ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1 - 30 of 31 in total

← Previous
1
2
Next →

WIP: Building a Bridge Between Hackathons and Software Engineering Capstones Through Adaptive Expertise

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Cecilia La Place, Arizona State University; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

as far west as Southern California to as far east as Pennsylvania.Dr. Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context and storytelling in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER

Relevance Score: 0.6304067

Experiences of Integrating Learning and Engagement Strategies (LESs) into Software Engineering Courses

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Peter J. Clarke, Florida International University; Mandayam Thirunarayanan, Florida International University; Sai Chaithra Allala, Florida International University; Juan Pablo Sotomayor, Florida International University; Monique S. Ross, Florida International University
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

Master’s degree from Florida International University currently pur- suing a Ph.D. in Computer Science. He is currently focused on the research area of Software Testing including MicroServices architecture.Dr. Monique S Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross earned a doctoral degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering from Elizabethtown College, a Master’s degree in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University, eleven years of experience in industry as a software engineer, and three years as a full-time faculty in the departments of computer science and engineering. Her interests focus on broadening participation in

Relevance Score: 0.37824398

Gamification in Computer Science Education: a Systematic Literature Review

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mourya Reddy Narasareddy Gari, North Dakota State University; Gursimran Singh Walia; Alex David Radermacher, North Dakota State University
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

Paper ID #22808Gamification in Computer Science Education: a Systematic Literature Re-viewMrs. Mourya Reddy Narasareddy Gari, North Dakota State University I am Ph.D student at North Dakota State University. My research work is to see how different Learning strategies affect the student learning.Dr. Gursimran Singh Walia Gursimran S. Walia is an associate professor of Computer Science at North Dakota State University. His main research interests include empirical software engineering, software engineering education, human factors in software engineering, and software quality. He is a member of the IEEE Computer Society

Relevance Score: 0.017288066

Introduction of Software Engineering Concepts for Electrical and Computer Engineering Students and Applications to Senior Projects

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Danielle Marie Fredette, Cedarville University; Nathan Jessurun, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

cycles, with definite goals reached each iterative cycle. Agile requiresteams to break large tasks, such as designing a system to act upon GPS data, into small, bite-sizedpieces. In the GPS example, this would involve turning the overall goal into objectives able to becompleted in 1-2 weeks like: • Design an interface to poll the EMLID system for positional data Figure 4: Drive by wire hardware for braking and steeringFigure 5: The Reach GPS unit and an example of the waypoints collected along a driving path.Data plotted using ♠❛♣s✳❣♦♦❣❧❡✳❝♦♠. • Develop an algorithm to extract heading and velocity data from progressive geographical timestamps • etc.The Agile mindset proved highly useful to our senior design team

Relevance Score: 0.016329017

WIP: Lessons Learned from Applying Standards-based Grading to a Software Verification Course

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Walter W. Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

.[3] "Standards-Based Grading Overview," Active Grade, 2012.[4] S. Ambrose, M. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. Lovett and M. Norman, HHow Learning Works: 7 Research Based Principles for Smart Teaching, San Franscisco: Wiley, 2010.[5] M. Townsley, "What is the Difference between Standards-Based Grading (or Reporting) and Competency-Based Education," Competency Works, 11 November 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.competencyworks.org/analysis/what-is-the-difference-between- standards-based-grading/. [Accessed 30 12 2019].[6] L. Davis, "Standards-Based Grading: What to Know in 2019," Schoology Exchange, 13 2 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.schoology.com/blog/standards-based-grading. [Accessed 15 12 2019

Relevance Score: 0.014759422

WIP: Engaging Software Engineering Students in Synchronous and Asynchronous On-line Course

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Bruce R. Maxim, University of Michigan - Dearborn; Thomas Limbaugh, University of Michigan - Dearborn
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

perceptions of their level of engagement with the class and active learning. Thestudents in both sections were asked a series of questions designed by the authors, to elicitcandid responses. The survey was conducted separately from the regular student courseevaluations and was completed before the final course grade postings. Table 7 compares studentresponses on the midterm survey (S = Synchronous, N=41/41 and A = Asynchronous N=19/20).The only significant difference (p < 0.1) found using the Mann-Whitney U test was for thestatement “I felt more engaged during activities than lectures”. Table 8 compares studentresponses on the final survey (S = Synchronous, N=39/41 and A = Asynchronous N=20/20). Theonly significant difference (p < 0.5) found

Relevance Score: 0.013135057

WIP: Teaching a Knowledge Engineering Course Using Active Learning, Gamification, and Scaffolding

