, Wiley. 9. Palm, W.J (2001), Introduction to Matlab 6 for Engineers, McGraw-Hill. 10. Wieder, S.(1992), Introduction to MathCAD for Scientists and Engineers, McGraw-Hill. 11. Bedford, A., and W. Fowler (2008), Engineering Mechanics: Statics, 5th ed., Pearson/Prentice-Hall. 12. Beer, F.P., and E.R.Johnston (2007), Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Statics, 8th ed., McGraw-Hill. 13. Efimba, R.E. (2012), “The Joy of Mechanics I: Statics,” 4th ed., Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Howard University, Washington, DC., 250 pp. 14. Efimba, R.E. (2012), “The Joy of Mechanics III: Mechanics of Materials,” 3 rd ed., Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Howard University, Washington, DC
. Page 25.1364.11 References1. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, National Academy of Engineering, 2004.2. D. Schaefer, J. H. Panchal, S-K. Choi, F. Mistree, “Strategic Design of Engineering Education for the Flat World,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 247-282, Mar 2008.3. T. L. Friedman, “The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century,” Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2005.4. G. W. Skates, “Interdisciplinary project working in engineering education,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 28, no.2, 187-201, 2003.5. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Internet: www.abet.org, Jan 2012.6. HCS
, New Jersey, U.S.A.: Prentice Hall.3) Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York, NY, U.S.A.: David McKay Co. Inc.4) Dziegielewski, B., Kiefer, J. C., Opitz, E. M., Lantz, G. L., Porter, G. A., (2000). Commercial and Industrial End Uses of Water. Washington, DC: American Water Works Association.5) Oertel, H., Prandtl, L. (2004). Prandtl’s Essentials of Fluid Mechanics. Boehle, M., Mayes, K., (Eds.). New York, NY: Springer.6) Calvert, J. B. (2003). Turbines. In Tech Index, University of Denver. Retrieved from http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/tech/fluids/turbine.htm#Refs
”. Retrieved December 2011 from https://www.sarc.miami.edu/ReinventionCenter/Public/assets/files/contentAnalysis.pdf4. Lopatto, D. (2003), “The essential features of undergraduate research “Council of undergraduate research quarterly, 139-1425. Hunter, A.B., Laursen, S. L. and Seymour, E. (2007), “Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development”. Science Education, 91, 36–74.6. Aghayere, A. (2005), “Strategies for embedding scholarship in the educational experiences of engineering technology undergraduate students”. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 11487. Boyer
the School. It should be stressed that thetechnology professor teaches engineering concepts to the students and is explicitly notattempting to “steal” engineering students.3.2 Data collectionData were collected for six years in three forms: transcript information, number of majors, andbrief in-class surveys. The six years involve twelve semesters: six fall semesters and six spring Page 25.1421.4 semesters. Here, a semester is referred to as the academic year with a “F” or “S” for fall orspring; e.g., the last semester examined was the spring of the 2010-2011 year, or “1011S'”.The transcript information was collected for EGR120 students from
be cleverly incorporatedinto courses. A future paper in which a large class can be assessed for comparative results usingwikis is planned.Bibliography1. Rhoulac, T.D. and Crenshaw, P. (2006). Preparing Civil Engineering Students to Meet Workplace WritingExpectations. Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA.2. Plumb, C. and Scott, C. (2002). Outcomes Assessment of Engineering Writing at the University of Washington.Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), July 2002, pp. 333-338.3. Lang, J.D., Cruse, S., McVey, F., and McMasters, J. (1999). Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Surveyto Assist Curriculum Designers. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(1), January 1999, pp. 43-51.4. “Criteria for
AC 2012-3515: UTILIZING PROJECT-BASED MULTIDISCIPLINARY DE-SIGN ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE STEM EDUCATIONDr. Andy Shaojin Zhang, New York City College of Technology Andy S. Zhang earned his master’s in mechanical engineering from the City College of New York in 1987 and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the Graduate Center of the City University of New York in 1995. Zhang’s research area includes materials testing, product design and prototyping, CAD/CAE, and mechatronics. From 2007 to 2009, Zhang served as a member of the Pre-engineering Advisory Commission of Advisory Council for Career and Technical Education of NYC Department of Education, which was designed to help high schools to enhance existing technology
