19 ReferencesACT (2012). 2011 ACT national and state scores. Downloaded from http://www.act.org/newsroom/data/2011/states.htmlBryceson, K. (2007). The online learning environment—A new model using social constructivism and the concept of ‘Ba’as a theoretical framework. Learning Environments Research, 10(3), 189-206.Capobianco, B., Mena, I, & Diefes-Dux, H.A. (2011). Elementary school teachers’ attempts at integrating engineering design: Transformation or assimilation? Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Vancouver, Canada.College Board (2012). The 8th annual AP report to the nation. Downloaded from http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/public/pdf/ap/rtn/AP-Report-to
necessitates smaller depths of cut and feed rates (i.e., chip-load values) on the tool and atomized delivery of the cutting fluid, so as to prevent tool breakage[10, 11] . Figure 3 shows a typical micro-scale machine tool (mMT) and spindle set-up along withsome of the unique geometries that are feasible with this process. (b) A 100 micron-milling tool showing an edge radius of 2 m(a) Three-axis micro-scale machine tool (mMT)[7] [5] (c) Micro-parts made using micro-milling Figure 3: Micro-milling
theinterviews, which we categorized as student-technology interactions. We are reconsidering theanalysis of interviews because of the wealth of information provided by teachers about computertechnology use and implementation (see information technology skills level of awareness). Thisanalysis will hopefully provide a different perspective on the effectiveness of teachers’ use ofcomputer and Internet-based technology in their classrooms. Specifically, there is preliminaryevidence that shows teachers’ use of computers as passive, productive, or as communicationtools to help students learn in the classroom (see below). (a) Passive Tools – represented by various mechanisms used to transfer science content to students such as ebooks (b
outreachactivities. Table 1 shows the responsibilities of the program managers. Page 25.1402.6 Table 1 Program Managers' Task List Sky’s the Limit Program Managers’ Tasks• Hold weekly meetings with the WEMS Student Leaders• Work with University Publishing on marketing brochure• Hire and supervise WEMS Student Leaders• Communicate and work with University Curriculum Leader A and Industry Professional Transportation Curriculum Leaders B, C, and D to answer curriculum questions• Reserve ropes course• Order supplies for outreach program• Make copies of handouts• Reserve hotel rooms and provide directions for leaders• Manage paperwork for outreach program funding
in a text. questioning NSES Teaching Standards (NRC)25 - Standard B: Teachers of science guide and facilitate learning Animals, habitats and Science basic needs, designed NSES Content Standards (NRC)25 – Grade K-4, and natural systems Standard C: Life Science, Organisms and Environments; Standard E: Science and Technology National Standards (ITEEA)6 – Engineering design Standard 3: Students will develop an understanding
Page 26.1266.12construction. In doing so, they sometimes failed to recognize that their weaknesses were notbeing improved, as can be seen in the following exchange: Teammate A: I feel like that’s the point of teamwork, is like whatever skill you have, that’s what you should apply it to. So if [Teammate B] and I aren’t too good at cutting or we can’t build a certain thing, I feel like that’s what [Teammate C] was useful for. And whereas [Teammate C] didn’t really quite know how to calculate some of the math that went into it, that’s where [Teammate B] and I came in. And I feel like that’s what made our team a good team, like we were efficient and effective, but- Teammate B: But then what happens
learning while providing theFellows with K-12 classroom experience. A long-range goal of our project is to study the impactof the Fellows on the professional development of teachers in terms of (a) implementation ofinstructional strategies, (b) increasing teaching efficacy, (c) development of content knowledge,and (d) delivery of the SLIDER curriculum with fidelity.PurposeIn this first report of the study, we begin to investigate the impact of the Fellows on seventeachers in six classrooms in two middle school contexts—suburban and rural. We areparticularly interested in ways the Fellows help teachers implement a problem-based learningcurriculum with fidelity. In studying impact, we focused this exploratory study on determiningthe ways SLIDER
Programs for Youth, 40 pages. Available on-line:http://dmp.nysci.org/system/files/filedepot/1/NYSCI_MAKER_BLUEPRINT.pdf.[6] Makerspace/Maker Media (2013). The Makerspace Playbook. School Edition, 84 pages. Available on-line:http://makerspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/MakerspacePlaybook-Feb2013.pdf[7] Young Makers (2012). Maker Club Playbook, 77 pages. Available on-line:https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9esWAj9mpBLNmRlMWYxZjUtZjJjMi00NTdhLThmNjUtMmM5ZDk5NTZmMzBh/edit[8] Richardson, M., Elliott, S., and Haylock, B. (2013). This home is a factory: Implications of the Maker movementon urban environments. Craft + design enquiry, Australian National University Press, Issue 5, 6 pages.[9] Rollins, J. C. (2014). Makerspaces and evolution of work
