have even proposed shifts in pedagogy such as ageometrical approach with measured increases in class performance [1]. Another attempt attransforming electromagnetics came from augmenting the course with a team-based project-based learning approach where it was found that student attitudes about relevance improved, butknowledge gain remained like traditional lecture topics. [6]. All these methods from theliterature point to an increase in student motivation, but do not show a discernable change inknowledge gain as proven by a rigorously developed exam.Ideally, one can apply a nationally standardized exam to measure such knowledge gain. There issome evidence of the existence of such exams within engineering disciplines [7], but the authoris not
forsupporting students through their design challenges, and review of curriculum. The trainingmaterials to support our continuous improvement includes items about human subject research,research with minors, and the Authors’ research philosophy and study protocols.Continuous ImprovementThe summer engineering makerspace experience is a design-based research project where theprogram undergoes iterative design, development, and test cycles each summer to improve theinterventions effectiveness. Because of this continuous improvement process, our design-basedresearch intends to achieve three objectives: (1) identify key elements of the intervention, (2)deepen the researcher’s understanding of phenomena, and (3) uses prior research to describe andjustify the
in appreciation of course relevance of both theengineering course and composition course. This project is significant as the results from thisstudy will be used to better design and link interdisciplinary curriculum and leverage topics inand between all cohorted classes.IntroductionThe importance of writing and communication skills to the academic and professional pursuits offuture engineers is well established. ABET lists an “ability to communicate with a range ofaudiences” as a student outcome for the accreditation of undergraduate engineering programs[1].Writing specialists have long sought to identify and develop “reliable ways” of helping studentsprepare for the writing situations they will likely encounter as engineers [2, p. 318]. Yet
Paper ID #35175Work in Progress: Spatial Visualization Assessment and Training in theGrainger College of Engineering at the University of IllinoisDr. Brian S. Woodard, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Woodard received his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign in 2011. His Aerospace research interests currently focus on the effects of icing on the aero- dynamics of swept-wing aircraft. In engineering education, he is interested in project-based learning and spatial visualization. He teaches courses at the University of Illinois where he serves as the Director of
software engineering from Southern Methodist Uni- versity and his bachelor’s degree in computer science from Texas A&M. Before joining Texas A&M, he worked at Ericsson (now Sony-Ericsson) in the network development and Digital Switch Corporation, and Motorola in cellular infrastructure development, project management and technical marketing. He also owned a company that developed custom networked and computer-controlled automation equipment.Dr. Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University Karan L. Watson, Ph.D., P.E., is currently a Regents Senior Professor of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering, having joined the faculty at Texas A&M University in 1983 as an Assistant Professor. She is also serving as the
projects. Onthe first group, the author used the standard approach of presenting the microcontroller, discussand explain how to program it. Although in the end students were able to use the microcontrollerin their project, they always had many questions to ask. The second group realized very latethat they would need a microcontroller, so the author had to prep[are also a special training; thatis when the author used the approach presented in this paper. The first group of students wereinvited again to sit in this session. After six days of discussing microcontrollers, al;l studentswere satisfied and with the knowledge, and continued working independently to the end of thesemester. Although no statistical data was collected to evaluate the student
dynamics and control, process control, energy conversion, and thermal fluids laboratory at the Houston Engineering Center. He also has been advisor and mentor to several senior design project groups.Dr. Andres C Garcia, The University of Texas at TylerMr. Benjamin Lee Stilwell, The University of Texas at TylerMr. Jongin Aaron Sithideth, The University of Texas at Tyler Graduating Mechanical Engineering candidate from the University of Texas at Tyler with ambitious lead- ership and dynamic interpersonal skills. He has completed a research internship for a Fortune 1000 company, an internship for a process heating manufacturer, and managed a team of 7 solidifying work structure within the organization. His passions include
