ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 31 - 60 of 588 in total

← Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
…
19
20
Next →

Providing A Support Community For Female Engineering Students Through A Peer Coaching Program

Conference Session: Potpourri Session
Collection: 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lisa Davids, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott; Heidi Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

same color badge. Tables weredesignated for each group with a matching color sign.As previously mentioned, the event consisted of two parts. The first part was a teamrace modeled after “The Amazing Race” television show. The Coach/Mentee Teamswere handed an initial clue card which lead to various locations on campus; locationswere hidden within riddles the teams had to decipher. Sample riddles have beenprovided in Appendix B. It was essential to get the teams interacting immediately, inorder to break the ice and create immediate relationships, so the race served as an idealmeans to get the students talking and working together.Once the location was determined and the team arrived, an additional clue card wasgiven for the next stop on the race

Relevance Score: 0.40883788

The Engineering Learning Environment: A Proposed Model

Conference Session: Trends in Engineering Education
Collection: 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nadia Kellam, University of Georgia; Ashley Babcock, University of Georgia; David Gattie, University of Georgia-Athens
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

. Without this link topractice, this research will not help move the field forward.Bibliography Page 13.1225.111. Vogt, C. M., Hocevar, D., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2007). A Social Cognitive Construct Validation: DeterminingWomen's and Men's Success in Engineering Programs. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 337-364.2. Hall, R. M. & Sandler, B. R. The classroom climate: a chilly one for women? Project on the status andeducation of women, Association of American Colleges, Washington, DC 1982.3. National Science Board. (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators Volume 1. Washington, D.C.: NationalScience Foundation.4. Byrne, Eileen M

Relevance Score: 0.40847555

Building a Community of Empowerment for Women in STEM with a Focus on Community College Women

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Beth McGinnis-Cavanaugh, Springfield Technical Community College; Isabel Huff, Springfield Technical Community College
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

, attitudes, and intentions. In B. Eitam & P. Haggard (Eds.), Human Agency: Functions and Mechanisms. UK: Oxford University Press.[20] Dasgupta, N. (2015). Role models and peers as a social vaccine to enhance women's self- concept in STEM. The American Society for Cell Biology. Retrieved from ascb.org/role- models-and-peers-as-a-social-vaccine-to-enhance-womens-self-concept-in-stem/.[21] Dasgupta, N., McManus Scircle, M., & Hunsinger, M. (2015). Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, accessed online from pnas.org/content/early/2015/04/03/1422822112.[22] Dasgupta, N

Relevance Score: 0.4073902

Inspiring girls to pursue STEM (ages three to thirteen): a recipe for a successful outreach event

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Technical Session
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jodi F. Prosise, St. Ambrose University; R R Romatoski, Saint Ambrose University; Susa H Stonedahl, St. Ambrose University; Yunye Shi Shi, St. Ambrose University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom.," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 424-436, 1993.[14] E. A. Geist and M. King, "Different, Not Better: Gender Differences in Mathematics Learning and Achievement," Journal of Instructional Psychology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 43-52, 2008.[15] D. F. Halpern, "A Cognitive-Process Taxonomy for Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities," Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 13, pp. 135-139, 2004.[16] U. Kessels and B. Hannover, "When being a girl matters less: Accessibility of gender-related self-knowledge in single-sex and coeducational classes and its impact on students' physics- related self-concept of ability," British Journal of

Relevance Score: 0.40663

Long Term Effects Of A Middle School Engineering Outreach Program For Girls: A Controlled Study

Conference Session: K-12 Programs (Co-sponsored by K-12 Division)
Collection: 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jeanne Hubelbank, WPI Evaluation Consulting; Chrysanthe Demetry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Shelley Errington Nicholson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Stephanie Blaisdell, Independent Consultant; Paula Quinn, Independent Consultant; Elissa Rosenthal, Marketing Research Consultant; Suzanne Sontgerath, Independent Consultant
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

AC 2007-1106: LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF A MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGINEERINGOUTREACH PROGRAM FOR GIRLS: A CONTROLLED STUDYJeanne Hubelbank, WPI Evaluation Consulting JEANNE HUBELBANK is an independent program evaluator and part-time faculty member at Boston College's Lynch School of Education. WPI's Camp Reach was one of her recent evaluation clients. Her teaching and research interests include assessment in higher education, creating a culture of evaluation use, evaluation capacity building, and educational technology.Chrysanthe Demetry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute CHRYSANTHE DEMETRY is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Director of the Center for Educational Development and Assessment at

