experiment fills the need of emphasizing thesignificance of fatigue in aerospace structural design. Similar experiments could be duplicated atmost engineering universities, enhancing the undergraduate education in this important topic thatis sometimes overlooked at the undergraduate level.A survey of students taken before and after completing the course shows that graduates of thecourse have a significantly improved understanding the stress concentration effects and theirinfluence on the stress field. These students also have a significantly increased awareness of theimportance of fatigue in engineering practice. Their appreciation of the role of stressconcentrations on overall fatigue life, while possibly improved over the students entering
AC 2012-3782: COMPETITIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER-ING CAPSTONE DESIGN PROJECTS: STUDENT PREFERENCES ANDLEARNING OUTCOMESDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder (CU). She was attracted into environ- mental engineering as a high school student participating in a summer research program at Iowa State University. While at CU, she has mentored more than 30 undergraduate student research projects. Page 25.336.1
multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2022-2023 Outstanding Research Pub- lication Award by the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division I, 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award and the Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Distinguished Scholar Award. Dina’s dissertation proposal was selected as part of the top 3 in the 2018 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division D In-Progress Research Gala. Dina was a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and an
carryout research and assistance to institutions and universities in developing thecompetency based curriculum for engineering courses at various levels viz, Diploma,Degree and Post Graduate. The use of Information Communication Technology in the teaching learningprocess is promoted in India through a nationally coordinated project – National Projecton Technology Enhanced Learning. As part of this project, e-contents are developed forvarious courses and virtual laboratories are being established across the country. This paper discusses the above and similar practices in achieving qualityeducation in India and the areas of mutual collaboration with other countries
capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering
engineering ideas and concepts to practical problems.It became evident in the development of the project based curriculum that one aspect of project Page 7.35.1based learning that is not typically addressed in engineering curricula is the integration of Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationengineering ideas into a larger business framework. The disconnect between the coupling ofbusiness/market forces and engineering training is often seen in the product design process.Engineering training often
advanced manufacturing; silicon micro-fabrication; micro- electromechanical Systems (MEMS); and electronic and MEMS Packaging. He has authored over 85 technical publications, book chapter, and is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, American Society of Engineering Education, and Phi Kappa Phi. Dr. Mian is a recipient of MSU Presi- dent’s Pure Gold Award (2012), ASEE Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Best Paper Award (ASEE Conference 2011), IMAPS Conference Best Paper Award (1999), and Graduate Research Forum Award (1998). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
big enough” One day a colleague stopped by Barbara’soffice to comment “Being the best industrial research lab in the world doesn’t do it for me. ButI’d get up in the morning to be best for the world.” It was with that minor “tweak” that the visionfor the lab began to generate sufficient enthusiasm to truly have an impact on the culture in thelab. As we studied this book on the flight home and in the days following our return, as a groupwe realized that there were real possibilities for our organization also.Three QuestionsAt the EELI, and at our initial meetings back in Madison, we began to realize that we wereconfronting three questions central to institutional change in a world of changing demographics,scarce resources, and globalization
. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13, pp. 909-922, 2019.[28] T. Litzinger, L.R. Lattuca, R. Hadgraft, & W. Newstetter, “Engineering education and the development of expertise,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 123-150, 2011.[29] P. Tynjälä, R.T. Salminen, T. Sutela, A. Nuutinen, & S. Pitkänen, “Factors related to study success in engineering education,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 221-231, 2005.[30] B.A. Brown, J.M. Reveles, & G.J. Kelly, “Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning
of knowledge” from the American Academy of EnvironmentalEngineers and Scientists (AAEES) and Army doctrine. The interaction of these two professionalaspects, and how they are integrated into the engineering design project, will be presented. Thedeliberate blending of these critical components from each perspective to meet both the needs ofthe engineering profession and the needs of active duty military service will be discussed.Although meaningful assessment of the impact of this educational approach is not borne out untilstudents have graduated, the faculty at our institution have assessment data that demonstrate thevalue of this approach for future personal and professional growth.Introduction One of the common attributes of a
University to assessthe impact of the Collaborative Engineering Program on its cohort of students.1.1 Research QuestionsThe long-term goal of this research is to improve understanding of how students become proficient atinterdisciplinary design for the purpose of creating better curricula to develop graduates with those skills.To facilitate this goal, the primary research method used was to observe engineering students from boththe Collaborative Engineering Program and not in the program working on interdisciplinary design teamson an engineering design activity. It uses a mixed-methods approach to address two main objectives,interdisciplinary collaboration and engineering design, by addressing two high level research questions.Research Question 1
course to take in the upcoming semester.Staff members report that since the practice of PCP was started in early 2020, most studentsfollow the PCP designed for them and self-enroll without the need to be reminded. It appears thePCP serves as a road map that gives the student some autonomy to take charge of their programof study. This in turn results in higher engagement with the program and timely degreecompletion. Of course, unplanned events occur that might necessitate a student to deviate fromtheir PCP, either in terms of changing elective courses they wish to take or inability to enroll in aterm which might impact their PCP. In such a case an advising session with the program Directortakes place and a revised PCP is created for them.Program
learning skills withinthe cognitive domain. Over 90 distinct learning skills are grouped into skill clusters that fallwithin process areas aligned with Bloom's taxonomy. Learning skills within the classificationapply from pre-college through graduate study. Candidate skills were inventoried fromnumerous literature sources and then validated, positioned, and refined through deliberations ofan inter-disciplinary focus group. This paper includes a holistic rubric for defining, measuring,and elevating individual learning skills as well as discussion of how targeting specific skills canstrengthen activity design, facilitation of learning, and classroom assessment.NEED FOR LEARNING SKILL CLASSIFICATIONEducators committed to applying learning theory to
a project that ultimately resulted in a publication [7]. The otherproject led to a start-up company, formed by a May 2009 Rowan graduate; which is continuingthe product development that began in the Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic.VII. References1. L.R. Latucca, P.E. Terenzini and J. F. Volkwein, “Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000,”ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD 2006.2. K. D. Dahm and J. A. Newell, “Baseball Stadium Design: Teaching Engineering Economics and TechnicalCommunication in a Multi-Disciplinary Setting,” Journal of SMET Education: Innovations and Research, 2, 1(2001).3. W. Riddell, P. Jansson, K. Dahm, H. Benavidez, J. Haynes, D. Schowalter, “Conservation of Energy for CampusBuildings: Design, Communication and
: 2000,” pp. 84, Table 116. 7 A. Scott, G. Steyn, A. Geuna, S. Brusoni, W. E. Steinmeuller, “The Economics Returns of Basic Research and the Benefits of University-Industry Relationships,” Science and Technology Policy Research, Brighton: University of Sussex, 2001. 8 “Social Rate of Return” is defined in C. I. Jones and J. C. Williams, “Measuring the Social Return to R&D,” Working paper 97002, Stanford University Department of Economics, 1997. 9 W. M. Ayers, “MIT: the impact of innovation,” Boston, MA: Bank Boston, 2002. 10 US Commission on National Security, “Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change,” Washington, DC, US Commission on National Security, 2001. 11 National Science Board, “Science and Engineering
AC 2012-2991: DESIGN OF A ZERO ENERGY HOME AS A FIRST-YEARDESIGN PROJECTProf. Andrew Lau, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andrew (Andy) S. Lau is Associate Professor of engineering and Coordinator of first-year seminars for the Penn State College of Engineering. Lau is a 1977 graduate of Penn State with a B.S.M.E. and was a Research Fellow and 1983 graduate of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, with an M.S.M.E. He has worked since 1977 as an engineer in the areas of solar energy applications in buildings, simulation of building energy use, and general consulting in the energy field. Most recently, his work has involved green buildings, engineering ethics, and sustainable design. He is a licensed
