, perceived cultural distance, and english self-confidence. Retrieved from ProQuest, TheUniversity of Texas at Austin.5. Ye, Y. (1992), Chinese students' needs and adjustment problems in a U.S. university. Retrieved from ProQuest,The University of Nebraska, Lincoln.6. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2001). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promoteself-development. Sterling, VA: Stylus.7. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2008). The evolution of self-authorship. In M. S. Khine, (ed.), Knowing, knowledge andbeliefs: Epistemoloigcal studies across diverse cultures. New York: Springer.8. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.9. Belenky, M. F
Application Brief #24, 2002.2. Drago-Severson, E., et al., “The Power of a Cohort and of Collaborative Groups,” Focus on Basics 5, Issue B, October 2001, pp. 15-22.3. Alexander, B., et. al., “Effects of a Learning Community Program on the First-Year Experience of Engineering Majors,” ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996, pp. 377-380.4. Smith, B., et. al., Learning Communities: Reforming Undergraduate Education, Wiley, 2004.5. Castro-Cedena, M., “ A Quantitative Assessment of the Benefit of a Learning Community Environment,” ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2005, session #F4C.6. Hargadon, A., “Firs as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation,” California Management Review, v. 40, #3, pp. 209
. Bashir, C. Wee, N. Memon, and B. Guo, “Profiling cybersecurity competition participants: Self-efficacy, decision-making and interests predict effectiveness of competitions as a recruitment tool,” Comput. Secur., vol. 65, pp. 153–165, Mar. 2017.[6] R. S. Cheung, J. P. Cohen, H. Z. Lo, F. Elia, and V. Carrillo-Marquez, “Effectiveness of Cybersecurity Competitions,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Management, 2012.[7] L. J. Hoffman, T. Rosenberg, R. Dodge, and D. Ragsdale, “Exploring a National Cybersecurity Exercise for Universities,” IEEE Secur. Priv. Mag., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 27–33, Sep. 2005.[8] M. Bashir, A. Lambert, B. Guo, N. Memon, and T. Halevi, “Cybersecurity
.[7] A. Sverdlik, N. Hall, L. McApline, and K. Hubbard, “The PhD Experience: A Review of the Factors Influencing Doctoral Students’ Completion, Achievement, and Well-Being,” Int. J. Dr. Stud., vol. 13, pp. 361–388, 2018.[8] L. B. Dunn, A. Iglewicz, and C. Moutier, “A Conceptual Model of Medical Student Well- Being: Promoting Resilience and Preventing Burnout,” Acad. Psychiatry, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 44–53, Feb. 2008.[9] J. L. Brockman, A. A. Nunez, and A. Basu, “Effectiveness of a conflict resolution training program in changing graduate students style of managing conflict with their faculty advisors,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 277–293, 2010.[10] J. Hunt and D. Eisenberg, “Mental
substantial supportfor chapter maintenance by ensuring connectivity with our parent organization even in the faceof lean years in terms of membership and interest at individual campuses. Aim to be active inthis exciting new endeavor!Bibliography1. Farvardin, N. “Retaining Students – and Their Hopes and Dreams.” ASEE Prism, 16 (7), 2007, 64-65.2. Bauer, E. H.; Moskal, B.; Gosink, J.; Lucena, J.; Muñoz, D. “Faculty and Student Attitudes Toward CommunityService: A Comparative Analysis.” J. Engr. Education, 96 (2), 2007, 129-140. Page 13.1293.93. Keating, D. A.; Deloatch, E. M. “Don’t Overlook Industry.” ASEE Prism, 17 (3), 2007, 80.4. Tau Beta
undergraduate grade point averagesexceeded 3.0 out of 4.0, had achieved junior status, and had completed 5 courses in their major,could be considered for participation. Both the undergraduate and graduate advisor had toapprove the choice of graduate courses to take while still undergraduates. The graduate coursesgenerally replaced undergraduate electives. Grades in all graduate courses had to be at B orbetter for later shift to the graduate record.At one time, all students were asked to take the GRE as a condition of participation in theBS/MS program but this requirement was later dropped in favor of consistency with GRErequirements for admission to various graduate programs. At NJIT, all PhD program applicants,all students seeking assistantships or
for rapid and global sharing of ideasthroughout the program. These allow collaboration to begin before travelling and to continueafter the trip. It is also essential in global education to recognize the needs of participants. GPPwas founded on the belief that global competency is incredibly important, but that graduatestudents cannot afford the time spent for such a trip over a whole semester. Finally, weencourage people to go. There is no substitute for physically walking around a new place,hearing conversations in another language, and experiencing life somewhere else in the world.References 1. L. B. Denney, M. Sanchez-Pena, and J. B. Main, “Examining how international experiences promote global competency among engineering graduate
