to relate to the course’s discipline of aerospace engineering. For more details aboutthe Winter 2019 OEMPs, please see our companion paper [20]. As in the data described in thispaper, we are once again interviewing and surveying students. Additionally, we are requestingcopies of students’ assignment to textually analyze, and we are recording groups of studentsduring the in-class discussions. These data will allow us to continue analyzing how studentsexhibit productive beginnings of engineering judgment in even more depth.References 1) Swenson, J. & Wendell, K.B. (2017) Characterizing Indicators of Students’ Productive Disciplinary Engagement in Solving Fluids Mechanics Problems. Proceedings of 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &
Zoom® meeting by the end of 2019. Four months after the pandemic later, thatnumber grew to 300 million [58]. However, this increase has caused an exacerbation in "Zoomfatigue" (a synonym for videoconference fatigue) among students and faculty. In a surveyconducted by Asgari et al.,[59] about 70% of students indicated difficulty in maintaining theirfocus or experiencing Zoom® fatigue after attending multiple online sessions. According to Wick(2021), faculty and students reported experiencing Zoom® fatigue when their participation insynchronous web-based class meetings left them feeling more exhausted than the same activitywould in person. There are many possible reasons for this exhaustion [58], [60]: a) lack of bodylanguage and eye contact, b
organized around the reasoned action model. The major themes revealed that many faculty do not see involvement with diversity and inclusion as a norm in the department, and do not recognize their power to influence these issues. Our conclusions provide recommendations for engineering departments to meaningfully involve their faculty in improving diversity and inclusion.IntroductionIn 2012, a report from the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) titled“Innovation with Impact” called out the gap between engineering education research andeducational practice in engineering schools [1]. The report stressed a need for engineeringschools’ faculty and administration to be actively involved in a cycle of research
Task Force. Throughout her career, Sabick has been passionate about improving undergraduate engineering education. She has been highly involved in efforts to transform STEM teaching practices at both Saint Louis Univer- sity and Boise State, where she helped mentor faculty members to infuse courses with more interactive and hands-on learning experiences. She is currently working on a Boeing-funded project to infuse more math content into the middle school curriculum in the St. Louis Public School System. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Introduction to Entrepreneurial Minded Learning for Faculty of Foundational STEM Courses Using the KEEN FrameworkIntroduction
the agent and students’ interactions. See Figure 1.Figure 1 - Tripartite Framework for Creating Instructional Design Agents. Adapted from Schimpf, C., Huang, X., Xie,C., Sha, Z., & Massicotte, J. (2019). Developing instructional design agents to support novice and K-12 DesignEducation. In ASEE annual conference & exposition.The present work builds on past research in front-end design, engineering design in K-12 and AI ineducation and design to analyze how a collaborative learning environment with an AI-powered designmentor can support middle and high school students to engage in the messy, iterative, and open-endednature of front-end design challenges.Theoretical FrameworksThe two core frameworks guiding this work are 1) situated
Two Institutions," in ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, 2013.[10] M. Johnson and Y.-H. Lu, "Teaching Software Engineering Through Competition and Collaboration," in ASEE Annual Conference, Chicago, 2006.[11] J. Tuya and J. Garcia-Fanjul, "Teaching requirements analysis by means of student collaboration," in Frontiers in Education, San Juan, 1999.[12] M. Cohn, "Advantages of the “As a user, I want” user story template.," Mountain Goal Software, 25 April 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/blog/advantages-of-the-as-a-user-i-want-user- story-template. [Accessed 15 1 2020].[13] K. Wiegers, "10 Requirements Traps to Avoid," The Startup, 22 11 2019. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/swlh/10
. Fatehiboroujeni, and A. Akera, “From ”leaky pipelines” to ”diversity of thought”: What does ”diversity” mean in engineering education?” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASEE Conferences, June 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32861 [8] M. Mitchell, M. Leachman, and M. Saenz, “State higher education funding cuts have pushed costs to students, worsened inequality,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, vol. 24, pp. 9–15, 2019. [9] K. Babineau, “Closing the gap: An overview of the literature on college persistence and underrepresented populations.” Cowen Institute, 2018.[10] T. Mitropoulos and D. Bairaktarova, “Why engineering?–Exploring the link between students’ self-concepts and their person or
