Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

,” Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference, 2014 17. Ernst, J., Bottomley, L., Parry, E., “Term Analysis of an Elementary Engineering Design Approach,” Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference, 2012 18. Lundstrom, K., Moskal, B., “Measuring the Impact of an Elementary School Outreach Program on Student’s Attitudes toward Mathematics and Science,” Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference, 2012 19. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., Rogers, C., “Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms,” Journal of Engineering Education, VOL 97, Issue 3, pages 369-387, July 2008 20. Tran, N., Nathan, M., “Pre-College Engineering Studies: An Investigation of the Relationship Between Pre- college Engineering Studies and

Conference Session

Student Experiences and Motivation: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba; Marcia R Friesen P.Eng., University of Manitoba; Sandra Ingram, University of Manitoba; Douglas Warren Ruth

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

: Cambridge University Press. 5. Hirshfield, L. Whinnery, J. L., Gilbuena, D. M. and Koretsky, M. 2014. A study of feedback provided to student teams engaged in open-ended projects. In 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education. Indianapolis, IN. June 15-18. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings (2015/01/15). 6. Litzinger, J.A., L. R. Lattuca, R. G. Hadgraft and W. C. Newstetter. 2011. Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1): 123-150. 7. Smith, K. A., S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson. 2005. Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jared David Berezin, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Jane Kokernak, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division: Sustainability and Hands-On Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

Conference Session

Tips of the Trade: Best Practices, Expanded Advice, and Strategies for Implementable Course Improvement

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren Thomas Quigley, University of Washington; Mania Orand, Human Centered Design and Engineering ; Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of Washington; Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

 an array of active learning approaches that pique their interest and spark excitement about the possible outcomes for their students. After initial exposure to new activities, contextual questions naturally arise for educators, and a clear understanding of the essential features for successfully implementing a teaching strategy becomes necessary. Reflection activities represent one approach for active learning that educators reasonably have questions about before adopting the approach.  Reflection is a topic that can have various meanings. For this project, reflection was conceptualized with the following definition: looking back on the past experience(s), to interpret and make meaning of those experiences in order to plan for the future [1

Conference Session

Socio-Technical Issues in Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Kenny Feister, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David H. Torres, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

stakeholders, and a concurrent lack ofinfluence offered by more abstracted stakeholders. Another interpretation of this finding suggests that ethics in these teams was directed byand linked to a human-centered orientation. Many students were not able to expand thisorientation beyond overt or clear links between their everyday work and the specific humanstakeholders involved. This finding supports Zoltowski et al.’s (2012) discussion of theimportance of critical experiences in aiding students’ experiences of HCD. Critical experiencesmay include meetings with users or other events that students found transformative to theirthinking about the stakeholders and their user’s experiences. It is difficult to distinguish theorigin of the human-centered

Conference Session

Computer Modeling/CAD in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aneet Dharmavaram Narendranath, Michigan Technological University; Prathamesh Prashant Deshpande, Michigan Technological University; Madhu Kolati, Michigan Technological University; Datta Sandesh Manjunath, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

beencorrected by the authors. (S)he also mentions that “The first sentence in the third paragraph ispatently untrue”. This is obfuscating since it is not clear to the authors whether the reviewer isreferring to the first sentence of the third paragraph in the abstract or that in the section on“Introduction and Philosophy”. Nevertheless, we examine both and make a change to the firstsentence of the third paragraph in the abstract: • “Problems in polar coordinates are complex in comparison to those in rectilinear coordinates. This is because of the requirement of symmetry boundary conditions or the neglect of constants of integration to avoid singularity type of errors when solving polar coordinate problems analytically.” has been

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University; Nasser Alaraje, Michigan Technological University; Scott A Kuhl, Michigan Technological University; Mark Highum, Bay de Noc Community College; Mark Bradley Kinney, Bay de Noc Community College; James Walker, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Conference Session

The Best of First-Year Programs Division

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darlee Gerrard, University of Toronto; Kirstin Newfield, University of Toronto; Narges Balouchestani Asli, University of Toronto; Chirag Variawa, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Burns, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Bob E. White P.E., Western Michigan University; Azim Houshyar, Western Michigan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

sources. Most students were able to identify potential moral or ethicalproblems and were also able to draw appropriate connections between personal morals, the Codeof Ethics for Engineers, and the situations described in the cases. Not surprisingly, studentsoften took strong positions surrounding the central issue(s) in the cases. The main difficultystudents had with was articulating a counter perspective when they perceived a clear ethicalproblem.The papers were evaluated using a scoring rubric in which points were awarded for addressingthe guiding questions (10 points), quality of writing (5 points), and how well they justified theirfinal position on the case (5 points). The summary from Part 1 was evaluated against the guidingquestions and

Conference Session

Assessment and Research Tools

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David DiBiasio, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Kristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Leslie Dodson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Paula Quinn, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; John Bergendahl, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; John M. Sullivan Jr, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Glenn R. Gaudette, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Curtis Abel, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Laura A. Robinson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Sarah Wodin-Schwartz P.E., Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Institutional Change