a reasonable “value” for your performance improvements along with a commonly used formula for estimating "real" training costs, the spreadsheet will calculate a Return on Investment for the training. The calculation can help you determine if it is worth your while to take the training. Each section is explained as you come to it. ENTER YOUR DATA IN THE ORANGE SHADED CELLS. ALL OTHER CELLS ARE PROTECTED. Step 1: TASK COMPENSATION This section calculates the weighted value of the portion of your base total "cash value" compensation (pay plus benefits) that is devoted to tasks involving the use of the knowledge/skills set(s) dealt with in the training program you are considering. Enter your base annual gross salary in line 1. In line 2, enter
. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35, 240-247.2. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., and Roth, G. (2002). Choice is Good, but Relevance is Excellent: Autonomy-Enhancing and Suppressing Teacher Behaviours Predicting Students’ Engagement in Schoolwork, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.3. Cordova, D. I., and M. R. Lepper (1996). Intrinsic Motivation and the Process of Learning: Beneficial Effects of Contextualization, Personalization, and Choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (4) 715-730.4. Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3-22.5. Green, S., Davis, C., Karshmer, E., Marsh, P., & Straight, B. (2005). Living
. Page 25.1494.93. Miline, I., and Rowe, G., 2002, “Difficulties in Learning and Teaching Programming-Views of Students and Tutors”, Education and Information Technologies 7:1, pp. 55–66.4. ABET Accreditation Commission, 2009, “Effective for Evaluating During the 2009-2010 Accreditation Cycle”, Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs.5. Lister, R., et al., 2004, “A Multi-National Study of Reading and Tracing Skills in Novice Programmers”, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 119-1506. Tenenberg, J., et al., 2005, “Students Designing Software: a Multi-National, Multi-Institutional study”, Informatics in Education, vol. 4, no.1, pp.143-162.7. Pears, A., Seidman, S., Malmi, L., Mannila, L., Adams, E., Bennedsen, J
NewsPatent Information News is a free newsletter published quarterly by the European Patent Officethat often contains helpful tips and information on patent searching. Archived copies back to2004 are available at http://www.epo.org/service-support/publications/patent-information/news.html.References[1] W. Macomber, Engineers’ Handbook on Patents, Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1913. Page 25.1029.9[2] M. White. (2008). How are Engineering Librarians Using Patent Literature? A Pilot Survey[Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1377.[3] S. Adams. “Patent Searching Without Words: Why Do It? How to do It?”, Free PintNewsletter, 130, Feb. 6
isalways an additional help. When the professor poses a problem and then works with theclass to generate feedback to solve it, understanding for a Deaf student is enhanced. Page 25.1037.7 BLACKBOARD P 1 2 SFigure 1 – Basic classroom setup. As the professor (P) lectures, one interpreter (1)translates to the deaf student (S). Meanwhile, a second interpreter (2) is preparing for thenext topic, as well as assist the deaf student.Although I
fall semester. Employed inthe current study, was a pragmatic approach, where the researchers utilize both qualitative andquantitative research methods to address the research problem, research question(s), and researchcircumstance. Surveys were used to gather quantitative data, while semi-structured interviewswere used to obtain qualitative data. Both the survey and semi-structured interview data werecollected and analyzed separately.ResultsQuantitative Analysis: SurveyThe survey provided the quantitative data to examine students’ perceptions of the classroomculture and social transactions. Means and standard deviations were calculated for level ofsatisfaction for faculty advising, availability and instruction. The higher the score the
contractors were awardedcontracts to build F-16s [ii] using the exact same design and drawings. The parts were made tostrict specifications. Naturally, as the blue prints used by both were the same, equivalentperformance was anticipated from both. But this was not the case when the field history resultscame in after some use of the jets in the field.What was found was that the Japanese built planes had a mean-time-between-failure (MTBF)reliability that was twice as that of the U.S. F-16’s! Such a difference in performance cannot beattributed purely to chance. There has to be an uncommon cause that resulted in this. Onconducting an analysis, it was found that the U.S. manufacturers used the full spectrum oftolerance that was available to them, whereas
topics –thereby making the structure of the lecture more interesting in the process. This is exhibited inTable 3. Table 3: Causes of failures with Examples Important causes of failures Example(s) 1 Failure in communication Challenger space shuttle disaster, Airline accidents ( Tenerife airport disaster) 2 Quality related failures BP oil spill, Therac 25 (the computerized radiation therapy machine) 3 Failure in leadership Exxon Valdez Oil Spill - Joseph Hazelwood, the person selected to be the ships leader, consumed
