clarificationand/or ask what the students think about what a question is asking. With the remaining classtime, students work in their groups and complete their team contract, which is due at the nextclass. The team contract helps the team to reflect on past teaming experiences and setexpectations for their current team.The following week, students have work days when the instructor moves from team to team tohelp out and direct their work. During this week, the instructor invites students who have alreadycompleted HT to come back and talk with the current students. They could be a senior(s) whocompleted the class and/or a graduate(s) who indicated the value of the course structure to theirlearning. (The instructor started inviting former students after a
gives workers the power to collectively negotiate with and pushback against capitalist corporate owners and the industries they extract profit through [3].NSPE and their Anti-Union Roots“The concept of Unionism in engineering was one of [the] real reasons for NSPE’s creation and amovement that D.B. Steinman [‘Father’ of NSPE] wanted to prevent with engineers. This topic iscovered frequently as early as the late 1930’s in [NSPE publication] The American Engineer.” -from The Complete PEI History of NSPE [19]“The [National] Society [of Professional Engineers] throughout its history has maintained aconsistent stance opposing collective bargaining for engineers.” - Paul H. Robbins, firstExecutive Director of NSPE [20]The National Society of
. and Technol. Educ 15, no. 1: 12-18, 2017. [2] A. Hofstein, and V. N. Lunetta. "The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century." Science education 88, no. 1: 28-54, 2004 [3] D. A. Bergin, "Influences on classroom interest." Educational Psychologist 34, no. 2: 87- 98, 1999. [4] N. Holstermann, D. Grube, and S. Bögeholz. "Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest." Research in science education 40: 743-757, 2010. [5] L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan. "Hands-on engineering: learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program." International Journal of Engineering Education 15, no. 1: 20-31, 1999. [6] A. Johri, and B. M. Olds, eds
not for profit boards. His interests include the integration of faith in all types and aspects of business including engineering and architecture, and the use of business in international community development.Tyler Scott Helmus, Calvin College TYLER S. HELMUS is a student currently enrolled in Calvin College’s engineering program. He expects to graduate in 2012 and hopes to attend graduate school after. research interests include robotics and control systems.Steven H. VanderLeest, Calvin College STEVEN H. VANDERLEEST is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin College, Vice-President of Re- search & Development at DornerWorks, Ltd., and partner at squishLogic LLC. He obtained the M.S.E.E. from Michigan
enhance students’ critical thinkingskills. This researcher included some of the strategies learned from her literature review in herintervention classes. I included class discussions, debates, role plays, and collaborative learning.Each time I introduced a new critical thinking methodology, I had the students apply the conceptin class. Summary of Critical Thinking Pedagogy Pedagogy Researcher(s) 1. In-class active learning exercises Tsui, (1998, 1999) 2. Class discussions, debates, role plays, Braxton, Milem, & Sullivan, (2000); Paul & collaborative learning
an opportunity to move to client/server architecture and take advantage of the latest developments in software and hardware technology.• The downsizing of the information services function – The corporate downsizing movement of the late 80’s and early 90’s has had significant impact on the information services function. The large IS staffs required to write and maintain custom application systems are a luxury only a few companies can now afford. The use of packaged software eliminates the need to write custom code and reduces the resources required to maintain the systems.The movement to packaged software can be considered essentially a replacement marketgenerated by technological needs with few advances in business or
previously the recipient of a Pitt Partners scholarship from the University of Pittsburgh which facilitated his service at Carnegie Mellon University from 2008-2009.Nancy George, University of Pittsburgh Nancy S. George has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Language Communications from the University of Pittsburgh and a Master's Equivalency degree in Education. She has been a junior high language arts teacher for 30 years. She will complete her Master's degree in Library and Information Science in April, 2010, from the University of Pittsburgh. Page 15.1146.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010
area.NaturalisticThe most recent addition to the bank of intelligences, a person with strengths in this area is Page 15.574.8capable of recognising forms in nature and understanding nature’s systems. Agriculturalistsand hunters possess this strength.In addition to these eight intelligences, the so-called “candidate” intelligences of spiritual andexistential intelligence were not included in this study, as these have not been fully endorsedby Gardner, due to their failure to fulfil all the criteria to be considered intelligences (Gardner,2006).One criticism of the theory of Multiple Intelligences has been that these eight areas do notrepresent intelligence(s) at
