Airbus for similar markets and with Brazil's Embraer for smaller jet markets. 2. Discuss the importance of systems engineering process in the competition between Boeing and Lockheed Martin to pursue the X-plane contract from DoD. 3. Discuss how and why a design team needs to incorporate Poka-Yoke concept in systems design. For the application of Poka-Yoke concept in railroad intersection safety improvement, show if there is an even better way than the approaches in the provided figure to improve the intersection’s safety assuming that (a) cost is not a main concern and (b) cost is a main concern.These assignments are for the students to understand the issues from a system
and software engineering development managementprocess, which is a vast area, and does that in a fast-paced manner, leaving not much room forstudent experimentation with the techniques presented in class. Secondly, the topics covered aregeneric, as they apply for multiple engineering disciplines and the instructor needs to talk about“Activity A” and “Activity B” when presenting the modeling techniques rather than the “design Page 26.639.6the propulsion system” and “design the software control system.” Having said that, the instructordeveloped the course learning outcomes in such a manner to provide the students with thefoundations of the
Paper ID #11232Systems Engineering Approach in Aircraft Design Education; Techniquesand ChallengesProf. Mohammad Sadraey, Daniel Webster College Mohammad H. Sadraey is an Associate Professor in the Engineering School at the Daniel Webster Col- lege, Nashua, New Hampshire, USA. Dr. Sadraey’s main research interests are in aircraft design tech- niques, and design and automatic control of unmanned aircraft. He received his MSc. in Aerospace Engineering in 1995 from RMIT, Melbourne, Australia, and his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Kansas, Kansas, USA. Dr. Sadraey is a senior member of the American
: experiences in industrial designengineering, Journal of Cleaner Production 14, pp. 932–939.[10] Porter, T. & Córdoba, J., (2009), Three Views of Systems Theories and their Implications for SustainabilityEducation, Journal of Management Education, Volume 33 Number 3, 323-347.[11] Cathy A. Rusinko and Linda M. Sama, (2009), Across The Management Curriculum, An Extended Journey,Journal of Management Education, Volume 33 Number 3, 271-275[12] Stables, K., (2009), Educating for environmental sustainability and educating for creativity: activelycompatible or missed opportunities?, Int J Technol Des Educ 19:199–219[13] Borchers, A.S., Harding, T., Lynch-Caris, T. , Redekop, B., EI-Sayed, J., Doyle, D., (2006), UndergraduateCourse in Environmental Design
follows: A. Easy-to-use – user-friendliness of software in terms of creating the simulation model, visualization, preparing animations, cooperation with Excel, preparing presentations, distinguishing various competence levels of users, B. Direct cooperation with a 3D model – students are very enthusiastic about working with 3D models, C. User-friendliness in terms of optimization possibilities D. Easy-to-create statistical distributions, E. Free access to the so called viewer, which makes it possible to start simulation without changing the model and input data, F. Elasticity, positive attitude of the software distributor towards the idea of cooperation between a university, industry and software distributor
, no. 2, pp. 76–85, 2015.[23] iGEM Foundation, “Team list for iGEM 2019 championship,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://igem.org/Team_List?year=2019. [Accessed: 08-Feb-2020].[24] J. L. Oplinger and M. Lande, "Measuring qualities of different engineering design process models: A critical review," in 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[25] R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.[26] S. B. Merriam and E. J. Tisdell, Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, Fourth. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.[27] G. A. Bowen, "Document analysis as a qualitative research method," Qual. Res. J., vol. 9
tPA Time to Death tPA Recovery Percentage tPA Survival PercentageFigure 3-a. Systems Dynamics model for Stoke Care Pathway.Figure 3-b. Population density in NC with overlaid stroke care center locations and 1-hour driving distanceradii
disposability, environmental compliance, and others. Arrow B depictsrequirements and design criteria being imposed on the design team and Arrow D indicate theteams contributed synthesis effort where need, functions, and requirements are the overarchingconsideration (Arrow C).Design Synthesis (Block 4). To design is to project and propose what might be. Designsynthesis is a creative activity that relies on the knowledge of experts about the state of the art aswell as the state of technology. From this knowledge, a number of feasible design alternativesare fashioned and presented for analysis. Depending upon the phase of the product life cycle, thesynthesis can be in conceptual, preliminary, or in detailed form.The candidate design is driven by both a