Biochemistry.www.chem.ucla.edu/~bacher/Specialtopics/vacuum%20distillation.html. Accessed Nov. 10, 2015.3 Kneen, B., Lemley, A., and Wagenet, L. Reverse Osmosis Treatment of Drinking Water. Cornell Cooperation Extention, College of Human Ecology. Fact Sheet 4, November 2005.4 Introduction of Nuclear Desalination, A Guide Book. www.pub.iaea.org /MTCD/publications /PDF/TRS400_scr.pdf Accessed Nov. 1, 2015.5 Multiple Stage Flash Processes.www.sidem-desalination.com/en/Process/MSF/. Accessed Nov. 10, 2015.6 Multiple Effect Distillation Process.www.sidem-desalination.com/en/Process/MED/Process/. Accessed Nov. 1, 2015.7 Enhanced Process using Vapor Compression. www.sidem-desalination.com/en /Process / MED/MED-TVC/. Accessed Nov. 9
5important to motivate students before starting projects and to continuously encourage themduring projects.Two beginning graduate students were assisted with the guidance of a teaching mentor.Research topics were related to my proposed Ph.D. research. Reading, summary, and discussionof research papers as an active learning exercise motivated these students and introduced them tothe state-of-the-art. Problem-based learning continued in an active laboratory experience. Theyproduced excellent results, which were presented in two papers, one presented at the IEEESensors Conference and one published in Sensors and Actuators B.12,13 The teaching mentorprovided feedback to help improve teaching skills for all teaching activities. These experienceshelped me
Study (HMS). The aim of this study is to answer the following research question: How doesthe presence of (a) self-sufficiency, (b) sense of belonging, and/or (c) social self-efficacy impactan SEM graduate student’s mental health?Attention to the mental health of students in higher education has grown in recent years. Prior workhas shown that several factors can influence an individuals’ mental health, including, but notlimited to, a students’ demographics, social factors, available resources, values, motivation, andacademic discipline. The purpose of this study is to focus specifically on how social aspects caninfluence graduate students’ mental health, or mental and emotional well-being. Therefore, thispaper will pull on past work that has
Paper ID #32258Minority Student Experiences in Engineering Graduate Programs:Socialization and Impact on Career TrajectoriesDr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Amelink is Associate Vice Provost for Learning Systems in the Office of the Provost at Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech.Dr. Mayra S. Artiles , Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering
. 6. I know how to apply a systems 50% 40% 10% 0% 0% approach to develop a unit of instruction for a comprehensive workplace training program. 7. I know how to prepare and deliver a 20% 50% 20% 10% 0% unit of training using current technologies and methods. 8. I know how to apply Kirkpatrick’s 40% 40% 10% 10% 0% training evaluation model to training programs. 9. I know how to develop a business 20% 70% 0% 10% 0% case for training.Section B – Use of role play in the Training System Design course Strongly
problems,in laboratory assignments, and in key projects. Qualitative assessment tools such as surveys andfocus groups are also being used for assessment purposes.The program uses direct and indirect measures to determine the attainment of programeducational objectives. The key methods used are: a)periodic alumni surveys, rating theirpreparation and the importance of program emphasis, their salaries, and their level ofprofessional and personal development activities. b) Employer Data: Surveys and focus groups,as well as advisory board panels provide feedback on employer satisfaction. c) Graduate Schooland professional school performance – including placement and graduation rates, as well assubsequent employment. This paper is focused on the results
on a deep and fundamental level [W]e all know that you can get an A or a B in a class and not understand it. You can know it, but not understand it…And as a practicing engineer I know you have to KNOW it, you have to understand it fundamentally in order to use it in practice. So my goals now are to understand…you know that you need to know it. Period. And get it in your head and understand it. Fundamentally. So you can change any knob and understand what’s going on.Catherine recognizes that, in the workforce, engineers face problems that they never explicitlylearned to solve in their coursework. By understanding material thoroughly, they are able toapply concepts to situations far outside of anything that
dedication to teaching thesummer bridge program. We would also like to thank the Office of the Vice Provost for Inclusion andDiversity and Dean’s Office in the College of Engineering for their financial support of the program andrelated assessment activities References1 B. E. Lovitts, Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.2 W. C. Lee, "Examining the transition to engineering: A multi-case study of six diverse summer bridge program participants," 2014.3 K. Beach, "Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organizations," Between school and work: New