AC 2010-275: A POSSIBLE CIVIL ENGINEERING BOK2 CURRICULUMDebra Larson, Northern Arizona University Debra S. Larson is a Professor and Associate Dean for the College of Engineering, Forestry and Natural Sciences at Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff, AZ. She served as department chair for civil and environmental engineering at NAU for four years. Prior to her faculty appointment at NAU, Debra worked as a structural and civil engineer for various companies. She is a registered Professional Engineer in Arizona. Debra received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Michigan Technological University. She received her Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from Arizona State
concepts.Methods of Data CollectionTo track the DREAM program’s effectiveness at imparting physics knowledge in the mentees,inventories were systematically administered at Austin High School, Chavez High School, andKIPP Houston High School.These inventories were intended to span the field of topics that occurred in the design projects ofboth the spring 2009 and fall 2009 semesters, to measure long-term retention. The inventorieswere broken into two parts. The first page was designed as an Intuition Inventory (I.I.). TheI.I.’s from spring 2009 and fall 2009 are nearly identical, as shown in the Appendix. Theseserved to gauge the mentees’ physics intuition without computation or algebraic representation.The primary topic covered on the I.I. was the
multi-disciplinary design. (4) Provide a platform where student performance against the ABET general criteria for engineering programs (3 a-k )14 and civil engineering program specific criteria can be assessed (basically BOK I now and BOK II in the future).The senior design experience was tailored to ensure coverage of the appropriate programmaterial – items (1) – (3) in the above list suggests this. In some ways, constructing theappropriate assessment vehicle(s) was a more considerable challenge. The open-endednature of realistic design does not always lend itself to concrete assessmentmethodologies. So the creation of a time effective assessment scheme that forces anexperience that includes coverage of all outcomes to include
own words I will immediately attempt to find the I will underline the important solution to the problem words, list down facts and knowledge that I know, and identify concept/s that I need to learn. When a conflict arise I will accept my friends’ point of view I will keep thinking about the during problem to avoid prolong the discussion matter
UNC Charlotte in 2010 as Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and researcher in the Energy Production and Infrastructure Center (EPIC).S. Gary Teng, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. S. Gary Teng is Professor and Director of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management Program and Center for Lean Logistics & Engineered Systems at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He holds B.E., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial Engineering. Dr. Teng is a Professional Engineer in the State of Wisconsin and an ASQ-certified Quality Engineer and Reliability Engineer. His research interests are in engineering system design and analysis, lean systems design & implementation, Lean
Peer Self Student • Good use of textbook in • I use material in the • I actually used the class. textbook every lesson. textbook more in your I cite and write on the course than in others. chalkboard equation numbers and figures.Assign design teams. In the real world engineers do not get to pick and choose who they want towork with. The professor should assign the teams based on some parameter(s) (background ofcourses, surveyed skills, in-class observations, etc.).27 The assignment of
and choose who they want to workwith. The professor should assign the teams based on some parameter(s) (background of courses,surveyed skills, in-class observations, etc.).19 The assignment of students to teams should bedone early in the semester to allow teams to sit together and work together on in-class and out-of-class group exercises. Learning then truly becomes a team effort throughout the semester.The authors have been known to send students to the chalkboard to solve an in-class problem.This allows one group to present their solution, right or wrong. Each group can see how the othergroups solved the same problem. When all in a group are working to solve the same problem atthe board, they are more focused. When seated, the instructor
moreabout technology National Research Council: National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.5. Massachusetts Department of Education, (2001) Massachusetts Science and Technology/EngineeringCurriculum Framework, Malden, MA6. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R.R. (eds), (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind,Experience, and School, Expanded Edition. National Research Council: National Academy Press,Washington, D.C.7. Thier, H. D. and Daviss, B., (2001) Developing Inquiry-Based Science Materials: a Guide for EducatorsTeachers College Press, New York.8. Brooks, J.G., and Brooks, M.G., (1999) In Search of Understanding: The Case for ConstructivistClassrooms. ASCD9. Dunn, S. and Larson, R. (1990) Design Technology: Children’s Engineering The Falmer
