://www.ncees.org/About_NCEES/News/News_Pages/FE_Other_Disciplines_module.php Accessed: 5/17/2012. 5. C. Davis, M. Yeary, and J. Sluss, “Reversing the Trend of Engineering Enrollment Declines with Innovative Outreach, Recruiting, and Retention Programs” IEEE Trans. Educ., DOI 10.1109/TE.2011.2157921, accepted and to appear 2012. 6. C. Davis, M. Yeary, and J. Sluss, “Results and best practices of a two year study on recruiting programs to boost ECE undergraduate enrollment,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, paper AC 2011-1539, pp. 1-17. June 2011. 7. Erwin, B. Cyr, M.; Rogers, C., 2000, "LEGO engineer and RoboLab: teaching engineering with LabView from kindergarten to graduate school," Int. Journal of Engineering Education, v. 16, n
, 20148. Robert B. Stone, Nancy Hubing, Timothy Philpot and James Schroetlin. “Striking a Balance between Engineering Science and Engineering Design: Creation of an Interdisciplinary Engineering Program”, Inter. Conf. on Engineering Design, 2003.9. Alexandra E. Coso, R. Reid Bailey and Ellen Minzenmayer. “How to approach an interdisciplinary engineering problem: Characterizing undergraduate students’ perceptions”, 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2010.10. M. Fikret Ercan. “Integration in Engineering Education”, IEEE Inter. Conf. on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, 2012.11. Prancel Chand, Mansour H. Assaf and Imran Jannif. “Implication of Curricula Design on Engineering Education”, IEEE Inter
://www.aplu.org/library/the-centrality-of-engagement-in-higher-education/fileJohnson, C. S., & Delawsky, S. (2013). Project-based learning and student engagement. Academic Research International, 4, 560-570. Retrieved from http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.4(4)/2013(4.4-59).pdfLee, J. J., Blackwell, S. B., Drake, J., J., & Moran, K. K. (2014). Taking a leap of faith: redefining teaching and learning in higher education through project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 8, 1-17. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1426&context=ijpblMantri, A. (2014). Working towards a scalable model of problem-based learning instruction in
Paper ID #10170A Hybrid Interdisciplinary Mechatronics Engineering Course Using ContentBased Learning and Project Based LearningProf. Genisson Silva Coutinho P.E., Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia Genisson Silva Coutinho currently teaches in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Technology at the Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia. He is a mechanical engineer and holds a Bachelor’s degree in law and a Master’s degree in mechanical engineering. He has been teaching at different levels, from the first year of technical high school to the final year of
feel strongly about, regardless of their team’s official position.Each team receives a team grade, based upon a combination of: a) the written position statement,b) the instructor’s judgment of the team’s approach to their presentation and the strength of their Page 15.62.6arguments, and c) the audience’s opinion of each team’s effort (a debate evaluation is filled outby the class to provide critical feedback to each team). Team Widget Deconstruction ProjectStudents also engage in a collaborative capstone research experience in which 5-person teams dotheir own widget deconstructions and present those findings to
the success of the college-wide multidisciplinary course, a second round of this course iscurrently underway. The department’s represented by the faculty teaching the course will berotated each year so that all departments have an opportunity to participate. 1. Eggert, R., “Engineering Design: Are We Teaching the Right Stuff,” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,” June 2007, Honolulu, Hawaii.2. Criteria for Evaluating Engineering Programs, Engineering Accreditation Commission, ABET Inc, 2006.3. Tuckman, B., “Developmental sequence in small groups”, Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399. The article was reprinted in Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal Number 3, Spring 2001 and is
AC 2011-680: PEER MENTORING, A TRANSITIONAL PROGRAM TOIMPROVE RETENTION IN THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERINGSummer Dann Johnson, Louisiana State University Ms Dann is the Project Manager for the College of Engineering’s STEP program. She has her Master’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering and worked for industry for 9 years prior to returning to academia.Paige Davis, Louisiana State University Paige Davis has 20 years experience as an Instructor in the College of Engineering at Louisiana State University. In addition to teaching she assists with the STEP program. She received her baccalaureate degree in Engineering Technology and her master’s degree in Industrial Engineering from Louisiana State University.Ashley
; Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2010. 3. E. Brent, B. Clayton and A. Frenkel, “Autonomous Blimp Bomber”, Final Report for RIT Robotics Course 20092, February 2010. Page 22.674.10
