Paper ID #28131Board 5: Construction Engineering Division: Tailoring Construction Man-agement Instruction to the Emerging Adult LearnerDr. Robert B Austin P.E., Bowling Green State University Dr. Austin has over 30 years of heavy construction, engineering and facility experience in industrial, transportation and building projects across the full range of project delivery systems. His industry expe- rience is multi-faceted with a strong background in civil engineering and construction management on both domestic and international projects. Having served in responsible charge of projects nationwide, he possesses
Paper ID #28114Board 6: Energy Conversion and Conservation Division: Improving VerticalAxis Wind Turbine (VAWT) PerformanceDr. Patrick A. Tebbe P.E., Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Patrick Tebbe is a professor and chair of the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. Dr. Tebbe received B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering as well as the M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri–Columbia. He is currently a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), student branch advi- sor for the American Society of Mechanical
Paper ID #28127Board 19: New Engineering Educators Division: Lowman’s Model GoesBack to the MoviesDr. David A Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth David Saftner is an Associate Professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth. He received a BS in Civil Engineering from the United States Military Academy and MS and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Michigan. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #22911Lowman’s Model Goes Back to the MoviesDr. Clifton B. Farnsworth
. Cerbin and B. Kopp, “Lesson Study as a Model for Building Pedagogical Knowledge and Improving Teaching,” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 18, issue 3, pp. 250-257, 2006.[10] J. McTighe and J. L. Brown, “Differentiated Instruction and Educational Standards: Is Detente Possible?” Theory into Practice, vol. 44, issue 3, pp. 234-244, 2005.[11] C. Bovill and C. J. Bulley, “A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility,” in Improving Student Learning (ISL) 18: Global Theories and Local Practices: Institutional, Disciplinary and Cultural Variations, C. Rust, Ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford Brookes University, 2011, pp. 176-188.[12] N. Balasubramanian, B
attemptedafter the student views the entire Course Content module. To pass the THORS course, aminimum score of 80% is required on the Post-Assessment. If an 80% is not achieved, thestudents are directed back to review the sections in the Course Content module on which theytested poorly. Afterward revisiting these sections, the student can retry the Post-Assessment. Anexample question from the Post-Assessment is shown in Figure 2B.Figure 2: Example of THORS interface for Course Content (A) and Post-Assessment (B) [9].*Used with permission from THORS eLearning Solutions.In lieu of homework assignments, students were assigned THORS courses (Tab. 1)corresponding to hands-on and active lecture components. Students were given 3 weeks tocomplete each course
].5. B. Jaeger and E. LaRochelle, "EWB (2)-Engineers Without Borders: Educationally, a World of Benefits," in Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 14-17 June 2009, Austin, TX [Online]. Available: ASEE Conferences, https://peer.asee.org/4961. [Accessed: 25 Jan. 2018].6. T. J. Kriewall and K. Mekemson, "Instilling the entrepreneurial mindset into engineering undergraduates," Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5-19, 2010.7. KEEN, "KEEN - Mindset Matters", Engineeringunleashed.com, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/Mindset-Matters.aspx. [Accessed: 25 Jan. 2018].8. P. Singh and M. V. Moncada, "Instilling the Entrepreneurial Mindset by
and none Analysis engineering standards,” in 2015 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2015.. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24218. [7] G. E. Okudan and B. Osif, “Effect of guided research Effective Design experience on product design performance: A pilot study,” J. Project Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 255–262, 2005. Grades [8] B. Otis and L. Whang, “Effect of library instruction on Effective Citation undergraduate electrical engineering design projects,” in 2007 Analysis ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2007. https://peer.asee.org/2620. [9] M. Phillips, S. Lucchesi, J. Sams, and P. J. van Susante, Effective
Paper ID #28116Board 8: Engineering Management Division: Implementing Lean Practicesin an Academic Department: A Case StudyProf. Byron G. Garry, South Dakota State University BYRON GARRY is Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Coordinator in the Department of Construction & Operations Management in the Jerome J. Lohr College of Engineering at South Dakota State University. He has been a member of ASEE since 1998. As SDSU ASEE Campus Rep., his goal is to help fellow College of Engineering faculty to be reflective teachers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
Paper ID #28110Board 1: Aerospace: Inclusion of Sustainability Analysis in a National Air-port Design CompetitionProf. Mary E. Johnson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Mary E. Johnson earned her BS, MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from The University of Texas at Arlington. After 5 years in aerospace manufacturing, Dr. Johnson joined the Automation & Robotics Research Institute in Fort Worth and was program manager for applied research programs. Fourteen years later, she was an Industrial Engineering assistant professor at Texas A&M - Commerce before joining the Aviation Technology department at Purdue University
