the results of an investigationof an intervention with the potential to improve students’ identification of the optimal solution tothe problems posed by sponsors.The intervention represents an extension of research funded by an NSF IUSE: EHR Multi-institutional grant to improve writing support for engineering students on their technicaldocuments through the use of peer writing tutors from non-technical backgrounds,collaboratively trained by engineering faculty and writing tutor supervisors. The project, WritingAssignment Tutor Training in STEM (WATTS), has been conducted in three universities overthree years and has demonstrated statistically significant improvement in STEM undergraduatewriting after students received tutoring from WATTS
Writing. Paper presented at 2019 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33610[2] Ware, R., & Turnipseed, N., & Gallagher, J. R., & Elliott, C. M., & Popovics, J. S., & Prior, P., &Zilles, J. L. (2019, June), Writing Across Engineering: A Collaborative Approach to Support STEMFaculty’s Integration of Writing Instruction in their Classes Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33671[3] Damron, R., & High, K. (2009, June), Writing To Learn: The Effect Of Peer Tutoring On CriticalThinking And Writing Skills Of First Year Engineering Students Paper presented at 2009 AnnualConference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. 10.18260/1-2—5684[4
technical writing skills in STEMdisciplines is well documented. Solutions have been proposed, implemented, and inconsistently sustained.One approach to improving disciplinary technical writing is through Writing Assignment Tutor Trainingin STEM (WATTS). WATTS is an interdisciplinary, collaborative approach in which STEM faculty workwith writing centers and generalist peer tutors to provide just-in-time assignment-specific feedback tostudents. WATTS research was funded by an NSF IUSE collaborative grant (award #s 2013467,2013496, & 2013541). In WATTS, the STEM instructor collaborates with the writing center supervisorand prepares materials for the tutor-training including assignment examples, a glossary of terms, areas ofconcern, and the
advancement ofChatGPT:“It’s a good tool for explanation, not great for solving calculations.”“It should use better resources when providing information.”“Updating to current data rather than data two years old.”Conclusion:Although the process of writing an essay was remarkably simpler when ChatGPT was used forwriting, independent writing yielded more accurate and dependable results. By so doing, studentsnoted that when they do research on their own, they can use valid sources such as published booksand journal articles rather than blogs and non-peer-reviewed research works. Furthermore, studentsunderstood that the statistics provided by ChatGPT are not up to date for they should rely oncredible sources such as official government websites for the
-progress introduces the KLIQED tool along with itsrationale, a template, emerging evidence on its effectiveness from students’perspectives, and tips for instructors. Future work includes survey data analysisand a content analysis of the peers’ comments collected from completed KLIQEDsheets to further assess the effectiveness of the tool.Keywords: Oral communication, student engagement, project-based learning,attentionBackground and MotivationThe value of oral communication skillsCommunication skills, including reading, writing, listening, and presenting, are essentialcompetencies for entering the workforce and for participating in society. Therefore, degreeprograms in all disciplines (e.g. liberal arts, science, and engineering) are expected to
-received, we would like to increase the way we support the students at JHU. We planto expand our website to include more student-facing resources and offer workshops on populartopics. We also want to build a repository with resources for our consultants and offer earlier,more efficient training to build their confidence.E. TCL Strengths From the data collected, we can see that the TCL is popular with both our student clientsand our employees. While many universities employ peer-to-peer models with undergraduatestaff in writing centers to cut costs, a recurring theme in the student surveys and interviews wasthe expertise of the consultants. Students value meeting one-on-one with faculty members orgraduate student consultants who know a lot
effective teaching ● Peer and Instructor Feedback ● Bring An Inclusive Mindset to Your Teaching ● Active Learning ● Ethical/Social Responsibility in the classroom ● How do we assess learning? ● Graduate Student lead Workshop - Peer Assessment ● Writing a Effective Teaching PhilosophyEngineering 397 (ENES 397): Advanced Topics of Teaching Fellow ScholarshipThis course is designed to continue to elevate the undergraduate teaching assistant knowledgeand understanding of the scholarly practices of teaching, learning and research. Throughout thesemester, students attend workshops and seminars that focus on the researched and applied bestpractices in the field of Engineering and Computing education.As more of a practitioner course, students
responsibility fortheir learning building up to structured problem-solving through their interests and involvementwith the issue they are solving as engineers. Often these problems are multi-disciplinary requiringknowledge in different fields such as materials, environment, acoustics, air quality, chemicalreactions, and business. This paradigm aims to impact students in multiple learning environmentsand extend their knowledge beyond classroom and technical knowledge.ImpactThe projects developed by the students not only broaden their understanding of their specificproject but also learn and get educated on other topics from their peers in different areas and topics.Students have demonstrated engagement and critical thinking in engineering problems
