inclusivecampus climates, there is still underrepresentation of Blacks/African Americans,Latinx/Hispanics, and Native Americans (including Native Hawaiians and Alaska Natives)within the STEM professoriate nationwide. For students who are members of these groups, theculturally isolating experience this deficit creates can weaken one’s academic self-perception,and hinder performance in STEM disciplines. This paper explores the relationship betweenintentionality towards diversity and inclusion in faculty job postings and corresponding facultydemographics at a variety of US postsecondary institutions. The research questions we areinvestigating are: • In what ways are diversity and inclusion implicitly and explicitly addressed in the
engineering major Item Occurrence Average rank Self-led exploration of engineering disciplines 496 2.26 Advice from family or friends not at Purdue 349 2.89 Advice from other Purdue students 344 2.95 An "Engineering Your Major" session 274 2.63 An extracurricular activity or experience 256 2.83 Guest Presentations in ENGR131 166 3.15 Advice from a faculty member 162 3.48 Advice from an FYE Advisor
Paper ID #38710Linking Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Outcome Expectations,Interests, Career Goals, Self-Efficacy, Social Support, and Barriers inSingapore: A Social Cognitive Career Theory StudyMr. Tejas Gupta, Nanyang Technological University Tejas Gupta is an undergraduate student in his second year at Nanyang Technological University, majoring in mathematics. As a member of Dr. Yeter’s Research Team, Tejas is currently engaged in a study on social cognitive career theory. With a strong background in STEM education and data analysis, Tejas has gained a distinct insight into the influence of social and cognitive factors
bereavement within academia, particularly among graduate students and faculty,remains limited. Academics, especially women, already grapple with a myriad of demands, andgrief adds another layer of emotional, physical, and psychological challenges, disrupting work-life balance [11]. As grief in academia is multifaceted, there is a need for supportive andinclusive environments that acknowledge and address the diverse experiences of grief amongwomen in academia.Work-Life BalanceWork-life balance can be defined as the act of managing the responsibilities and roles that aperson assumes both in their workplace and personal life while being fully engaged in each roleand demonstrating an attitude of attentiveness and care [19], [20]. Work-life balance
right to education [35]. Today, higher education (includingstudents and faculty) would most likely be more diverse if not for systemic, structural, andinterpersonal sexism and racism that have acted and continue to act as barriers to graduateeducation and careers in the academe. These same systems and structures within highereducation that were intentionally designed to exclude women and people of color remainrelatively unchanged, thereby facilitating an inequitable culture that self-perpetuates, leading tothe disparities demonstrated by existing statistics and literature related to participation andpersistence.Furthermore, before marginalized students even apply to graduate school, they must have had topersist through an educational pathway
method study that aims to explore the impacts of intergenerational familypatterns on engineering students academic and career decisions. The research setting was a large,public, predominately white (PWI) southeastern university that has a College of Engineering andComputing with six engineering programs: aerospace, biomedical, chemical, civil andenvironmental, computer, electrical, and mechanical. The research study was approved by theinstitutional review board (IRB) of the university and qualified for exempt review. The researchmethod utilized in this paper was qualitative case study to “… reveal an in-depth understandingof a case or bounded system, which involves understanding an event, activity, process, or one ormore individuals” [45
decision-makingprocess are those that are challenging and applicable, provide students with new perspective, andstimulate self-reflection. Strategies should be focused on an orientation to learning includingbreaking down myths and basing a search process on individual identity. However, interactionswith others including faculty members, alumni, administrators, and other students influence astudent’s learning process and increase self-efficacy. Collaboration with other campus officesmore often provides load-leveling when staffing is slim as it is in most career services units ofcolleges and institutions. By partnering with academic units, career services can shareresponsibility in shaping students’ decision-making processes. This collaboration can
semesters includedthe provision of extra virtual and in-person office hours, grade curving, and recoding of zoomsessions to allow for an enhanced asynchronous learning experience. Faculty members alsoremained open to dropping the lowest grades for struggling students and encouraged students tokeep their cameras on to enhance class participation.Student Cheating Behavior, Contributing Factors and Prevention: Comparably to the Spring 2020 results, Fall 2020 interviews also revealed that studentcheating behavior remained present across universities. However, the degree and rate at whichcheating behaviors occurred was not as high as when the pandemic first started. This reducedrate of cheating can be attributed to the new efforts instituted by