Relevance Score: 0.40663

Attracting and Retaining a Diverse Cohort of Engineering Majors: Building a Program from the Ground Up

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Lee Kemp Rynearson, Campbell University; Lynn A. Albers, Campbell University; Michele Miller, Campbell University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

through Service basedLearning. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA.10) Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2011, October). " Microaggressions" inengineering education: Climate for Asian, Latina and White women. In Frontiers inEducation Conference (FIE), 2011 (pp. S3H‐1). IEEE.11) Davies, A., Ramsay, J., Lindfield, H., & Couperthwaite, J. (2005). Building learningcommunities: foundations for good practice. British Journal of EducationalTechnology, 36, 615–628.12) Seron, C., Silbey, S.S., Cech, E., and Rubineau, B. (2015). Persistence is Cultural:Professional Socialization and the Reproduction of Sex Segregation. Work andOccupations, 43(2), 178-214.13) Klingbeil, N.W., High, K.A, Keller, M.W., White, I.M., Brummel, B.J

Relevance Score: 0.40611818

“ I am Not a Feminist, but…”: Making Meanings of Being a Woman in Engineering

Conference Session: Myths About Gender and Race
Collection: 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Carroll Suzanne Seron, University of California, Irvine; Erin A. Cech, University of California, San Diego; Susan S. Silbey, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Brian Rubineau, Cornell University
Tagged Divisions: Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

…:” Making Meanings of Being a Woman in EngineeringAbstractEngineering is often described as one of the last bastions of a macho culture where womencontinue to experience minority status. In this article we ask, how do women make meaning ofthis status? We explore this question in the context of students‟ socialization into the professionover the course of their engineering education. Drawn from diary data, our findings show thatyoung women hold multiple and contradictory perspectives about their status as women inengineering. The strands of these perspectives are articulated around (a) a feminist critique, (b)gender essentialism, (3) meritocracy and individualism, and (d) exceptionalism. These findingssuggest that their taken-for-granted assumptions

Relevance Score: 0.40560636

Using Mentoring As A Catalyst For Change

Conference Session: Focus on Faculty
Collection: 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Barbara Hacker, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Winny Dong, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Mary Lucero Ferrel, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.7 Wasburn, M. H., “Strategic Collaboration ™: A Model for Mentoring Women Faculty in Science, Engineering,and Technology,” Proc. of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.8 Bates, R. A., “Constructing an Interdisciplinary Peer Mentoring Network for First Year Faculty,” Proc. of the 2005ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.9 Jones, B. E., D. Martinez, “Meeting the Mentoring Needs of New Faculty: An Interdisciplinary Experience,” Proc.of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.10 Autenrieth, R., K. Butler-Purry, A. H. Price, and J. Rinehart, “A ‘Grass Roots’ Mentoring Model to CreateChange,” Proc. of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.11 “Faculty Mentoring

Relevance Score: 0.4051383

A Warmer Climate For Women In Engineering

Conference Session: Women Faculty Issues and NSF's ADVANCE program
Collection: 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Barb Silver, University of Rhode Island; G. Boudreaux-Bartels, University of Rhode Island; Helen Mederer, University of Rhode Island; Lynn Pasquerella, University of Rhode Island; Joan Peckham, University of Rhode Island; Mercedes River-Hudec, University of Rhode Island; Karen Wishner, University of Rhode Island
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

equitably and fairly. We believe that women faculty have been adversely affected professionally by the hostile climate toward women [in Engineering]. Some believed it necessary to resign their positions and pursue their professional lives elsewhere” (McVicar, 25 March 2000, Providence Journal).As a result of the grievance settlement to the sexual harassment in the College of Engineering, anindependent audit team visited the University of Rhode Island during Fall 2000 to examine theclimate in the College of Engineering, identify tangible and intangible factors that retard theachievement of full professional equality and recommend effective remedial measures.a The finalreport was released in December 2000.b The report lists a

Relevance Score: 0.40411466

Retaining Female Students in a Robotics Program

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Gloria Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Lili Ma, New York City Colledge of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

). After school student club practices in U.S. kindergarten thru 12th grade educational institutions. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2(3), 235-244.4. S. Crowe, Robotics playing a bigger role in STEM education”, May 27, 2015,5. A. Welch and D. Huffman, "The Effect of Robotics Competitions on High School Students' Attitudes Toward Science”, School Science and mathematics, Vol. 111, No. 6, 12/2011.6. F.B.V. Benitti," Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review", Computers & Education, 2012.7. G Nugent, B Bruker, N Grandgenett, "The impact of educational robotics on student STEM learning, attitudes, and workplace skills", Robots in K-12 education: A