Planned Performance Option A Key Milestones Delivery Key Milestones Delivery Solution Decision Convergenc System Engineering e Approach Option B 3 Your Choice Delivery Figure 1: Contrasting SE-Based System Development versus the Plug & Chug …Design-Build- Test-Fix Paradigms.The program reverts to their traditional
. Hutchinson, D. Henry, D. Verma, M. Clifford, and A. Pyster, Atlas: The Theory ofEffective Systems Engineers, version 1.0, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA,December 16, 2016.[5] R. K. Garrett, Jr., S. Anderson, N. T. Baron, and J. D. Moreland, Jr., “Managing theInsterstitials, a System of Systems Framework Suited for the Ballistic Missile Defense System”,Systems Engineering Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 87-109, J. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011.[6] R. Deiotte, and R. K. Garrett, Jr., A Novel Approach to Mission-Level Engineering ofComplex Systems of Systems; Addressing Integration and Interoperability Shortfalls byInterrogating the Intersititials, Missile Defense Agency, 13-MDA-7269, 29 April 2013.[7] J. Marvin, T. Whalen, B. Morantz, R
/acquisitionworkforce, April 2010. 2. The Defense Acquisition University provides a full range of basic, intermediate, and advanced certification training, assignment-specific training, applied research, and continuous learning opportunities for DoD personnel. Information can be found at http://www.dau.mil/default.aspx . 3. Bloom B. S., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc., 1956. 4. Anderson, L.W., and D. Krathwohl (Eds.), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York, 1956. 5. Information regarding graduate programs at the Air Force Institute of Technology can be found at
, I worked for NASA at a Satellite Tracking Station in Ecuador Subsequently I obtained my M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering with a minor in Applied Mathematics at the University of Colorado, Boulder. My Ph.D. dissertation work (on Neural Networks applied to control systems and automation) went to the DOD in Virginia. My formal grad- uate academic training was in Control Systems, Telecommunications and Applied Mathematics. After receiving my Masters and Ph.D. degrees in EE, I joined AT&T Bell Laboratories. During my tenure at Bell Labs, I became skilled in the formal methodology and processes of Systems Engineering and Sys- tems Architecture applied to large systems. Throughout my career, in the high-tech
AC 2012-5553: QUO VADIS, ENGINEERING ECONOMICSDr. John H. Ristroph, University of Louisiana, Lafayette John Ristroph is an Emeritus Professor at the University of Louisiana, Lafayette. This summer will mark his 42nd year of teaching engineering economics. He maintains his passion for the subject and is actively developing a novel computer-aided instructional system to enhance the self-learning that should be part of an engineering student’s homework experience. Page 25.1094.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Quo Vadis, Engineering Economics
Paper ID #31339Engineering Economy Taught Across Engineering Disciplines: Work inProgressDr. Brian Aufderheide , Hampton University Dr. Brian Aufderheide is Chairperson in Chemical Engineering at Hampton University. He completed his PhD in Chemical Engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. His areas of expertise are in advanced control, design, and modeling of biomedical, chemical, and biological processes. He has consulted for both medical device and biotechnology companies. He was sole engineer and QC supervisor of a 40MM lb/yr custom extrusion company. He has over 15 years of experience in education developing over
AC 2012-3318: THIS VIDEOGAME IS JUST LIKE MY PLANT!Mr. Leonardo Rivera, Universidad Icesi Leonardo Rivera has a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering from Virginia Tech. He is Head of the Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.Mr. Andrs Lpez, Universidad Icesi Andrs Lpez has a M.Sc. in society of information from Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, a M.B.A. from Universidad Icesi, and a B.Sc. in business administration from Universidad Icesi. He is Director of the specialist degree in environmental management at Universidad Icesi.Mr. Andrs Caldern, Universidad Icesi Andrs Caldern is a specialist in the teaching of history at the Universidad del Valle. He is also a Historian at