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Bruce R. Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn; Gail Luera, University of Michigan, Dearborn
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

student courseevaluations and was completed before the final course grade postings. Table 7 compares studentresponses on the midterm survey (S = Synchronous, N=41/41 and A = Asynchronous N=19/20).The only significant difference (p < 0.01) found using the Mann-Whitney U test was for thestatement “I felt more engaged during activities than lectures”. Table 8 compares studentresponses on the final survey (S = Synchronous, N=39/41 and A = Asynchronous N=20/20). Theonly significant difference (p < 0.05) found using the Mann-Whitney U test was for the statement“I prefer the use of activities and discussion rather than lecture only content”.The students were asked specifically, “With which activities or parts of the course have you feltmost

Relevance Score: 0.013135057

Students' Perceptions of Software Risks

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Venkata Rama Chaitra Thota, University of Cincinnati; Nan Niu, University of Cincinnati; Wentao Wang, University of Cincinnati; Carla C. Purdy, University of Cincinnati
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

stakeholders, evaluating thealternatives for satisfying the win conditions, managing the risks that stem from the selectedalternative(s), and obtaining the stakeholder approvals and commitments to pursuing the nextcycle are the four basic steps of the spiral model2. For example, if sensitive information is storedand accessed but the end user is not invited to participate in the trade-off analysis andprioritization of the requirements, then the software project is at risk of failing to satisfy thesecurity needs of the user.Having key stakeholders such as user and customer representatives involved is a hallmark ofagile software development3, which is considered to not only inherent the iterative andincremental natures embedded in the spiral model but

Relevance Score: 0.011881106

Experiences of Teaching Software Testing in an Undergraduate Class Using Different Approaches for the Group Projects

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Ingrid Buckley, Florida Gulf Coast University; Peter J. Clarke, Florida International University
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

testing and regression testingDeliverable 3 Update test design plan, and perform continuous integration testing and regression testingDeliverable 4 Complete the test design plan and perform system testingNote that developing and testing the same project sometimes involved changing requirements; onthe other hand, testing the same project did not involve changing requirements, thereby making thetesting process a lot easier.4.3 Sample ProjectsThis section summarizes some of the group projects used for testing in CEN4072 in 2016, 2017,2019, and 2020. The summary includes the semester (year) the project was done, the project name,a short description of the project, the language(s) used, and development and testing tools used. In2016 and 2020, the

Relevance Score: 0.011432599

Software Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction: Students' Perception of a Project-based Approach in a Postgraduate Course

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Luis Alberto Rojas Pino, Universidad Andres Bello; Maria Elena Truyol, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile; Juan Felipe Calderón, Universidad Andres Bello
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

learning readiness and project-based learning outcomes: the case of international Masters students in an engineering management course,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 453–465, Aug. 2007.[3] G. Zavala, M. E. Truyol, and A. Dominguez, “Professional development program on active learning for engineering faculty in Chile: First stage,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 2017.[4] M. Marques, S. F. Ochoa, M. C. Bastarrica, and F. J. Gutierrez, “Enhancing the Student Learning Experience in Software Engineering Project Courses,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 63–73, Feb. 2018.[5] L. F. Capretz, “Bringing the human factor to software

Relevance Score: 0.011317696

The Use of HFOSS Projects in the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing Open Source Day

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Cam Macdonell, MacEwan University; Heidi J.C. Ellis, Western New England University; Darci Burdge, Nassau Community College; Lori Postner, Nassau Community College; Gregory W Hislop, Drexel University (Computing and Informatics)
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

introduction to the project, often under the guidance ofsomeone with considerable project knowledge.Computer Science (CS) programs have recently experienced a surge in enrollments surpassingthe growth of the late 1990’s [9]. There has also been an increase in the number of non-majorstaking CS courses. Despite there being more students in CS courses, the number of womengraduating from CS programs was still only 15% in 2015 [9]. Since HFOSS projects are builtwith the intention to better the human condition, they often exemplify characteristics thatresearch has shown attracts women to computing such as helping others and working in diversegroups [2, 10]. There is some evidence that working on HFOSS projects is appealing to women[13, 14]. The 2016 Open

Relevance Score: 0.010331595

Teaching the Culture of Quality from the Ground Up: Novice-tailored Quality Improvement for Scratch Programmers

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Eli Tilevich, Virginia Tech; Simin Hall, Virginia Tech; Peeratham Techapalokul, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

) Overall, I found Part 2 helped me understand why ... 1. duplication can make code hard to understand 2. duplication can make code hard to modify 3. E XTRACT C USTOM B LOCK can make code easy to understand 4. E XTRACT C USTOM B LOCK can make code easy to modify5 Results and DiscussionOn average, it took 50 minutes per participant to complete the entire study (tutorial and survey). Weprovided minimal help to some participants via a live support feature of our online study website.Most of the help was given for the tutorial tasks prior to the refactoring tasks, in which participantswere asked to fill in the missing parts to complete Part 2’s objective (basic-slides). Next, we presentthe analyses and their results and discuss how they