governed by a nonlinear differential equation(s). This situation often occurs whenstudents are assigned design projects, or more importantly when students practice engineering inindustry after graduation. Students are taught, in a series of dynamics courses, how to derive theequation of motion of a dynamic system whose resulting differential equation can be linear ornonlinear. At the same time, students these days are taught such that they are capable of usingthe above mentioned NAS to solve differential equations, even though their usage is mostlyfocused on solving ordinary linear differential systems. For most undergraduate mechanicalengineering students, who have no experience with the complex nature of nonlinear dynamicsystems, numerical
. The root of the problem might be in scholars' unwillingness to crossdisciplinary boundaries. As Ancarani (1995: 653) argued, “there has been relatively little contactto date between scholarship in international relations or political economy and the advances inscience and technology studies.... As a result, basic analytic concepts, including ‘globalization’and science and technology themselves, have been taken for granted and have not beenproblematized to a far greater degree than in more traditional areas of S&T research, such aslaboratory studies or controversies.”Furthermore there are significant conceptual and empirical problems with social theories thatmake implicit a possible role for engineers in globalization. For example
Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 20, pp. 146-165, 2020.[9] M. S. Tooley and E. E. Umphress, "Work in progress - the ethics of diversity: Addressing diversity issues in undergraduate engineering ethics education," presented at the Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, 2009.[10] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, C. Swan, D. Knight, and N. E. Canney, "Variations in reflections as a method for teaching and assessment of engineering ethics," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual, 2020.[11] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, D. Knight, C. Swan, and N. Canney, "Intersections between engineering ethics and diversity issues in engineering education," Journal of
engineers intheir community, career expositions, friends or family members, class trips, guest speakers ormedia.[5,7,8] Unfortunately, current methods of educating K-12 students about engineering andengineering careers have shown little impact, with the percentage of U.S. bachelor’s degreesawarded in engineering remaining constant around 4.5% over the past decade, down from anaverage of 7.1% during the 1980’s.[9] While it may appear beneficial to bring an engineer intothe classroom to spend time with the students and talk about their profession, many students areoften left with only a slight understanding of the guest engineer’s career and fail to seethemselves in the same role as that engineer.[10] More effective methods of generating
Evaluations During the 2004-2005Accreditation Cycle, Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology,ABET, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland, 2005.5 ASCE. Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future,2nd Edition, Reston, VA, 2008.6 Bloom, Benjamin S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Longman, 1956.7 Ressler, S. J., “Influence of the New Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge on Accreditation Criteria.”Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, June 2008.8 Ressler, S.J., “The Raise the Bar Inititiative: Charting the Future by Understanding the Path to the PresentAccreditation Criteria.” Proceedings of
smart mobile devices). The course relies heavily on open source software such as Linux, Python, Java, Android, cross-platform Mobile Development PhoneGap (Cordova), Web Development Technologies (HTML, JavaScript, CCS, php, for example), MySQL, and Apache Web ServerCourse Design ObjectivesThe course goal is to prepare the students to create value, innovate, and roll out creativeapplication prototypes in a small, nimble and entrepreneurial work environment. The course hasbeen designed to meet the following objectives: • to expose under-skilled students to basic networking, computing and software development technologies and tools and important trending; • to form highly motivated and diverse team(s) that are effective
, organizational simplicity, high adaptability to a particular society or cultural environment, sparing use of natural resources, low cost of final product, or high potential for employment.9(p. 10)During the 1980’s, when the National Science Foundation sponsored a program dedicated toresearch in Appropriate Technology, the definition in the program solicitation was similar,though somewhat less prescriptive: Appropriate Technologies are defined as those which possess many of the following qualities: they are decentralized, require low capital investment, are amenable to management by their users, result in solutions that conserve natural resources, are in harmony with the environment, are small or intermediate scale, and are more labor- than