Collection

2017 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Yimesker Yihun; Rajeev Nair; Jason Herron

Team-Based Learning on short-term and long-term retention of factual knowledge." Medical teacher 38(3): 306-311. 7. Gilley, B. H. and B. Clarkston (2014). "Collaborative testing: Evidence of learning in a controlled in-class study of undergraduate students." Journal of College Science Teaching 43(3): 83-91. 8. Hall, M. L. and M. T. Stocks (1995). "Relationship between quantity of undergraduate science preparation and preclinical performance in medical school." Academic Medicine 70(3): 230-235. 9. Hill, B. C., C. Ruptic, L. Norwick and C.-b. Assessment (1998). "Christopher." Squier Experimental aspects of oral carcinogenesis: 492-501. 10. Jacobs, G. and T. H. Shan (2016). "Advancing learner autonomy in TEFL

Conference Session

Student Feedback and Assessment in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andreas Febrian, Utah State University, Engineering Education; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

designprocess.Engineering Design Project Engineering design is an iterative decision-making process of devising components orprocedures that satisfy certain needs and constraints by utilizing basic science, mathematics, andengineering science [3]. Due to its iterative nature, it is not easy for a novice engineer to graspand handle the complexity of the design process, which encourages the development of variousmodels to describe the design process. In this study, we focus on models that are phase-basedand prescriptive for two reasons: (a) these models are developed based on best design practices[13]; and (b) these models are the most suitable for students [13]. There are countless modelsunder this category. Most of them describe the design process as a

Conference Session

Applied Frameworks

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lori C. Bland, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University; Anastasia P. Samaras, George Mason University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

EducationMotivation and BackgroundThere are two purposes for this paper. The first purpose is to describe our unique application oftwo different qualitative research methods to evaluate the implementation and outcomes for thefirst year of an NSF funded grant on STEM faculty development. We used two different researchmethods in order to be able to describe and examine adequately the underlying change processesand outcomes that faculty experienced during participation in Year One of the grant. The secondpurpose is to report out the implementation results and outcomes from this evaluation.The two different research methods were: (a) conjecture mapping1 and (b) self-study2,3,4. Thegrant evaluator used conjecture mapping, which is a method from design-based

Conference Session

Curricular Issues in Computing and Information Technology Programs I

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tian Qiu, Purdue University; Mengshi Feng, Purdue University; Sitian Lu, Purdue University; Zhuofan Li; Yudi Wu; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University; Yung-Hsiang Lu, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

the vice president of Purdue Billiards Club since 2015.Mr. Zhuofan LiMr. Yudi WuDr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yashu Kang, Chung Yuan Christian University; Yao-Jen Chang, Chung Yuan Christian University; Shaou-Gang Miaou, Chung-Yuan Christian University; Chen Li-Yu, Chung Yuan Christian University; Yao-Sheng Chang, Department of Tourism and Leisure Management, Chung Chou University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

code games for education and entertainment. However, this was thefirst effort to combine Kinect, Scratch, and Kinect2Scratch to develop interactive gamesfor children with ASD to engage in shower training.Four male and two female elementary school children with ASD (Allen, Bart, Chris,Diane, Emilie, and Fred) participated in this study. All of the children were enrolled inspecial education services under the autism category and their cognitive and adaptivefunctioning fell within the moderate intellectual disability range. Specifically, thechildren were selected based on the following criteria: (a) diagnosis of autism or anintellectual disability, (b) an Individual Education Plan (IEP) goal to improve adaptivebehavior related to personal care

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Ruth Young M.Ed, University of Texas, Austin; Margo Cousins, University of Texas at Austin; Laura Suggs, University of Texas, Austin; Mia K. Markey, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. House, J. Livingston, and A. Watt, “Grandest Challenge: Models for Communication Development in Technical Contexts,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., Jun. 2014.[4] A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour, “Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development,” Sci. Educ., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 36–74, Jan. 2007.[5] D. Lopatto, “Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisions and Active Learning,” CBE-Life Sci. Educ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 297–306, Dec. 2007.[6] K. W. Bauer and J. S. Bennett, “Alumni Perceptions Used to Assess Undergraduate Research Experience,” J. High. Educ., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 210–230, Apr. 2003.[7] M. C. Linn, E. Palmer, A. Baranger, E

