by the time class ends. Students should then be prepared tocomplete higher-level work, which they are required to do via a post-class homeworkassignment. To be more precise, the method entails the following: 1. Before class, students complete two assignments related to that day’s topic: a. A reading assignment due at least one day before the start of class b. A set of exercises due by the start of class 2. During class, students discuss and refine these pre-class assignments. 3. After class, students complete a third, more advanced assignment related to the day’s topic.This structure is summarized in the following diagram:All together, this work should account for the large majority of a student’s grade
://www.sciencebusiness.net/sites/default/files/archive/Assets/94fe6d15-5432-4cf9-a656-633248e63541.pdf. [Accessed 19 Jan 2020].[6] S. Kaul, G.A. Chang, PM Yanik, and CW Ferguson (2015, June), “Development of a MentorshipProgram in Engineering and Engineering Technology,” presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Seattle, Washington.[7] M. Nelson, B. Ahn, and CN Nelson (2019, June), “Make to Innovate: Blending of Project-basedLearning and Flipped Classroom Pedagogies to Provide Real-world Engineering Experiences toEngineering Students,” presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.
and Y. Zhao, “Design project based modules to promote engineering learning and retention,” The Technology Interface International Journal, Vol 11(1), 2010. 4. K. Ricks, J. Richardson, H. Stern, R. Taylor, R. Taylor, “An engineering learning community to promote retention and graduation of at-risk engineering students,” American Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 4(2), 2014.5. B. W-L. Packard, “Mentoring and retention in college science: Reflections on the sophomore year,” Journal of College Student Retention, Vol 6(3), pp. 289-300, 2004.6. L. Schreiner, “Linking student satisfaction and retention,” Noel-Levitz, pp. 1-16, 2009.7. J. Wolfe, Team Writing: a guide to working in groups, Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2010.8. J. G
betterunderstanding about the function and layout of the building. Lastly, this building does not containany private areas, such as dormitory rooms, so students were allowed to examine the entirebuilding in detail. (a) ARC Building Exterior (b) Elevation - Drawing Figure 2. Images of the ARC Building (Photo Courtesy of Ohio University)The building has a gross area of 101,850 sq. ft. with five different levels: the area of the lowerlevel is 13,400 sq. ft.; the area of the 1st floor is 27,700 sq. ft.; the area of the 2nd floor is 23,750 sq.ft.; the area of the 3rd floor is 25,500 sq. ft.; and the area of the mechanical penthouse is 11,500 sq.ft.Project Team OrganizationIn order to provide a necessary
includingmultidisciplinary innovation measured via transition to the university student incubator,continued growth in multidisciplinary participation among engineering and art students, andvalue of experience on employability following graduation. Faculty from both academic units areengaged in discussions for multidisciplinary grant and curricular opportunities. Lastly,engineering has committed to hiring art students as Aggie Innovators as openings arise to ensuresustainability of the emerging multidisciplinary alliance and create a positive student experienceregardless of academic major.References1 Morocz, R., Levy, B., Forest, C., Nagel, R., Newstetter, W., Talley, K., & Linsey, J. (2015).University Maker Spaces: Discovery, Optimization and Measurement of
effects prior to the tensile tests and compare the test results with the bare (B) compositecoupons (approximately 0.1x2.5x15 cm). All the specimens were cleaned properly, and tensiletested using a 22 kip MTS Alliance RF/100 tensile test machine under standard environment,ambient temperature and humidity levels. For each set of samples, at least five tensile tests wereconducted and the test results were averaged for a comparison. At the beginning of the fabrications and characterization steps, the PhD student trainedMS and BS students about how to setup the experiments, layup the fiber composites with differ-ent orientations, vacuum bagging and composite curing, machining the composite edges, andedge sealing of the damages to eliminate the
by thestudents in all the courses they take. The survey was not set up specifically for this study, butprovides insight into how the authors can frame a future study. It is, therefore, a general tool tomeasure the students’ perceptions about a course and the instructor of that course. The survey is acompound of 19 statements plus two open questions. These 19 statements are evaluated by thestudents using the following scale: 1 Never, 2 Sometimes, 3 Frequently, 4 Always. Table 1 shows (a) LCD on a smart bicycle (c) Smart door prototype (b) LED array on a smart bicycle Figure 1: Examples of projects realized by students.the