AC 2011-1727: SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING CONTENTION: FACULTYAND STUDENT VIEWSCasey Canfield, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering A recent systems engineering graduate from Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, Class of 2010.Brittany Strachota, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Brittany Strachota is a member of the Class of 2013, studying engineering at Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering.Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Yevgeniya V. Zastavker is an Associate Professor of Physics at Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering. Her research interests lie at the intersection of project-based learning and gender studies with specific emphasis on the curricula and pedagogies
undergraduatecomputing students worked in teams to sketch and create ethics based decision making scenariosusing paper or blackboard. This scenario creation activity model was later refined and employedin different Ethics in Engineering courses as a means to increase engagement through gameplayand role playing.In 2022, this work was expanded by joining forces with engineering faculty from the Virtues andVocations initiative and the Ethics at Work project which included other computing faculty,faculty from Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, and faculty from Philosophy, where thegoal was to capture an engineering wide faculty and undergraduate student sentiment about ethicscontent in engineering. A multidisciplinary team of undergraduates, led by advising
readers, and(4) create recommendations on how this information can be used in student advising and inmentoring first-year engineering students.MethodsI. Resume AcquisitionResumes were collected from a subset of each graduating senior biomedical engineering cohortover the course of four years. This collection of resumes (n = 68) was then stored and protectedin accordance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) [13]. Resumes weregiven willingly to the primary faculty member overseeing this work and were de-identified uponrequest. The datasets and resume repositories containing identifying information were onlyaccessed by authorized users who have completed FERPA training. Upon further inspection ofthe resumes, three could not be
pages serve are engineering educators andfaculty members, similar to us, the authors of this paper. We are international engineeringeducators in the United States, who are in the early phases of our careers, and identify as womenof color. As universities switched to the online format during the Spring 2020 semester, we, likemany of our colleagues, had to adapt to new and unusual circumstances as well as makesignificant adjustments to our professional and personal lives. At the onset of the pandemic, wecreated a support group to share our experiences as we navigated these unprecedentedcircumstances. Through the course of the months following the sudden shift in learningenvironments, we continued to reflect and record our personal challenges of
emphasis includes faculty development and mentoring, graduate student development, critical thinking and communication skills, enhancing mathematical student success in Calculus (including Impact of COVID-19), and promoting women in STEM. Her technical research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, and multicriteria decision making. She also has extensive experience in K-12 STEM education and program evaluation and assessment. She has held a variety of administrative positions: 1) Director of STEM Faculty Development Initiatives-Clemson, 2) Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Sciences-Clemson, 3) Interim Director of Student
engineering lab, under the guidanceof an assigned mentor (usually a graduate student) and supervision of a faculty member. In thelab setting, students work on an authentic research project. Participants also attend a weeklyscientific communications class, weekly seminars, and social events. At the culmination of theexperience, students present a research talk to the research community and participate in a postersession at the university-wide Undergraduate Research Symposium. Students receive a $5,000stipend for participation in the program. Each lab that hosts a summer student receives $500 forsupplies and each student’s primary mentor receives $500 to support their travel to a conference.The YSP is funded by the National Science Foundation
. (1991). Evaluating and rethinking the case study. The Sociological Review, 39(1), 88-112.25. Padula, M. A. and Miller, D. L. (1999) Understanding graduate women’s reentry experiences: Case studies of four psychology doctoral students in a midwestern university. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 327-343.26. Mills, N. L., & McCright, P. R. (1993). Choosing the Ph. D. Path: A Multi-Criteria Model for Career Decisions. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(2), 109-117.27. Countryman, K. (2006). A comparison of adult learners' academic, social, and environmental needs as perceived by adult learners and faculty.(Doctoral dissertation).28. Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective
countries,such as Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) system in India. The objectives of the internationalREU program were similar in that undergraduate students from international institutions getimmersed in the university research environment, so they consider the graduate school option.The REU Program for National Students. The program coordinator emailed flyers to facultyat different supporting universities or travelled to various universities within driving distance topersonally recruit students. Utilizing an online application process, the program coordinator andseveral faculty members selected and matched top applicants with faculty members who sharemutual areas of interests in aerospace engineering. This meant that not one single
Paper ID #44307Developing a Learning Innovation for an Undergraduate Mechanical EngineeringCourse through Faculty, Engineer, and Student CollaborationDr. Sean Lyle Gestson, University of Portland Sean Gestson graduated from the University of Portland (UP) in 2016 with a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering and received his M.S. and Ph.D. in civil engineering with a research emphasis in engineering education from Oregon State University (OSU). During his time at OSU, Sean taught multiple undergraduate engineering courses including, geotechnical engineering, highway design, surveying, and senior capstone design. His
or mismatched understandingscan lead to inappropriate career decisions, ineffective curriculum, and poor performanceevaluations. This paper describes a process and defines the profile of an engineer performingwell in professional practice. Developed with input from both academic and non-academicengineers, the profile presents technical, interpersonal, and professional skills or behaviors thatalign with key roles performed by the engineer. The profile is a valuable resource for educatorsand for students aspiring to become high performing professionals in the field of engineering.IntroductionSociety holds high expectations of people in professions entrusted with the well-being of peopleand society as a whole. The engineering profession, for
Arizona State University, and has been a research faculty member at Brown University. A career-shift in 1984 led to 16 years of consulting in the private and public sector with primarily emphasis on organizational change, quality management, and employee participation. Starting in 2000, Alan began to focus on supporting higher education partners in projects that address broadening participation in the sciences, graduate student development, curriculum innovation, instructional technology, teacher professional development and other education reforms. For the past five years, Alan has been the lead evaluator for Epicenter, an NSF-funded STEP Center focused on infusing entrepreneurship and innovation into undergraduate
campuses. They then complete a poster-size GAPAhandout to explore opportunities for enhancing their students’ intrinsic motivation at theirinstitution. Workshop facilitators also encourage faculty members to hang their completedworksheets on the wall and participate in a modified Gallery walk [34]. After feedback anddiscussion, participants were asked to refine a final GAPA worksheet of their design. Figure 3. Simplified GAPA worksheet adapted from [33]Data AnalysisOur exploratory study applied an inductive and deductive approach to analyze and identifyemerging themes from participants’ responses [35]. Worksheets were collected, and participants’responses were de-identified and scanned. Responses were transcribed, organized
purposes other than matching yourpre- and post-experience responses. MENTORINGMentoring is an important aspect of an undergraduate research experience. A mentoring encounter is defined as anopportunity for you to interact with an individual (e.g., faculty member, post-doctoral or graduate student, staffmember, another student) who helps to guide you through your research experience. Mentoring encounters couldoccur on an individual basis (i.e., you and one person) or they may occur in group settings (e.g., weekly laboratorymeeting, group research team meeting). The questions in the next section explore your mentoring experiences inrelation to your summer research experience.1. Who do you consider
another endorsement of the ‘you’ve done goodthings.’” He hopes there is more freedom to work and less administrative duties involved in hisnew job after he earns his Ph.D. in comparison to the military lab.KristenSituating the CaseTaking the advice of an engineering faculty member, Kristen joined a non-profit organizationafter graduation for the summer to investigate cookstoves for developing countries. She met herhusband there, and they decided to spend the next few years fulfilling their humanitarian sense ofduty. Kristen was a pre-school teacher, worked with special needs children and adults, and re-joined the non-profit organization as a laboratory manager. She created test protocols, wrotereports, and traveled to developing countries. After