involvesconfidence in taking on research challenges, learning new skills, and contributing to the project team.Finally, recognition by others plays a pivotal role in solidifying an engineering identity. It can be definedas “recognition (i.e., beliefs that they are seen as a good student in the subject by peers, parents, andteachers) as being the type of person that can do a particular subject” [17, p. 2]. In the context of thisstudy, recognition reflects both interpersonal validation from engineering peers and mentors as well aspersonal internalization of external recognition. Through others identifying their engineering talent andtechnical contributions, students begin to think of themselves as good engineers worthy of that field. Withengineering interest
program in the Mid-Atlantic region were tasked to write a reflective essay explaining the challenges faced intheir first four weeks in college. A thematic analysis of the qualitative data was used to analyzethe reflective essays.This “work in progress” paper will summarize the main results of the study. Based on theanalysis, we propose interventions to assist these students in their transition from high school tocollege. This project is relevant to institutions seeking to improve the retention of students intheir engineering programs.Background:First generation college students are defined as students whose parents completed only a highschool diploma or equivalent. Some researchers include in this classification those studentswhose parents
inindustry.The Peer Mentors (Peer Mentoring is discussed later in this paper) are invaluable in providingfeedback from the students on how the first-year classes are going, as viewed from the studentperspective.One additional adjustment in our Program was to expand our two introductory courses,Introduction to Data Science and Role of Data Science in Today’s World, from one- and two-credit hour courses, respectively, to three-credit hours each. They were originally designed thatway but were reduced to fit in another course whose content has been folded into other courses.This has resulted in minor changes to the first two years of the 8-semester plan. At the sametime, this change has allowed us to expand the Introduction and Role courses to the
, job shadowing programs still exist and have been documentedin the literature.In engineering, most job shadowing experience is in connection with industry. Job shadowingprograms have been found to have impacts on student career trajectories. Engineering programsare expected to help students find internships and job shadowing opportunities in industry becauseit is considered a best practice for students to have this experience early in their careers [3]. Whenpaired with a near-peer mentor and participating in a job shadowing experience, research showsthat there is a positive impact on student retention in STEM programs [4].Many different aspects can influence a successful job shadowing program. As in the definition,job shadowing should involve
, networkingevents, and overall social interactions with colleagues in a technical atmosphere. Revitalizingthese efforts and advancing their development is crucial for student professional development,which has shown to be a significant contributor to successful entry into the workforce [12]-[15].We tried to overcome these limitations and leverage the advantages of online interactionsthrough the following events.Strategy for Success Seminars - These events were focused on expanding students’perspectives of resources and skills associated with the engineering fields. The ESC engaged inthree events: an Engineering Resources Fair, Students Orgs 101, and Technical Writing Seminar.These seminars presented the importance of connecting with University
students also presented theirfindings as a group presentation to obtain the final grade for the project. A standard rubric was used for grading the student work, with 60% of the grade assigned to thecontent (quality and depth of analysis) and including the major aspects of the EOP framework. Theremaining 30% and 10% of the project grade were assigned for the presentation (clarity of expression,organization of ideas, and adherence to academic writing standards) and collaboration (peer evaluation ofthe group's collaborative effort, including communication, contribution, and teamwork), respectively.Furthermore, the students completed an indirect voluntary assessment using an anonymous surveyconcerning the EOP concepts. The survey was created
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Perception of Engineering Undergraduates Towards an Active Learning Pedagogy at a Minority Serving InstitutionAbstractExperimental centric pedagogy (ECP) which is an active learning approach has been reported toincrease student engagement, critical thinking, peer collaboration, as well as motivation inengineering related courses. However, little is known on the perception of students about thisActive Learning Pedagogy (ALP). This study aims to investigate the perception of minorityserving institutions (MSI) engineering undergraduates on the use of ALP as an active agentduring instruction. This study adopted a quantitative approach in a pre-post-test design. Theengineering
multidisciplinarity will be used to refer to thebalance of and cognitive distances between majors of students within a student team. Thestudy builds on methods used in measures of interdisciplinary research, so references to thosemethods will use the term interdisciplinary, consistent with writings in that area. With thatclarification given, Rousseau et al. place minimal emphasis on terminology, “Although someresearchers make a distinction between the terms interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary,transdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary research, in empirical studies one finds a continuumwhich makes it difficult to distinguish among these modes” [2, p. 70]. 3% % of Papers with Multi- or
professor access to students of anymajor on campus and the students can stay with the VIP team for multiple semesters. VIP teamstypically have 10 to 20 students. The Electronic ARTrium VIP team is co-instructed by Prof.Weitnauer and Dr. Thomas Martin, Chief Scientist of the Electro-optics Systems Laboratory atthe Georgia Tech Research Institute. Enrollments in the Electronic ARTrium team since itsinception to the time of this writing have been 22, 15, 21, and 24, for Fall 2021, Spring 2022,Fall 2022, and Spring 2023. Many if not all the computer science (CS) students on the VIP teamwere using VIP to satisfy their junior capstone design requirement, but this is transparent to theVIP instructors. Engineering students also have the option to use VIP
