Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon University; Jaime Allen Fawcett, Carnegie Mellon University; Elizabeth A. Powell, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #12741Help Seeking Among Undergraduate Men and Women in EngineeringDr. Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon UniversityJaime Allen Fawcett, Carnegie Mellon University Jaime Allen Fawcett recently completed her undergraduate studies at Carnegie Mellon University in De- cember 2014 where she received a degree in Professional Writing and an additional degree in Creative Writing. Her research interests include pedagogical practices, educational policy and cultural attitudes that influence learning and development for students with specific learning disabilities.Dr. Beth A Powell, Tennessee Technological University

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chloe Wiggins, Designing Education Lab; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, SKG Analysis; Benedikt von Unold, Stanford University; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University Design Factory; Michael Arruza Cruz

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #23707Coding for Culture, Diversity, Gender, and Identity: the Potential for Au-tomation in ResearchMs. Chloe Wiggins, Designing Education Lab Chloe Wiggins is a graduate of Stanford University who majored in Civil Engineering with a concentration in structures and construction.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Changing Engineering Culture

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rui (Celia) Pan, Toyota Financial Services; Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma; Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma; Cindy E Foor, University of Oklahoma; Susan E. Walden, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #14975Barriers to Broadening Participation in Engineering Competition TeamsRui (Celia) Pan, Toyota Financial Services Dr. Pan is currently working as a sales, product and remarketing analyst at Toyota Financial Services. She received her Ph.D in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She hold a M.S. in Statistics and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering.Dr. Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma Dr. Randa L. Shehab is a professor and the Director of the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She was recently appointed as Director of the Sooner Engineering Education

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sinéad C Mac Namara, Syracuse University; Anne E Rauh, Syracuse University; Michelle M Blum, Syracuse University; Natalie Russo, Syracuse University; Melissa A Green, Syracuse University; Shikha Nangia, Syracuse University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #29077Peer Mentoring for Women in STEMProf. Sin´ead C Mac Namara, Syracuse University Sin´ead Mac Namara is a structural engineer and Associate Professor teaching in both the School of Ar- chitecture and the College of Engineering of Syracuse University. She studied civil and structural en- gineering at Trinity College Dublin and Princeton University. Her research is concerned with structural art, shell structural design, alternate pedagogies for interdisciplinary education, and investigations to fos- ter creativity and innovation in engineering curricula. Mac Namara co-authored a book Collaboration in

Conference Session

Institutional Transformations

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Christi McGeorge, North Dakota State University ; Cali L. Anicha, North Dakota State University; Ann Burnett, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #5965Engaging Male Faculty in Institutional TransformationDr. Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University Canan Bilen-Green is Dale Hogoboom Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Di- rector of the ADVANCE Program at North Dakota State University. She holds Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Statistics from the University of Wyoming and a M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Bilkent University. She was recently appointed to serve as the Vice Provost for Faculty Advancement, a new position created as part of institutionalization of the NSF ADVANCE Program at NDSU.Dr. Roger A. Green, North

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Agnes G. d'Entremont, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Hannah Gustafson, University of British Columbia; Katherine A. Lyon, University of British Columbia ; Jonathan Verrett P.Eng., University of British Columbia; Kerry Greer, Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia; Atif Shoukat Ali, University of British Columbia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #19095Gendered Words in U.S. Engineering Recruitment DocumentsDr. Agnes G. d’Entremont, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Dr. Agnes d’Entremont is an Instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Her technical research in Orthopaedic Biomechanics is focused on joint motion and cartilage health with a particular concentration in pediatric hip disorders and MRI-based methods. Her teaching-related interests include team-based learning and the flipped classroom, as well as diversity and climate issues in engineering education.Dr. Hannah Gustafson, University of British Columbia Hannah Gustafson

