generation of engineers to be ethical, human-centric, collaborative, communicative, and transdisciplinary. As a graduate student she has advised international interactive qualifying projects (IQP) and a senior capstone design project (MQP). As she pursues a career in academia, Tess strives to combine her interests in medical robotics and engineering education.Dr. Ceren Yilmaz Akkaya, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Yilmaz Akkaya is a postdoctoral researcher in Nanoenergy Group under the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). She holds BS degrees in Chemistry and Molecular Biology and Genetics from Bogazici University. She completed her Master’s and PhD Degrees
, rather thanPh.D. level academic writing and speaking. Joshua Schimel’s Writing Science is among the fewresources for learning how to write scientific and engineering journal papers along with H.Glasman-Deal’s textbook focusing on science writing for non-native English speakers [2,3].Engineering communications theory and practice is described in [4], and a recent effort todevelop an engineering writing course for Ph.D. students in China is elaborated in [5].[6] investigates the benefits of providing ethics education in an engineering graduate program inorder to raise awareness of ethical norms and wider exposure to the societal implications andcontext of the field of engineering. In fact, the addition of ethics-based writing assignments tothe
, 5 ethics, etc.). The other activities in that third instance were modeled on a class that had been well-received by students but had not been optimized to support doctoral students. ● Wave 2-Pivot. The fourth instance marked a new direction; a direction in which the student selected readings played a role in 100% of the learning experience. Responding to comments that the engagement with the student-selected readings in instance 3 had promise but was too fast; in instance 4, engagements with the student-selected readings were distributed over the entire 10-week term. In addition, instance 4 featured 12 analysis questions (each coupled with conceptual readings) that were applied to the student-selected
training lab and observe essential safety measures in operating a laser system • Hands-on demonstration of some cool optical experiments, e.g. nanostructure behaviors under laser lights • Opportunity to meet an expert and a legend in optics.Course Detail: ETHC104 - ETHICAL HACKING: (Middle & High School) IN-PERSONETHICAL HACKING: Want to become an Ethical Hacker? Learn to hack like a black hat andsecure like a white hat hacker. Ethical hacking is a practice of detecting vulnerabilities in anapplication, system, or organization's infrastructure and bypassing system security to identifypotential data breaches and threats in a network. This beginner-friendly course acts as a launchpad for your cybersecurity career and aims to walk
broad, globallyminded, ethical, innovative, excellent collaborators, and visionary leaders that excel at deliveringimpact with social consciousness.This paper discusses the development of the MELP residential program aimed to providegraduates with a competitive advantage when seeking employment at the nexus of science andtechnology policy, policy analysis, complex systems design, and regulatory compliance withinan engineering systems framework. Qualitative student feedback is also discussed, showing thepositive impact of the new MELP courses developed.IntroductionThe National Academy of Engineering (NAE) has recognized the need for engineers to work oninterdisciplinary teams. Rapid advances in technology and globalization have spotlighted
., mathematics, science,and the social sciences). The conceptualization of research mindset in these domains can makesuch explorations more impactful to the community.Doctoral education is responsible for cultivating a proper research mindset among early careerresearchers. STEM Doctoral education in the U.S. is not only designed to enhance criticalthinking, and persistence over the Ph.D. journey of a student [37], [38] but also to develop theability to work in collaborative and team settings and acquire the capacity to communicate, bothorally and in written form [38], [39]. Honesty and ethical conduct are an integral part of anydoctoral education [40], [41]. There are numerous studies indicating that open mindednessimproves doctoral education [42]–[44
of this framework include (1) personalqualities and people skills, (2) professional knowledge and skills, and (3) technological knowledgeand skills. There were seven workforce readiness skills denoted by the majority of employers as“extremely important”: initiative and self-direction, integrity, positive work ethic, reading andwriting, speaking and listening, teamwork, time, tasks, and resource management. Additionally,the workforce readiness skills that most need improvement were critical thinking and problemsolving, positive work ethic, initiative and self-direction, time, task, and resource management,speaking and listening, conflict resolution and customer service. It was recommended that the skilldomains be updated to include (1
). Qualitative research quality: A collaborative inquiry across multiple methodological perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 398-430.[16] Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.[17] Barry, C., Alpert, C. L., & Thate, K. (2017, June). Board# 5: A Mentoring Workshop for an REU Program. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[18] Abbott, L. E., Andes, A., Pattani, A. C., & Mabrouk, P. A. (2020). Authorship not taught and not caught in undergraduate research experiences at a research university. Science and engineering ethics, 26(5), 2555-2599.[19] Evans, S. E., Perry, A. R., Kras, A., Gale, E. B
