-based courses, the skills they learned in the redesigned ME 100L have proven tobe very beneficial; they are comfortable applying the basic programming skills to design andbuild their respective projects. Finally, the students’ overall opinion of a project-basedenvironment is overwhelmingly positive when compared to a traditional seminar setting. Thispositive learning experience occurs in one of the first core courses they take, which can booststudents’ confidence and inspire them to excel in subsequent courses.References1. Mariappan, J. & Nissenson, P.M., & Shih, A.C., (2016). A Hands-on First-year Mechanical Engineering Course, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA.2. Meyer, M. & Marx, S., (2014
overall approach to the course extends the amount of“designing” that occurs in the course by having students work on designs starting on the first dayof the course.Bibliography1. Areibi, S., 2001. “A First Course in Digital Design Using VHDL and Programmable Logic”. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual (Vol. 1, pp. TIC-19). IEEE.2. Benson, B. and Mealy, B., 2014, October. “Experience with Teaching Digital Design Online”. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2014 IEEE (pp. 1-7). IEEE.3. Donzellini, G. and Ponta, D., 2007. “A Simulation Environment for E-Learning in Digital Design”. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 54(6), pp.3078-3085.4. Marx, J., 2000. “A Proposal for Alternative Methods for Teaching Digital
checks namely: S rules (Scan chain rules), Z rules (internaltristate busses and bi-directional pins), C rules (Clocks or capture), X rules (combinationalfeedback loops) and V Rules (Vector statements in the SPF). Rules above mentioned areresponsible for following aspects of the design. The user should specify details about clock portsand primary inputs in STIL test protocol. STIL verifies the scan chain outputs and inputs arelogically connected and check all the asynchronous set/reset pins and clock pins are inconnection with scan through primary ports, verifies if any internal multiple-driver nets can be inconflict and whether the clocks/sets/resets are off when you switch from normal mode to scanshift mode and again when you switch back to normal
the course within their college training and to the course topic. Presently, wehave started to embed short electronically-scored quizzes in the video lessons of theElectronics course10. The embedded quizzes present short problems to solve and provideimmediate feedback to the students and the instructor to let them know how well the coursecontent is understood from watching the video lessons2. The quizzes have a token valuetoward the final course score. We will examine if adding these quizzes increases thepercentage of lessons viewed by the students.References 1. Mason, G. S., Rutar Shuman, T. & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering
wider societal context. As a follow-on in measuringimpact, it would be useful to track Grand Challenges Scholars after graduation to identify theircareer paths and any potential long-term influences from their involvement with this initiative.BibliographyAntaya, C.L. (2015). Integrating Sustainability Grand Challenges and Active, ExperientialLearning into Undergraduate Engineering Education. Dissertation: Arizona State University.August.Augustin, N., (2007). On the Nature of Challenges, NAE Website,(http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/14373/GrandChallengesBlog/Augustine.aspxBurkett. S., et al. (2015). Tracking Student Participants From a REU Site with NAE GrandChallenges as the Common Theme. American Journal of Engineering Education. December
scientific exploration."Diving For Science 2014 (2014): 14.[8] S. H. Kim and J. W. Jeon, "Introduction for Freshmen to Embedded Systems Using LEGOMindstorms," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 99-108, Feb. 2009.
Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/16367 7. Kelnhofer, R., & Williams, S., & Petersen, O. (2010, June), Sustainable Assessment For Program Improvement And Abet Preparation Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/15890 8. Blake, J. (2010, June), Technological Literacy, Eac Abet, And Tac Abet Accreditation Criteria Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/16617 9. Shankar, R. T., & Dickson, J. P., & Mazoleny, C. A. (2013, June), A Tool for ABET Accreditation Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Undergraduates (REU) Spring 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 7-8, 2017 MSUprogram, which was designed to attract talented students into research careers in science andengineering (S&E). 4Other national organizations also realized the importance of undergraduate research early on.The Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR), founded in 1978, is a national organization ofindividual and institutional members representing over 900 colleges and universities. Theorganization defines undergraduate research as “an inquiry or investigation conducted by anundergraduate student that makes an original intellectual or creative contribution to thediscipline.” 3From the myriad of supporting members represented amongst the 900 plus colleges
/undergraduate/dp-engineering-technology-bs.pdf3. Zhou, Z. (2014, January). Managing engineering capstone design teams: A review of critical issues and successfactors. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings (p. 3006). Institute of Industrial Engineers-Publisher.4. Tee P.L.K., Goh S.K., Cheah K.S.J. (2015) Cross-Cultural Challenges and Synergies Working in an InternationalCollaboration Project. In: Tang S., Logonnathan L. (eds) Taylor’s 7th Teaching and Learning Conference 2014Proceedings. Springer, Singapore5.Carew, A. L., Wickson, F. & Radcliffe, D. (2006). Lessons from transdisciplinarity studies in the design andevaluation of engineering education research. AAEE - Annual Conference of Australasian Association forEngineering Education (pp. 1-7
issledovatelskomtekhnologicheskom universitete v kontekste novykh vyzovov i problem inzhenernogo obrazovaniya [TrainingEngineers at a Research Technological University in the Context of the New Challenges and Problems ofEngineering Education]. In: Herald of Kazan Technological University. Vol. 16. No. 23. Pp. 7-12. [In Russian].2. Ivanov, V., & Barabanova, S. V., & Galikhanov, M., & Guzhova, A. (2013, June), IGIP Co-Plenary -Public-Private Partnership in Professional Education: Experience of the Research University Paper presented at2013 ASEE International Forum, Atlanta, Georgia. No. 8367.3. Tolkacheva, K.K. (2015), Ekspertny seminar kak forma realizatsii tseley problemno-orientirovannogoobucheniya spetsialistov v oblasti tekhniki i tekhnologii
social adaptation characteristics. Psychology and school. №1, 43-56.[17] Pilugina Е.I., Taranenko О.N., Prozorova S.А. (2016) Specifity of diagnostic research of self-esteem as a mechanism of socio-psychological adaptation of a migrant student in poly-cultural university environment. World of science, culture, education. № 2 (57). P. 282-287.[18] Sergienko, E.A. (2012). The principles of Developmental Psychology. Modern look. Psychological studies, Volume 5, №24.[19] Shottenloer G. (2001) Painting and image in Gestalt therapy.. Saint-Petersburg: Pirojkova.[20] Sidorenko, E.V. (2008) Communicative competence training. Saint-Petersburg: Rech.[21] Valeyeva, N. S., Kupriyanov, R. V., & Valeyeva, E. R
the U.S. Government DDTC did not adopt the proposal in its interim final or final rule and will address in future rulemakings 9EAR § 734.10: Patents Information regarding patents remained in § 734.10 Final rule similar to proposed rule 10EAR § 734.13: Definition of “Export” Actual shipment or transmission from the U.S. “Deemed export” to foreign national in the U.S. Transferring by a person in the U. S. of registration, control, or ownership of spacecraft to: ● Any destination or national if spacecraft not STA-eligible ● Country Group D:5 for any other spacecraft subject to EAR See § 734.17 for
-14.11 P.A. Alexander, T.L. Jetton and J.M. Kulikowich, “Interrelations of Knowledge, Interest and Recall: Assessing a Model of Domain Learning,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2008, 87, 559-575.12 Kulturel-Konak, S., Konak, A., Esparragoza, I. E., and Okudan Kramer, G. E., 2013, Assessing Professional Skills in STEM Disciplines. Proceedings of the Third Integrated STEM Education Conference, ISEC ’13, Princeton, NJ, 2013.13 R. L. Barry, and E. G. Seebauer, Fundamentals of Ethics for Scientists and Engineers. New York. NY: Oxford University Press, 2001, 286Ivan EsparragozaDr. Esparragoza is a Professor of Engineering at Penn State Brandywine. He holds a BSc degreein Mechanical Engineering from Universidad
Education", Proceedings of the AIAA 2000, Paper No. AIAA 2000- 0525, 2000.3 Donald F. Elger, Steven W. Beyerlein, and Ralph S. Budwig, "Using Design, Build, and test Projects to teach Engineering", Proceedings of the 30Th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Engineering Education Conference, USA, 2000, FC9-FC13.4 William H. Kilpatrick, "The Project Method: The use of the purposeful act in the educative process", No. 3. Teachers college, Columbia University, 1918, 319-335.5 Erik de Graaff, Annet Kolmos, "Management of Change: Implementation of Problem-Based and Project- Based Learning in Engineering", Sense Publishers, The Netherlands, 2007.6 John W. Thomas, "A review of research on project-based learning", 2000.7
/global-awareness/3. I.P Podlasy. Pedagogics: 100 questions-100 answers. M.: VLADOS-PRESS (2006)4. “UNESCO Guidelines on Intercultural Education”, ICL blog,http://www.afs.org/blog/icl/?p=19195. S. Davydov, L. Suprunova The concept of intercultural education in high school in Russian Federation, Pyatigorsk, PGLU (2003).6. V. Seeberg, T. Minich, “Enhancing Cross-cultural Competence in Multicultural Teacher Education:Transformation in Global Learning”, International Journal of Multicultural Education, Kent State University,Vol.14, No.3 (2012).