, 178-186.9. Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 89-106.10. Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New South Wales: Page 15.1370.8 Currency.11. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process- output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.12. Schaffer, S., Lei, K., & Reyes Paulino, L. (2008). A framework for cross
AC 2007-803: MEASURING STUDENT ABILITY TO WORK ONMULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS: BUILDING AND TESTING A RUBRICCarolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University. She works on various curriculum and instruction projects including instructional development for faculty and graduate students, assessment of student learning, and program evaluation. Prior to coming to MSU, Plumb was at the University of Washington, where she directed the Engineering Communication Program. While at the UW, Plumb also worked as an Instructional Development and Assessment Specialist for the School of
otheruniversities.References [1] A. Holdsworth, K. Watty, and M. Davies, Developing Capstone Experiences. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, 2009. [2] Computing Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for accrediting computing programs, 2019-2020,” 2019, last accessed 29 January 2019. [Online]. Available: https: //www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2019-2020/ [3] R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, B. R. Swan, and D. K. Anthony, “A survey of capstone engineering courses in north america,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 165–174, 1995. [4] Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for accrediting
interests, including mechanical engineering and technology (33.3%), computer andinformation technology (16.7%), computer graphics and technology (11.1%), aviation (8.3%),and building and construction management (5.6%) among others. Additionally, 19.4% did notidentify their interest by the beginning of the semester. The majority of students were males(83.3%). Students came from diverse ethnic background. Overall, the demographic compositionof the first cohort aligned with that of the college. Finally, all students self-identified their pastacademic success within the “A” to “B” range.The faculty fellows developed a set of values to ensure that an overarching goal of preparing anew generation of technologists and engineers was achieved:17,16
. Page 23.12.11 (a) Front panel(b) Zero-crossing algorithm for speed detection Page 23.12.12 Figure 6. LabView Program.III. Course Outcome AssessmentThe assessment presented here with a total of 24 student responses (student distribution: 33%EE, 42% ME minoring in EE, and 25% regular ME) is based on our collected data from teachingthe dynamic system modeling and analysis/feedback control system in spring 2011 and spring2012. At the end of each semester, we conducted a student self-assessment. A student survey wasgiven before the final exam to ask each student to evaluate his/her achievement for each courselearning outcome listed in Table 1. Students were asked to make the
sponsor, DPM student, or faculty/staff member.2. PRP draft is submitted to the DPM instructor, MSD Program or Director for initial review.3. PRP draft goes to review team and is assessed against acceptance criteria 1-4. It is at this stage that if the RIT champion is also identified if the project is not going to be rejected. Possible outcomes are (a) rejection, (b) postponement, or (c) identification of RIT champion to complete PRP.4. If the RIT champion is not the project Guide, a project Guide is assigned.5. PRP reviewed by project Guide. The Guide is responsible for securing reviewers from other departments and gaining approval from those reviews. The Guide is also responsible for any final changes needed before releasing the PRP to
Paper ID #18245On Quality Assurance Mechanisms in Engineering Education: A Case Studyof Purdue UniversityMing Li, Tsinghua University Ming LI is a postdoctor at the Institute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, PRC. He received B.A. in Qingdao Agricultural University, M.Ed. in Shandong Normal University, and Doctor of Management in Beihang University. From March 2013 to June 2013, he studied in School of Engineering Education at Purdue University as a visiting scholar. He is interested in higher education administration as well as engineering education. Now his research interest focuses on the quality assurance in
. Robinson, L. Shuman, A. Shartrand, P. Weilerstein, ”Factors Related To Entrepreneurial Knowledge in the Engineering Curriculum,” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol 4, Number 1, pp. 31-38, June 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.7814/jeen5v4p3borssw. [Accessed Mar 18, 2018].[11] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, S. Haghighi, ”The Engineering Entrepreneurship Survey: An Assessment Instrument to Examine Engineering Student Involvement in Entrepreneurship Education,” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, Vol 2, Number 2, pp. 35-56, Winter, 2011.[Online]. Available: http://www.jeenonline.com/Vol2/Num2/Vol2No2P3.pdf. [Accessed Apr. 1, 2018].[12] D. Pistrui, B. Bonnstetter, C. Fry, ”Creating, Educating