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alexa Tannebaum, Duke University; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Rebecca Simmons, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

printing history and asked aboutthe design process, intended use, and success of each of their prints. The interview questions canbe found in Appendix B. After the interview, a third party transcribed the interview, removed anyidentifiers in the transcript, and destroyed the video recording files.ResultsFifty undergraduate engineering students were surveyed in the study. Descriptive statistics of theparticipating students are presented in Table 1. While students were given nonbinary choices whenasked for their gender identity, very few identified outside of the male and female categories,and so results given here are for those two groups (referred to as men and women, respectively,here).The majority of men and women sampled entered college with no

Conference Session

1st Year Retention Programs for Women Students

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University; Amanda Funai, University of Michigan; Allison Interrante, Northeastern University; Sara Wadia-Fascetti, Northeastern University; Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

the key formulas, concepts, and strategies to solve the physicsproblems, especially in relation to concepts already covered in class. Although little more than asummary of lecture notes and the book, these notes especially seemed to improve the confidenceof the students, drawing on a different learning style which seemed very beneficial.9 Bypresenting the material in a different way, students are provided more opportunities to developtheir own learning style. The material seems less intimidating to mid-level students whensuccinctly summarized and also provides clues on appropriate study habits they should develop.A final review sheet was developed just before the final exam. (This review sheet is included inAppendix B.) Through the teaching

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Anu Osta, Rowan University; Jennifer Kadlowec, Baldwin Wallace University; Alissa Papernik; Amanda Ferreira Dias-Liebold, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

their retention inengineering. The survey and interview question list can be found in Appendix A and B. Theaudio interviews were expected to be approximately 20-30 minutes in duration. In the first weekof May 2019, the survey was sent out to the graduating seniors and students of senior status toget some of their feedback for phase one. About 60 students took the survey. The responses werelower than expected, as the target group was preparing to graduate and it was a little late in thesemester too.In fall 2019 semester, the survey was sent out once again. About 260 participants took the surveythis time. Once the results were collected, data analysis on the survey responses was carried out.The interviews were the next step. An email of interest

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiahui Song, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

exit survey: Table 1: Survey Questions Mechanical Workshop Electrical Workshop 1. I know…. 1. I know…. (a) Nothing about Mechanical Engineering (a) Nothing about Electrical Engineering (b) A little about Mechanical Engineering (b) A little about Electrical Engineering (c) Some about Mechanical Engineering (c) Some about Electrical Engineering (d) A lot about Mechanical Engineering (d) A lot about Electrical Engineering 2. I know… 2. I know… (a) Nothing about Heat Engine (a) Nothing about Microcontroller (b) A little about Heat Engine (b) A

Conference Session

Climate Issues for Women Students

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Creamer, Virginia Tech; Soyoung Lee, Virginia Tech; Peggy Meszaros

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

in the final statistical analysis were: (a) parents’opinions or views about the importance of a career and how to pursue information about careeroptions, (b) information orientation features (decision orientation, receptivity, informationsources, and information credibility), (c) stereotypical and positive attitudes about the attributesof toward IT workers (such as that they are hardworking, smart, and creative, or anti-socialloners, geeks, and males), (d) frequency and type of computer use, and (e) IT career interest andchoice. Response options were: disagree (1), slightly disagree (2), slightly agree (3), and agree(4). All measures were coded such that the higher the value, the more positive the interpretation.Items about general

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University; Aimee Cloutier, Texas Tech University; Guo Zheng Yew, Texas Tech University; Maeghan Marie Brundrett, Texas Tech University; Dylan Christenson, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

) of women into engineering careers. Finally, assessment to trackfuture career and majors participants select will be collected using post-surveys administeredonce participants graduate high school.References 1. Backer, P. R. and Halualani, R. T. (2012). Impact of self-efficacy on interest and choice in engineering study and careers for undergraduate women engineering students. In: 119th American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 2. Beede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., Doms, M. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. U.S. Department of Commerce: Economics and Statistics Administration. 3. Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005