Engineering/Business SchoolEntrepreneurial Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition,Pittsburgh, PA, USA, June 22-25, 2008, pp. 13.384.1-13.384.9.[24] J. Rand, D. Bowie, D. Peter, A., and A. Donaldson, “Business And Engineering ProjectInteraction,” in Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT,USA, June 20-23, 2004, pp. 9.278.1 - 9.278.9.[25] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. “Criteria for Accrediting EngineeringPrograms, 2018 – 2019.” Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, [Online].Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2018-2019/, [Accessed: Oct. 1, 2018].[26] The Association
component of engineering education: International design projects,” American Society for Engineering Education Conference Paper, 2019.[29] M. C. Alves, “Preparing engineering college students for a culturally diverse global job market,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2018- June, no. December 2003, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30885.[30] A. Goncher and J. Devitt, “Development of global competencies through humanitarian engineering experiences,” 28th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, 2017.[31] J.-A. Panzardi, K. Disney, N. Cordoba-Velasquez, B. Faria, S. Kalman, and P. Mojica, “Development of the whole student through an engineering
students’ exposure to the four different realms of STEMduring secondary education. In turn, STEM degrees are not as prevalent in post-secondaryeducation as those from more established, traditional fields of study. The National Center forEducation Statistics (NCES) reports that of the 2 million bachelor’s degrees conferred during the2018-2019 period for US colleges, 6% (126,700) were in engineering, following behind business(19%), health-related programs (12%), and social sciences and history (8%) [12]. Similarly,more than 66% of the 1 million associate’s degrees awarded during the same period focused onone of three major areas of study: liberal arts and sciences, health professions, and business [13].There is a clear need to continue exposing
of teaching-focused faculty," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[2] S. Danielson, A. Kirkpatrick, and E. Ervin, "ASME vision 2030: Helping to inform mechanical engineering education," in 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011: IEEE, pp. T1J-1-T1J-6.[3] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein, "Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature," Journal of research in science teaching, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 952-984, 2011.[4] J. Smith and L. Herckis, "Understanding and overcoming institutional roadblocks to the adoption and use of technology-enhanced learning resources in higher education," ed: Pittsburgh
/accreditation-policy-and-procedure-manual-appm-2023-2024/[5] Hoople, Gordon D., and Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick. Drones for good: How to bringsociotechnical thinking into the classroom. Springer, 2022.[6] Reddy, Elizabeth, and Juan C. Lucena. "Engagement in practice paper: Engineering studentsvs. geological risk in the gold supply chain: Using geological risk in gold mining communities toovercome technical instrumentalism among engineering students." In ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition. 2019.[7] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Integration of theHumanities and Arts with Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in Higher Education: Branchesfrom the Same Tree. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018.[8] Snow, Charles
Strengthening Community College Engineering TransferPrograms.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018.4. US Census Bureau. (2019). QuickFacts: Texas. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/TX5. Texas A&M University – Kingsville. Interactive campus data.https://www.tamuk.edu/oira/institutional-data/Interactive-Campus-Data.html6. Acevedo-Gil, N., Santos, R. E., & Solorzano, D. G. (2014). Examining a rupture in theLatina/o college pipeline: Developmental Education in California community colleges. Issues inHigher Education Policy and Practice, 3, 1-19.7. Vasquez Urais, M. C. (2014). Predictors of sense of belonging among Latino men incommunity college. [Doctoral dissertation, San Diego State University
1994. Dr. Miguel’s professional interests involve image processing, machine learning, and engineering education especially active learn- ing, diversity, equity, and inclusion, retention, and recruitment. Her teaching interests include MATLAB, circuits, linear systems, and digital image processing. She is an ASEE Fellow and a member of the IEEE, SWE, and Tau Beta Pi. Currently, Dr. Miguel is the ASEE First Vice President and Vice President for External Relations which gives her a seat on the ASEE Board of Directors. Dr. Miguel has held several other officer positions across the ASEE including: Professional Interest Council I Chair, Division Chair and Program Chair of the ECE and New Engineering Educators Divisions