projects • Materials addressing issues arising from the team’s review of the Self-Study Report or online instructional materials • Documentation of actions taken by the program after submission of the Self-Study Report as being available for review, and • Materials necessary for the program to demonstrate compliance with the criteria and policiesThe programs should confer with PEV to ensure that display materials will provide adequate evidenceof meeting the accreditation criteria.About two months prior to the on-site virtual visit, the program reviewed in fall 2020 provided thePEV access to an on-line OneDrive folder that contained the following electronic binders. 1. Course Binder: this binder contained some or all of the
scale, disparate data. He is currently working on a project that ambitions to design a system capable of providing students customized motivational stimuli and performance feedback based on their affective states.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Tucker holds a joint appointment as Assistant Professor in Engineering Design and Industrial En- gineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also affiliate faculty in Computer Science and Engineering. He teaches Introduction to Engineering Design (EDSGN 100) at the undergraduate level and developed and taught a graduate-level course titled Data Mining–Driven Design (EDSGN 561). As part of the Engineering Design Program’s ”Summers
optimization of intelligent systems through the acquisition, integration, and mining of large scale, disparate data. He is currently working on a project that ambition to design a sys- tem capable of providing students customized motivational stimuli and performance feedback based on their affective states.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Tucker holds a joint appointment as Assistant Professor in Engineering Design and Industrial En- gineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also affiliate faculty in Computer Science and Engineering. He teaches Introduction to Engineering Design (EDSGN 100) at the undergraduate level and developed and taught a graduate-level course titled
achieving underserved students differ by gender? 2. How do their computing identities differ by field (CS, IT, CE)? 3. How do their computing identities differ by first year versus upper class status?2 BACKGROUNDNational attention to retaining U.S. prominence on the global stage has precipitated a necessity togarner interest, enrollment, and subsequent graduation of computing majors. The demand for atechnologically trained workforce far outpaces the growth. After all, computing is projected tocontinue to grow at a rate of 17% from 2014-2024, much faster than the average for alloccupations [2]. This urgency has prompted an expansion in literature on understanding theengagement of women, underrepresented minorities, and diverse socio
Professor in Industrial and Manufac- turing Engineering at Cal Poly, SLO. In her current role she overseas Engineering Students Services and diversity effort in the college. Coming from a 24 year career of practicing innovative pedagogies from Project based learning to flipped classrooms, she now works to transform the institution of high education through structures and practices.Dr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is Chair of the Women’s & Gender Studies Department and a Professor in Ethnic Studies at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is also the Faculty Director of the Cal Poly Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority and Underrepresented
author found that somepredictors of success for women were related to frequency of working on group projects while formen it had to do with satisfaction with math and science coursework and the opportunity to conductresearch. It appeared that the college environment was a greater predictor of success compared tobackground characteristics or precollege experiences. The study also indicated that the collegeenvironment makes students less sure of their motivation to achieve. This may indicate that despitelack of academic preparation, these students can achieve success if the college climate issupportive and conducive to success. Strayhorn [12] summarized his study on the social barriers and supports for URM studentsin STEM fields based upon
undergraduate elective at California State University,Sacramento that focuses on the design of steel structures for civil engineering majors. Thiscourse meets twice a week for 75 minutes and has 29 meetings over the 15 week semester. Oneclass period is spent on the midterm exam and another 2 hour time period beyond the 15 weeksemester is spent on the final exam. The course covers content regarding the analysis and designof tension members, compression members, beams, beam-columns, and connections in steelstructures. Students in both sections engage in an open-ended service learning project, completenine in-class conceptual quizzes, are provided with suggested homework problem sets andsolutions (not graded), and have access to examples with solutions
online discussion forums were delivered through a course web site in the university learningmanagement system (UVaCollab, collab.itc.virginia.edu). Some aspects of the grade were basedon activities that could be compared to the traditional lecture course: homework problems (25%of the grade), in-class test problems (25% of the grade), and a final exam (15% of the grade).Students also worked in teams to complete a “grand challenge project” (25% of the grade) thatconsisted of a series of assignments of increasing complexity addressing methods to deliverchemotherapeutic drug to a tumor in a patient. Finally, students completed daily formativeassessments in a category called, “Help Yourself Learn” (10% of the grade). Examples of theselow-stakes