workshop on Computing education research (ICER '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 97-108, 2006.[2] A. Petersen, M. Craig, J. Campbell, and A. Tafliovich, "Revisiting why students drop CS1," in Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 71-80, 2016.[3] C. Watson and F. W. B. Li, "Failure rates in introductory programming revisited," in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education (ITiCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39-44, 2014.[4] T. Beaubouef and J. Mason, "Why the high attrition rate for computer science students: some thoughts and observations," in SIGCSE Bull. 37, 2
Paper ID #29253Evaluating ABET Student Outcome (5) in a Multidisciplinary CapstoneProject SequenceDr. Nicholas A Baine P.E., Grand Valley State University Nicholas Baine, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at Grand Valley State University. His expertise is in the design of electrical control systems and sensor data fusion. As an instructor, he specializes in teaching freshman courses as well as control systems and design of digital and embedded systems. While at Wright State University, he was part of the group that developed a new model to teach mathematics to engineering students. As a faculty
, 2004.[8] V. J. Shute, "Focus on formative feedback," Review of educational research, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 153-189, 2008.[9] T. R. Guskey, "Reporting on student learning: Lessons from the past-Prescriptions for the future," ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERVISION AND CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT- YEARBOOK-, pp. 13-24, 1996.[10] J. B. Nyquist, "The benefits of reconstruing feedback as a larger system of formative assessment: A meta-analysis," Vanderbilt University, 2003.[11] G. Smith, "How does student performance on formative assessments relate to learning assessed by exams?," Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 36, no. 7, p. 28, 2007.[12] J. A. Kulik and C.-L. C. Kulik, "Timing of feedback and verbal learning
., “Person Orientation and Encouragement: Predicting Interest in Engineering Research”, Journal of Engineering Education, 104 (2), pp. 119-138.6. Altruger-Genc, G., Issapour, M., Zoghi, B., Radu, M., Hung, J., Islam, N., Ghadyahi, H., “Learning by Research: A Review of Undergraduate Research Experience in the School of Engineering Technology”, Proceeding of the 2016 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Annual Conference.7. Okhio, C., Misoc, F, Asgill, A., “Incorporating Training In Research & Research Methods into the Undergraduate Curriculum in Engineering and Engineering Technology-(E&ET)”, Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.8. Foroudastan, S., Posey, J
B 31 32 170 29 C 16 16 78 13 D 5 5 42 7 F 6 6 45 8 W 17 18 69 12 Total: 97 590 DFW Rate: 29% 26% Table 1. Comparison of Majors vs. Non-majors Final GradesStudents also express satisfaction with being part of a non-CS major cohort and increasedinterest in computing. When asked in a fall 2019 end-of-semester survey if
, no. 2, pp. 72–7, Feb. 2010.[8] C. Robinson and J. Collofello, “Utilizing Undergraduate Teaching Assisstants in Active Learning Enviornments,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., 2012.[9] “Grand Challenges - Grand Challenges for Engineering.” [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/. [Accessed: 03-Feb-2020].[10] Author and Autor, “Relationship Between Motivation, Contribution in a Team Project and Academic Performance in a Design Thinking Course.,” Under Review.[11] E. Roberts, J. Lilly, and B. Rollins, “Using Undergraduates as Teaching Assistants in Introductory Programming Courses: An Update on the Stanford Experience,” ACM SIGCSE Bull. 1995, 2011.[12] N. V. Ivankova, J. W. Creswell, and S. L. Stick, “Using Mixed
Paper ID #31471Hands-On Cybersecurity Curriculum using a Modular Training KitMr. Asmit De, The Pennsylvania State University Asmit De is a PhD Candidate in Computer Engineering at PennState. His research interest is in developing secure hardware and architectures for mitigating system vulnerabilities. Asmit received his B. Tech degree in Computer Science and Engineering from National Institute of Technology Durgapur, India in 2014. He worked as a Software Engineer in the enterprise mobile security team at Samsung R&D Institute, India from 2014 to 2015. He has also worked as a Design Engineer Intern in the SoC Template
toinstill interest in advanced manufacturing research and careers among undergraduate students. Theprogram recruits 10 students each year and provides them with an opportunity to work on anadvanced manufacturing research project under the guidance of a faculty and a graduate studentmentor. The following are the main objectives of this program: a) improve research skills of thestudents in STEM fields in general, and in the fields of advanced manufacturing in particular; b)enhance student’s interest in advanced manufacturing as it relates to graduate education or industrycareer; c) provide guidance to students on their graduate school selections and applications; and d)provide the participants with engineering innovation and entrepreneurship
