Paper ID #18072The Retention and Usefulness of Concept Maps as Advance OrganizersDr. Jacob Preston Moore, Pennsylvania State University, Mont Alto Jacob Moore is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Penn State Mont Alto. He has a PhD in Engineer- ing Education from Virginia Tech and a Bachelors and Masters in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include concept mapping, digital textbooks, and additive manufacturing.Dr. Chris Venters, East Carolina University Chris Venters is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University in Greenville, North Carolina, USA. He teaches
Paper ID #41822Assessing Entrepreneurial Mindset in Computer Science Students Using ConceptMappingArwen Elizabeth Pearson, University of Washington Undergraduate mechanical engineering student at the University of Washington Tacoma. Set to graduate June 2024. Conducting undergraduate research with Heather Dillon on the benefits of concept mapping in computer science and numerical methods courses as of December 2023.Mr. Simon Njoroge, University of Washington Simon Njoroge is a driven Mechanical Engineering student born and raised in Central Kenya, currently finalizing his Bachelor of Science degree in the United States
Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing Interdisciplinary Competency in the Disaster Resilience and Risk Management Graduate Program using Concept Maps: A Pilot StudyIntroductionIn recent years, an increasing number of natural and human-made disasters, like Hurricane Mariaand the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, have impacted vulnerable populations across theglobe. The Disaster Resilience and Risk Management (DRRM) graduate program, housed atVirginia Tech, aims to educate interdisciplinary scholars who can help address these disastersboth before and after they happen in order to increase community resilience. Our overall projectgoal is to improve understanding and support proactive decision-making relative to DRRM byestablishing a sustainable and
of belonging within engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Concept Mapping the Entrepreneurial Mindset in a First-Year Engineering Design Course: How Students' Perceptions ShiftAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper looks at a concept mapping activity that was usedin a first-year engineering design course. Students created concept maps of the EntrepreneurialMindset before their design project started and then they were asked to iterate on the map afterthey completed their design project. This study examines the concept maps and uses anautomated scoring tool to complete traditional and categorical scoring. The results show that thecomplexity of the maps did increase
working in survey, concept map, and narrative assessment. She was awarded an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship in April, 2022, and hopes to continue her research in entrepreneurial mindset assessment using narrative inquiry.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game-based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship.Cassandra Sue Ellen Jamison, Rowan University Cassandra (Cassie) Jamison is an Assistant Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University
mechanical engineering, with a total of 64faculty members across the departments.Study designFor this study, faculty from both the College of Education and the College of Engineering wererecruited. Faculty members who agreed to participate were asked to attend a one-houron-campus workshop on concept mapping. The purpose, as portrayed to the participants, wastwo-fold: a) participate in a study on topics faculty members from different disciplines prioritizeas part of their curriculum, and b) practice concept mapping as a pedagogical tool to be used intheir own teaching practice.The researchers received responses from 35 faculty members with interest in participating in theworkshop. Of those 35, 6 participants requested virtual access to the
the aforementionedskills and is a common theme in many STEM in particular engineering and medical disciplines.And for the second issue where students’ mastery of the skills is to be demonstrated andevaluated, we find concept maps to be fitting because of their use of both content and processknowledge to create visual maps of a diagnostic strategy to identify technical problems 8,9 .We have found the needed platform to assess concept map based active learning in a NationalScience Foundation funded project, “Advancing Diagnostic Skills Training in the UndergraduateTechnology and Engineering Curriculum”. On one hand, the project uses concept map to bothsolicit input from domain experts and assess student outcomes. On the other hand, the
studyaims to improve construction management (CM) students’ systems thinking ability in circulareconomy and conceptualize their ideas about design for disassembly. To achieve this goal, thestudy integrated a combination learning model through a flexible combination of problem-basedlearning (PBL) and concept map development (CMD) activity in three CM courses includingPrinciples of Construction, Sustainable Construction, and Sustainable Approach to Construction.Overall, 61 students participated in the pre-and post-course survey and a Wilcoxon-signed ranktest is utilized to analyze the obtained data. The results of the statistical analysis indicated thatstudents significantly improved their systems thinking ability, technical communication