Conference Session

Student Success & Development - Focus on Mentoring

Collection

2017 FYEE Conference

Authors

Sharri Lee Kornblum, CSULA engineering department; Zanj Kano Avery El; Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles; Deborah Won, California State University, Los Angeles; Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity, FYEE Division - Paper Submission

involved in several grants at CSULA increasing student articulation.Dr. Zanj Kano Avery ElDr. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering Department at CalStateLA. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has focused on improving student success and has participated in sev- eral teaching workshops, including one on ”Excellence in Civil Engineering Education” and another in ”Enhancing Student Success through a Model Introduction to Engineering Course.” He is currently the PI of TUES project to revamp the sophomore-year experience at the college of engineering (esuc- ceed.calstatela.edu) and the PI/Director of the First-Year Experience (FYrE

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks Session II - Curriculum II

Collection

2017 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Bettina Dahl, Aalborg University, Denmark

Tagged Topics

Main Forum (Podium Presentation)

present.Overall the new group exam consists of three phases: (a) Students jointly present their projectwhich usually lasts around one hour. (b) A joint phase usually lasting up to two hours where theexaminers ask questions to the group and where each group member can volunteer to answer thequestion or add something to what another group member has stated, and (c) an individual phasewhere each student directly gets a specific question. Sometimes the students draw the questionfrom a poll of questions at random, at other times the students are being asked something withinan area of the project report that the students did not previously say something about. Before thereintroduction of the new group exam, the Faculty of Engineering and Science had held

Collection

2017 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Nicolas Ali Libre; Jeff Jennings; Amy Skyles

A look at an active learning strategies for deeper understanding: a case study in Mechanics of Materials Nicolas Ali Libre a*, Jeffrey W. Jennings b, S. Amy Skyles b a Civil, Architectural and Environmental Eng. Dep., Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO b Educational Technology, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MOAbstractActive learning encompasses anything students might be called on to do in class besideswatching and listening to an instructor and taking notes (Felder & Brent, 2016). The purpose ofthis study was to incorporate active learning strategies into Mechanics of Materials, a

Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daisuke Aoyagi, California State University, Chico

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

) Introductory computer programming (e.g. C/C++, MATLAB), and 2) Linearcircuit I. The course corresponds to the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) Outcome criterion (b) “an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as toanalyze and interpret data,” and (k) “an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modernengineering tools necessary for engineering practice.”[1]When I joined CSU Chico in 2013 as a new faculty member, I took over the course from aretiring professor, who had been teaching the course for many years. A good part of the labequipment had been purchased presumably in 1980s and in 1990s, such as HP 3478A DigitalMulti-meters (DMM), which we still use. We also have Hewlett-Packard (HP) 34401A DMMsthat are getting

Conference Session

Writing and Communication

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Sheffield, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan; Katie Snyder, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, or formatting to increase clarity andreadability. The suggestions are truly minor, and if the document were sent on without the requestedchanges, I wouldn’t be too concerned. None of the errors are so large that they would affect ourcompany’s or your relationship with the client. See your document, as instructors will have madesuggestions directly on the text.(B+/B) 86.5% of points possible. Work earning this score is good. If I were your supervisor on aninternship, I’d consider this a ​strong draft but suggest changes before sending it on to a real client​.Either because of severity of a single issue (perhaps errors or missing evidence for technical content), orsignificant issues with prose, I would be concerned if this document went to a

Conference Session

Qualitative Research Methods

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James L. Huff, Harding University; H. Ronald Clements, Harding University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

like to express our gratitude to the McNair Scholars Program at Harding University.This work was made possible by their support. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in the material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the McNair Scholars Program.Additionally, we would like to thank the insightful comments of the anonymous reviewers of thispaper. These points of feedback helped us sharpen the quality of the paper.References 1. Graesser, A. C., D'Mello, S. K., Craig, S. D., Witherspoon, A., Sullins, J., McDaniel, B., & Gholson, B. (2008). The relationship between affective states and dialog patterns during interactions with AutoTutor. Journal of Interactive

