L Lect m both minder of what I should be doingProf M Lect f both I like to hear your suggestions and ideas about my class. Prof N Asst m mid I have all kinds of Think, Pair Share added into my lesson today. Prof O Asst m mid I am trying to make my PowerPoint more interactive I group the students according to pre-test results so that group work is Prof P Asst m mid more successful. Prof Q Prof m mid Group work is the basis for this course. Prof R Assoc m post I feel that the students have changed so much over the years
equationsof the form P(D)y(t) = Q(D)x(t), for derivative operations P(D) and Q(D) and functions x(t) andy(t) by looking at the equation in a different light. The transform reframes the equation as analgebraic equation in a new variable s by which the solution is easily obtained; in fact, for acompletely relaxed system (no initial conditions), the transform almost appears to amount to aninnocent change of variables. The new world of frequency is not trivial; in fact, the concept of "frequency response" is a difficulty when teaching circuits and controls. Two prominent methods of visualizing the frequency response exist, Bode Plots and Nyquist
Case Study from Petroleum Engineering,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, pp. 1–16, Dec. 2016.[9] N.M. Smith, J.M. Smith, L. Battalora and B.A. Teschner, “Industry–University Partnerships: Engineering Education and Corporate Social Responsibility,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 3, p. 04018002, Jul. 2018.[10] E. Conlon and H. Zandvoort, “Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: beyond the individualistic approach,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 217–232, Jun. 2011.[11] C. Mitcham, “A historico-ethical perspective on engineering education: from use and convenience to policy engagement,” Eng. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–53, Mar. 2009.[12] Q. Zhu and B. K. Jesiek, “A Pragmatic Approach to Ethical Decision-Making in
of students preferred the synchronous webinars over the in-person lectures. This relativecomparison needed to be tempered with the fact that less than half of the 2014 students actuallyexperienced an in-person lecture in the course.In the first year the discussion forum was open for students for Q&A with the instructor andinteraction amongst students. This was completely voluntary and no marks were gained byparticipating. In the second year, the course outline was changed to assign 6% of the final gradeto discussion forum participation. The expectation was that students would ask one question(start a thread) and reply to five other people’s threads with a meaningful contribution (not just“Liking” their post). This resulted in a nearly a
. “Reconciling Graduate Attribute Assessment with Existing Outcome-Based Assessment.” In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference (CEEA), 6 pp., 8–11 June. Canmore, AB: OJS/PKP. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/PCEEA/issue/view/54331. Kishawy, H. A., T. Sidhu, R. Pop-Iliev, M. A. Rosen, D. Zhang and Q. H. Mahmoud. 2014. “Meeting the Outcome-Based CEAB Accreditation Criteria: Engineering Programs at UOIT.” In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference (CEEA), 7 pp., June 8-11. Canmore, AB: OJS/PKP. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/PCEEA/issue/view/54332. Lye, L. 2014. “Development and Use of Simulation Apps and Physical Toys for Teaching Experimental Design
chain management. South-Western, 2009.[51] A. J. Van Weele, Purchasing & supply chain management: analysis, strategy, planning and practice. Cengage Learning EMEA, 2010.[52] R. R. Chen, R. O. Roundy, R. Q. Zhang, and G. Janakiraman, “Efficient auction mechanisms for supply chain procurement,” Manage. Sci., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 467–482, 2005.[53] R. Angeles and R. Nath, “Business-to-business e-procurement: success factors and challenges to implementation,” Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 104– 115, 2007.[54] W. D. Presutti Jr, “Supply management and e-procurement: creating value added in the supply chain,” Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 219–226, 2003.[55] M. Essig and U. Arnold, “Electronic
. Brennan, M. Eggermont, and W. Rosehart, “Peer Ratings and Intentions to Change: Adopting the CATME to Explore Outcomes of Peer Ratings: American Society for Engineering Education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. , 2015.[19] P. L. Berger and T. Luckmann, The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge - University of Ottawa. Garden City, N.Y. , 1967.[20] D. M. Mertens, Research and evaluation in education and psychology : integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, 2005.[21] M. Q. Patton and M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications, 2002.[22] K
in the book, and some requested moreguided journaling assignments. Overall, the lesson learned is programs that build upon texts orother “homework” must be carefully designed to provide utility for students who may not beable to complete the “assigned” tasks.Balance Information and CommunityOften, co-curricular programs are either highly structured (i.e., lectures with Q&A, guestspeakers) or very informal (i.e., coffee hours). While both approaches can be successful, theycan also stifle enthusiastic students or frighten away shy ones. In the “Lean In” discussions, themost successful sessions struck an even balance between formal professional developmentactivities—videos, structured discussion, information sharing—and open discussion