(Michigan State University Outreach and Engagement). She is involved in usability evaluations, focus groups, and information architecture projects for MSU and external clients. Her research areas include effects of cooperative online learning, interventions based on cognitive flexibility theory for read- ing to learn on the web, and student motivation and achievement in flipped classrooms. Hannah holds a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Bonn, a M.A. in Communication from the University of Missouri, and a Ph.D. in both Communication and Educational Psychology and Educational Technology from Michigan State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Using
in STEM fields. 1,2,3 . Under the umbrella of active learning,however, a large variety of different (and sometimes contradictory) methodologies have beenproposed; including project-based learning, problem-based learning, gamification, tinkering,collaborative learning, class competitions, and many others. As educators become more interestedin student-centered pedagogies, the question of which specific techniques are most effective isincreasingly important.Because active learning is still an emerging paradigm, the number of studies examining distinctapproaches is somewhat limited, and the difficulty of isolating those techniques in the classroomenvironment is a recognized concern. 1 In this paper, we wish to contribute to the growing pool
Paper ID #19152Work in Progress: A Delphi Study to Investigate the Value of Board Gamesto Teach Teamwork SkillsDr. Kevin Ray Hadley, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Hadley received his BS in Chemical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines and his PhD in Chemical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. At Vanderbilt, he also completed their teaching certificate program and was the first participant to publish the results of his project in a national peer-reviewed journal, Chemical Engineering Education. Afterwards, Dr. Hadley completed a postdoctoral study at NASA. IN 2012, he joined the faculty at South
engineering) along with composition-studies experts from the UndergraduateRhetoric Program. The team developed a course designed to focus on introducing engineers torelevant genres and types of writing prominent in many engineering disciplines. The “Writing inEngineering Fields” course, designed to mirror in structure and delivery the university’s first-year composition course (Table 1), aims to inculcate these skills in a single semester.Our team developed the course in one semester by meeting every two weeks to discuss contentand provide feedback on drafted material. Throughout the development and offering, two teammembers (our graduate TAs—one from English and one from Engineering) were essential inpromoting the success of the project. These TAs
have been progressivelyutilized as general purpose GPU (GPGPU). They are used to improve the performance of manyapplications such as multimedia 16, EDA 17, numeric algorithm 18. This paper is written tomotivate and inspire engineering students in taking up projects in this particular domain. Thisdomain of study is at the research level in many universities and thus there is very limited scopefor teaching in class. However, as the topic is booming in the market there is always a scope fordoing wide range of study or projects in this domain. We would like to share our survey on thisdomain as it may be a guide or motivation for many engineering students. The increasingcomputational power of GPGPU’s makes it a solution for high performance
tenured full professor. CSULB is a teaching-intensive institution and thus, he has taught classes at different levels from introduction to programming and data structures; to junior level classes in database design; senior level classes on database, web development, and senior projects; and finally to graduate classes in database systems. In 2014, Dr. Monge joined a team at Google that created NCWIT’s EngageCSEdu, an online living col- lection of peer-reviewed teaching instruments that use research-based techniques that retain and engage students, particularly effective in broadening participation in computing. Dr. Monge’s research inter- ests have evolved over time. Through his participation in an NSF sponsored
this program concluded, the authors determined to use whatthey had learned with local CCs to work with non-metropolitan CCs. The authors then received aone year NSF exploratory grant (#0836050) to work with three non-metropolitan CCs. Based onthis successful project, ASU was awarded a five-year STEP grant from NSF (#0856834) to workwith five non-metropolitan CCs, only one of which was within an hour’s drive of the university;most are about three hours distant. After the program was expanded out from Maricopa County,our acronym METS was defined to stand for “Motivated Engineering Transfer Students” with anunderstanding that computer science is included in the term “engineering.”Our “Motivated Engineering Transfers STEM Talen Expansion Program