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Rajeev Darolia, University of Missouri; Cory Koedel, University of Missouri; Junpeng Yan, University of Missouri; Jean Felix Ndashimye, Univesity of Missouri-Columbia

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #17895The Role of High School Math and Science Course Access in Student CollegeEngineering Major Choice and Degree AttainmentDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Rajeev Darolia, University of Missouri Rajeev Darolia is Assistant Professor and Director of Research of the Institute of Public Policy at the

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Derek Breid, Saint Vincent College; Lawrence Machia, Saint Vincent College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

assistance regarding the analysis and design. Class sessions will shift away fromlectures as originally planned, to allow more in-class involvement of the instructor, althoughlectures will still have their place. In addition, students will be required to present their full finalresults to the instructor in advance, before presenting to the greater community. Some of thedifficulty of this first year will be ameliorated simply by the fact that enrollment is expected toincrease, so that a student team, instead of an individual, will take on the challenge and will thushave a more balanced workload. With these intended changes, we believe that the success of thiscollaboration will increase greatly in upcoming years.[1] C. B. Zoltowski and W. Lafayette

Conference Session

Student Division Innovative Research Methods Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel K. Anderson, Clemson University; Julie P Martin, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Student

and the faculty mentor and our individual roles on the team. During the mid-semesterinterview, I also asked additional questions related to the existing cross-disciplinary model(Pragmatic Validation). I developed a unique set of interview protocol questions for each of theten students based on my observations in weekly team meetings (Figure 2, data type B and D)and each student’s progress reports (Figure 2, data type E) (Procedural Validation). Thisresulted in the development of ten unique interview protocols for just the second round ofinterviews.My initial data collection plan also included interviewing the two faculty mentors for the projectto gain their insights into makerspace team interactions. However, I did not follow through withmy

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Gonser, United States Military Academy, West Point; Todd Mainwaring P.E., United States Military Academy, West Point

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

majors elected to take the credentialing course as one of only three electives that areavailable to them under a normal academic load.Research QuestionThis paper seeks to understand to what extent the course delivers on expectations set by thecourse creators and what mechanisms there are to provide industry feedback that support oradjust the balance of course content between teaching sustainability concepts (theory) andfocusing on credentialing (specific skills). It will examine if perceived value of the credentialsand knowledge gained in the course is (a) generally positive or negative, (b) consistent across jobdescriptions (field of practice) (c) stable over time, and (d) consistent with employers’ view.Specifically, this paper looks at the

Conference Session

Design Tools and Skill Development

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria R. Young, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Sara L. Hoffman, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Madeline A. Gilleran, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

miss out on information. Instead, it is beneficial to not make people‘defend themselves’, by asking them to tell you about their experience instead.” Similarly, Participant B, whoidentified having previous design experience through co-curricular programs noted, “Asking "why" questionslimits the response to what is considered appropriate to be said and makes the interviewee feel somewhatdefensive about the practice being asked about, as they're being told it's necessary to justify it. A better way tophrase questions [is] to ask about how similar subjects are viewed or how an imaginary scenario involving thepractice would be perceived and responded to.” We observed that participants generally avoided “why” questionsin both the pre- and post

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University; Tirupalavanam G. Ganesh, Arizona State University; Diana Karen Chen, Arizona State University; Jorge Luis Roldan

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Challenge Scholars Program," 2017. Retrieved from http://www.grandchallengescholars.org[2] "Grand Challenge Scholars Program-Arizona State University", 2017. Retrieved from https://gcsp.engineering.asu.edu/[3] C.L.A. Dancz, J.M. Plumbee, D. Bargar, P. Walters Brunner, K. High, L. Klotz and A.E.Landis, "A Rubric to Assess Civil Engineering Students' Grand Challenge SustainableEntrepreneurship Projects," in American Society for Engineering Education 123rd AnnualConference & Exposition, 2016.[4] R. Stevens, K. O'Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns and D.M. Amos, "Becoming an engineer:Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning," J Eng Educ, vol. 97, pp. 355, 2008.[5] J. Turns, B. Sattler and D. Kilgore, "Disciplinary knowledge