concept maps for “equitable infrastructure” at the end of the semester. The concept mapsrevealed differences in student ideas that reflect the different approaches taken in the courses.Analysis of these concept maps yields insight into student learning on equitable infrastructureand can provide guidance for others wishing to incorporate equity into first-year and/or civilengineering coursework.IntroductionCivil engineering education has long recognized the need for the curriculum to blend a broadarray of technical and professional skills to meet the needs of the profession (see, for example,the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge [1]). The ways in which infrastructure has bothpositively and negatively affected equity in our social systems have
. that occurred tothem during discussions. Participants would immediately adhere their sticky note to a posterboard reflecting the thread the idea most closely related to. This process continued throughout allof the sessions on the first day and resulted in a large collection of participant-produced stickynotes at the end of Day 1. On day 2 the participants were given a subset of the sticky notecollection and were asked to analyze the notes. The conference ended with participants workingtogether to create concept maps that outlined relationships between the ideas reflected on thesticky notes. Figure 3. Overview of the process of developing a
, Concept Mapping, Reflective writingIntroductionContext of the paper (COVID) and NSF Funded Community of PracticeIn the summer of 2020, the Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E, anNSF-funded center to develop and implement curriculum on infrastructure) hosted theInfrastructure Education in Unprecedented Times Workshop to maintain and grow thecommunity of practice established by this organization. The workshop allowed participants toco-create lessons on how pandemics and systemic racism affect and/or are affected by civilinfrastructure. These topics were introduced through keynote speaker presentations as well assuggested readings curated by the organizing committee. During the event, participants proposedtopics for
assessment tool allows for the breadth ofdiffering ideals of cross-disciplinary engineers to be measured on an equitable playing field. Aflexible measurement tool such as concept mapping allows students to explore ideas creatively,while still allowing instructors to understand thought processes and knowledge development.When connecting EM to international experiences, curiosity is developed through discussionswith people from different cultures. Students have the opportunity to spark lifelong curiositywhile developing an appreciation of differences with the realization that diverse perspectiveslead to innovative solutions. Connection is created when students integrate information frommultiple sources, domestic and international, to design a solution
were the Engineering Disciplines Team Concept Map, Hand PumpLaboratory Team Report, Simply Supported Beam Laboratory Report, Alpine Tower StaticsLaboratory Wiki and Grand Challenges Video Project.A team leader was designated for each of these five assignments, which provided every studentwith an opportunity for an intentional leadership experience. As the first assignment was given,the instructor led a class discussion on the roles of team members and team leaders. After thedeliverables for team assignments were submitted and in order to reflect individually on theexperience, students were required to submit a Self-Reflection using a journaling tool inBlackboard. The intent of these structured reflections was to reinforce and foster
MapsConcept maps have been widely applied as a heuristic tool in engineering education to promotemeaningful knowledge structures for students. A concept map allows a student to organize acollection of concepts and to identify/present the relationships between each other using a graph3- 4 . Studies suggest that concept mapping be a valid tool to categorize and to reflect changes instudents’ structures of knowledge in STEM disciplines 3, 5. However, concept maps emphasizethe macro relationships among concepts and may not reflect students’ understandings of anindividual concept.Concept inventories referred to here comprise of a series of instruments for the assessment ofstudents’ conceptual understanding of STEM disciplines. The questions were
ashorter workshop, more time with faculty in their own discipline, longer icebreaker to meet morepeople, and more deliverables to take with them.Second Annual Workshop Hosted by Nassau Community CollegeThe goal for year two was to improve the student transfer experience by ensuring students wereprepared for upper level courses with both content knowledge and skills and by making sure thecourse objectives, activities, assessments and instructional strategies were aligned. An additionalgoal was to catalyze collaborations across institutions by creating working groups.Ice BreakerThe ice breaker objectives were to learn to produce a concept map [9], connect with faculty fromother institutions or departments, and gain an understanding of our NCC/HU