. Bateson (2002), Introduction to Control System Technology, 7th Edtion, PrenticeHall.[2] J. Norberto Pires (2007), Industrial Robots Programming: Building applications for thefactories of the future, Springer Science and Business Media, LLC.[3] Niku, B. S. (2001). Introduction to Robotics: analysis, systems, applications. New Jersey:Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall.
literature relating to the measurement of student success inhigher education. Research should continue in this area to enable more formal guidelines to bedeveloped regarding best practices in undergraduate teaching in engineering education and morebroadly.Bibliography1. Angrist, J. D., & Lavy, V. (1997). Using Maimonides' rule to estimate the effect of class size on student achievement (No. w5888). National Bureau of Economic Research.2. Gilbert, S. (1995). Quality education: Does class size matter? CSSHE Professional File, N14(Win 1995).3. Gladwell, M. (2013). David and Goliath [LP]: underdogs, misfits, and the art of battling giants. Little Brown & Company.4. Horning, A. (2007). The definitive article on class size. WPA: Writing
Paper ID #25043Using Signals of Opportunity to Experience and Understand HF IonosphericRadio PropagationDr. Paul Benjamin Crilly, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Paul Crilly is a Professor of Electrical Engineering at the United States Coast Guard Academy. He re- ceived his Ph.D. from New Mexico State University, his M. S. and B.S. degrees at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, all in Electrical Engineering. He was previously an Associate Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering at the University of Tennessee and was a Development Engineer at the Hewlett Packard Company. His areas of interest include laboratory development
quality meters. Students should also be able to acquire, interpret and analyze data that was gathered in the laboratory. C. TextbookThere was no official textbook chosen for the course. However, course notes were constructedbased on information from multiple textbooks or industry application notes. These textbookswere listed as supplemental materials for the course on the syllabus and are listed below: 1. J. Duncan Glover, Mulukutla S. Sarma, Thomas Overbye, Power Systems Analysis and Design, 6th Edition, Cengage Learning, ISBN-10: 130563618X | ISBN-13: 9781305636187 2. S. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill Education, ISBN: 978-0073529547 3. W. H. Kersting, Distribution System Modeling
engineering education, 95(2), 123-138. 8. Cooney, E., & Alfrey, K., & Owens, S. (2008, June), Critical Thinking In Engineering And Technology Education: A Review Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. https://peer.asee.org/3684 9. Adair, D., & Jaeger, M. (2016). Incorporating critical thinking into an engineering undergraduate learning environment. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 23.