, June), Prototyping Strategies: Literature Review andIdentification of Critical Variables Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21848[7] Wettergreen, M., & Hinds, T. J. (2016, June), Rapidly Deployable Prototyping Activities toTeach Engineering Design. Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26036[8] Elegoo EL-KIT-003 UNO Project Super Starter Kit with Tutorial for Arduino available fromAmazon. https://www.amazon.com/Elegoo-Project-Starter-Tutorial-Arduino/dp/B01D8KOZF4/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1511792853&sr=1-1-spons&keywords=elegoo+arduino+uno&psc=1 [Accessed: 24- Jan 2019][9
. Järvelä, and H. Järvenoja, “Capturing temporal and sequential patterns ofself-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning,” ContemporaryEducational Psychology, vol. 49, pp. 160-174, Apr. 2017.[22] J. Zheng, W. Xing, and G. Zhu, “Examining sequential patterns of self-and socially sharedregulation of STEM learning in a CSCL environment,” Computers & Education, vol. 136, pp.34-48, July 2019.[23] L. L. Wu, R. Cassidy, J. M. McCarthy, J. LaRue, and G. Washington, “Implementation andimpact of a first-year project-based learning course,” in Proceedings of 2016 American Societyfor Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 26-29, 2016, New Orleans, LA. ASEE[24] L. L. WU, C. Fischer, F. Rodriguez, and G
. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, 2015.[28] B. B. Wheatley, K. M. Fischencih, L. Abrams, S. A. Sorby, H. S. Mali, A. K. Jain, and Donahue, T. L. H. Improvement of an international research experience: Year two. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, USA, 2017.[29] K. Fischer, Retention is a growing issue as more international students come to U.S. [online]. The Chronicle of Higher Education. , 2017. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/retention-is-a-growing-issue/146807 [Accessed Jan., 2019][30] A. A. Herrera, E. Specking, and R. Ham
accessed 2/4/2018. [2] D. Elzey, “Teaching Intro to Engineering in Context – UVA Engineering’s New Cornerstone,” in 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006, pp. 11.1212.1-11.1212.8. [3] K. G. Gipson, J. J. Henriques, and S. Sequeira, “Development and Implementation of a Cornerstone Course: Engineering Opportunities,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26.509.1-26.509.19. [4] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. Lovett, and M. K. Norman, How learning works: seven research-based principles for smart teaching, 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2010. [5] The Scrum Guide, http://www.scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html . Last accessed 2/3/2019. [6] K. S. Rubin
://peer.asee.org/17318[10] Slater, C. S., & Savelski, M., & Hesketh, R. (2006, June), Green Engineering DesignThrough Project-based Industrial Partnerships Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference &Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. https://peer.asee.org/168[11] Yousuf, A., & Mustafa, M., & De La Cruz, A. (2010, June), Project-based Learning Paperpresented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky.https://peer.asee.org/16081[12] Rossmann, J. S., & Stewart-Gambino, H. (2019, June), Cornerstone Design forSociotechnical "Grand Challenges" Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition , Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32551[13] Elzey, D. (2006, June), Teaching Intro To Engineering In Context
, BS), architecture (MArch), and civil engineering (PhD, MS, MPhil) facilitates systems-level research intersecting disciplinary boundaries. She specializes in implementing Lean-Integrated Project Delivery / Target Value Design simulation gaming tools to effectively address complex, multidisciplinary challenges, and has delivered a TEDx talk about illuminating lean efficiency principles and aligning multidisciplinary teams toward common goals. For her research in interdisciplinary systems thinking, Dr. Rybkowski has been awarded the J. Thomas Regan Interdisciplinary Faculty Prize, the Harold L. Adams Interdisciplinary Professorship in Construction Science, and in 2019 was named by Texas A&M as a prestigious
social justice movements, including if and how students and practitioners are addressing global inequality and the SDGs in career pathways, especially now, when activists are calling for the development sector to implement decolonized and anti-racist structures. Emma graduated from the California Polytechnic with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2019 and an M.S. in Irrigation Engineering in 2020.Prof. Amy Javernick-Will, University of Colorado Boulder Amy Javernick-Will is a Professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder in the Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering Department. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 How Decolonial and Anti
communication: How engineering students per- ceive gender typical speech acts in teamwork. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1):5–16, 2009.[10] Karen L Tonso. On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender, and power via engineering practice, volume 6. Brill, 2007.[11] Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W Malone. Ev- idence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. science, 330(6004):686–688, 2010.[12] Behzad Beigpourian and Matthew W Ohland. A systematized review: Gender and race in teamwork in under- graduate engineering classrooms. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[13] Jenni Buckley, Amy Trauth, Sara Bernice