to the use of concept maps, and a tiered analysis approach toanalyze subareas of sustainability as they related to describing and quantifying impacts. Lastly, asurvey was distributed to the students to gather their perceptions about engineering and aboutother disciplines. The survey also inquired which activities (mentioned above) had the greatestimpact in which of the objectives and why. Due to the small class size, these results are notrepeatable. Instead, as stated, a more in-depth approach to assessment was taken.The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the organization of theclassroom. Section 3 then provides an assessment of the course outcomes. Next, Section 4summarizes the results from the student
| Susan Fullerton | Goetz Veser University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of EngineeringOverview• Need for innovation in graduate STEM education• Personalized Learning Model • Developing the Body of Knowledge • Concept Mapping of Learning Objectives • Modularization of Core Courses• The New Curriculum• Implications and Takeaways• Next steps https://pittnews.com/article/159247/top-stories/swanson-engineers-a-path-for-fall-semester/#modal-photoNeed for Innovation in GraduateEducation and STEM Training• Current graduate STEM education does not fully address the diverse needs of graduate students, especially at a time when cultivating diverse talent is crucial
produced include a concept map. Students leave the course with a clear listof which topics they mastered and which they are still working on. This model still permits roomfor traditional laboratory and project components.IntroductionIn standard teaching, course topics are covered on a set schedule and exams occur at set schedules.If students have not learned the material for an earlier portion of the class, the course moves alonganyway and focuses on new more difficult material that builds on the previous material thatstudent still does not understand. This promotes a fixed mindset promoting the idea that if youdidn’t get a concept, you never will. At the end of the course, students may only have a partialunderstanding of the material and may be
Paraphrased: Describe the initial cause of composition (usually an an adverse event that caused environmental argument) about a damage. Describe what actually happened, sustainability topic. what the aftermath was, and a positive outcome that came from it9. Concept Maps Students draw descriptive Students constructed concept maps on the linking lines to show focus question: “What is sustainability?” relationships between using CmapTools, a free concept mapping sustainability-related software10
summarizes the structure of such curricular priorities identified bythe backward design model, using the modified language proposed by Streveler & Smith [13]. Figure 1. Levels of course content adapted from Wiggins & McThige [4] based on the CAP model [13].The core element of the CAP model is the alignment between the content, assessment, and pedagogyelements, having the enduring outcomes as the main driver for the design [13]. In addition, the Streveler& Smith CAP framework, which has been taught for more than a decade at Purdue University [13], hasinfused the execution of backward design with tools that facilitate its different stages. For the first stage,(1) Content, the use of concept maps is suggested as a tool to explore the
-identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer (LGBTQ+), veterans, low income/firstgeneration, or having disabilities in engineering. The authors of this paper used their participation in theWho’s Not At The Table? conference to shape the organization of the workshop outlined here; one teammember and author of this paper, Stefl, organized the Who’s Not At The Table conference and two otherteam members and authors, D. Lee and High, participated in the event. Additionally, High worked withStefl and Martin, to develop the strategy for the second day of the conference where research ideas (onsticky notes) were used to create concept maps that informed the research agenda.As organizers of the How Many Hats Do You Wear workshop, we were able
Good to be familiar with section of the curricularpriorities: Ability to know how different formulas were derived dealing with solving different concepts of the course. Ability to use specific methods for analyzing specific type of definite structures. Figure 1. Three nested rings used by Wiggins & McTighe (2005) for describing curricular prioritiesB. Concept mapConcept maps are the graphical representation of how the concepts/ideas in a target domain areinterconnected to each other. Considering the above three different stages of curricularpriorities for the course, the author has come up with the following concept map for Statics: Figure 2. Concept map for the curricular priorities of Statics1. Concept map
designed the workshop to follow the steps associated with a typical research project. In each section,we challenge participants to think about research as a way to enhance student mindset. We developedshort presentations that were then followed by active learning worksheets in a printed field guide. Most ofthe active learning worksheets were designed to be easily adapted for use with research students backhome.Module 1. Connecting Research to Your Career. In this module we encourage participants to thinkabout how they might connect research to other parts of their roles. In the activity, we ask participants tobuild a concept map that connects their research to service, classes, and other aspects of their work. Anexample of this type of concept map