analysismethod was used to validate the instrument. This analysis revealed four factors defined as: 1) theimportance of DET; 2) teachers’ familiarity with DET; 3) teachers’ perceptions of stereotypicalcharacteristics of engineers; and 4) teachers’ perceptions of characteristics of engineers. Theinternal consistency reliability estimate for the survey was 0.88. The analysis of 98 teachers’responses to these items indicated that: a) the importance of DET in the curriculum was strongerfor female teachers as compared to male teachers, t ( 96) = 2.42, p < 0.05; b) elementary schoolteachers were least likely to teach DET in their curriculum as compared to middle school andhigh school teachers, F (2, 28.81) = 4.35, p < 0.05; and c) DET was more likely to
these reforms as students will need skills for: (a)finding, organizing, and managing information; and (b) team working, oral communication, andi This material is based upon work supported by the Learning through Engineering Design and Practice, NationalScience Foundation Award# 0737616, Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings, underInformation Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) Youth-based Project. Opinions, findings, Page 22.442.2conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the National Science
Paper ID #11490Project-based learning in a high school pre-engineering program: Findingson student achievement (RTP, Strand 3)Todd France, University of Colorado Boulder Todd France is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Colorado Boulder. He is part of the Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education Program and helps teach and develop curriculum at a high school STEM academy. His research focuses on pre-engineering education and project-based learning. Page 26.1265.1 c American Society for
AC 2008-1728: GEARING UP FOR THE FUTURE: A K-12/UNIVERSITYPARTNERSHIP TO CREATE AN ENGINEERING MAGNET ELEMENTARYSCHOOLElizabeth Parry, North Carolina State University ELIZABETH A. PARRY is currently the Project Director of RAMP-UP, a K12 math outreach program funded by the GE Foundation and the National Science Foundation GK-12 Program. She obtained her BS degree in engineering management with a minor in mechanical engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla in 1983. After over 10 years with IBM, she has spent the last 20 years working on K-12 engineering and STEM issues and initiatives, particularly in support of underrepresented groups.Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University
ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999) Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, Addison Wesley, Harlow, UK.2. Blumenthal, D. (2003) Evaluation Approaches for a K-12 Digital Library Collection. WGBH Educational Foundation. Boston. MA. Available: http://eduimpact.comm.nsdl.org/evalworkshop/blumenthal.doc. Accessed 12/03/2008.3. Breen, C. (2008) Review: NetTrekker. MacWorld.com. Available: http://www.macworld.com/article/134787/2008/08/nettrekker.html. Accessed: 12/03/2008.4. Cunningham, C.M., Hester, K. (2007) Engineering is Elementary: An Engineering and Technology Curriculum for Children. Proceedings, ASEE
interpretation on their own, the evaluator concluded, we will be able to deemMISO “institutionalized.”B. Re-Use of Products, Use of Social Connections, and Transfer of Learning PracticesThere was a lot of evidence at the higher level of the MISO project (the data analyticscomponent, principal investigator interactions), that MISO is creating a “buzz” in the oftendifficult to access research and publication world. An update from the Data AnalyticsCoordinator indicates that over 150 researchers, nationally and internationally, had accessed theS-STEM survey and the T-STEM survey for their own research. In addition, the PIs arecontinuously looking for opportunities to present their work. For example, in October 2013,MISO team members presented at a state
can be found in Appendix B (Roadmap).Parent ProgramParents are able to hear from College Advisors who provide information on college requirementsand financial planning. Additionally, a panel composed of university students from diverseSTEM backgrounds share their personal experiences and permit the parents to ask questions ofinterest. Parents also get to experience the campus and lab tours.Advertising for the event is normally done through a local science advocate organization and bydirectly contacting partner schools of the university. The cost of the event is free to participants,with local industry and organizations picking up the expenses for food and supplies. The collegestudents and professional attendees volunteer their time
