel, T., Gale,B., and Harvey, I. s.l. : American Society of Engineering Education, 2003.4. Using Computational Fluid Dynamics to Excite Undergrad Students about Fluid Mechanics. Pines, D.s.l. : American Society of Engineering Education, 2004.5. Work in Progress: Micro-/Nanotechnology 'Lab on a Chip' Research Project for First-Year HonorsEngineering Program. Clingan, P.A., Tomasko, D.L. and Allam, Y. s.l. : Institute of Electrical andElectronics

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Joseph Frank, Ohio State University; Kelly Lynn Kolotka, Ohio State University; Andrew H. Phillips, Ohio State University; Michael Schulz, The Ohio State University; Clare Rigney, Ohio State University, Engineering Education Department; Allen Benjamin Drown, Ohio State University; Robert G. Stricko III, Ohio State University; Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University; Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics department and department of engineering education. Her research interests address a broad spectrum of educational topics, but her current foci are adapting problem-solving instructional techniques to first-year engineering and incorporating engineering elements into K-12 science courses.Dr. Richard J

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 3; The Best of All the FPD Papers

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie M. Gratiano, Roger Williams University; William John Palm IV P.E., Roger Williams University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Paper ID #17216Can a Five-Minute, Three-Question Survey Foretell First-Year EngineeringStudent Performance and Retention?Stephanie M. Gratiano, Roger Williams University Stephanie Gratiano is a Junior Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering student at Roger Williams Uni- versity. She is an officer of both the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and Engineers Without Borders (EWB) Chapters at the university. Her future career interests include Product Design or Mechanical Design, and she wishes to further her education in Industrial Design after graduating.Dr. William John Palm IV P.E., Roger Williams University

Conference Session

First-Year Programs (FPD) Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyssa N Berg, University of Colorado Boulder; Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado at Boulder; Virginia Lea Ferguson, Mechanical Engineering; University of Colorado; Boulder, CO; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Vocational Behavior. 43, pp 251-265, 1993.[9] Sosik JJ, Godshalk VM. The role of gender in mentoring: Implications for diversified and homogeneous mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 57, pp102-122, 2000.[10] Ehrich LC, Hansford B, Tenant L. Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions:A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly. 40(4), pp518-540, 2004.[11] Blake-Beard S, Murrell A, Thomas D. Unfinished business: The impact of race

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael Elmore P.E., State University of New York at Binghamton; Koenraad E. Gieskes, State University of New York at Binghamton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Grohs, “Exploring engineering major choice and self- concept through first-year surveys,” In Proc. 125th ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition, June 24 – 27, 2018, Salt Lake City, UT.[6] O. H. Griffin and S. J. Griffin, “Consideration of happenstance theory in major selection and migration in a large engineering program,” In Proc. 118th ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition, June 26 – 29, 2011, Vancouver, B. C., Canada, 22.376.1 – 22.376.30.[7] H. E. Rodríguez-Simmonds, J. D. Ortega-Alvarez, S. Z. Atiq, and S. R. Hoffmann, “Identifying sources of information that students use in deciding which engineering major to pursue,” Proc. 122nd ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition, June 14 – 17, 2015, Seattle, WA.[8

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Assessment

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James A. Coller, University of Michigan; Magel P. Su, University of Michigan; Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan; Stephanie Sheffield, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literaturebetween 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525-545. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2[4] Hug, S., Thiry, H., & Tedford, P. (2011). Learning to love computer science: Peer leadersgain teaching skill, communicative ability and content knowledge in the CS classroom. InProceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 201-206.DOI: 10.1145/1953163.1953225[5] Stout, L. M., & McDaniel, A. J. (2006). Benefits to supplemental instruction leaders. NewDirections for Teaching and Learning, 106, 55-62. DOI: 10.1002/tl.233[6] Oakley, B. A., & Finelli, C. J. (2014). A practical approach to understanding—andapplying!—the

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Munden, Fairfield University; Marcia Arambulo Rodriguez, Fairfield University; Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University; Michael Zabinski, Fairfield University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

and presentation? 29.73 59.46 10.81 0 0 0 89.19 28 Which elements the TDP rubric were least clear (select up to text response 29 How would you reword one of those elements? text response If a scale score were used instead, how many levels would be 30 best (1 – 10)? 10 levels majority by 48%, 5 levels 27% 31 Would a peer-evaluation of teamwork have been helpful for Yes 65.87% No 35.14% 32 Suggest one improvement to the TDP rubric? text responseAppendix B - Rubric for Individual Oral

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 5: Using Video, Games, and More in the First Year

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel D. Anastasio, University of Connecticut; Malgorzata Chwatko, University of Connecticut; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Jeffrey Ryan McCutcheon