of the UCSD Peer Review tool. This screen shot for 3 person team, but most of ourteams have 4-6 members. Page 25.1096.3 Fig. 1: Initial Rating ScreenshotSingle Parameter Assessment with a Fixed Pie ApproachA key difference between the UCSD Peer Review tool and CATME tool is that the UCSD toolhas a single parameter that the each student applies to their teammate to indicate overall teamcontribution. Moreover, this single parameter is applied in a fixed-pie fashion, meaning that ifone teammate is rated above average then other teammates(s) must be rated below average. Thenumber of points that can be allocated is
Education”, Section 2546, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 18-21, Chicago, Illinois.[4] O’Brien, S; Abulencia, J.P, “Learning Through Reverse Engineering”, Section 505, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 20 - 23, Louisville, Kentucky.[5] Kellogg, R.S; Jenison, R., “Utilizing Reverse Engineering to Explore the Design Process”, Section 2438, 1997 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15-18, Milwaukie, Wisconsin.[6] McCracken, W.M; Newstetter, W., “Reverse Engineering or Design Recovery: Two Approaches to Uncovering Designing”, Section 2225, 2000 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 18-21 St. Louis, Missouri.[7] Robertson, J; Wales, B.; Weihmeir, J., “Reverse Engineering as a Means
] “Wyoming Institute for Disabilities WIND Resource and Information Center.” Internet:http://www.uwyo.edu/wind/resource_info_center/index.html[5] S.F. Barrett. “Undergraduate Design Projects to Aid Persons with Disabilities.” NSF CBET Proposal 0962380,August 17, 2009. [6] S.F. Barrett, S.A. Morton, S. Root-Elledge. “Undergraduate Design Projects to Aid Persons with Disabilities,”in Proceedings of the 44th Rocky Mountain Bioengineering Symposium, (Denver, CO), Apr. 2007. Also available inISA Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, vol. 43. , pp. 296-301.[7] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs – Effective for Evaluations During the 2011-2012 AccreditationCycle.” ABET, Inc. October 30, 2010.[8] “Accessible Fishing.” Internet: http
, Research, Training, Education, and Remediation for Teamwork,” American Society for Engineering Education 2010 Annual Conference. Layton, R.A., M.L. Loughry, M.W. Ohland, and G.D. Ricco, “Design and Validation of a Web-Based System for Assigning Members to Teams Using Instructor-Specified Criteria,” Advances in Engineering Education, 2(1), Spring 2010, pp. 1-28. Zhang, B., and M.W. Ohland, “How to Assign Individualized Scores on a Group Project: an Empirical Evaluation,” Applied Measurement in Education, 22(3), 2009. Meyers, K., S. Silliman, M. Ohland, “Comparison of Two Peer Evaluation Instruments for Project Teams,” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2008
desenvolvimento das Engenharias: Situação Atual. Revista de Ensino de Engenharia, 18. Rio de Janeiro: ABENGE, 1998, p.74-82.[07] Naisbitt, J.A. Megatrends 2000: Ten New Directions for the 1990’s. New York: AvonBooks, 1999. 416p.[08] JC e-mail 2426, de 11 de Dezembro de 2003; Engenharia e a Sociedade Brasileira: reflexões para o dia dosengenheiros, artigo de Denis L. Balaguer[09] Ciampi, M. M.; Brito, C. da R. New Trend in Education: Port Engineering Graduation Program. In: International Society of Engineering Education (IGIP) Annual Symposium, 39, Trnava, 2010. Diversity unifies - Diversity in Engineering Education. Trnava: IGIP, 2010
Sommer, Curt Acredolo, Michael W. Maher, and Harry R. Matthews. "A Study Comparing Traditional and Hybrid Internet-Based Instruction in Introductory Statistics Classes." Journal of Statistics Education 3rd ser. 11 (2003). 2. Hilton, S. C., and Christensen, H. B. "Evaluating the Impact of Multimedia Lectures on Student Learning and Attitudes," Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, ed. B. Phillips, Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute(2002) Page 25.1250.8 3. Bourne, John; Harris, Dale; and Mayadas, Frank, "Online engineering education: Learning anywhere
Session 2793 A Speech and Music Detector Project for a DSP Class Christopher J. Vondrachek, Joseph P. Hoffbeck University of PortlandAbstractA project is described in this paper which is designed to monitor a radio station and detectcommercials and talking, which would allow the radio to be muted so the listener would not bedistracted by obnoxious radio ads and D.J.’s. The project is designed to be an interestingapplication of a very simple pattern recognition system and requires little more than a low passfilter, high-pass filter, and a threshold scheme. The approach was to
practice and of itsinterrelatedness with other areas.Institution-specific standards for H/SS learning outcomes based on these NEASC Standardscombined with EC2000 can be sketched briefly as follows:4.15 An H/SS curriculum should characterize carefully how the outcomes of H/SS studies at a given institution “embod[y] the institution’s definition of an educated person.” This embodiment should link readily to EC2000’s “general education component that complements the technical content of the curriculum and is consistent with the program and institution objectives.”4.16 Similarly, the H/SS standards should clearly relate to any university-wide general education requirements. Such requirements very likely will include expectations
, Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston, p. 182.Somerton, C. W., Benard, A., Genik, L. J., Hoke, P., Schroeder, J., Vance, R., Design Competitions Come to Heat Transfer, Proceedings of the 1999 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition, HTD-VOL. 364-4, Nashville, November, 1999.Wankat, P. C., and Oreovicz, F. S., 1993, Teaching Engineering, McGraw- Hill, NY, p. 7. Page 6.901.10 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education
the “business sense” that isperceived to be critical for climbing the corporate or organizational ladder. The success inmeeting these expectations is primarily based on the materials in the financial analysis course(s)similar to graduate level engineering economics.Several studies have examined the financial analysis tools that corporations employ [1,2]. Butthese studies did not specifically track the translation of these tools into the engineeringmanagement work place at the operating manager (first level manager, second level manager,and program / project manager) and engineer level. Consequently they are of limited use to theMEM instructor since they provide high - level organizational data, primarily from larger publicsector firms. The
house. Another has used the RCX for further automation of vehicles, where abus for example stops to gather children at each house along the roadAcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the LEGO Corp., NASA, and the many teachers and studentsthat have been involved with this project.Bibliography1. Dewey, John. Experience and Education. 1963. New York: Collier Books.2. Resnick, M., Martin, F., Sargent, R., and Silverman, B. (1996). Programmable Bricks: Toys to Think With. IBM Systems Journal, vol. 35, no. 3-4. pp. 443-452.3. Greenberge, Scott S. (2000, December 21). State Pushes Engineering. The Boston Globe, B-64. URL: http://www.pldstore.com; Pitsco Lego DACTA Online Store.5. URL: http://ldaps.ivv.nasa.gov; Lego Data Acquisition and
successful completion of the beam deflection experiment, the product description(s)are then synthesized and documented. The results are then assessed by the faculty.The students now branch to the physics application illustrated by the application of Ohm’s Law,e = Ri (electrical technology). They study resistance and how resistors are applied in electricalcircuits. The Unified Concept Chart can also include other layers (such as flow of fluids andtransfer of heat energy) based on this math node.The sequence of competencies is documented via Unified Concept Charts. These chartsinterlock nodes, units, and disciplines. They also provide a basis for systematically organizingthe curriculum and sequencing the material to be presented. x = yz
Hall, TS 156.8 .K64 (1991)16. Stuart Bennet, "Real-Time Computer Control: An Introduction," Prentice Hall International Series in systems and Control Engineering, TJ 223.M53. B46 (1988).17. David M. Auslender, Cheng H. Tham, "Real-Time Software for Control," Prentice-Hall, TJ 217.7 .A87 (1990).18. Roy S. Kawalsky, "The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments," Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ISBN 0-201-63171-7 (1993).19. Randy H. Katz, "Contemporary Logic Design," The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., TK 7888.4 .K36 (1994).20. Shem-Tov Levi, Ashok K. Agrawala, "Real-Time System Design," McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, (1991).21. David M. Auslander and Paul Sagues, "Microprocessors for Measurement and
forward to schedulingit in their senior year. In the mid-1990’s, there also began to appear a number of computer-basedflight simulator programs. Many of these were just games, but some were more sophisticated,and were being adopted by flight schools to assist in the training of students. The FederalAviation Administration (FAA) even approved some of these software/hardware combinations tobe used in the official training programs for certain pilot ratings. The FAA calls them PCATD’s(PC-based aviation training devices). Several of these software packages were investigated fortheir adaptability to a flight test course.The major concern with using such software was that the flying qualities would not besufficiently accurate to allow for fairly
Analysis, McGraw-Hill, U.S.A., 1991.2. S. Graham Kelly, Ph.D., Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Mechanical Vibrations, McGraw-Hill,1993.3. Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Discipline Specific Reference Handbook, Third Edition, December 1997,National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES), 1997.4. TXI Chaparral Steel Structural Shapes Technical Manual, February 1999.5. Kistler Instrument Corp product information K54.201e, 5/99.6. United McGill Corporation Acoustical Engineering Reports 1 through 7, United McGill Corporation’s AcousticalDivision, Ohio, 1990.7. Victor Wowk, Machinery Vibration: Balancing, McGraw-Hill, U.S.A., 1995.8. Robert C. Eisenmann, Sr., P.E, and Robert C. Eisenmann, Jr., Machinery Malfunction