2=ˆ (1) 11H 1 ( 01 − 11 ) , so finally that Cˆ NOT(1,2 ) ˆ (1) H= 11 1 ( 01 − 10 ) . 2 2MATLAB codeBelow is an example of MATLAB code to perform a simulated measurement of a ket. A columnvector is passed to the ket_measure function, the function returns an integer from 1 to 4corresponding to the amplitudes of the ket. If the ket is ψ = a 00 + b 01 + c 10 + d 11 , thenthe probability of returning a 1, corresponding to the state 00 is a a = a . The
from Auburn University in 2014. He is a contributor to the Australian Maths Trust, and member of the MASAMU international research group for mathematics.Dr. Carl Pettis Carl S. Pettis, Ph.D. Professor of Mathematics Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Al- abama State University Administrative role: Interim Associate Provost Office of Academic Affairs Alabama State UniversityDr. Uma Kannan Dr. Uma Kannan is Assistant Professor of Computer Information Systems in the College of Business Administration at Alabama State University, where she has taught since 2017. She received her Ph.D. degree in Cybersecurity from Auburn University in 2017. She specialized in Cybersecurity, particularly on
Paper ID #32128Best 2019 PIC IV Paper : Student Views on their Role in Society as anEngineer and Relevant Ethical IssuesDr. Angela R Bielefeldt P.E., University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a
. Harrop and B. Turpin, “A study exploring learners' informal learning space behaviors, attitudes, and preferences,” New Review of Academic Librarianship, vol.19, no.1, pp.58-77. 2013[4] G. Matthews and G. Walton, “Strategic development of university library space: Widening the influence,” New Library World, vol.115, no.5/6, pp.237-249, 2014.[5] M.D. Riddle and K. Souter, “Designing informal learning spaces using student perspectives,” Journal of Learning Spaces, vol.1, no.2, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152692. [Accessed Feb.2, 2020].[6] D.J. Mallon III, “Making their place: Identifying the transformation of college space to student place, a study of individual student
interview with STEM Excellence coordinators and teacher while thelatter included a structured survey instrument completed by students about their experiences inthe program and general demographic data. At the end of the academic year, teachers performeda supplementary online survey. Findings suggest that students and teachers shared satisfactionwith involvement in the program, and that they thought about their work more creatively andobjectively. Analysis of focus group responses and open-ended survey data gave rise to threeprimary themes describing the perspectives of educators on their STEM Excellence programexperiences: (a) Increased understanding, (b) Increased recognition, and (c) Enhancedawareness. Results also showed that the impression of
objectives are to keep themodules complete and independent so that they can be easily integrated into the courses. Eachmodule package consists of instructions, lab exercises and solutions, and assessment methods.The modules were also designed to incorporate the National Initiative for CybersecurityEducation (NICE) Cybersecurity Workforce Framework (NCWF) topics of Cyber Threat andVulnerabilities, Risk Management and Software Reverse Engineering [9].The purpose of this paper is a) to describe a set of six security modules that was implemented ina Computer Science 1 course during the fall semester of 2019 at Texas A&M University-SanAntonio and b) to report the results of evaluating teaching effectiveness of implementing thesecurity modules with
NUEN PETE (b) Number of Students from each Major. Figure 2. Main Engineering Majors Taking Class in Spring Terms 2016 2017 2018 2019 80% Spring 60% DFQ 40% 20% 0% BAEN CHEN ELEN ENGE INEN NUEN PETE (a) DFQ rates per Major. 2016 2017 2018 2019 120
(MATLAB),rearrange topics, and slow down delivery. The result is a course that many students rave about asthey are taking calculus and physics, and best yet, their average course GPA shows a half-to-fullletter grade improvement, which bodes well for retention.References[1] N. Klingbeil, K. High, M. Keller, I. White, B. Brummel, J. Daily, R. Cheville and J. Wolk, "The Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: Highlights from a CCLI Phase 3 Initiative," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[2] N. Klingbeil, "The Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education," [Online]. Available: https://engineering-computer-science.wright.edu/research/the-wright-state-model-for- engineering