link between high-impact practices and student learning: some longitudinal evidence,” Higher Education (2015) 69: 509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z[6] R. Vaz, “Designing the Liberally Educated Engineer,” Peer Review, Spring 2012, Association of American Colleges and Universities.[7] A. Heinricher, P. Quinn, R. Vaz, and K. Rissmiller, “Long-term Impacts of Project-Based Learning in Science and Engineering,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013.[8] R. Vaz, P. Quinn, A. Heinricher, and K. Rissmiller, “Gender Differences in the Long-Term Impacts of Project-Based Learning,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013.[9] R. Vaz and S. Jiusto
Nozzle in Undergraduate Engineering Classes', Am. Soc. for Eng. Ed. Annual Conf. & Exposition 2015, Seattle, Washington, 14-17 June.11. Burgher J. K., D. Finkel, B. J. Van Wie, O. O. Adesope, S. Brown and J. W. Atkinson, 'New Hands-on Fluid Mechanics Cartridges and Pedagogical Assessment', Am. Soc. for Eng. Ed. Annual Conf. & Exposition 2013, Atlanta, Georgia, 23-26 June.12. University of Cambridge, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, “Rules of thumb on magnitude of effect sizes,” (2018),
responses As a reminder, summative survey Question 9 (Sum9) is: What score do you think you will earn on this exam? Responses are ranked as shown below. 1: 90% to 100%, 2: 80% to 89%, 3: 70% to 79%, 4: 60% to 69%, and 5: <60%In addition, when compared with their actual performance on their summative assessment,Figure 7 shows that students are good are predicting their performance on their exams. Fitted Line Plot Actual Score = 110.0 - 12.94 (Predicted Score) 100 S 11.4254
flipped classrooms for teaching CS1," 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oklahoma City, OK, 2013, pp. 733-735.19. Herreid, C., & Schiller, N. (2013). Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.20. Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Yao, S., Savolainen, P., & Jahren, C. (2018). Student Perspectives on the Flipped-Classroom Approach and Collaborative Problem-Solving Process. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(4), 513–537.
., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 131–140, 2011.[8] L. H. Jamieson and J. R. Lohmann, “Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, D. C., 2012.[9] M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and S. Hall, “Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, pp. 185–207, 2010.[10] C. Henderson and M. Dancy, “Increasing the Impact and Diffusion of STEM Education Innovations,” Characterizing the Impact and Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations Forum. New Orleans, 2011.[11] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein, “Facilitating
situations.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1726268. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2017.“Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017.” SpecialReport NSF 17-310. Arlington, VA. Available at www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd[2] Meadows, Lorelle, Denise Sekaquaptewa, Marie Paratti. 2015. “Interactive Panel: Improvingthe Experiences of Marginalized Students on Engineering Design Teams.” Conference Paper,122nd annual
, using a food dehydrator makes it possible to extend the periodfor which fresh food can be safely prepared and stored for later consumption when food sources arescarcer. The efforts of the first-year engineering student teams demonstrates their capability inaddressing one of the global issues –zero hunger– identified and targeted by the United NationsDevelopment Programme in their Sustainable Development Goals.REFERENCES[1] Gee, D., “Are Post-Millennials Enrolled in Engineering Majors Inclined to be Socially Active?” Proc.ASEE First Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE 2018), Glassboro, NJ, 2018[2] Gee, D., Tiari, S., and Zhao, L., “Design of Solar-Powered Food Dehydrators to Meet Food AvailabilityNeeds in Emerging Markets,” Proc. 2018
for the lab activity? What would you do differently in the future when approaching a design problem? Did you learn anything new about working in a team, and/or designing a solution after the first lab?Thirty one students provided consent to participate in this research study and their responseswere analyzed qualitatively. The pre-survey responses were checked to see if customer wasmentioned in their visual representations. For the post reflection, the number of reflections inwhich customer was mentioned was counted and a few specific themes were identified.In the pre-survey, only one out of the thirty one participants mentioned customer and thisparticipant indicated that s/he had been exposed to the concept of engineering
the Status and Improving the Prospects. Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council of the National Academies. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.[8] Su R., Rounds J., Armstrong P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884.[9] Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: STEMing the Tide and Broadening Participation in STEM Careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471[10] Cooke, L., & Williams, S. (2004). Two approaches to using
, portable spectro-photometer to determine contaminant concentrations in water. The students in this course havefocused primarily on the development of the user interface consisting of a LCD shield withbuttons for navigation. In year one of the project, a circuit was constructed on a solderlessbreadboard and the students in the first-year course developed the user interface and relatedcontrol signals to operate the spectrophotometer with an Arduino Uno, see Figure 1. In thisversion of the circuit, calibration data was provided and hard-coded into the system.Figure 1: Left: Initial spectrophotometer circuit designed and constructed at Norwich Univ.Readily available materials were used for the sample holder (labeled S D in the photo). Right:Example