Relevance Score: 0.403091

Girls Who Draft: A STEM Outreach Initiative

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ali Ahmad, Northwestern State University; Jerie Pedescleaux, Northwestern State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

-defined engineering technology activities b. An ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require the application of principles and applied procedures or methodologies c. An ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; and to apply experimental results to improve processes d. An ability to design systems, components, or processes for broadly-defined engineering technology problems appropriate to program educational objectives e. An ability to function effectively as a member or leader on a technical team f. An ability to identify, analyze, and solve broadly

Relevance Score: 0.403091

LGBT Professionals’ Workplace Experiences in STEM-Related Federal Agencies

Conference Session: Research on Diversification & Inclusion
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Erin A. Cech, Rice University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

informaladvancement structures in other labor market sectors.15-17 Of course, this does not imply thatovert and subtle processes of discrimination and bias are absent in federal agencies; just that (a)LGBT employees have baseline legal protections not guaranteed in other sectors, and (b) moreformalized advancement structures in federal agencies mean that, at least in theory, hiring,promotion, and disciplinary procedures are under greater scrutiny to align with anti-discrimination policies. As such, although organizations in the private, non-profit and educationsectors likely vary widely in their treatment of LGBT professionals, the differential experiencesof LGBT professionals in STEM agencies documented here may be equally if not more extremein other

Relevance Score: 0.399478

Title IX and Project Lead the Way: Achieving Equity through All-female Cohorts in Public School Settings

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Shawna Fletcher, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

%20DR%20TAI%20- %20brochure.pdf (2012).13. PLTW video, Girls in Engineering: How one School is Solving the Problem, https://www.pltw.org/our- programs/experience-pltw/girls-engineering (2012).14. PLTW article, Bertram Visits Schools, Speaks of Urgency in Alaska, https://www.pltw.org/news/items/201410- bertram-visits-schools-speaks-urgency-alaska (2014).15. Cahill, J., Bridging the Engineering Gender Gap, Globe Newswire http://globenewswire.com/news- release/2012/02/23/468807/246867/en/Bridging-the-Engineering-Gender-Gap.html (February, 2012).16. Hughes, R., Nzekwe, B., Molyneaux, K., The Single Sex Debate for Girls in Science: a Comparison Between Two Informal Science Programs on Middle School Students' STEM

Relevance Score: 0.39940524

Creating a Student Organization to Engage Female Students Better

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division: Retention of Undergraduate Students
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

, L.J., Ikeda, E.K., & Yee, J.A. (2000). How service learning affects students. Higher Education Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles. 5. Billig, S.H. & Waterman, A.S. (2003). Studying service learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 6. Blum, L. & Frieze, C. & Hazzan, O. & Dias, M. B. (2006) “ A Cultural Perspective on Gender Diversity in Computing” Proceedings of ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education 2006 7. Brainard, S.G. and L. Carlin (1998), “A six year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science,” Journal of Engineering Education, 87: 369-376. 8. Braxton, J. M., Hirschy, A. S., &

Relevance Score: 0.39735794

Work in Progress: An Autoethnographic Account of a Female Engineering Intern

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Gretchen A. Dietz, University of Florida; Kayla Julianna Kummerlen, The University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

, F. K. Hamieh, and R. E. Shoujaa, “Women in engineering: A qualitative investigation of the contextual support and barriers to their career choice,” Womens Stud. Int. Forum, vol. 74, pp. 127–136, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2019.03.014.[17] E. A. Cech and W. R. Rothwell, “LGBTQ inequality in engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 583–610, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20239.[18] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students,” Eng. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.545065.[19] G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, H. L. Chen, K. Jackson

Relevance Score: 0.3495192

Challenges And Benefits Of Running A Multi Institutional Recruitment

Conference Session: At The Institutional Level
Collection: 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Judy Loveless-Morris, University of Washington; Priti Mody-Pan; Robert Embrey, Highline Community College; Kali Kuwada, Seattle Central Community College; Marisela Mendoza, Columbia Basin College; Robert Olsen, Washington State University; Eve Riskin, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

exception of one institution, a representative from each of the six institutionswas interviewed.The structured interviews were mostly centered around Kanter’s (1994) “CollaborativeAdvantage,” which will be further discussed in the literature review 8. Sample questions include: • Which of the following description(s) best describes the relationships among the partners. After choosing the best description(s), please provide an example that demonstrates the relationship you chose. For example, if one chose option B, and example for why one chose this option might be: Institution A has the ability to reach more minority students, while Institution B has the ability to connect students with real- world internships