problem in business development,operational improvement, financial or people development. The key learning outcomes include: 1. Demonstrate the systematic thought processes used in engineering design thinking and assessment of current industry practice. 2. Apply the engineering problem solving approach to practitioner problems. 3. Identify a need and define a problem, its objectives, and constraints from real-world business challenges. 4. Implement key steps in ‘engineering problem solving to evaluate possible solution taking into consideration broad problem constraints including economic, environment, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. 5. Develop a detailed plan for deployment of
://tennesseelookout.com/2022/02/21/suicides-at-vanderbilt-highlight-demand-for- mental-health-services/[10] B. L. Benderly, “Explosions in the Lab,” Slate, May 22, 2009. Accessed: Nov. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://slate.com/technology/2009/05/what-makes-so-academic- laboratories-such-dangerous-places-to-work.html[11] A. Cohen and Y. Baruch, “Abuse and Exploitation of Doctoral Students: A Conceptual Model for Traversing a Long and Winding Road to Academia,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 505–522, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04905-1.[12] P. Hutchinson, “Health insurance is a make-or-break cost for LSU graduate assistants,” Louisiana Illuminator. Accessed: Nov. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https
overall obtain atenure-track position [3]. Most doctoral scientists and engineers obtain employment in theprivate sector rather than in education [4], and increasingly as entrepreneurs. A wide range ofskills and knowledge is required in order to succeed in industry, such as leadership,communication, and teamwork skills [5] as well as development of understanding of business,social, and ethical contexts within STEM [6]. Traditional graduate programs fall short ofpreparing students for multifaceted careers in the current landscape of rapidly evolvingtechnology and scientific knowledge [2]. The PAtENT model provides a framework to engageengineering doctoral students in entrepreneurship throughout their academic work and not as anaddendum to it. In
private and business positions require a range of skillsand knowledge including leadership, communication, and teamwork [9] as well as an in-depthunderstanding of business, social, and ethical contexts [10]. The PAtENT model responds tothese challenges through a curriculum focused on building these skills and providing suchconnections throughout the academic experience of the doctoral student and not as an add on to atraditional program. The program was implemented at one university with the intent that thismodel was adaptable to other institutions.The PAtENT model applies a student-centric approach to focus the educational emphasis towardthe development of entrepreneurial skills necessary to engage in the modern and rapidlychanging technical
perpetuate negative and unhealthy stereotypes. For example, commonsubject matter of graduate school memes include skipping sleep to perform school work, self-deprecating humor that features negative self-talk [27], and glorification of “grind culture,”which prioritizes productivity and performative work ethic at the expense of social-life, mentaland physical health, and other personal needs [30]. To this end, graduate school memes mayreproduce a culture where students believe they should be overworked and shouldn’t sleepenough to fulfill this mythic work ethic, regardless of direct external pressures to do so.Self-efficacySelf-efficacy is defined as a “[person’s] beliefs about their capabilities to exercise control overtheir own level of functioning
, broad perspective; and (v)Ethics, research integrity. These top 5 skills identified for industry career success were the sameas top 5 skills identified for academic career success in the pre-event survey. This finding supportsthe hypothesis that, although focused on careers in industry, recommendations made here are likelyto support careers in the academy and other sectors too.Three major categories of challenges were identified in order to prepare doctoral students forsuccessful careers in professions besides academia. (i) Identification and implementation of themechanisms for providing skills, (ii) Faculty buy-in. Need for core competencies has beenrecognized for some years, but there has been lack of enthusiasm, even resistance from faculty
, collaboration, time management, ethics andresearch integrity, analytics (e.g., data science/statistics), project management, and criticalthinking — faculty members were asked to rate from 'very important' to 'not important at all.'The results showed that 'very important' is the largest proportion for all qualities or skills.Additionally, faculty members mentioned various skills that they also consider important,including writing, marketing, hands-on experiences, entrepreneurial skills, networking, self-assessment, and independent research skills.When asked if they would like to encourage collaborative research between their PhD studentsand non-academic partners (e.g., an industrial lab), 78% of the participants provided a positiveanswer (see Fig. 8