concerns. Her research interests include how students approach decision making in an engineering design context. She obtained her BS in General Engineering (Systems & Design) and MS in Systems and Entrepreneurial Engineering from the University of Illinois and PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Modeling the Systems Design Thinking ParadigmAbstractSystems thinking and design thinking have always been considered separate concepts. Systemsthinking is described as the cognition a person uses in the solution and design of large-scalecomplex systems, often requiring hypothetical and holistic approach. Design thinking prioritizesthe
AC 2011-2186: SE CAPSTONE- INTRODUCING MULTIDISCIPLINARYDESIGN TO USCGARichard W. Freeman, U.S. Coast Guard Academy RICHARD W. FREEMAN has served as a lecturer in the U.S. Coast Guard Academy’s Electrical Engi- neering Section since 2008. Prior to joining the faculty, he taught fulltime for eight years. He also worked in the Telecommunications Industry for eight years. He earned BS and PhD degrees in Computer Engi- neering from Iowa State University and a MBA from Southern Methodist University. He is pursuing his Professional Engineering License.Contact: Richard Freeman, PhD, United States Coast Guard Academy (dee), 15 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT 06320, (860) 444-8536, richard.w.freeman@uscga.edu.Prof. Richard J
Paper ID #10611Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Robotic Football Players by Under-graduate Students from Multiple Science and Engineering ProgramsMr. Adam Said El-Rahaiby, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Dr. Andr´es Tovar is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Previously, he served as a Research Assistant Professor of Aerospace and Me- chanical Engineering at the University of Notre Dame and as an Associate Professor of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering at the National University of Colombia, where he also acted as the Department
Paper ID #13554Integrating Affective Engagement into Systems Engineering EducationDr. Timothy L.J. Ferris, School of Engineering, University of South Australia Timothy Ferris holds the degrees B.E.Hons, B.Th., B.Litt.Hons. Grad.Cert.Ed., and PhD from University of Adelaide, Flinders University, Deakin University, Queensland University of Technology and University of South Australia, all in Australia, respectively. He is a member of the School of Engineering at the University of South Australia. He teaches courses in systems engineering and research methods and supervises several PhD students in systems engineering. He was a
AC 2012-4103: ”LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ECONOMICS” MOD-ULEDr. K.J. Rogers, University of Texas, ArlingtonDr. Melanie L. Sattler, University of Texas, Arlington Melanie Sattler serves as an Associate Professor at the University of Texas, Arlington, where she teaches courses and conducts research related to air quality and sustainable energy. Her research has been spon- sored by the National Science Foundation, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Luminant Power, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. She has published more than 60 peer- reviewed papers and conference proceedings. In 2010, she received UT Arlington’s Lockheed Martin Excellence in Engineering Education Award. She is a registered
AC 2011-1211: SE CAPSTONE: INTEGRATING SYSTEMS ENGINEER-ING FUNDAMENTALS TO ENGINEERING CAPSTONE PROJECTS: EX-PERIENTIAL AND ACTIVESteven Corns, Missouri University of Science and TechnolotyCihan H. Dagli, Missouri University of Science & Technology Cihan Dagli is a Professor of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, and Affiliated Profes- sor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. He received BS and MS degrees in Industrial Engineering from the Middle East Technical University and a Ph.D. in Applied Operations Research in Large Scale Systems Design and Operation from the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, where from 1976 to 1979 he was a British
Paper ID #17162Systems Engineering of Cyber-Physical Systems: An Integrated EducationProgramProf. Jon Patrick Wade, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Systems & Enterprises) Jon Wade is a Distinguished Research Professor in the School of Systems and Enterprises at the Stevens Institute of Technology and currently serves as the Director of the Systems and Software Division and Chief Technology Officer for the Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) where he is leading re- search in the use of technology in systems engineering education and complex systems. Previously, Dr. Wade was the Executive Vice President
AC 2012-4481: EDUCATION APPROACH IN JAPAN FOR MANAGEMENTAND ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMSProf. David S. Cochran, Southern Methodist University and Meijo University David Cochran is a professor of industrial and systems engineering management. He is Founder and Prin- cipal of System Design, LLC, Visiting Professor with the School of Business, Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan and faculty of systems engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas. Cochran devel- oped the Manufacturing System Design Decomposition (MSDD) to determine the underlying design of the Toyota Production System (and ”lean”) from a systems engineering viewpoint and was Founder and Director of the Production System Design Laboratory in the