Relevance Score: 0.3491625

Engaging Female Students Using a First-year Wearable Electronics Project

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division: Curricular Programs
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jenahvive K. Morgan, Rowan University; Mario J. Leone, Rowan University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

serves as a basefor learning how to build a circuit where errors in creating the circuit can be easily corrected. Page 26.605.5 F E C B A DFigure 1: An LED Circuit with (A) LM555 Timer Integrated Circuit, (B) 1.8MΩ Resistor,(C) 270Ω Resistor, (D) 22KΩ Resistor, (E) LED, (F) 10nF capacitor, with wires connectingthe electrical components on the breadboard.The 555 IC was placed between the bottom and top half of the breadboard, and the capacitor wasplaced towards the top of

Relevance Score: 0.3491625

Girls Are It A Workshop For Recruiting Girls Into Information Technology

Conference Session: K-12 Programs for Recruiting Women
Collection: 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ann Beheler, Collin County Community College
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

recruit women in to STEM careers. Given thatthe National Science Foundation Regional Center for Convergence Technology grant has as itsgoal the recruitment of underserved populations into the field of convergence technology, the“Girls are IT” workshop is designed to assist in accomplishing this goal by attracting more girlsinto studying these subjects. The workshop’s approach aligns with the effective best practicesidentified in a search of current scholarly literature concerning interventions that positively affectthe attitudes and knowledge of girls and their adult influencers with respect to careers inconvergence technology.1. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986) Women’s ways of knowing. New York

Relevance Score: 0.3488638

Gender and Human Imagery in the Halls of a BME Department

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Kali Lynn Morgan, Georgia Institute of Technology; Adrianna Bernardo; Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

gender gap: A sentiment analysis,” Public Understanding of Science, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 68-84, 2019.10. Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, “Portray Her: Representations of Women STEM Characters in Media,” The Lyda Hill Foundation & The Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, 2020.11. J. B. Browsh, “Revenue, Representation, and ‘Rooby-Roo’: Hanna-Barbera and the Business of Television Animation,” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Media Studies, Univ. of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO, 2017.12. E. Whitelegg, R. Holliman, J. Carr, E. Scanlon, B. Hodgson, “Invisible Witnesses: Investigating Gendered Representations of Scientists, Technologists, Engineers, and Mathematicians on UK Children’s Television,” UK Resource Centre

Relevance Score: 0.3482025

A middle school engineering outreach program for girls yields STEM undergraduates

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Chrysanthe Demetry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Suzanne Sontgerath, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

the Control group in 1997. ** In 2010 the program was enlarged to accommodate up to 40 participants. All 36 girls who applied were accommodated and completed the program.2) An automated method was used to cross-check the data gathered manually, using a combination of SQL, RStudio, and Python programming. An information analyst wrote a script to query the admissions database and filtered records of applicants who: a) identified as female; b) applied for admission in the fall of 2003 or later; and c) had birth years earlier than 1983. (Girls in the first cohort in 1997 would have applied for admission as an undergraduate in 2003 if following a typical schedule, and the earliest birth year

Relevance Score: 0.3482025

“They Don’t See Girls”: Construction of Identities in a Maker Program

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sagit Betser, University of California, Davis; Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis; Rebecca Ambrose Ph.D., University of California-Davis
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

. Archer, J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, B. Wong.”“Balancing acts'': Elementary school girls' negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science”, Science Education, 96(6):967-89, Nov 2012.[2] C. Hill, C. Corbett, A. St Rose. “Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics”, American Association of University Women, 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, 2010.[3] E. Smith. “Women into science and engineering? Gendered participation in higher education”, STEM subjects. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6):993-1014, Dec 2011.[4] Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017. Available: www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.[5] A. Johnson, J. Brown

Relevance Score: 0.34813884

Community College Transfer Students: Does Gender Make A Difference?