offerings. The first exams consisted of an in-class portion and atake-home programming assignment. The final exam was cumulative and had no take-homeportion, although students had previously completed a large, multi-week final project. Thoughdifficult to directly compare, in both offerings performance on the final projects were comparablewith most students meeting or exceeding expectations.ResultsAs Fig. 3 show, formatting of exams across the Fall 2016 offering without daily quizzes and theFall 2017 offering that included daily quizzes was similar. In 2016, the in-class portion of the firstexam had 35 questions that varied between multiple-choice style questions and open-responsesquestions. Similarly, the Fall 2017 offering’s first exam had 47
is the cause of inadequate pressure, and (c) realizing that the water tower isinsufficient to meet the minimum required water pressure at the current daily demand. Figure 1-ii–iv show some views corresponding to these tasks in the FS case study.The municipal engineer is then tasked with designing a new water tower that provides adequatepressure at the base of the water tower throughout the day while not exceeding the maximumpressure rating imposed by the town’s old pipe network. The new water tower is also expected tomeet the minimum/maximum pressure constraints for both current and projected (1.5x) demand.Designing the new water tower that meets all the design requirements (minimum/maximumpressure at current and projected demands) involves
classroom, and engaging her students with interactive methods.Dr. Andrea M. Ogilvie P.E., Texas A&M University Andrea M. Ogilvie, Ph.D., P.E. serves as Assistant Dean for Student Success and Assistant Professor of Instruction at Texas A&M University. Prior to her current appointment, Andrea served as Director of the Equal Opportunity in Engineering Program at The University of Texas at Austin. Her expertise includes: project management, program assessment, university-industry partnerships, grant writing, and student development in the co-curricular learning environment with a special focus on recruiting, supporting, and graduating students from groups historically underrepresented in engineering. Since 2014
MindsetBusiness acumen • Understanding engineers’ roles within the organization • Understanding the role of management functions • Discussing their products and services in business and economic terms • Being willing to make decisions with incomplete information • Effectively collaborating in a team setting • Effectively managing projects and commercialization processUnderstanding • Searching for market opportunities for technological innovationcustomer needs • Recognizing customer segments and their needs or problems • Constructing and communicating customer
evaluation of the projectssuccess, psychometric survey-based measures of these social psychological outcomes will alsobe operationalized as dependent variables, thus providing both quantitative and qualitativeassessments. A vital first phase of this RED project then involves the development of thepsychometric scales (i.e., testing of the tests), that will be used. Although researchers have developed a number of survey-based measures of socialpsychological aspects of the learning process, and recent efforts have been made to assess causal 2models of the multiple social psychological influences on educational and career outcomeswithin the area of engineering [cf. 4, 2, 5]. Importantly, the
art facilities.One of the more effective ways to increase knowledge about science, technology, engineering,and math (STEM) careers is to increase the knowledge of teachers. As part of a National ScienceFoundation Advanced Technological Education project, a group of high school teachers wasoffered the opportunity to work in advanced manufacturing labs with engineering faculty. Theseprojects included additive manufacturing (AM) of ceramics, surface characterization of AMmetal parts, and surface alteration. The teachers were tasked with developing lesson plans whichincorporated the advanced manufacturing concepts that they had learned.As part of the assessment of the program, teachers were given pre- and post- research experiencesurveys
by the high schoolparticipants themselves. Most reports of service learning outreach focus on the experience ofundergraduate and graduate student volunteers, including recent studies of efforts to recruitwomen [15, 16]. Other studies involving K-12 outreach do not address effectiveness of specificmaterials in engaging underrepresented students, but instead focus on general best practices,program development, or assessment [17-20]. Additionally, groundbreaking studies involvingbest practices in teaching engineering to K-12 students have not been within the context ofoutreach, but instead have focused on formal classroom teaching approaches in general such asproblem-, inquiry- and project-based approaches [21]. One program that evaluates
”). Professional codes of ethics and ABET requirements are sometimes applied, withsustainability introduced as a design constraint.3 In our experience, these professionalrequirements are often treated only in senior design projects, and then only as items on achecklist. Optional minor and certificate programs may exist for those engineering students whoare interested, but even here crucial tensions often go unexplored between definitions ofsustainability (between weak and strong sustainability4, 5, between “technological sustainability”and “ecological sustainability”6, between “eco-efficiency” and “eco-effectiveness”7, or betweensustainability and sustainable development8, 9, 10, 11) and even between areas of the triple bottomline.3 Missing, too, are