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremi S London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

researchimpact frameworks serve as a valuable starting point for developing one for engineeringeducation research.References[1] London, J.S. (2014). The Impact of National Science Foundation Investments inUndergraduate Engineering Education Research: A Comparative, Mixed Methods Study.(Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation), Purdue University, ProQuest Dissertations and Thesesdatabase. (3687797)[2] Allen, Sue, Campbell, Patricia B., Dierking, Lynn D., Flagg, Barbara N., Friedman, Alan J.,Garibay, Cecilia, . . . Ucko, David A. (Eds.). (2008). Framework for Evaluating Impacts ofInformal Science Education Projects. (Available at:http://informalscience.org/evaluations/eval_framework.pdf)[3] Dembe, Allard E, Lynch, Michele S, Gugiu, P Cristian, & Jackson

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nirmala Prakash, Florida Atlantic University; Rachel Tobillo, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine at Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

recruitment,retention, and training needs from cradle to career. His national agenda emphasized (a)recruitment of students into STEM courses of study in K-16, (b) recruitment of dislocatedworkers and females into STEM careers, and (c) retention of K-16 students in STEM majors(Obama for America, 2012; U.S. DOLETA 2010, 2011, Ramlakhan, 2012). Findings from thiseconomic plan, coupled with other research and literature, recognizes the need for STEM careerand talent development in underrepresented populations. Beyond the need to direct resourcestowards underrepresented populations, the literature supports integrating government, industry,and community partnerships into STEM education and recruitment efforts. The WorldDeclaration on Education for All in

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 2, IE-ing the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul C. Lynch, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Joseph Wilck, College of William & Mary; Amanda Elizabeth VanBuskirk

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

the IE EE class A. The instructor knowing student names in the Class B. Starting Every Class with Announcements/Questions C. Knowing all upcoming events from ANGEL Calendar D. Knowing the Topics to Study for all Exams and Quizzes E. Knowing Your Grades at all times on ANGEL F. Having a 1 class Quiz or Case Study Grade Return Policy and 1 Week Exam Grade Return PolicyThe average results for the three semesters of the IE EE class are shown in Figure 1 below: Importance for your Course Satisfaction (IE EE) The instructor knowing your Name Starting Every Class with Announcements/Questions Knowing all upcoming events from Angel Calendar Knowing the Topics to Study for all Exams and

Conference Session

Engaging Ethics in Teams and Communities

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaofeng Tang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Eduardo Mendieta, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Should Be Done? Summary of a Workshop. The NationalAcademies Press.[7] Litzinger, T. A., and Lattuca, L. R. 2014. “Translating Research to Widespread Practice in EngineeringEducation.” In A. Johri, and B. M. Olds eds. Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research.Cambridge University Press.[8] Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. 2010. Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: ASurvey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in US Engineering Departments. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 99 (3), 185-207.[9] Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. 2008. Educating Engineers: Designingfor the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass.[10] Bodilly, S. J., Glennan, T. K., Kerr, K. A., and Galegher, J. R. 2004

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Innovation Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy Joseph Balz, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Ashley Bernal, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Jessica Livingston, Rose-Hulman Institute of technology; Stephen Michael Misak, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

classroom while also seeking the additional knowledge required to create a valuable endproduct for their client. Engineers are hired to create value for their employer, and if a studentonly knows how to follow a syllabus, then they will not be prepared to anticipate unknownopportunities to create value. Learning core engineering skills is the single most important part ofan engineering education, and by teaching an entrepreneurial mindset through programs thatreinforce these skills, we are better preparing the innovators of tomorrow.ReferencesBarrett, T. W., & Pizzico, M. C., & Levy, B., & Nagel, R. L., & Linsey, J. S., & Talley, K. G., &Forest, C. R., & Newstetter, W. C. (2015, June), A Review of University Maker Spaces