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashish Agrawal, Virginia Tech; Cassandra J. Groen, Virginia Tech; Amy L. Hermundstad Nave, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech; Thomas Martin, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge, 3rd Edition: Preparing the Future Civil Engineer

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Norman D. Dennis Jr. P.E., University of Arkansas; Decker B Hains P.E., Western Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

secondary schools) led by Benjamin S. Bloom,committed themselves to create this common framework. They met annually as a working groupthrough the late 1940s and early 1950s to create a common framework for the characterizationand assessment of educational activities. Their goal was to create a common hierarchal set ofterms and language that characterized educational objectives in a uniform and repeatable way.The publication describing their early work presented the concept of three domains ofeducational activities. Those domains included the cognitive, which deals with the recognitionof knowledge and the progressive development of intellectual abilities; the affective domain,which describes changes in interests, attitudes, and values; and the

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Corple, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David H. Torres, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Katharine E. Miller; Megan Kenny Feister, California State University, Channel Islands; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. Informal language: contractions (I’ve), wording (a lot) or starting a sentence with and or butThe language of engineering writing is more formal than other types of writing such as fiction. For thatreason, using contractions or beginning a sentence with a conjunction is too informal for most engineeringdocuments.References1. R. House, A. Watt, and J. Williams (2007, June), “Assessing The Impact of Pen Based Computing on Students’ Peer Review Strategies Using the Peer Review Comment Inventory,” 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/2052.2. C. Nicometo, K. Anderson, T. Nathans-Kelly, S. Courter, and T. McGlamery (2010, June), “More Than Just Engineers―How Engineers Define and Value Communication

Conference Session

Track: Learning Spaces, Pedagogy, & Curriculum Design Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Alisha L. Sarang-Sieminski, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Adva Waranyuwat, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Emily Ferrier, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Alison Wood , Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Daniela Faas, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Learning Spaces, Pedagogy & Curriculum Design

,QYHVWLJDWLRQRIWKH0RWLYDWLRQRI&ROOHJH6WXGHQWVZLWK 1RQYLVLEOH'LVDELOLWLHVWR8WLOL]H'LVDELOLW\6HUYLFHV´-RXUQDORI3RVWVHFRQGDU\(GXFDWLRQDQG 'LVDELOLW\YROQRSS .5LYLRX*.RXURXSHWURJORX12LNRQRPLGLV³$1HWZRUNRI3HHUVDQG3UDFWLFHVIRU$GGUHVVLQJ /HDUQHU9DULDELOLW\8'/QHW´,Q6WXGLHVLQ+HDOWK7HFKQRORJ\DQG,QIRUPDWLFV$VVLVWLYH 7HFKQRORJ\,263UHVV$PVWHUGDP7KH1HWKHUODQGV9ROSSí 5XEULFIRUD8'/6\OODEXV8'/8QLYHUVH$&RPSUHKHQVLYH8QLYHUVDO'HVLJQIRU/HDUQLQJ)DFXOW\ 'HYHORSPHQW*XLGH>2QOLQH@$YDLODEOHKWWSHQDFWVRQRPDHGXFSKS"J S >$FFHVVHG)HE@ 8QLYHUVLW\RI:DVKLQJWRQ³'2,7´'R,7QG>2QOLQH@$YDLODEOHKWWSVZZZZDVKLQJWRQHGXGRLW >$FFHVVHG)HE@ 86'HSDUWPHQWRI(GXFDWLRQ1DWLRQDO&HQWHUIRU(GXFDWLRQ6WDWLVWLFV'LJHVWRI(GXFDWLRQ 6WDWLVWLFV&KDSWHUKWWSVQFHVHGJRYSURJUDPVGLJHVWGFKBDVS

Conference Session

DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors

Conference Session

The Best of First-year Programs Division

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

George James Lamont, University of Waterloo; Kari D. Weaver, University of Waterloo; Rachel Figueiredo, University of Waterloo; Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo; Andrea Jonahs, University of Waterloo; Heather A. Love, University of Waterloo; Brad Mehlenbacher, University of Waterloo; Carter Neal, University of Waterloo; Katherine Zmetana, University of Waterloo; Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Mehlenbacher for her valuableadvice about how to teach and enhance these courses. Finally, we extend our gratitude toFrederick Yu and Quincy Hou for helping us set up our online document and data sharing forthis project, and further thanks to Frederick Yu for his extensive review of the paper.References[1] ABET. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020.” ABET. pp. 4-6.https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/ (accessed February 1, 2020).[2] K. A. Douglas, C. Rohan, M. Fosmire, C. Smith, A. Van Epps and S. Purzer. “‘I just GoogleIt’: A qualitative study of information strategies in problem solving used by upper and lowerlevel engineering students,” presented at