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Page 26.40.15References1. Sheppard, S., and R. Jenison. (1997). Examples of Freshman Design Education. International Journal ofEngineering Education 13(4). 248-61.2. Dally, J.W., and G. Zhang. (1991). Experienced in Offering a Freshman Design Course in Engineering.Proceedings of the Conference on New Approaches to Undergraduate Education. July, 1991. Banff, Canada.3. Frank, M., I. Lavy, and D. Elata. (2003). Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an AcademicEngineering Course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13. 273-88.4. Marra, R.M., B. Palmer, and T.A. Litzinger. (2000). The Effects of a First-Year Engineering Design Course onStudent Intellectual Development as Measured by the Perry Scheme. Journal of

Conference Session

Research on the First Year I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chirag Variawa, University of Toronto; Susan McCahan, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

AC 2010-1195: DESIGN OF THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FORINCLUSIVITY: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREChirag Variawa, University of Toronto Chirag Variawa graduated with a degree in Materials Science Engineering from the University of Toronto in 2009. He is currently pursuing a graduate degree in Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto.Susan McCahan, University of Toronto Prof. McCahan: B.S. (Mechanical Engineering), Cornell University, M.S. and Ph.D. (Mechanical Engineering ), RPI. Dr. McCahan is currently the Chair of First Year in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto. She has been with the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at

Conference Session

Research on the First Year I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rhonda Kowalchuk, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; Tarnisha Green, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; Robert Ricks, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; John Nicklow, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

SummerBridge Program had the following three overall objectives: (a) “to help at risk students develop asolid foundation of problem solving skills that will facilitate their advancement in theengineering math curriculum,” (b) “to help students gain a deeper appreciation for the role thatmath and science plays in the engineering field,” and (c) “to integrate first year students into thesocio-academic environment of the College of Engineering and help smooth their transition tocollegiate life.” Achievement of the objectives was evaluated with pre and post survey datacollection and math performance measures.Achievement of ObjectivesOne objective of the Summer Bridge Program was “to help at risk students develop a solidfoundation of problem solving skills

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Using Technology and/or Technology Tools to Enhance Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rodrigo Cutri P.E., Maua Institute of Techonology; Luiz Roberto Marim, Maua Institute of Technology; Juliana Ribeiro Cordeiro; Hector A. C. Gil, Maua Institute of Technology; Camila Cunha Toledo Guerald, Maua Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

to design examples andexercises that meet the specific needs of each classroom. In order to better understand thedifferences between classrooms, students from two different classrooms (named“Classroom 1” and “Classroom 2”) were submitted to the same following question duringan electrochemistry lesson:Consider the following overall reaction for a battery: 2 Ag+ + Sn → 2 Ag + Sn2+What is the reaction quotient (Q) for this redox process?a) [Sn2+].[Ag]2/[Ag+]2.[Sn] b) [Sn2+]/2[Ag+]c) [Sn2+]/[Ag+]2 d) [Ag+]2/[Sn2+]The correct answer to the question above is letter c): Q = [Ag+]2/[Sn2+].Although it seems to be a very easy question, is was possible to

Conference Session

First-Year Advising and Transition

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jay Brockman, University of Notre Dame; Lynnwood Brown, WikiRing Partnership; Michael McDonald, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

value to the educational experience. Distribution of our content throughthe wiki will help us track how our content is used and allow us to update and improve materialas needed. This new model will also change how resources are acquired and reviewed. Thetraditional framework of book editions and chapters may go away, but a premium will still beplaced on high quality, vetted content that best enables instructors to teach a successful courseand students to master the topics.Bibliography1. Jay B. Brockman. Introduction to Engineering: Modeling and Problem Solving. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.2009.2. TWiki® - The Open Source Enterprise Wiki and Web 2.0 Application Platform. http://www.twiki.org3. Foswiki - The Free and Open Source Enterprise Wiki

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Paying More Attention to Retention

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michele Yatchmeneff, University of Alaska Anchorage; Matthew Calhoun, University of Alaska Anchorage

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

shown which students increased their engineering identity andin which factors.The professors should also continue to improve the common Introduction to Engineering courseand evaluate if these engineering identity interventions are effective. It is possible that theseengineering identity interventions could be included in other common engineering courses tohelp improve retention and persistence of engineering students. Future research should also lookinto other areas to improve such as mentoring and tutoring2,3.Bibliography1. Matthews, M. Keeping students in engineering: A research-to-practice brief. 1–7 (2016).2. Yoder, B. L. Going the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Wednesday Cornucopia (Educational Research)

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michele Yatchmeneff, University of Alaska, Anchorage; Matthew E. Calhoun, University of Alaska, Anchorage

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

issues with engineering identity. Therefore, the professors should also look into other areasto improve retention such as mentoring and tutoring [2], [3].Bibliography[1] M. Matthews, “Keeping students in engineering: A research-to-practice brief.” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, pp. 1–7, 2016.[2] B. L. Yoder, “Going the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and computing students,” Washington, DC, 2012.[3] M. Atwater, “Why students leave engineering,” Engineering.com, Mississauga, Ontario, Jul-2013.[4] M. Yatchmeneff and M. Calhoun, “Exploring engineering identity in a common introduction to engineering course to improve retention,” in