University of North Dakota (industrial technology, 2001), and a Ph.D. (teaching & learning, 2010) from the University of North Dakota. Johnson’s research interests are in engineering and technology education, manufacturing processes, and small wind turbine technology. Johnson may be reached at ajohnson@business.und.edu. Page 25.220.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012“Assessing the viability of bench-top versus full scale industrial lathes to teach fundamental machining concepts.” Page
of the So- ciety for Health Systems. He serves on numerous editorial and advisory boards, has received 12 research, teaching, and service awards, and has been principal investigator or co-director in seven research centers totaling over $32 million in funding.Mr. Corey Balint, Healthcare Systems Engineering Institute at Northeastern University Corey Balint, holds both a BS and MS in Industrial Engineering from Northeastern University and cur- rently is a staff healthcare system engineer in the HSyE institute. Current responsibilities include: serving as day-to-day project manager of our AHRQ patient safety center, leading a portfolio of roughly 10 projects at any time, and assisting with senior team projects
, and sustainable engineering applications. Page 26.1161.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Model-Based Control Systems with Intermittent Feedback: Conceptualization and Insights for the Teaching and LearningI. IntroductionThe field of engineering education has grown considerably over the past two decades, with themajority of the research focusing on empirical results or statistical studies. Alongside thisgrowth, it is important for researchers to develop increasingly intuitive and useful conceptualmodels for educational processes. In this paper we present a conceptual
AC 2011-1009: SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND SPACECRAFT SUBSYS-TEMS MODELING AS PREREQUISITES FOR CAPSTONE DESIGNLisa Guerra, NASA Headquarters Ms. Lisa A. Guerra Research Fellow NASA / Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Lisa Guerra has 25 years experience in the NASA aerospace community. Ms. Guerra is currently working with the UTeach Engineering Program. She recently completed a 4-year assignment from NASA Head- quarters to establish a systems engineering curriculum at The University of Texas at Austin, as a pilot for national dissemination. Ms. Guerra’s most recent position at NASA Headquarters was Director of the Directorate Integration Office in the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate. In that position, her
Paper ID #11227Exploring Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications (V2V) in an Electrical Engi-neering Undergraduate ProgramMr. Anthony Ian Smith, Penn State Harrisburg Recent undergraduate student, studying Electeical Engineering Technology at Penn a State Harrisburg.Mr. Fares S. Alromithy, Wayne State University Fares Alromithy is a teaching assistance of electronics engineering at the University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.He is currently pursuing his master’s degree in the department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering (ECE) at Wayne State University, MI. Fares received a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Indiana
, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Software Engineering in the School of Graduate and Professional Studies at The Pennsylvania State University. Prior to entering academia she worked in industry and government as a software and electronics engineer. Her research interests include problem solving in software and systems design, team learning, and project management. Page 22.838.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Improving Team Learning in Systems DesignAbstractA detailed statistical experiment to study the effect of the cognitive collaborative model (CCM
AC 2012-3312: SYSTEMS ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN THE U.S.: TEXT-BOOKS AND PROGRAMSDr. Jane M. Fraser, Colorado State University, Pueblo Jane M. Fraser is Chair of the Department of Engineering at Colorado State University, Pueblo. She was formerly on the faculty at the Ohio State University and Purdue University. She has a B.A in mathematics from Swarthmore College and a M.S. and a Ph.D. in industrial engineering and operations research from the University of California, Berkeley.Dr. Abhijit Gosavi, Missouri University of Science & Technology Page 25.1230.1 c American Society for