, learningobjectives and expected outcomes for the four GC DELI units adapted for high school studentscan be found in Appendix A, B, C and D.1.1 GC DELI for High SchoolIntroduction to Engineering in High School (ENGR 102 HS) is an introductory engineeringcourse offered by the University of Arizona, College of Engineering (COE). Taught by highschool teachers to high school students, the dual credit program has been in operation for sevenyears. Like the on-campus version of the course, ENGR102 HS introduces students toengineering design principles and practices as well as to emerging and current challenges withinthe field. Winner of the 2014 ASEE “Best Practices in K-12 and University Partnerships” award,ENGR 102 HS is currently offered in 37 high schools
, M.; Jacobs, S.; Coe, E., Larsen, S.; Hsu, E. (2002). Applying Covariational Reasoning While Modeling Dynamic Events: A Framework and a Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 352-378.10. Rivard, L., & Straw, S. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566-593.11. Blanton, W. E., Simmons, E., & Warner, M. (2001). Fifth dimension: Application of cultural-historical activity theory, inquiry-based learning, computers, and telecommunications to change prospective teachers’ preconceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 435-463.12. Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of
University planned professional development sessionsaround (a) a formalized professional development model and (b) a set of clearly definedoutcomes to guide the process. Having these two components in place prior to planningand delivering professional development enhances the quality of the work. The outcomesof the professional development workshops serve a valuable purpose in guiding theproject regarding these critically important elements. At the time of this paper,professional development and lesson development was in process. The followingdescribes the professional development and lesson development process. The findings ateach site, Mexican Hat Elementary and Todd Elementary are described separately.During the year long professional development
applications had beenreceived for the 30 spots available in the program. All applications were read and evaluated bythe WiE assistant director. Evaluations were based on the following criteria: (a) how supportivethe teacher recommendation was of the applicant, (b) the extent to which the applicant’s personalstatement indicated an interest in attending a chemical engineering camp, and (c) the level ofclasses taken and grades earned by the applicant. After the assistant director had narrowed thepool of admissible applicants to those students who were highly qualified for and enthusiasticabout the program, the WiE director reviewed this group of applications and collaborated withthe assistant director to determine which students would be admitted into
” students are converted to “high interest” students. “Interest” in a subject matter isdirectly related to affect, and may also serve as a rough indicator of anxiety levels. Page 22.1045.11 Figure 4 Percentage of students, by semester, that expressed a high or very high level of interest in the subject matter before and after the course. [N=140] Figure 5 “Conversion” percentage of those students that had a low level of interest in the Engineering Math subject matter before the course “converted” to a high level of interest after the course(b) Course surveys:More recently a survey has been administered to Engineering Math
parity bit, and 2 stop bits, and 6 bits ofdata, and is otherwise a standard UART signal. How much overhead does this signal have,where overhead is % of non-data bits to all bits sent?a) 50%b) 66%c) 40%d) 25%15. What is a BAUD rate?a) The inverse of the time period of one-bit of data on a serial streamb) The rate of change of a digital systemc) How quickly a digital signal degrades over timed) The CPU speed of an embedded microcontroller16. A C-Program begins executing at what part of the code in the main.c file?a) at the top of the codeb) at the start of the main functionc) at the beginning of the first included libraryd) at the start of the while() loop17. In the field of programming, and IDE program refers to what?a) Integrated Development
AC 2008-2304: LESSONS LEARNED FROM A PRODUCT REALIZATION RETSITE: MAXIMIZING SUCCESS FOR TEACHER RESEARCH AND HIGHSCHOOL STUDENT IMPACTBirdy Reynolds, University of PittsburghMatthew Mehalik, University of PittsburghMichael Lovell, University of PittsburghChristian Schunn, University of Pittsburgh Page 13.849.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Lessons Learned from a Product Realization RET Site: Maximizing Success for Teacher Research and High School Student ImpactAbstractRecent trends suggest a degradation of our nation's technological competitiveness and thesignificant decline in the number of K-12 students