. IEEE Trans., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 1999.[19] R. Straub and R. Lunsford, 12 Readers Reading: Responding to College Student Writing. 1996.[20] S. Smith Taylor, “‘I Really Don’t Know What He Meant by That’: How Well Do Engineering Students Understand Teachers’ Comments on Their Writing?,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 139–166, Mar. Page 26.1482.20 2011.[21] S. Smith, “What is ‘Good’Technical Communication? A Comparison of the Standards of Writing and Engineering Instructors,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7–24, Jan. 2003.[22] S. Smith Taylor and M. D. Patton, “Ten Engineers Reading
obtaining evidence of improved studentachievement during the early “period of classroom adjustment” that occurs when an innovationis introduced into a new classroom setting and the difficulty of seeing learning improvement thefirst few times an innovation is used25 (p. 98). PI: So if you had to rate this whole experience [of using the online forum in Calculus I], one to ten, what would you rate it? MI: Pretty highly – with ten being the best, right? Q: Yeah… A: I’d say an eight. Q: An eight? A: Yeah, I’d say an eight. I mean I would love to have seen dramatic increases in performance on exams, but you know, realistically we shouldn’t even expect that
, VA.6. ASCE – American Society of Civil Engineers. 2011. The ASCE Code of Ethics: Principles, Study, and Application. ASCE. Reston, VA.7. ASCE – American Society of Civil Engineers. 2013. 2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure. ASCE. Reston, VA.8. ASEE PEER. https://peer.asee.org/advanced_search?q=%22concept+map%22&collection_id=&year=&published_after=&pu blished_before= accessed Dec. 20, 20159. Badurdeen, F., D.Sekulic, B. Gregory, A. Brown, H. Fu. 2014. Developing and teaching a multidisciplinary course in systems thinking for sustainability: lessons learned through two iterations. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18
Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.11. Wang, Q. & Zhu, Q. (2012). “Traditional Chinese Thinking and Its Influences on Modern Engineering andSocial Development.” In Christensen, S., Mitcham, C., Li B., & An, Y. (Eds.). Engineering, Development, andPhilosophy: American, Chinese, and European Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.12. Davis, M. (1995). “An Historical Preface to Engineering Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics vol. 1. 33-48.13. Harris, C., Pritchard, M., Rabins, M., James, R., & Englehardt, E. (2013). Engineering Ethics: Concepts andCases 5th ed. Boston: Wadsworth Publishing.14. Martin, M., & Schinzinger, R. (2000). Introduction to Engineering Ethics 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.15. Van de Poehl, I., & Royakkers, L
Text readings Lecture videos (6-18 minutes) Optional supplemental materials 3-6 optional pre-class problems (web distributed and scored) In-class Lecture (50 minutes) Lecture (10 minutes) 4-6 graded in-class problems (web distributed and scored) Post-class Q&A in a weekly
46.8 40 30 20 15.4 11.2 10 7.1 7.8 7.1 7.1 6.0 4.5 6.5 2.6 3.0 1.9 3.0 2.6 0.9 0.9 1.9 1.9 2.2 3.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.0 0 Critical Q Expert Conseq popular Position Cause Correlat Bias Analogy commit induct Deduct exam
. For the two display panels, the right one is replaced for the question and answer (Q&A). Inthe control panel, we remove the function of changing the data set, as only a single data set is associated with a question.Furthermore, we decide to move the data set description section to the top of the control panel for quick attention, asthe questions are usually data set specific. GraphVisual supports textual questions with a text box for answering aswell as single- or multiple-choice questions associated with a corresponding display panel. The interaction functionsin the quiz component are a subset of the functions provided in the study component.Figure 7: The screenshot of GraphVisual (quiz component). Compared with the study component shown
value of E or tensile strength that determines the best materialfor a weight constrained application (aircraft or bicycles, for example). The “singing rod” is amemorable and amusing demonstration to introduce the concept and initial assessment datashows a more memorable way for them to still understand by the end of the term. This activity iseasily accessible and transferable to other institutions. In fact, we have found studentsperforming this demonstration to other students on campus after the in-class demo.You can purchase “singing rods” in science supply stores. However, all you really need are solidor hollow rods made from particular materials. Physicists most often use an aluminum rodbecause they have a high Quality Factor (Q), which
principles of fluid mechanics.HEAT TRANSFERIn order to introduce an inductive approach to the structure ofthe heat transfer course that is offered in the fall of the junioryear, the class begin with a discussion about heat exchangers.On the first day of class, students visit the laboratory where Figure 6: Shell and Tube Heatthey observe the operation of a shell and tube heat exchanger. ExchangerReturning to the classroom, students explore the application ofthe performance equation for single pass heat exchangers: q = UA∆TLM (2)Equipped with this simple equation, students investigate the effect of each variable: How doesthe heat exchanger area (A) affect the rate of
Summer a 3.47 3.10 3.78 Research Course. g Planning of a research project. 3.45 3.09 3.78 d Relate a research question to current needs and trends. 3.44 3.09 3.80 j Communicate results of research orally and in writing. 3.43 2.91 3.90 q Do research on a topic outside of my major. 3.37 3.17 3.60 p Write a report on a group assignment. 3.33 2.73 3.80 c Identify good research questions. 3.31 3.09 3.67 m Present and critique