Relevance Score: 0.009700882

WIP: Introducing Active Learning in a Software Engineering Course

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn; Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Stein Brunvand, University of Michigan-Dearborn; Marouane Kessentini, University of Michigan-Dearborn
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

University of Michigan-Dearborn Advancement ofTeaching and Learning Fund and the NSF Award #1245036 Collaborative Education: Building aSkilled V&VF Community. We would like to thank Ms. Raminderdeep Randhawa who workedas Research Assistant on this project and Ms. Navin Tama who worked as a Graduate StudentInstructor for the fall 2016 offering of CIS 375. They gave generously of their time and energy tothis project.Bibliography1. Branch R. (2010): Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach, Springer, 2010.2. Ardis, M., Chenoweth, S. and Young, F. (2008): “The ‘Soft’ Topics in Software Engineering Education”, Proceedings of 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (Vol. 1, Oct 2008), IEEE Press, Saratoga Springs, NY, 2008, pp. F3H1

Relevance Score: 0.009700882

WIP: Active Learning Exercises to Promote System Performance Testing

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Walter W Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering; Brad Dennis, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

forth. ● Application (a): Using learned material in new and concrete situations. For example, using information, methods, concept s, and theories to solve problems requiring the skills or knowledge presented.A topic’s relevance to the core is designated in a similar manner: ● Essential (E): The topic is part of the core. ● Desirable (D): The topic is not part of the core, but it should be included in the core of a particular program if possible; otherwise, it should be considered part of elective materials. Figure 1: IEEE SE2014 Software Verification and Validation Coverage [7]One of the challenges of teaching software verification has been the lack of quality teachingmaterials at

Relevance Score: 0.00924086

Applying Scrum to Manage a Senior Capstone Project

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Zesheng Chen, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

audio service by filling out an online form. Once the form issubmitted, the data are stored in the database. An administrator at ACPL can log into the systemthrough the Web interface and manage the system. The functionalities for the administratorinterface include searching, reading, creating, and updating users’ and radios’ profile, as well asassigning audio radio(s) to a user or an organization.The main challenges to implement such an architecture lie in two aspects: Figure 1. System Structure of Our Web Application (1) Ease of use. The information for both the user’s interface and the admin’s interface must be displayed in a user friendly manner. Especially, the user’s interface should be accessible to

Relevance Score: 0.009146079

Infusing Software Security in Software Engineering

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Walter W Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering, [Webpage], Retrieved January 29, 2017 from URL http://sites.computer.org/ccse/SE2004Volume.pdf [5]. The Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula: IEEE-CS and ACM, (2015), Software Engineering 2014 Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering, [Webpage], Retrieved January 29, 2017 from URL https://www.acm.org/education/se2014.pdf [6]. Acharya, S., Ackerman, A. (2012), Software Engineering Education Needs more Engineering, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition – Software Engineering Constituent Committee, June 10 – 13 – San Antonio, TX[7]. McGraw, G. Software Security - Building Security In, Addition-Wesley

Relevance Score: 0.008855653

Measuring Broader Impact of NSF-funded Project on Software Engineering Education

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Priyadarshan A Manohar P.E., Robert Morris University; Peter Y Wu, Robert Morris University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

course. - As a focus group member co-developed six hours of course modules to address identified gaps in a content area familiar to the University program and its local industry partner(s). - Assessed course contents through at least two delivery cycles. Implementation Academic PartnersSix institutions Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Montana Tech, University of Michigan,Virginia State University, Fairfield University, and Milwaukee School of Engineering supportedthis project as an ‘Implementation Academic Partner’ and carried out the following tasks: - Used entire or partial courseware developed by this project in at least one course through at least two delivery cycles. - Evaluated the course(s) and assess the

Relevance Score: 0.008855653

Evaluating a Software Project Management Course Collaboration Framework at a Second Institution

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Stefan Christov, Quinnipiac University; James Walker, Michigan Technological University; Mark Hoffman, Quinnipiac University
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

Relevance Score: 0.0083491905

Using Agile and Active Learning in Software Development Curriculum

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Ben Tribelhorn, University of Portland; Andrew M. Nuxoll, University of Portland
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

, the fact that the product had a real user in mind meant thatstudents were less inclined to compromise on the quality of their work.Instructors who try this variant should be mindful of intellectual property. In the Spring 2020, weintroduced a legal agreement where the students agreed to give up their intellectual property to thecustomer.DiscussionThe course presented here has increased the process focus beyond the level that is normallyincluded in a typical software engineering curriculum. This course design is highly flexible andapplicable at other institutions. In addition to the possible variations discussed above, we foundthat the choice of the primary programming language(s) has not impacted the learning outcomes;although when

Relevance Score: 0.0080028195

Work in Progress: One Approach to Software Engineering Project Selection for Small Student Populations

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Paul A Bender, Ohio Dominican University
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

reason(s) would you give to recommend students participate in projects found onsocialcoder.org?What reason(s) would you give to recommend students not participate in projects found onsocialcoder.org?Students generally answered the first question with a variation of ”it is a potential source ofprojects where you can gain experience”.In the second question, the students made notes about the relative lack of project choices, and thelack of communication from the project leaders.The question of why there is a contradiction between these two statements stems from two factors.The first factor was simply the number of projects that the students could apply to. While studentswere allowed to view approximately 20 projects, fewer than 10 were accepting

Relevance Score: 0.0074677425

Applied Knowledge Retention – Are Active Learning Tools the Solution?