overall plays a major role as it can be seen as almost the foundation for communication. If you are aware of aspects such as the culture of one, it can lead to better conversations. No further questions at this time.” (Student 2) “What I learned about myself is that many people may look at myself and think in many different ways. Then I may see myself in a different light. I believe through life everyone has their own trials, culture, ethnics and experiences that all reflect who and how they are today. Being able to understand all perspectives and ethics is valuable to understanding each person's perspective.” (Student 8) “I learned about myself using the three stages of adulthood and
GTAs took the course. The course consisted of fourteen 50-minute weeklysessions, seven bi-weekly written assignments, and one optional service learning project. Theweekly sessions followed a lecture-type series with different guest speakers introducing the TAsto key pedagogical topics such as Bloom’s taxonomy, active learning, rubric design, studentmotivation, and ethics. The seven bi-weekly assignments engaged the GTAs by asking them towrite their reflections on personal teaching experiences related to the topics presented in thecourse. The service learning project was optional, and it required the GTAs to design and teach anengineering module in one of the local schools’ classrooms. Service learning is also anexperimental education procedure
and strategies for being your best self. Research Understanding the best practices and ethical implications of advanced research. Teaching Developing skills in relaying knowledge/information to others; understanding how people learn; using assessment tools to track successful learning.Professional Development Activities for BD Fellows. Table 4 presents the workshops plannedfor BD Fellows to support professional development as they progress through each year of adoctoral program.Table 4: PFMPR Workshops/Seminars Year Title Competency Deliverable 1 Summer Fellowship Research
researcher and the audience.Unlike conventional scholarly writing, it is more reader and researcher-friendly as it appeals toboth parties [64]. Autoethnography differs from ethnography (i.e., the study of individuals, people,and cultures) in that it allows exploration of familiar topics, primarily the researcher self, ratherthan unfamiliar terrain. Despite its advantages, autoethnography can introduce biases if researchersoverly rely on personal experiences without considering the cultural context [64]. To mitigate theserisks, Chang advises researchers to avoid pitfalls such as excessive focus on the self, reliance solelyon memory, neglect of ethical practices, inappropriate labeling, and prioritization of narrativesover cultural interpretation is
Professor at George Mason University’s Department of Information Sciences and Technology. He earned his doctorate in Information Technology in 2003 from George Mason Univer- sity’s Volgenau School of Engineering (Fairfax, VA), and has since taught graduate courses there in big data analytics and ethics, operating systems, computer architecture and security, cloud computing, and electronic commerce. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Metacognition in Graduate Engineering Courses Larisa Olesova1, Duoduo Liao2, Ioulia Rytikova2, Mihai Boicu2, Harry Foxwell2 1
National Science Foundation underIUSE/PFE:RED Grant No. 2105721. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.In accordance with standards for ethical use of AI, we acknowledge that we have utilized theAPI of the GPT-4 model to assist with reviewing the manuscript, including proofreading andreducing redundancies. The use of GPT-4 was strictly limited to editing assistance; no aspect ofthe AI was employed for generating the content herein. We hold full responsibility for theaccuracy and originality of the ideas conveyed. References[1] H. A. White and P. Shah
Paper ID #38844Work in Progress: Student Learning Experiences in the Research Lab:Qualitative Analysis of Two Types of Leadership-Mentorship StyleDr. Magdalena G. Grohman, University of North Texas Magdalena Grohman, Ph.D. is Clinical Associate Professor in Design at New College, University of North Texas at Frisco. Her research, publications, and educational interests focus on design, creative thinking and creative problem solving, pedagogy of creativity, and engineering ethics education. Dr. Grohman has significant experience in mixed methods and in studies employing cognitive ethnography as main methodology. She was Co
. 376-380). Students who have more in-ternal motivation are more likely to succeed in doctoral degree programs, whichtend to require individual work ethic and self-driven goals and research (Sverd-lik et al. 2018, p. 376-377). Internal motivators, such as a desire to succeed inacademia or the desire to better research skills, help graduate students succeedwithin a graduate school environment (Sverdlik et al. 2018, p. 377). Addition-ally, students who already have a strong set of writing skills are likely to be moresuccessful in graduate school than those without (Sverdlik et al. 2018, p. 377-378). Beyond having strong technical writing, students who are able to plan,write, and revise in an organized manner are less anxious and more confident
thedocument if one focuses on the research and scientific skills of statistical analysis, creativity andinnovation, ethical research, and technical skills (Figure 1). Figure 1: An example of how to write an IDP for research and scientific skills, taken from the Purdue University College of Engineering Individual Development PlanThe third step is for the student to meet with their PhD advisor to discuss the IDP and identifyguidelines for their relationship. Brief paragraphs are included for what makes a good researchmentor and mentee to remind each party about honesty, communication, and mutual respect(Figure 2). During this meeting, the student and advisor should answer each of the seven sets ofquestions to