disengagement in engineering education?,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0162243913504305.[22] A. Liu, “Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education,” High. Educ., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 383–397, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9394-7.[23] C. Turpen, J. Radoff, A. Gupta, H. Sabo, and A. Elby, “Examining how engineering educators produce, reproduce, or challenge meritocracy and technocracy in pedagogical reasoning,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32778. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32778.[24] A. E. Slaton, “Meritocracy, technocracy
Learning, and the Internet of Things (IoT). Prior to joining APSU, Dr. Haider taught more than ten undergraduate courses in the areas of engineering technology, embedded sys- tems, and digital circuits at the School of Engineering and Technology, Central Michigan University. Dr. Haider is an author of various publications including multiple journal/conference articles and book chap- ters on signal and image processing. He is an active member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and ASEE. Dr. Haider also serves as a reviewer for several conferences and journals, in- cluding IEEE WF-IoT, IEEE EIT, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Journal of Signal Processing Systems, and Remote Sensing of
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27284 on Micro/Nanosystems and Vibration and Sound, as well as the Design, Materials, and Manufacturing (DMM) Segment Leadership Team. Dr. Rhoads is a recipient of numerous research and teaching awards, including the National Science Foundation’s Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award; the Purdue University School of Mechanical Engineering’s Harry L. Solberg Best Teacher Award (twice), Robert W. Fox Outstanding Instructor Award, and B.F.S. Schaefer Outstanding Young Faculty Scholar Award; the ASEE Mechanics Division’s Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell
courses heavily focus on gravity systems’ analysis and design. All students were 4th yearstanding in 5-year program. None of the students in either offering had taken either classespreviously and all were architectural engineering majors with a structural focus. Also, the sameset of students were mandated to take both classes in their 4th year. As such, the student populationis identical from one class to the next which allowed for identical teams in both semesters. Thisresearch study has had two deployed iterations, the first was in the 2017-2018 academic year whilethe second was in the 2018-2019 academic year. The evaluation included student survey data ontheir experiences that was correlated to assessment grades.Course Structure CompositionThe
primary and secondary outreach programs. Dr. Weese has been a highly active member in advocating for computer science ed- ucation in Kansas including PK-12 model standards in 2019 with an implementation guide the following year. Work on CS teacher endorsement standards are also being developed. Dr. Weese has developed, organized and led activities for several outreach programs for K-12 impacting well more than 4,000 stu- dents.Mr. Salah Alfailakawi, Kansas State University Salah Alfailakawi is a PhD student in Educational Technology (ET) Graduate Programs at Kansas State University’s College of Education. His areas of interest include social/cultural issues in ET, the impact of ET on learners and teachers, as well
Conference (FIE), IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–5.[12] C. Leachman, J. Leachman, and J. Leachman, “If the Engineering Literature Fits, UseIt! Student Application of Grey Literature and Engineering Standards,” 2015 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Jul. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24218.[13] Konstantin Pervushin, M. Fosmire, and P. B. McPherson, “Standards are Everywhere: AFreely Available Introductory Online Educational Program on Standardization for ProductDevelopment,” Standards Engineering, Jan. 2018.[14] P. McPherson, M. Phillips, and K. Reiter, “Integrating Technical Standards into ETCurricula to Meet ABET standards and Industry Needs,” in 2019 CIEC, 2019.[15] P. McPherson and K. Reiter, “Providing Students with Practical Experience in
, S. Loeb, and E. S. Taylor, “Virtual classrooms: How online college courses affect student success,” American Economic Review, vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 2855–2875, 2017. [9] T. Easton, “Online versus in person student learning outcomes,” in 2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference, 2021.[10] D. Spencer and T. Temple, “Examining students’ online course perceptions and comparing student performance outcomes in online and face-to-face classrooms.” Online Learning, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 233–261, 2021.[11] B. W. McKeever, “Different formats, equal outcomes? comparing in-person and online education in public relations,” Journal of Public Relations Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–40, 2019.[12] J. Paul and F. Jefferson, “A comparative analysis