Conference Session: Potpourri
Collection: 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 2005, 14 pages. 13. Padmanabhan, Lin, W., Pieri, R., Patterson, F., and Cobb, S. “Strengthening Native American Pathways to Science and Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 2002, 9 pages. 14. Moore, H., Safai, N.M., and Richardson, D. “Building Bridges from the Community College to a University Engineering Education: A Model for Collaborative Approach,” Proceedings of the American Society Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 2004, 21 pages.15. Anderson-Rowland, M.R., Vanis, M., Zerby, D., Banks, D., and Matar, B., “METS Pilot Program: A Community

Relevance Score: 0.347316

A Research Experience For Undergraduates Program In Nano Technology

Conference Session: Using Teams, Seminars & Research Opportunities for Retention
Collection: 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Carolyn Vallas, University of Virginia; Anaïs Miodek, University of Virginia; Larry Richards, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

participantElizabeth Logsdon published a paper with Professor T.C. Skaylak entitled, “Inverse Micro andNanocontact Printing.”13 There is a U.S. Patent Pending on the findings with a ProvisionalPatent Application filed with U.S. Patent Office in October 2003. 2003 participant Lisa Cemkepublished a paper in 2004, co-authored by UVa Professor Robert Hull, Director of the Center for Page 11.111.9Nanoscopic Materials Design at UVa, as well as UVa Professors T. Harrell, B. Hosticka, M.E.Power, and P.M. Norris. The paper entitled, “Selective Deposition of Biocompatible Sol-GelMaterials,” was published in the Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, in 2004.14

Relevance Score: 0.347316

Attracting and Retaining Women in Undergraduate Engineering Programs – A Case Study

Conference Session: WIED: Medley
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ahmed Imran, Ajman University of Science & Technology, United Arab Emirates (UAE).; Mohamed Nasor M. Kalil; Fahar Ghalib Hayati, Ajman University of Science & Technology
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

enhanced student retention in both groups. The enhancementwas more for the women group.Further, an important and interesting observation from this study about student attrition suggeststhat early period after admission is decisive for a significant majority of students, irrespective ofgender.Bibliography1. Cech, E., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S., & Seron, C. (2011). Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering, American Sociological Review, 76(5) 641–666.2. Databytes: Female enrollment in engineering undergraduate programs still growing. Connections – newsletter of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), December 2013. (http://www.asee.org) (Last accessed, December 2013

Relevance Score: 0.3471152

Implementation of a Sexual Harassment Workshop Targeting Female Engineers

Conference Session: WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lisa Rae Volpatti, University of Pittsburgh; Cheryl A. Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh; Lauren M. Byland, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

studies,questions were asked on the senior exit survey. These questions were as follows:1. If you feel that sexual harassment is an issue of concern within an engineering environment (academic, industry, etc.), which of the following topics do you feel are important (check all that apply)? a) How to identify it? b) What to do if you encounter it? c) Which departments or persons to contact for help and/or advice? d) Sexual harassment is not an issue of concern2. Do you feel that further information on how to identify and cope with sexual harassment within engineering may be useful to you as you enter into the workforce? a) Yes b) NoGraduating seniors were contacted for participation in this on-line survey through e-mail

Relevance Score: 0.34706375

Reversing Gender Stereotypes in STEM Education in a Gender-Segregated Region

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 10
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Safia Malallah, Kansas State University; Salah Alfailakawi, Kansas State University; Taiba Yousef Alkhurafi, Kuwait University; Joshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

B D A E F G Figure 2. Educational Progress in KuwaitResearch QuestionsTo identify the factors behind reversed gender stereotypes and build a quantitative tool, thefollowing research questions were considered: RQ1: What STEM Model Factors Influence Male Preferences and Performances in STEM Education? RQ2: What STEM Model Factors Influence Female Preferences and Performances in STEM Education? RQ3: How do Male and Female Preferences and Performances Compare based on STEM Model FactorsMethodSample and SettingThe sample

Relevance Score: 0.3463399

Femineer® Program: A Model for Engaging K-12 Girls in STEM

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kristina Rigden, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Mariappan Jawaharlal, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Nicole Gutzke, Cal Poly Pomona
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

-framework [Accessed December 11, 2019].[4] J. Dewey, “How we think,” 1910. [Online]. Available: http://rci.rutgers.edu/~tripmcc/phil/dewey-hwt-pt1-selections.pdf [Accessed December 7, 2019].[5] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 1956.[6] Resource Area for Teaching, “Bridging the engagement gap with hands-on teaching,” 2013.[Online]. Available: from http://www.raft.net/public/pdfs/case-for-hands-on-learning.pdf [AccessedDecember 8, 2019].[7] P. Goertz, “10 signs of a 21st century classroom,” Edutopia: George Lucas EducationalFoundation, February 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.edutopia.org/discussion/10-signs-21st-century-classroom [Accessed December 7, 2019].[8] K. Gary, “Project-Based Learning,” IEEE