: (a) current knowledge, (b) a scale on perceptions ofentrepreneurship, (c) practice, (d) team and business model, and (e) program evaluation (post-survey only).Among those several sections, this study only utilized the data from perceptions ofentrepreneurship on the scale and practice of customer interview skills captured in open-endedquestions. As shown in Table 2, the scale was designed to assess student perceptions of the sixconstructs indicated by 33 items: (1) interest in entrepreneurship, (2) confidence in valueproposition, (3) self-efficacy in entrepreneurship, (4) self-efficacy in marketing/businessplanning, (5) self-efficacy in customer interview skills, and (6) current status of technology andbusiness model. As an attribute-focused
help associate academic needs with the necessary faculty trainingin a way that instructors are well prepared to present lecture materials for fundamentals insustainable development. Particularly, instructors will be able to incorporate systems thinking anddesign thinking in an interdisciplinary prospective. Additionally, outcomes will give foundationsto advance research and education in sustainable development in engineering. The developedlearning objectives for the introduction to sustainable development in engineering practice follow: a. Recognize what sustainable development is in engineering practice. b. Discuss the basics of the historical development and societal importance of sustainable development in
. Original manual directional valve. Figure 4. New solenoid directional valve.The solenoid directional valve has three positions, outlet A on, all closed, and outlet B on. It hastwo 110V AC solenoids that are mounted to both end of the valve to move the spool inside of thevalve to change the positions. When the left one is energized, outlet A is connected to thecompressed air supply (and B to the exhaust hole), thus retracts the position. When the right oneis energized, it extends the piston instead. When both are deenergized, both outlets are blocked,and the piston chamber can retain its pressure, so piston retains its current position.Electro-Pneumatic RegulatorA proportional electro-pneumatic regulator from SMC is used to regulate the air
., MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2007.[3] S. Bante, and E. Hilton, and K. Talley, and K. Shryock, and J. Linsey, and T. Hammond, “Board 65: Changing Homework Achievement with Mechanix Pedagogy,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. https://peer.asee.org/32398[4] B. Williford, and M. Runyon, and J. Cherian, and W. Li, and J. Linsey, and T. Hammond, “A Framework for Motivating Sketching Practice with Sketch-based Gameplay,” in Chi Play ’19, Barcelona, Spain, October 22-25, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3311350.3347175.[5] R. Brooks, and J. Koh, and S. Polsley, and T. Hammond, “Score Improvement Distribution When Using Sketch Recognition Software (Mechanix) as a Tutor: Assessment
: An Overview, Theory Into Practice, 41:4, 212-218,4) Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: The affective domain. New York: David McKay.5) Fink, L.D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: an integrated approach to designing college courses. 2nd Edition. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.6) Randolph, G. B. “Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Writing Across the Curriculum Approach.” Journal of Engineering Education. ASEE. Vol. 89, No. 2. April 2000. pp. 119-122.7) Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K. “Learning and Teaching Styles In Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering
engineering doctoral student pursuing research on the development and dissemination of low-cost, hands-on learning modules displaying heat and mass transfer concepts in a highly visual, interactive format. Graduated from Washington State University with a B.S. in chemical engineering in 2017 and with an M.S. focused on potentiometric biosensing in 2018.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education.Dr. Olusola Adesope, Washington State University Dr. Olusola O. Adesope is a Professor of
;T RED project. Withthis, we can course-correct and adjust to provide an optimal learning experience for our students. References[1] S. Chandrasekaran, J. M. Long and M. A. Joordens, "Evaluation of student learning outcomesin fourth year engineering mechatronics through design based learning curriculum," in 2015IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), El Paso, TX, Oct 2015, pp. 1-7.[2] C. E. Hmelo-silver, "Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?"Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, (3), pp. 235-266, 2004.[3] T. N. Walton, S. B. Knisley and M. B. A. McCullough, "Board 154: Model-building inengineering education," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, June