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Work in Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Goli Nossoni, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

psychological type in engineering education. Engineering Education: 394-400.3. McCaulley, M.H. et al. (1987). Myers-Briggs type indicator and retention in engineering. International Journal of Applied Engineering Education 3(2): 99-109.4. NERIS Analytics Ltd. (2019). Is it possible to change your personality type? 16 Personalities. Retrieved from < https://www.16personalities.com/articles/is-it-possible-to- change-your-personality-type>.5. Vitelli, R. (2015). Can you change your personality? Psychology Today. Retrieved from < https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/media-spotlight/201509/can-you-change-your- personality>.6. Donnell, J. A., Aller, B. M., Alley, M., and Kedrowicz, A. A. (2011). Why industry says that engineering

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Ann Howard, New Mexico State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

libezp.nmsu.edu:2186/ehost[4] Liang, B., Grossman, J. (2010). Diversity and youth mentoring relationships. In Allen, T., Eby, L., (2) The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 239-255). Hong Kong: Blackwell Publishing Ltd[5] Chesler, N., & Chesler, M., (2002). Gender-informed mentoring strategies for women engineering scholars: On establishing a caring community. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=786f3e8c-3928-479b-88af- b256066f1374%40sessionmgr4005&vid=6&hid=4213 https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:258230/th_ASEE_paper.pdf.[6] Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy Retrieved from https

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: The Transition from High School to College

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tony Vercellino P.E., Youngstown State University; Dylan Christenson, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Page 26.900.10engineering student.References1. Marra RM, Rodgers KA, Shen D, Bogue B. Leaving Engineering: A Multi‐Year Single Institution Study. Journal of Engineering Education 2012;101(1):6-27.2. Board NS. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2006.3. Board NS. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2008.4. Gibbons MT. The year in numbers. American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC 2005.5. Ohland MW, Sheppard SD, Lichtenstein G, Eris O, Chachra D, Layton RA. Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education 2008;97(3):259-278.6. Bernold LE

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Hands-on Projects and Spatial Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob L. Segil, University of Colorado Boulder; Beth A Myers, University of Colorado Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan Ph.D., University of Colorado, Boulder; Derek T Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

research colleague Denise W. Carlson for her insights and critique.References1. Sorby, Sheryl A. and Anne F. Wysocki. “Introduction to 3D Spatial Visualization: An Active Approach.” New York, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning, 2003.2. Guay, Roland B. “Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations.” West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation, 1977.3. Battista, Michael T. “Spatial Visualization and Gender Differences in High School Geometry.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 21.1 (1990): 47-60.4. Sorby, Sheryl A. “A Course in Spatial Visualization and Its Impact on the Retention of Female Engineering Students.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 7.2 (2001b): 153-172.5. Yoon, So Yoon

Conference Session

FPD6 -- Early Intervention & Retention Programs

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Bradley, Indiana University; Walter Bradley, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

2006-1849: INCREASING RETENTION BY INCORPORATING TIMEMANAGEMENT AND STUDY SKILLS INTO A FRESHMAN ENGINEERINGCOURSESteven Bradley , Indiana University Steven Bradley earned his B.S. in Chemical Engineering at the University of Texas and his M.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. He ran his own engineering consulting firm for 10 years. He also founded OneQuest Learning, a company committed to helping students achieve their academic potential.Walter Bradley, Baylor University Walter Bradley earned his B.S. and Ph.D. at University of Texas (Austin). He has taught at Colorado School of Mines ('68-'76) and Texas A&M University ('76-'00) before assuming his present

Conference Session

FPD 7: First-Year Engineering Courses, Part II: Perceptions and Paradigms

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Esmaeili, University of Dayton; Ali Eydgahi, Eastern Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Education, Vol. 8, pp.55-78, 2009.[12] A. Conklin, “Cyber Defense Competitions and Information Security Education: An Active Learning Solution for a Capstone Course,” Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii international Conference on System Sciences, Washington D.C., Vol. 9, pp. 220b, January 4-7, 2006.[13] C. Meyers and B. T. Jones, Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom, Jossey-Bass Inc., CA, 1991.[14] P. Ramsden, “A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire,” Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 16, No.2, pp. 129- 150, 1991.[15] K. L. Wilson, et al. (ed.), “The development, validation and application of the Course Experience

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Paying Attention to Retention

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth A. Adams, Chandler Gilbert Community College; Mary Beth Burgoyne

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

year, andthe percentage of women in most undergraduate engineering programs has remained at or below20% for decades, as estimated from enrollment and degrees awarded from National Center forScience and Engineering Statistics data (2012). Further research indicates that women inengineering programs value social context in their program of study. To this end, the designproject discussed in this paper integrates humanitarian application experiences using the NAEGrand Challenges as well as campus-specific projects.It is hypothesized that implementation of this module will a) increase students’ perspective ofengineering as a socially meaningful career option and, b) show higher retention and successfulcompletion by female and underrepresented