2006-1086: DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF INNOWORKS: A PORTABLE,INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRAM BYVOLUNTEER COLLEGE STUDENTS FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL YOUTH FROMUNDERPRIVILEGED BACKGROUNDSWilliam Hwang, United InnoWorks Academy and Duke University William L. Hwang is a senior Angier B. Duke Scholar at Duke University majoring in Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Physics and minoring in Chemistry. He co-founded United InnoWorks Academy in 2003 and is in his third year serving as CEO and program director of InnoWorks. In addition to his work in K-12 educational outreach, William is conducting research on developing early cancer detection biosensors and pin
indicate state (A) or Georgia county (B) where teacher workshopparticipants reside.We began our workshop development by exploring the numerous educational materials currentlyavailable on the Internet typically from NSEC, MRSEC, and the NNIN websites. Each lessonwas analyzed in terms of how it could possibly fit into current science topics. We also usedsecondary science textbooks to align the lesson with current curriculum. From examiningapproximately 40-50 NSE classroom lessons, we narrowed the list down to approximately sixthat we felt could address broad science concepts important to NSE and we designed our initialworkshops around these lessons. An additional consideration was that the lesson did not requireexpensive equipment, could be done
reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. M. (2004). Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students' ideas about engineers and engineering. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.2. Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S. & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60-73.3. Dyehouse, M. Weber, N., Kharchenko, O., Duncan, D., Strobel, J., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2011). Measuring students’ perceptions of engineers: Validation of the draw-an-engineer (DAET) coding system with Interview
Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES) hosted the 11th Pre-serviceTeacher Program. The program had two significant components: a) A national Pre-service Teacher Conference (PSTC) held at Alexandria, VA, during February 16-18,2006, that drew participation from HBCUs (Historically Black Colleges andUniversities), HSIs(Hispanic Serving Institutions), TCUs ( Tribal Colleges andUniversities) and majority universities with significant minority enrollment and b) Anintensive two week Preservice Teacher Institute (PSTI) in the summer for a relativelysmall group of pre-service teachers held at NASA Langley for inspiring future K-12teachers in the fields of mathematics, science, and technology education fields. Thispaper will focus on a robotics activity designed by
, April 26, 2001. (see http://www.rpi.edu/web/President/speeches/universidad.html)3. Neeley, K., Olds, B., and Steneck, N. Recommendations for liberal education in engineering: A white paper from the liberal education division of the American Society for Engineering Education. Paper presented at the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 16-19, 2002.4. Hawley, R. Engineering and the creative arts: A new frontier? The Royal Society of Edinburg, 2005.5. Florman, S.C. Learning liberally. ASEE Prism November 1993: 18-23. Page 12.84.86. Thorndike, R.L., Hagen, E.P., and Sattler, J.M. Stanford-Binet
Association of University Women. 7. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001, February). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187-206. 8. Lent, R.W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K.J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 3 (4), 424-430. 9. Catsambis, S. (1994, July). The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 67(3), 199-215. 10. Clewell, B. C., & Campbell, P.B. (2002). Taking stock: Where we’ve been, where we are
AC 2008-1018: FORMATIVE EVALUATION OF A PROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS INFUSINGENGINEERING DESIGN INTO THE CLASSROOMJodi Cullum, Utah State University Jodi Cullum is a doctoral student in the Experimental and Applied Psychology program at Utah State University. Her interests lie in outcomes research in health psychology and program evaluation more broadly. Jodi has been involved in numerous small-scale research studies in Canada and the United States as well as large-scale national projects. She has been involved in STEM evaluation for the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education since May 2007.Christine Hailey, Utah State University
activity for the engineering design challenge lesson: Provide the students with some background information on what an engineer is and what engineering is. a. Have them write the definitions in their notebooks b. Have them discuss with their partners examples of engineers in the real world.Although this short discussion does not dive very deeply into the content of the CEE indicator, itdoes at least provide an introduction upon which future lessons and discussions could be built.Another approach to addressing this indicator came in the form of bringing in a guest speaker totalk to the students about the work that he or she does. Putting a human face on an engineer andgiving the students a chance to hear