engineering students and faculty. Survey responses for eachaspect of an inclusive curriculum will be compared before and after implementation, as will theaverage of all responses, i.e., the “average level of inclusivity” used by Mills, et al. [14]. Inaddition, student and faculty responses will also be compared. The previous benchmarking doneby Mills, et al. [14] using classrooms in the U.S. and Australia will serve as a basis ofcomparison.Students’ conceptions of engineering will be assessed using a concept map as described by [17].Students in both the experimental and comparison groups of Freshman Engineering Clinic willcomplete concept maps at the beginning of their first semester and at the end of the course. Theconcept maps will be evaluated
comparative method was used to develop a codebook during the focused coding phase[10]. From the focused coding, constructs, i.e. categories, of the social identities of the students aswell as their factors that influenced their personal experiences where defined. Analytical memoswere also being concurrently maintained during the coding processes. Axial coding was done afterthe initially focused coding was completed for all of the themes discussed in the interviews. Fromthis analytical approach, a concept map of the factors that act as stressors in organizationalleadership experiences for undergraduate engineering students are proposed and the interactionsamong social identities and other factors are discussed.Results and Discussion The categories
the context of news oracademic readings) affect what is published and how it is discussed. 4 Class Schedule Week Activity Week 1 Introduction to module Week 1 Videos covering module material Week 1 Readings (scholarly and news articles) covering module material Week 2 Role-play pre-questions Week 2 Individual concept map Week 3 Role-play activity (moderated, semi-scripted) Week 4 Group concept map Week 4 Role-play post-questions
valuable benefit. Students had to study the outdatedmaterial, research the subject, and update the information with the latest developments andissues, drawing conclusions based on comparison between the book statements and theactual reality.Results and InterpretationAssessment of student learning is considered a challenging issue in courses on engineering andtechnology literacy (15). Development of a concept map requires selectivity and judgment,classified at the “synthesis level” of Bloom’s taxonomy. This requires a high degree of cognitiveengagement, and therefore when the students debate the technology- intensive subjects in partsIII, IV, V, and VII they are required to develop concept maps of their subjects to support theirstatements.The
-inspired design process and design tools to identify engineeringneeds, produce a documented design solution, demonstrate ability to collect, analyze andinterpret data, through a project-based learning course structure. The researchers adopted thevisual analysis methods in semiotics and iconography to classify students’ engineering designprocess map visually, aiming to quantify the qualitative data (Leeuwen & Jewitt 2001). Throughmethods to analyze concept maps as tools for scientific learning, the researchers identified topicsas “nodes,” with directionality connecting through “links” and patterns more generallyconnecting within. The former might be readily identified as design process steps, the latter asindications for iteration. The
Understanding/Outcome 4. D. Tool - Concept MapConcept mapping is a technique for identifying important concepts and their relationships to oneanother. Iteration is encouraged for developing content for a course. The sixth iteration for thiseffort, presented here in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5, draws heavily from theRotorcraft Handbook topics and adds micro-concepts from the fourth iteration (based on theauthor’s professional experience) that support detailed design of a rotor. Helicopter rotorconcepts are so interactive that the concept map must be presented in several figures for clarityand readability. Enduring Understandings are colored in purple. Important-to-Know items arecolored in blue. Good-to-be-Familiar-With items
began with interviewers summarized their notesand developed a concept map outlining the conversation. The interviewers were trained inontological concept map development using the method described by Turns, Atman and Adams(2000) and later adapted by Besterfield-Sacre et al. (2004). This method typically places thecore, central concept in the center of the page and then connects related concepts, sometimesusing “action words” to describe the nature of the connection. The interviewers assembled in aroom and drew their individual concept maps on a whiteboard, simultaneously explaining thefindings to the other interviewers. Once all maps had been displayed and discussed theresearchers summarized the findings and then developed a “consensus concept