industry sponsored projects, usually, therewill also be one technical advisor from the company too.Each team will present their project to classmates two times during the semester through themidterm and final presentation. In the midterm presentation, students present their progress todate, share challenges they faced and how they tackled them, and describe their plan for the restof the semester. However, final presentations, usually a week before the capstone conference,allow teams to practice their presentation skills for the big conference day and receive feedbackfrom their peers and the instructor.Roles of the Course Instructor and Technical AdvisorTimely and effective communication is key to the success of each capstone design project. AtPenn
satellite campus can demonstrate their potential ofeventually becoming a traditional big University campus, by ensuring that their students arereceiving high-quality education and are performing at the same level as their peers at the big-University campus.Popularity of Satellite CampusThe plan to establish a satellite campus and incur eventual growth is largely dependent on theeconomic strengths of the region in which they are located. The current popularity of highereducation leads to having easily accessible locations that can attract a broad spectrum of highlyqualified faculty, efficient staff members, and enthusiastic students. The appropriate curricularoptions, majors, etc. of the satellite campus is determined based on the specialized
Paper ID #38078A Self-Study of Faculty Methods, Attitudes, and Perceptions of OralEngineering ExamsDr. Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Darcie Christensen is a probationary Assistant Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University Mankato. She teaches for Iron Range Engineering, which is located at the Minnesota North Campus in Virginia, MN. Dr. Christensen received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University in the Summer of 2021. The title of her Dissertation is ”A Mixed-Method Approach to Explore Student Needs for Peer Mentoring in a College
exploratory, to elicit interesting and important patterns and build the foundation for futureinterviews. Key questions included: ● Why did you choose to enroll in an interdisciplinary graduate program? ● What were your expectations for interdisciplinary studies? ● How do you perceive working with peers from different disciplines? ● Can you discuss any courses that combine multiple disciplines, and how do they do so? ● In what ways do you think learning from other disciplines will influence your future career? ● How do you collaborate with other teammates on projects? ● What have you learned from this program so far, and what challenges have you encountered?The dataset for the current study consists of interviews with seven
systems, including SHR 1.1 programming, maintenance, and integration with other sys- tems Students should have proficiency in programming lan- guages commonly used in automation systems, such as SHR 1.1.1 Programming Skills Python, C++, or Java. They should be able to write, debug, and optimize code. Students should have an understanding of the hardware used in automation systems, including
University, Mankato Dr. Darcie Christensen is a probationary Assistant Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University Mankato. She teaches for Iron Range Engineering, which is located at the Minnesota North Campus in Virginia, MN. Dr. Christensen received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University in the Summer of 2021. The title of her Dissertation is ”A Mixed-Method Approach to Explore Student Needs for Peer Mentoring in a College of Engineering.” Darcie holds a Master of Engineering degree in Environmental Engineering (2019) and Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering (2017), both from Utah State University. She is passionate about student success
questions, likely attributable to286 the PSS sessions and training they received. For instance, during the modeling for pump size287 selection, a less defined problem, 8 students from Session A proactively sought the instructor's288 help to establish connections. Among the 6 students who achieved a high degree of connection289 (80% or higher), 5 actively collaborated with the instructor during lectures and office hours, while290 the sixth student worked closely with two of these peers. Additionally, in addressing the complex291 question of profitability, four students in Session A specifically inquired about the ski area's capital292 either from the instructor or the field tour guide, demonstrating engagement in PSS activities.293
implementing control algorithms in robotic systems. 4. Analyze the performance of control algorithms for robotic systems in terms of stability, robustness, optimality, and accuracy. 5. Develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills by troubleshooting and improving the performance of control algorithms for robotic systems. 6. Develop communication skills by presenting project results and findings to peers and instructors. 7. Gain practical experience in working with robotics platforms in physics engine robot simulators.In light of the opportunities presented by project-based learning and the challenges of providingaccess to reliable hardware for robotics education, we have developed a sequence of sixproject-based assignments
, demonstrating an impressive grasp ofcontext and the ability to craft responses that are both creative and logically coherent. In thehealthcare sector, AI’s role is increasingly pivotal, aiding in the early diagnosis of diseases andeven preempting potential health crises. The field of autonomous driving has witnessed AIsuccessfully tackle the intricacies of real-world traffic scenarios, a feat once believed to beexclusive to human cognition. In the creative arts, AI’s footprint extends to composing music,generating art, and writing stories, illustrating its burgeoning creative capabilities.Despite these groundbreaking advancements, a critical aspect where AI still lags is inunderstanding and interpreting human emotions and the subtleties of social