Conference Session

WIED Olio

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie C.T. Van Tyne P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Chester J. Van Tyne, Colorado School of Mines; Kathryne Van Tyne, University of Chicago

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Effective Teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2: 9-34.4. R. Marra, K. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, 2009. Women Engineering Students and Self-Efficacy: A Multi- Year, Multi-Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self-Efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98: 27-38.5. A. Bandura, 1977. Self- Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84: 191-215.6. A. Carberry, H-S Lee, and M. Ohland. 2010. Measuring Engineering Design Self-Efficacy. Journal of Page 22.739.8 Engineering Education, 99: 71-79.7. R. Felder, G. Felder, M. Mauney, C. Hamrin, and E

Conference Session

Retention Programs for Women Students

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Douglas, Kansas State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

university experience in demanding curricula. Freshmenwomen are matched with upper-class women who are in the same major. The mentorsoffer advice, answer questions, and provide support throughout the academic year.WMW structures monthly opportunities for all participants to network. Activities rangefrom a ceramic event to attending a theatrical performance to a semi-formal dinner withthe deans and administrators on campus.Historically, this program was an individual (one-on-one) mentoring program. Afterattending a panel discussion on mentoring programs at the 2004 WEPAN conference, theprogram transitioned to a group mentoring structure in the fall of 2004, and the structuralchanges were modeled after the mentoring program at Penn State (Ruel, Bogue

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Underserved Students in the CSU Moving Beyond Race and Economic Status to Close Equity Gaps. Rethinking the Gap. [online] Long Beach, CA: CSU, pp.1-12. Available at: http://www.dashboard.csuprojects.org/rethinkingthegap/Historically-Underserved-Student- Factor-Model.pdf [Accessed 30 Jan. 2019].[4] French, B. F., Immekus, J. C., & Oakes, W. (2003, November). A structural model of engineering students’ success and persistence. In Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003 33rd Annual (Vol. 1, pp. T2A-19). IEEE.[5] Lichtenstein, G., McCormick, A. C., Sheppard, S. D., & Puma, J. (2010). Comparing the undergraduate experience of engineers to all other majors: Significant differences are programmatic. Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Reports from ADVANCE Institutions

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Susan Ruth Geier, Purdue University; Chris Sahley, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

across campus.Prior to the first meeting, participants responded to three open-ended questions; Cohort memberswere asked to: (a) list what they hoped to gain from participation, (b) what topics they would liketo discuss and (c) what resources and skills are important for future career success. The mostprominent theme from the responses was the desire to enhance leadership skills. Also cited were:developing effective career management strategies, gaining professional advice throughmentoring, and learning new self improvement skills (see Table 1). In addition to leadership,participants wanted information about how to negotiate various aspects of the workplace tocreate an environment conducive to attain their goals. These included interpersonal

Conference Session

Issues of Outreach and Interest in Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Sandrin, Arizona State University; Connie M Borror, Arizona State University West

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

STEM majors and the subjects required for these majors more oftenthan students of other races/ethnicities (Figure 1 b). There was not one single race/ethnicity thatconsistently had the smallest percentage of students who answered “yes” about succeeding indifferent STEM subjects. In terms of encouragement by a teacher/counselor or parent, for both questions,significantly less Native American students responded that “yes” they were encouraged (only39.5% encouraged by a counselor or teacher and34.2% encouraged by a parent, as opposed toalmost 50% of students being encouraged by both groups overall). Page 23.1102.10 100 Female MS/HS

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

biological, chemical, and physical sciences” [27].These course are required for all engineering majors and as indicated in the literature, are a largereason that students leave the field of engineering. However, to ensure that only engineeringstudents are observed, criteria 5b of the ABET accreditation guidelines were considered. Thisguideline requires (b) one and one-half years of engineering topics, consisting of engineering sciences and engineering design appropriate to the student’s field of study. The engineering sciences have their roots in mathematics and basic sciences but carry knowledge further toward creative application. These studies provide a bridge between mathematics and basic