Science Teaching (42 (2), 185-217. 3. Fishman, B., R. Marx, S. Best and R Tal, (2002). A Design Approach to Professional Development: Linking Teacher and Student Learning in Systemic Reform, Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. 4. Garet, M.S., A.C. Porter, L. Desimone, B.F. Birman, and K.S. Yoon, (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers, American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945. 5. Loucks-Horsley, S., N. Love, K.E. Stiles, S. Mundry and P. Hewson, (2003). Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics, 2nd Edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc
failure rate that is 75% lower than those who do not, see Table 1 [1].Research also shows that project management regularly ranks high on the list of essential skillsthat experienced practitioners say new engineering graduates need [2]. Fundamental technical content takes up the bulk of the typical undergraduate engineeringcurriculum, leaving little room for a course that would focus on both the hard and soft skills ofproject management. However, the importance of developing engineering students’ projectmanagement skills should not be discounted. Standard practice is to include a one or twosemester design project for senior engineering students, often referred to as the capstone course.Such courses are an ideal forum for providing project
. 28th Annual (Vol. 3, pp. 1133–1138). IEEE.Guglielmino, L. M. (1991). Developing self-directed learners: Why and how. Changing Schools, 19 (2), 6-7 &11.Mabrouk, P. A., & Peters, K. (2000). Student perspectives on undergraduate research (UR) experiences in chemistry and biology. CUR Quarterly, 21(1), 25–33.Porter, L. A. (2017). High-impact practices in materials science education: Student research internships leading to pedagogical innovation in STEM laboratory learning activities. MRS Advances. doi:10.1557/adv.2017.106 7Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., McCullough, J., Roessner, J. D., & Storey, C. (2005). Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate
educational rewards of teaching to the mentors. The minor designrecognizes the key importance of having a broad, diverse team not only design, but also buildand test their design.We are in the process of declaring our first students and graduating some that have alreadyfulfilled the requirements through their work on ongoing team projects. Specializations such asSpace Systems, Global Health, Sustainable Energy, and Service Learning are currently beingfinalized. With the approval of these specializations, we are anticipating a large number ofstudents to be part of the Multidisciplinary Design Minor experience. We are also nowdeveloping the methods for which we can more quantitatively study the impact and outcome ofthis program for our
ECE design project reports consistentlyrevealed that design content was consistent with WPI’s and ABET’s expectations, reviewers alsonoted that some considerations of the design process—for example safety, reliability, aesthetics,ethics, and social impact—were not evident from the report documentation. Similarly, notenough reports revealed appropriate use of simulation and design analysis steps, or consistentlymade clear how students synthesized designs from user requirements, design criteria, andtechnical specifications. These shortcomings were in some cases exacerbated by students’ lackof experience in applying fundamental principles in the context of the design process.The faculty concluded that a formative ECE design experience could
completed including an inventionthat was recognized as one of the nation’s best in 2005 and a product that is being sold across thenation. Finally, we will reveal ways that K-State is realizing an economic benefit from theseactivities that goes beyond licensing intellectual properties and includes the production and salesof products.The program described in this paper enhances the education of university students whilesimultaneously deriving economic benefits for both university programs and private enterprise.This model increases the readiness of graduates for professional work, increases the likelihood offinancial returns to the university, transforms university intellectual property into market-readyproducts, and provides a resource to
scholarship of teaching. His efforts in leading the Sustainable Buildings program were recognized with the 2019 Award for Excellence in Education Abroad Curriculum Design. He has also worked as a construction project engineer, consultant, and safety inspector. He believes educating the next generation of professionals will be pivotal in sustainability standard practices. Regarding engagement, Dr. Valdes-Vasquez has served as the USGBC student club’s adviser and the ASC Sustainability Team’s faculty coach since 2013. He is a CSU President’s Sustainability Commission member, among multiple other committees. In addition, he is involved with various professional organizations at the national level, including the