AC 2010-31: WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY'S HYBRID BUS - AMULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO PROJECT BASED EDUCATIONSteven Fleishman, Western Washington University STEVEN FLEISHMAN is currently an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Technology Department at Western Washington University. He joined the Vehicle Research Institute at WWU in 2006 after spending twenty years in automotive drivetrain R&D. Steven.fleishman@wwu.edu Page 15.1362.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Western Washington University’s Hybrid Bus – A Multidisciplinary Approach to Project-BasedEducationAbstract Western
; Exposition, Tampa, Florida Jun 15-19, 2019, 26562. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32782.[15] P. M. Secola, B. A. Smiley, M. R. Anderson-Rowland, and D. R. Baker, "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gender Equity Training in Engineering Summer Workshops With Pre- College Teachers and Counselors " presented at the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico Jun 24-27, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/9237.[16] G. Pfeifer and E. A. Stoddard, ""Equitable and Effective Teams: Creating and Managing Team Dynamics for Equitable Learning Outcomes" in Kristin Wobbe and Elisabeth A. Stoddard, eds. Beyond All Expectations: Project-Based Learning in the First Year," ed, 2019.
condition. Page 24.765.8ASEE Annual Conference, 2014 Figure 1: Psychrometric charts for heating (a) and cooling (b) seasonsWall and Windows Input: In determining our walls and windows U-Values ASHRAE Standard 90.1and ASHRAE handbook fundamentals 2009 were utilized. We went with all of the base values stipulatedby them.Outside Supply Air: To determine the amount of required outside supply air we used a spreadsheetwhich utilized both IBC and ASHRAE standard 62.1. In this spreadsheet room occupancy classificationswere given along with their areas and the normal number of occupants. Based on these simple variablesthe program
Mechatronics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 1996. [2] A. Birk, “What is robotics? an interdisciplinary field is getting even more diverse,” IEEE robotics & automation magazine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 94–95, 2011. [3] S. E. Lyshevski, “Mechatronic curriculum–retrospect and prospect,” Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 195–205, 2002. [4] D. G. Alciatore and M. B. Histand, “Integrating mechatronics into a mechanical engineering curriculum,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 35–38, 2001. [5] R. Manseur, “Development of an undergraduate robotics course,” in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change, vol. 2. IEEE, 1997, pp. 610–612. [6] T.-R. Hsu
Communications and a Fellow of the IEEE.Prof. Edwin K. P. Chong Ph.D., Colorado State University See edwinchong.usProf. Edward J. Coyle, Georgia Institute of Technology Edward J. Coyle is the John B. Peatman Distinguished Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing, directs the Arbutus Center for the Integration of Research and Education, and is the founder of the Vertically-Integrated Projects (VIP) Program. He is a Georgia Research Alliance Eminent Scholar and was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s 2005 Bernard M. Gordon Award for Inno- vation in Engineering and Technology Education. Dr. Coyle is a Fellow of the IEEE and his research interests include engineering education, wireless networks
," IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 89-99, 1997.[4] D. Bradley, "What is mechatronics and why teach it?," International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 275-291, 2004.[5] S. Boverie, D. D. Cho, H. Hashimoto, M. Tomizuka, W. Wei and D. Zühlke, "Mechatronics, robotics and components for automation and control: IFAC milestone report," in 17th IFAC World Congress (IFAC'08), 2008.[6] C. F. Auerbach and L. B. Silverstein, Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis, New York: New York University Press, 2003.[7] N. L. Ramo, A. Huang-Saad and B. Belmont, "What is Biomedical Engineering? Insights from Qualitative Analysis of Definitions Written by Undergraduate Students," in ASEE
(Figure 1). Figure 1: Workshop 3 Interactive Session.Each workshop concluded with a summary by the organizers of what was covered and learned.The schedule for workshop 3, shown below, was typical of all workshops in the series, althoughthe topics covered by the parallel sessions varied slightly among the workshops: 1. Introduction and Overview 2. Interactive parallel sessions I a. Mechatronic education knowledge base b. Robotics education knowledge base c. Project-based learning in Mechatronics and Robotics d. Advanced and open-source platforms for Mechatronics and Robotics 3. Report out I 4. Interactive parallel sessions II a. Reducing barriers to adoption b. Accreditation c. Preparation to teach