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kaitlyn Anne Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno; Whitney Gaskins, University of Cincinnati; Kelly J. Cross, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

environment through the themes of microaggressions, engineering socialization, andisolation. The double standard forced WOC to adapt to an unwelcome environment and createsystems around them for their own success that are not provided by the engineering educationenvironment. This study opens the discussion for ways engineering colleges can better supportWOC students through programs and initiatives that seek to understand and celebrate the uniqueexperiences of WOC in engineering.ReferencesCarlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Katherine L Walters, University of Georgia ; John M Mativo, University of Georgia; Uduak Zenas George, San Diego State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

-2f6bbca45f14.html[10] J. Bossart and B. Neelam, “Women in Engineering: Insight into Why Some EngineeringDepartments Have More Success in Recruiting and Graduating Women.” American Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 8, no. 2, Dec. 2017.[11] A. Siani and C. Dacin. “An Evaluation of Gender Bias and Pupils’ Attitude towards STEMDisciplines in the Transition between Compulsory and Voluntary Schooling.” New Directions inthe Teaching of Physical Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, 2018.[12] E. Lee. “Effects of South Korean High School Students’ Motivation to Learn Science andTechnology on Their Concern Related to Engineering.” Educational Sciences: Theory andPractice, vol. 17, no. 2, 2017.[13] R. Christensen, G. Knezek, and T. Tyler-Wood. “Gender Differences in

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Dante Fratta, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Elizabeth C Harris, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Wayne P. Pferdehirt, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Heidi-Lynn Ploeg, Queens University at Kingston; Barry D. Van Veen, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

of improved peerevaluation of teaching proposed here addresses key limitations of the most current peerevaluation processes and may lead to more inclusion of best practices of teaching by instructorsof engineering.References[1] Stark, P. B. and Freishtat, R. (2014), An Evaluation of Course Evaluations, Science Open Research, DOI: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AOFRQA.v1.[2] Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., and Stark, P. B. (2016), Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness, Science Open Research, DOI: 10.14293/S2199- 1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1.[3] MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., and Hunt, A., N. (2015), What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching, Innov High Educ, 40: 291-303, DOI

Conference Session

Issues of Persistence in Engineering

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carol Burger, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

predict that they would be working in anengineering-related field in ten years (Table 3). Page 14.625.5Table 3. Student respondents who strongly and somewhat agreed that they are likely to beworking in an engineering-related field ten years from now, by gender and institution Overall Male Female Institution N Percent N Percent N Percent High Total 352 82.1%a 201 86.6%b,c 151 76.2%b,c Low Total 810 94.5%a 592 94.4%c 218 94.5%c

Conference Session

WIED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassandra Groen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Jennifer Karlin, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Andrea E. Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Faculty Mentoring. The University of Rhode Island, 2007. Web. 29 Sept. 2010. .11. Hacker, B., Dong, W., Lucero Ferrel, M., (2009). Using Mentoring as a Catalyst for Change. American Society of Engineering Education 2009 Annual Conference and Exposition.12. Homer, and W. H. D. Rouse. The Odyssey. New American Library, 1949.13. "How the Mentoring Program Works." UMPACE: Partnership for Comprehensive Equity. The University of Montana, 2008. Web. 23 Sept. 2010. .14. Ineffective Mentoring. University of Arizona.15. Kanter, Rosabeth M. The Change Masters: Innovations for Productivity in the American Corporation. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983.16. J. Karlin, and A. E. Surovek. "When Critical Mass Is Not an Option

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Technical Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel Alberto Acuna, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Joseph E Michaelis, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Joshua Daniel Roth, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Joseph Towles, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, the facilitator marked the surveysof those who participated in the trivia game activity with a stamp unique to the version of theintervention that they completed.   3   Engineering Problem Possible Solutions Scientist/Engineer who Discovered/Created Solution Problem statement 1 Solution A Female A Female B Female C Solution B