with a variety of audiences. 2. To expose students to a diverse set of future career opportunities available to STEM PhD holders.With an immersive training experience in mind, the SciComm program integrated a variety ofknowledge-based learning activities about communication, practice with communicating, andpractical experience communicating with various audiences. Program participants also engagedwith peers, practitioners, and professionals throughout the program. The program curriculum included three primary components: a) bi-weekly seminarmeetings, b) communication challenges, and c) mentorship by University alumnus/a. The threecomponents were designed to integrate hands-on learning and practical application to helpstudents
a significant portion of timeexplaining tasks in preparation for doing, and there was no way to record those interactions usingthe revised version of the G-RATE. As a result of this, a “transition” observation code was addedto the tool, and another round of observations was conducted. For the second round, three 3-minute videos were randomly selected, and 10-second observations were recorded. Table 1presents an overview of the context of the courses used to conduct reliability checks. Page 23.1032.5 Table 1. Description of the video Instructor A Instructor B
are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] J. S. Shippmann, R. A. Ash, M. Batjtsta, L. Carr, L. D. Eyde, B. Hesketh, J. Kehoe, K. Pearlman, E. P. Prien, and J. I. Sanchez, "The practice of competency modeling," Personnel psychology, vol. 53, pp. 703-740, 2000.[2] B. J. Brummel, D. E. Rupp, and S. M. Spain, "Constructing parallel simulation exercises for assessment centers and other forms of behavioral assessment," Personnel Psychology, vol. 62, pp. 137-170, 2009.[3] D. E. Rupp, A. M. Gibbons, A. M. Baldwin, L. A. Snyder, S. M. Spain, S. E. Woo, B. J. Brummel, C. S. Sims, and M. Kim, "An Initial Validation of Developmental Assessment
size has been illustrated. The reason for each ranking is comprehensively discussedwhere we expand the inquiries into three stages of our graduate program timeline. The stages arelabeled as “(B) - Before,” “(D) - During,” and “(A) - After,” which demonstrates the time whenwe were applying to graduate programs, while we were studying at the graduate programs, andwhat we anticipate pursuing after our graduation, respectively.Table 1. Categories of the subject matters Priority Importance Size Personal Life Nationality (B, D, A) 5 4 Visa (B) 4
examination and providing proof of graduation shall be licensed as a professional engineer, if otherwise qualified: (1) An engineer intern who satisfies one of the following education and experience requirements: (a) Following the bachelor’s degree, an acceptable amount of coursework resulting in a master’s degree in engineering from an institution that offers EAC/ABET accredited programs, or the equivalent, and with a specific record of 3 years or more of progressive experience on engineering projects of a grade and a character which indicate to the board that the applicant may be competent to practice engineering (b) Following a master’s degree in engineering from an EAC/M-ABET-accredited
, open coding process was used to identify meaning units of data(statements or examples) that represented each code (Glaser, 1965; Saldaña, 2014). First,meaningful units related to mental health challenges in the STEM environment were identifiedfrom the transcribed interviews with participants. Second, open coding was used to organizethese meaningful units into themes along three dimensions: (a) difficulties in the STEMenvironment, (b) coping strategies, and (c) effect on students and STEM outcome. Theorganization of these themes formed the basis of the codebook for this study (See Table 2). To establish interrater reliability between three members of the research team,Krippendorf’s alpha (α) was calculated using the KALPHA SPSS macro
courses (a) self-paced, independent study, (b) Page 14.654.3asynchronous interactive learning, (c) synchronous learning, and (d) a combination of online andin-person learning .10 As a department, the need for graduate education was not only to supportexpanding knowledge in the industry, but also spark interest in practitioners to pursue academiccareers. Construction Management programs struggle to fill faculty positions. One goal of theMS in Construction Management program would be to find the select few who would completethe Master’s degree and go on to a PhD.Therefore, a master in construction degree needs to be attractive to young