emailed data and information every night that prepared them for the next- day activity. This contributed to the success of the workshop as the students knew exactly the activities of the day and had the files they needed to start the activity. 10) Parents were kept involved by: a) inviting them to a short presentation about the camp on Friday afternoon before the start of the workshop (the workshop started the next Monday) and b) inviting them to their children’s presentations. One of the success stories of summerDr. AC Megri 2019 ASEE Annual Conference camp is that two of the students who participated in the program were accepted into the Mechanical
AC 2011-975: ENGINEERING FOR AMERICAN COMMUNITIES: EN-GAGING ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY ALTRU-ISTIC ENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECTSMalinda S Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder MALINDA SCHAEFER ZARSKE is a doctoral candidate at the University of Colorado Boulder in engi- neering education. Her research interests include engineering student learning, diversity and recruitment. Her current research is centered on the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, recruitment, and retention in engineering. She is a Co-Director of the Engineering for American Commu- nities student organization, on the development team as well as a content editor for the TeachEngineer- ing.org digital
AC 2007-2913: MINOR IN ENGINEER STUDIES: A NEW PROGRAM FOR A NEWERAMani Mina, Iowa State University Page 12.1070.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 MINOR IN ENGINEER STUDIES: A NEW PROGRAM FOR A NEW ERAAbstractA new program has started in our school. This is a true multidisciplinary program that includesthe whole engineering college and all engineering fields. The major goal of the program is toprovide technological awareness and understanding of the technical issues to non-engineeringstudents. Since many managers, directors, and policymakers (all around the world) are makingdecisions on technological-based
formulate it”, (b) “solutions to wicked problems are not computable throughoptimization calculations”, (c) problems are non-repeatable, and (d) wicked problems areaddressed in an open-ended temporal space (p. 133).2 Because wicked problems are by definitionnever solved, we discuss ‘responses’ rather than ‘solutions’ in this paper.Traditional examples of wicked problems include social issues such as homelessness or K-12education in the U.S. Most people would agree that a problem exists in these areas, but theappropriate response to that problem shows a large variation depending on individual values (e.g.charter schools, merit pay, increased public funding). Many challenges within the engineering
complex problems, 3. select the correct trigonometry principles to solve a problem, 4. obtain straight line function (y = mx + b) coefficients, 5. construct hand drawn semilog graphs, 6. obtain exponential function (y = K emx) coefficients, 7. participate as a group member and/or leader in a study group.ENGR 104 Î Applied Problem SolvingThis is a 3-credit course that has two hours of lecture and two hours of computer laboratory perweek. This course introduces computer problem solving methods using flowcharts and computerprogramming. ENGR 103 and Math 118 (College Algebra & Trig) are the pre-requisite for thiscourse. The textbook are required include the same text for ENGR 1035 plus a new text forusing Microsoft Excel6.The course
disciplines. a) b)Figure 1: a) IDEAS Showcase at the End of a Semester (There have been 8 events, with a participation ofapproximately 2000 students in total with more than 600 projects so far), b) IDEAS Showcase Awardees at the endof a Semester (Top 10% of the Projects are Awarded First Place)For IDEAS students are asked to form groups and work on a final project. They select a topic,preferably related to their majors, and conduct research involving some of the concepts learnedin the Engineering Analysis-Statics course. The projects involve creation of physical models,designing experiments, testing, measurements, and comparison of the experimental data with thetheoretical
society. He also places thisunderstanding in the context of ABET criterion (b), “an ability to design and conductexperiments, analyze and interpret data” [6, p. 2], in that such ability is part of the scientificmethod, which has its foundations in the philosophy of science, and which together alsoconstitute one of the primary components of the course design for IDM and SMR.Splitt [7] interprets the demand on engineers as the “solution of problems involving humanvalues, attitudes, and behavior, as well as the interrelationships and dynamics of social, political,environmental, and economic systems on a global basis” [7, p. 182], restated in the conclusion interms of “problems involving … world cultures, religions, ethics, and economics” and