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James P Becker, Montana State University; Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

contribution to their grade. Just asthe results of Table 1 reveal, it seems solid policy is to afford the student with a variety of waysto receive help; the web-based system described being one which is readily scaled to largeclasses and transferable to other institutions.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation throughGrant 1504880.Bibliography[1] Dennis H. Congos and Nancy Schoeps, “Does Supplemental Instruction Really Work and What is it Anyway?” Studies in Higher Education, Volume 18, No. 2, 1993, pp. 165-176.[2] John Flavell, “Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving,” in The Nature of Intelligence, Lauren B. Resnick ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hilsdale , N.J., 1976

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hua Li, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Kai Jin, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Mohamed Abdelrahman, Arkansas Tech University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC-1359414. The authors would also like to thank the support from Texas A&M University-Kingsville.References:[1] Prince, M. J., Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2007). Does faculty research improve undergraduateteaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies. Journal of Engineering Education,96(4), 283-294.[2] Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role ofundergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Scienceeducation, 91(1), 36-74.[3] Seymour, E., Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefitsof research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University; Norma Perez, Houston Community College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. Rapid City, SD, SB3-1-SB3-5.[8] Wineburg, S., (1998). Reading abraham lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22 (3), 319-346.[9] Schwartz, D.L., Bransford, J.D. & Sears, D., (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In Mestre, J.P. ed. Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT :: IAP.[10] Golter, P., Van Wie, B. & Brown, G., (Year). Comparing student experiences and growth in a cooperative, hands-on, active, problem-based learning environment to an active, problem-based environmented.^eds. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandra Nite, Texas A&M University; G. Donald Allen, Texas A&M University; Ali Bicer, Texas A&M University; Jim Morgan, Charles Sturt University; Vanessa Mae Warren, Texas A&M University; Luciana Barroso, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

to similar problems on the exams. • I will find a small number of general principles, learn them well, and apply these principles to solve all the exam problems. • I will practice a large number of homework problems on a regular basis, and then practice will enable me to solve the exam problems. • I will read the calculus textbook and use what I learned to solve exam problems. • I will study in a group where we will teach each other to solve different types of problems.I believe the way I studied mathematics in high school will enable me to earn an A or B incollege calculus. (4-point scale: strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree)Which of the following most accurately describes how I will need to study college

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

gender. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(4), 610-618. doi: 10.1109/TE.2010.21003987. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi-year single institution study. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 6-27. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x8. Ohland, M. W., Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M.M., Layton, R. A., Long, R. A., Lord, S. M., & Wasburn, Mara H. (2011). Race, gender, and measures of success in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 225-252. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00012.x9. Cullinane, J., & Treisman, P. U. (2010). Improving developmental mathematics education in community colleges: A prospectus and early progress

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yongpeng Zhang, Prairie View A&M University; Xiaobo Peng, Prairie View A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Technology and the Lessons Learned from Engineering, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2005.Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Beede, D., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). STEM: Good Jobs Now and for the Future, Economics and Statistics Administration, Jul 2011.Mullin, C.M. (2012). Transfer, An Indispensable Part of the Community College Mission, AACC Policy Briefs, 2012.Mullin, C. M., & Phillippe, K. (2013). Community College Contribution, AACC Policy Briefs, 2013.Munce, R., & Fraser, E. (2012). Where are the STEM Students? My College Options, 2012.Nora, A. & Crisp, G. (2009). Hispanics and Higher Education: An Overview of Research, Theory, and Practice, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory of Research,2009

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Its Impact on Faculty and Students

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Lopez, Arizona State University; Yong Seok Park, California State University, Fullerton; Bethany B. Smith, Arizona State University; James A. Middleton, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University, Department of Physics; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

State University, Fullerton Yong Seok Park is an assistant professor in mechanical engineering at California State University Fuller- ton. He earned his Master’s degree at George Washington University and his Doctorate at the Virginia Tech. Prior to joining California State Fullerton, Dr. Park was a postdoctoral research associate at Arizona State University. His research interests lie in undergraduate STEM education research and engineering design education.Ms. Bethany B. Smith, Arizona State University Bethany Smith is currently a master’s student in materials science and engineering at Arizona State Uni- versity. She has been involved in STEM education research since 2012 under the direction of Professor