Minor Conceptual Error (B/C) 3.0 Major or Multiple Minor Conceptual Errors (D) 2.0 Something was Correct (F+) 1.0 Problem was Attempted (F)The grading system evolved over several years. The skills as defined in 2017 were based onwhat was learned from the first offering of this course as a competency-based grading course in2016. The motivation for the changes and the effect on the student outcomes are discussedbelow. Before 2016, the course was graded more traditionally. Each student took four examscovering specific topics and skills. All students moved forward to new skills regardless ofperformance on the previous exam. The 2016 mastery skills were based directly on the skillsused in the
. Comparison of the number of students (top number) and fraction (bottom number) in Study 1 with errors in parts 1 and 2 of the FCC (111) plane. (a) “Should touch” misconception. (b) “Missing atoms” misconception. (a) FCC (111) “Should Touch” (b) FCC (111) “Atoms Missing” Part 2 Part 2 N=46 N=46 Error No Error Error No Error Error 16 13 Error 1 10 0.35 0.28 0.02 0.22 Part 1
- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1029–1045, 2002.[10] C. M. Riordan, “Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions,” in Research in personnel and human resources management, M. R. Buckley, J. R. B. Halbesleben, and A. R. Wheeler, Eds. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2000, pp. 131–173.[11] S. E. Jackson, K. E. May, and K. Whitney, “Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teans,” in Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, R. A. Guzzo and E. Salas, Eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995, pp. 204–261.[12] L. R. Goldberg, “The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure
relationships from the perspective of the mentor. In B. R. Ragins & K. E. Kram (Eds). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research and practice (pp. 123-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Anfara, V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(28), 28-38.Anfara, V. A, & Mertz, N. T. (Eds.) (2015). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Babbie, E. (2015). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Boston, MA: Cenage.Baez, B. (1999). Faculty of color and traditional notions
also transmitted acomputer running LabView software which simulates a virtual instrument panel for displayingtypes of data. The printed circuit board is 3.1cm by 4.1cm. Its microprocessor is FT232RL. Theshield’s interface is a mini-B USB and a 2.54mm pitch pin header. The communication protocolsfor this shield are UART, eight bit-bang inputs/outputs, and SPI. Its adapter socket is XBeecompatible with a 2.0mm pitch female pin header. The shield is FTDI compatible and has a USB2.0 compatible Serial Interface. It has 3.3V and 5V inputs/outputs and 3.3V and 5V dual poweroutputs. The typical and maximum input voltage is 5Vdc, and it has a current consumption of500mA. Its minimum output voltage is 3.3Vdc, while its maximum output voltage is
. 57, no. 2, pp. 141–158, 2007.[33] K. B. Catton, A. Galang, and A. T. Bulk, “Disruption in large classes during active learning sessions,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016–June, 2016.[34] D. Haak, J. HilleRisLambers, E. Pitre, and S. Freeman, “Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology,” Science (80-. )., vol. 332, no. June, pp. 1213–1217, 2011.[35] M. Lorenzo, C. H. Crouch, and E. Mazur, “Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 118–122, 2006.[36] R. M. Felder, G. N. Felder, and E. J. Dietz, “The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 3–17
/ [Downloaded March 9, 2018][12] F. Garafalo and V. LoPresti. Evolution of an integrated college freshman curriculum.Journal of Chemical Education. 70,5. Pgs 352-359. 1993[13] B. Ronald. The limits of competence. Knowledge, higher education and society. OpenUniversity Press. Bristol, PA 1994[14] E. O’Herrin. Enhancing Veteran Success in Higher Education, “Peer Review” (Associationof American Colleges and Universities) Vol. 13, No. 1(Winter 2011).[15] G. Ford and J. Ford. Translating United States military occupational specialties traininginto college credit at a regional, comprehensive university. Proceedings of the AmericanSociety of Engineering Education, New Orleans, LA. 2015[16] E. Pascarella and P. Terenzini. How college affects students: A third
1st cycle 1st cycle CE CE A A 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 1- extremely negative to 5- extremely positive 1 -always to 5-never (a) Resolution of conflicts between designer (b) How often do you think conflicts will be resolved and contractor are usually: in your favor before going to court? Figure 4: Students’ perception of conflicts with other disciplinesWhen students
Paper ID #28120Board 12: Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division: Examining theRelationships Between How Students Construct Stakeholders and the WaysStudents Conceptualize Harm from Engineering DesignAlexis Papak Alexis Papak is a Research Assistant at the University of Maryland, College Park with the Physics Edu- cation Research Group. They completed their Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Their research interests are centered around how race and identity relate to STEM teaching and learning. c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #28129Board 21: Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineer-ing Division: Technological Literacy, Engineering Literacy, Engineers, PublicOfficials and the PublicDr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. research and development in Curriculum and Instruction