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn; Jeffrey J. Yackley, University of Michigan, Dearborn
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

analysis and requirements specification. Students respond byRequirements saying the needs statement could be represented as a Decision(50 mins) Tree, a Decision Table (truth table) or a Use Case. The answers are then discussed in class.ALT: In this exercise students Identify the ambiguity (or ambiguities) in RequirementsRequirement the given statements. They then discuss and propose how the ManagementAmbiguity ambiguity may be corrected.(50 mins)ALT: Stated and In this exercise students read the given stated need and write RequirementsImplied down implied need(s). The answers are then discussed in class. ManagementRequirements(25 mins

Relevance Score: 0.007379711

Balancing Student Learning and Community Relations in Software-Based Service Learning

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nusaybah Abu-Mulaweh, Purdue University, West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

allows projects in EPICS toaddress complex and compelling needs in the local or global community. EPICS teams, or course sections, each consist of 8-25 students and are student led witha faculty or industry instructor, which we call an advisor. Graduate student teaching assistantssupport the advisors and each one supports 3-4 sections providing a mechanism for consistencyacross teams. Each team or course section comprises multiple sub-teams, each one of whichsupports a single design project. Once a project is delivered, a new project is then identified bystudents under the guidance of their faculty mentor(s) and community partner(s). Exampleprojects include designing assistive technology for people with disabilities, developing

Relevance Score: 0.007379711

Applying Slack to Help Teach Computer Science and Computer Engineering Courses

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Chao Chen, Purdue University, Fort Wayne; Zesheng Chen, Purdue University, Fort Wayne
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion - CSCW’16 Companion, San Francisco, CA, USA, Feb 27 - March 02, 2016, pp. 333-336. 4. J. Perkel, “How scientists use Slack,” Nature, January 2017, vol. 541, pp. 123-124. 5. M. Gofine and S. Clark, “Integration of Slack, a cloud-based team collaboration application, into research coordination,” Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics, 2017, vol. 24, no.2, pp. 252- 254. 6. J. Gaines, O. Akintewe, and S. Small, “Engineering design instruction using Slack for project support and teamwork,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, FL.7. X. Zhang, Y. Meng, P. Pablos, and Y. Sun, “Learning analytics in collaborative learning

Relevance Score: 0.0068595596

A Case Study in Teaching Agile Software Product Line Development

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Derek David Riley, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

. Riley, Using mobile phone programming to teach Java and advanced programming to computer scientists. Proceedings of the 43rd annual SIGCSE, 2012.[5] R. Carbon, M. Lindvall, D. Muthig, P. Costa, Integrating product line engineering and agile methods: Flexible design up front vs. incremental methods, First International Workshop on Product Line Engineering, 2006.[6] Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, URL: https://www.sei.cmu.edu/productlines/[7] M. Catala, S. Dowling, D. Hayward, Expanding the Google Transit Feed Specifications to Support Operations and Planning, No. FDOT BDK85# 977-15, 2011.[8] G. Chastek, P. Donohoe, J. McGregor, and D. Muthig, Engineering a Production Method for a Software Product Line

Relevance Score: 0.0068595596

Analyzing Popularity of Software Testing Careers in Canada

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Western Michigan University; Luiz Fernando Capretz P.E., Western University; Sachin Narendra Pardeshi, R.C.Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

analytical thinking.• More money – Testing jobs come with • Financially rewarding. good salary packages. • You get to work in a very lucrative ind ustry.• Career growth – Some professionals • It’s a means to an end: learn on the “s think that testing has better growth hop floor” and move up to roles such as Solutions Architect, Director ‐ Project Management, Chief Technology Officer, or

Relevance Score: 0.0065342747

A Course as Ecosystem: Melding Teaching, Research, and Practice

Conference Session: Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Software Engineering Division

course? A module for an LMS? Adapt a metric to be applied to course projects? Practice • In managing student projects, can the instructor practice skills that (s)he can teach to students? • Can student projects help develop relationships with industry that can lead to joint research or development projects? • Can the instructor’s experience in industry develop internship or funding opportunities for students?review and machine learning. If your area is intelligent tutoring, you could lead students inworking on intelligent tutors for topics that you teach.Other opportunities are related to research areas that do not involve course tools. One idea