program for an average of 2.8semesters. All participants were born at the end of Generation X (1961-1981)1 or at thebeginning of the Millennial Generation (1982-2002)1. Their average age was 27 years old.Because of this, they may share characteristics commonly associated with one or bothgenerations.In comparison to the population of graduate student instructors in the College of Engineering, theEGSMs in our study have taught for more semesters on average and are more likely to expressinterest in a tenure or tenure-track faculty career (Table 1). Moreover, EGSMs are as likely toexpress interest in pursuing a career in industry. Survey respondents were allowed to choosemore than one potential career path (Table 1). Table 1. Comparison of
Society of Engineering Educa- tion with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential learning. She was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland).Dr. Rocio C. Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education Rocio Chavela is Director of Education and Career Development at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University, a B.S. and a M.S. in Chemical Engineering from Universidad de las Americas, Puebla in Mexico. Rocio’s current efforts focus on engineering faculty and graduate student development, with particular
Paper ID #30124An Autoethnography: Outcomes from Faculty Engagement in CourseDevelopment in a Large First-Year Engineering ProgramDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Holly M. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. She is current the Assistant Department Head for Undergraduate Programs and the former Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and practice related to graduate student mentoring. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, was nominated for a
top three criteria when choosing a place to publish your scholarly work? o #1 ________________________________________________ o #2 ________________________________________________ o #3 ________________________________________________5 When starting as a graduate student or new faculty member, how were you advised about publishingchoices? How do you advise undergraduate or graduate students on publishing scholarly outputs?6 When considering dissemination of scholarly activity, have you considered other options outside oftraditional publishing formats?7 Do you think publishing choices change over an academic career? If so, how?8 Do you think that promotion and tenure guidelines relate to scholarly publishing? o Yes o
federallyfunded research in mathematics, science, and engineering and encouraging United States citizensto work in these fields. Since we rely on public schools to provide high-school graduatesprepared to enter these careers and task our universities with preparing tomorrow’s innovativeworkforce, it is critical to examine our students’ perceptions of their own skill development,feelings of self- efficacy, and formation of STEM identities throughout the STEM pipeline.Underrepresentation of Women in EngineeringAs an underrepresented group in the STEM fields, young women’s standards for mathematicsachievement are lower than young men’s, resulting in lower self-efficacy and greater feelings ofself-doubt that negatively contribute to a woman’s decision to
engineering graduate programs22 and MOOCofferings, 23 are increasing as computer technology advances. Furthermore, the literature supportsthat e-learning is effective in achieving student learning outcomes.24-26We are in the third year of implementing this curriculum model at our campus. In spring 2016,we launched a pilot program to deploy these e-learning modules in engineering courses at otherinstitutions to assess their effectiveness in developing an entrepreneurial mindset in engineeringstudents. Six e-learning modules were deployed at 25 institutions across the country during the2016-17 academic year. We report findings based on data collected from the fall 2016deployment.BackgroundAt the University of New Haven we employ an innovative
well [laughter].” Other challenges encountered by mentors included: the mentor did not know much aboutthe student’s project, differential goals between the mentor and student, different preferences forwork time (early vs late in the day), communication, and having enough of a “heads-up” aboutgetting an REU student. This last challenge may be a factor of lack of communication betweenthe mentor and the supervising faculty member, as all faculty members were provided withinformation about their REU student prior to the start of the program.Discussion The purpose of the current study was two-fold: 1) to explore the ways in which graduatestudent mentors approach mentoring REU students; and 2) to study the impact of the
to be a role model 38 . In the long-run, we take much greater pride in the examplewe have set for students rather than the knowledge our students have gained from us. It is whatthey remember after they graduate. Yet in most teaching situations we are an idealized role model- measured by how “smart” someone can become after years of study. We keep our cool and makerational decisions because we already know where the class is going. The Faculty Ulysses Contractcan establish a faculty member as a much more realistic role model. We can display for them goodhabits of mind and action when they matter the most - when conditions are uncertain 30,31 .Courses that use a Ulysses Contract reward students who adopt a learning mindset. In the ab