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laine Schrewe, Tolles Career and Technical Center

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

school career - meaning that freshmen don’t havesignificantly more enthusiasm for these subjects than seniors, or vice versa. When asked ifstudents were interested in STEM courses (in general), 80% of male students answered that theyhave some interest in STEM courses, compared to only 60% of female students. Charts 1a and 1b: Data for male and female responders related to the following survey question:Please select which of the following BEST describes how you feel about STEM-related electives (such as Engineering, ComputerHardware, etc.) a. Those classes sound interesting. b. Those classes sound pretty interesting, but I don't think I'm smart enough to do well in them. c. Those classes

Conference Session

WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raquel Perez-Castillejos, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Priya Radhi Santhanam, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

/index.php/trends-stats/3293-literature-review[5] R. Sevo, The Talent Crisis in Science and Engineering. In B. Bogue & E. Cady (Eds.). Apply Research to Practice, Assessing Women (and Men) in Engineering (AWE) project: Literature Overviews, USA (2004). Available online: http://www.engr.psu.edu/awe/secured/director/assessment/Literature_Overview/PDF_ overviews/ARP_Talent_Crisis_in_SandE_Overview.pdf[6] Handbook for achieving gender equity through education, S.S. Klein, B. Richardson, D.A. Grayson, L.H. Fox, C. Kramarae, D.S. Pollard, C.A. Dwyer (eds.), 2nd Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah NJ (2007).[7] American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (AAUW), Under the microscope: a

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Changing Engineering Culture

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Omoju Miller, UC Berkeley

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

types, data-directed programming, and message-passing; (b) between programming languages, using functional and rule-based languages as examples. It also relates these techniques to the practical problems of implementation of languages and algorithms on a von Neumann machine. There are several significant programming projects.2 . • CS61B - Data Structures. Fundamental dynamic data structures, including linear lists, queues, trees, and other linked structures; arrays strings, and hash tables. Storage management. Elementary principles of software engineering. Abstract data types. Algorithms for sorting and searching. Introduction to the Java programming language. • CS61C - Machine Structures. The internal

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malle R Schilling, University of Dayton; Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

/. [Accessed May 19, 2017].[18] Purdue University, “Youth Programs,” purdue.edu, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.purdue.edu/purdue/about/youthPrograms.html. [Accessed March 7, 2017].[19] N. Bachman, P. J. Bischoff, H. Gallagher, S. Labroo, and J. C. Schaumloffel, “PR2EPS: Preparation, recruitment, retention and excellence in the physical sciences. A report on the 2004, 2005 and 2006 summer camps,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008.[20] L. Bottomley, J. P. Lavelle, S. B. D'Amico, and L. D. LaPorte, (2015). “Engineering summer programs: A strategic model,” In Proc. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 1-22.[21] A. Bandura, “Guide for

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jiahui Song, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Douglas Eric Dow, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; James R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Workshop Electrical Workshop Manufacturing Workshop 1. Did you learn something 1. Did you learn something 1. Did you learn something new new during this activity? new during this activity? during this activity? (a) I learned a lot (a) I learned a lot (a) I learned a lot (b) I learned some (b) I learned some (b) I learned some (c) I did not learn anything (c) I did not learn anything (c) I did not learn anything (d) I was confused (d) I was confused (d) I was confused 2. Did you enjoy the 2. Did you enjoy the 2. Did you enjoy the activity? activity

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Changing Engineering Culture

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kylie Denise Stoup, James Madison University; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Spears, R., Doosje, B., Ellemers, N. 1997. Stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, (538-553).6. Boros, S. (2008). Organizational identification: Theoretical and empirical analyses competing conceptualizations. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 8, 1-27.7. Dehing, A., Jochems, W., & Baartman, L. (2013). The development of engineering students professional identity during workplace learning in industry: A study in Dutch bachelor education. Engineering Education, 8(1), 42-64.8. London, B., Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011). The influences of perceived identity compatibility and social support