-sets tostudents through multi-disciplinary course content effectively. The paper also seeks to address thefollowing specific questions: a) How can this course prepare students from diverse backgrounds to have ageneral proficiency in skill sets? b) Will integration of modules such as identifying aspects of researchmethods and statistics, required for successfully understanding and being proficient in data mining, workbetter as opposed to offering a stand-alone menu of topics in research methods, statistics and data mining?The paper is organized with a description of the COT 706 course background, followed by details of thecourse including the proposed structure for the course. Data from various sources are collected to analyzethe effectiveness
addresses the skills continuum in three main parts: a) Part I addressesthe Direct Leadership Skills and Actions required for Engineering Levels [1-3]; b) Part II addresses theOrganizational Leadership Skills and Actions required for Engineering Levels [4-6], and; c) Part IIIaddresses the Strategic Leadership Skills and Actions required for Engineering Levels [7-9]. The overallanalysis sets the foundation for building a coherent professional graduate curriculum and dynamiceducational process reflective of how experienced engineering professionals learn, grow, and create newtechnology in industry. This paper addresses Part III: the Strategic Leadership Function, Skills andActions that the engineer must learn and develop at Director of Engineering
’ oral presentations (see Appendix B).The categories cover various aspects of the content, delivery, and slide/poster design, which arediscussed on the first day of each workshop. The instructor also fills out the same review formduring the student presentations. These forms are collected and given to the students at the endof the presentations. In addition, audience members are encouraged to provide real-time oralfeedback to the presenter directly following the presentation.In the written evaluation of these workshops, which the students complete on the final session,there is a question asking how useful they felt the peer reviews were on a scale of one to ten.Because these workshops are part of a new program that began in January 2015, they
question they will address and why the work is important. Students are asked to summarizethis information succinctly in one sentence, as suggested by [5]. The completed sentence shouldread “The topic I am studying is X, because I want to find out Y, in order to help my readerunderstand Z.” where X is the topic of study, Y is the question that needs to be answered, and Z isthe significance of the work.In addition, this worksheet is also designed to help students to determine if the problem they planto address is a practical or conceptual problem [5], [6], by answering the following questions: a. Practical Problem: What do you want your reader to do after reviewing your work? b. Conceptual Problem: What should the reader think after
same student outcome characteristics, with a particular focus on problem-solving, communication, and teamwork. Arguably the most influential these frameworks havebeen the ABET accreditation criteria, reviewed next.2.1 ABET Accreditation CriteriaIn 1997, ABET, a non-profit, non-governmental organization that accredits engineering andother programs at the bachelor and master degree level, established eleven student outcomes inwhat is known as EC2000 [2]. These outcomes are listed below: a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within
Science, Technology & Society, 22(1), 31-41.18. Patterson, E. A., Campbell, P. B., Busch-Vishniac, I., & Guillaume, D. W. (2011). The effect of context on student engagement in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(3), 211-224. Page 26.1326.12
postgraduate education for Engineers in IndustryBecause of the need to continue the education of the engineers in industry that provide theinnovation that drives the U.S. Economy, the University faculty members that provide thispostgraduate education must be properly compensated relative to the engineers that they instruct.The pay scales of these faculty members must fit on the scale of engineering levels as shown inAppendix A. If this is done, then the faculty will be more willing to assume these additionalduties, and the postgraduate programs promoted by the National Collaborative for EngineeringGraduate Education Reform, can take place.[Please review appendices B-F for additional information
. B ─ CONCEPTUAL SKILLS AND VISIONConceptual skills include handling ideas, thoughts and concepts. These include critical reasoning, creativethinking, and reflective thinking.Critical Reasoning Critical reasoning involves needs-finding, assessment of alternatives that satisfy theneed, and reflection on outcomes. In short, critical reasoning or creative problem solving is what effectiveengineer-leaders do. Experience plays an important role in critical reasoning because current bestpractices often are the starting point for exploration of alternatives to a problem. Experience allows theengineer-leader to judge the viability of current technologies and propose new solution to the problems athand. Reflection on past projects, the solutions to