< 0.05 in paired t-tests 10of Engineering, an experiment was performed in which five recent high school graduates, whohad not yet taken college courses, were asked to design and build a pulse oximeter in five weeks.They did not fail as expected, but built a functional device that reportedly “performed wellagainst a hospital version of the device brought in for calibration [27].” These results spurredOlin to consider that engineering educators may be underestimating how well students learnindependently, and that student engagement can significantly impact attitudes, behaviors, andmotivation [27]. The Olin curriculum contains a
roles and responsibilities of professional engineers is better defined andthe need for graduate-level engineering education has received more comprehensive study.Consequently, it’s important to define certain terms and principles that are foundational for theconclusions presented herein.The term Professional EngineerThe term “Professional Engineer” is a legal term set in state statute, as only those engineerslicensed by a state or U.S. territory can refer to themselves as a Professional Engineer (or PE).The license allows PEs to practice engineering (defined by these same state statutes) involvingthe protection of public health, safety and welfare where non-licensed engineers cannot. Similarto other professions, licensing is granted state-by
(1), 21-51.3. Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. A Status Report for The National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education.4. Linenberger, K., Slade, M.C., Addis, E.A., Elliott, E.R., Mynhardt, G., & Raker, J.R. (2014). Training the foot soldiers of inquiry: Development and evaluation of a graduate teaching assistant learning community. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(1), 97-107.5. Bohrer, K., Ferrier, A., Johnson, D., & Miller, K. (2007). TA training workshops. In K.L. Chase (Ed.), Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE) Proceedings, 29, 67
Carnegie Foundation forthe Advancement of Higher Education. Initially, 15 graduate students expressed interest in theprogram. These students were divided into two separate peer groups. Over eight consecutiveweeks, these groups met and each participant built their own teaching portfolio. The programwas completely voluntary; participants did not receive course credit or compensation for theirparticipation.We designed a qualitative, ethnographic research study9 to formatively evaluate the EngineeringTeaching Portfolio Program and to understand the meaning of the program for its participants.Consistent with ethnographic approaches, we collected data from a variety of sources in order toenhance the rigor, or trustworthiness of our results9. We used
) information for future space studyresearchers to use.Literature Review The focus of most studies on University spaces has been based on the studentengagement framework to explore the role of various study spaces on the university campus (e.g.[1], [2], [3], [4], [13]). Riddle and Souter [5] argued that current practices in designing studentstudy spaces ignore students’ perspectives and reproduce environments that are familiar but lesssuitable for active peer learning and learning supported by technologies that students prefer.Although many researchers have attempted to find the students’ perspectives through varioussurvey instruments, not many have used ethnographic surveys. A study by Harrop and Turpin[3], explored learners’ with photographic
Coasts. In fact, from the Florida Panhandle to theLouisiana-Texas boarder, there are no graduate programs in coastal engineering on the centralGulf Coast. The inadequate coastal engineering research and education in the Gulf Coast regionare reflected in the failures of civil engineering infrastructure and buildings seen in the HurricaneKatrina’s aftermath. We use the collapse of coastal bridges during Hurricane Katrina as anexample to demonstrate the need for and importance of coastal engineering research andeducation in hurricane-prone areas. An examination of the engineering practice in thetransportation engineering community has indicated transportation engineers often rely oncoastal engineers to assist their design and construction of
students to interact directly with high schoolteachers and assist in designing research-focused curriculum to motivate and excite students into pursuingSTEM careers. A multi-level mentoring experience was created by pairing the RET participants with theREU students, faculty mentors and graduate students. RET participants joined 4 weeks before the end ofthe program. RET welcoming events were added to foster inclusion into the research environment. Onesuch event, REU science chalk talks, enabled both groups to ask and answer questions, creating a uniquebond. Teachers were learning from the REU students which reinvigorated learning and teachingexperiences for all. The program achieved its overarching goals with noticed improved mentoring