Conference Session

Opening Up: Data, Open Access, and Open Educational Resources

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Leena N. Lalwani, University of Michigan; Paul F. Grochowski, University of Michigan; Jamie M. Niehof, University of Michigan; Craig E. Smith, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

Years Later: The North Carolina State University Perspective,”Against the Grain, v.13, no.6 p.22+, 2001. [Online].DOI: 10.7771/2380-176X.3642[2] J. Waters, J. Roach, J. Emde, S. McEathron, and K. Russell, “A Comparison of E-Book andPrint Book Discovery, Preferences, and Usage by Science and Engineering Faculty and GraduateStudents at the University of Kansas,” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Winter2014. [Online]. DOI:10.5062/F48G8HN5[3] A.J. Carroll, K. Corlett-Rivera, T. Hackman, and J. Zou, “E-Book Perceptions and Use inSTEM and Non-STEM Disciplines: A Comparative Follow-Up Study,” portal: Libraries and theAcademy, v.16 no.1 p.131-162, 2016. [Online]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2016.0002[4] M. Wiese and G. Du Plessis

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wendi M. Kappers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Martha Nanette Harrell, Arkansas Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

administration and industry mentorship planning used to increase enrollments of woman and minorities with declared majors in the areas of Computer Sci- ence (CS), Engineering (E), Mathematics (M), and Science (S). Currently, Dr. Kappers is an Assistant Professor within the M.S. in Information Security & Assurance (MISA) within Embry-Riddle Aeronau- tical University’s (ERAU) College of Business, Worldwide Campus, and teaches within the College of Engineering for the Daytona Beach Campus of ERAU. Teaching responsibilities include: RSCH 202 – Introduction to Research, CS120 – Introduction to Computing in Aviation, and the entire collection of MISA-related program courses as needed. Both positions allow her to stay focused

Collection

2016 St.Lawrence Section Meeting

Authors

Rebecca K. LaForest; Iulian Gherasoiu; Daniel White; Harry Efstathaidis

Conference Session

New Tools in Teaching and Learning Biomedical Engineering Concepts

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vikki Hazelwood, Stevens Institute of Technology; Arthur Ritter, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

organizations, including co-investigators, federal and stateregulatory agencies, and the IRB(s) overseeing the research may receive yourinformation during the course of this study. Except when required by law, studyinformation shared with persons and organizations outside of Stevens will notidentify you by name, social security number, address, telephone number, or anyother direct personal identifier.Confidentiality of Your Study InformationYour study records include information that identifies you and that is kept inresearch files. We will try to keep this information confidential, but we cannotguarantee it. If data from this study are to be published or presented, we will firsttake out the information that identifies you.Retention of Your Study

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

sameer prabhu, The MathWorks; Zachariah Chambers, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Liz Callanan, The MathWorks; Marc Herniter, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Conference Session

Our Future in Manufacturing

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott Danielson, Arizona State University; Trian Georgeou, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Page 12.1472.9Technology programs in 2007 and was generated from responses to the spring 2007 METsurvey. The 2007 MET survey added four additional questions to the 2005 survey. One of theadditional questions asked MET programs to list their perceived strength(s), particularly thosestrengths attracting new students. We hope these strength data provide information about whattype of manufacturing curriculum attracts students to MET programs. A question pertaining tograduate level degrees was also added to the survey, as the 2005 survey did not specifically askprograms if a M.S. in Manufacturing Engineering Technology was offered.The graduate starting salary question was modified from a two-part question where a yes/noquestion was followed by a

Conference Session

How to Effectively Teach Using Teams

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristopher Lengieza, Weitz Golf International; Jennifer Caffrey, Pennoni Associates Inc.; Gerard Lennon, Lehigh University; John Ochs, Lehigh University; Joe Sterrett, Lehigh University; Vincent Munley, Lehigh University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

with the coaches of various sports who acted as the client(s),recruited a group of faculty advisors in each of the home departments who were willingto supervise the individual students, helped arrange support from the university facilityservices (blue prints, topographic maps, utility information, etc), and helped provide theresources beyond the ability of the students to obtain, such as real pricing from actualconstruction companies, clearance for issues such as candidate sites for projects, andrealistic budget. They also often made public announcements, and arranged for studentsto present one of the projects to the Lehigh University Board of Trustees, and helpedarrange for a truly broad audience that included upper-level facilities staff

Conference Session

Case Studies & Engineering Education Around the Globe

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

International

the classes taught by the aforementionedfaculty are small size, seldom exceeding 35 students per class. The lecture format dominates theseen. Students listen, take notes, and are allowed to ask questions at the end of the lecture orduring office hours. There seem to be less interest (by most of the faculty interviewed) in theprocess by which the course content is delivered during the lecture period, and more of a concernwhether the rate of delivery would allow the instructor to finish the course on time. The viewsexpressed by the faculty and the impression(s) arrived at by the author, leads one to believe thatit is highly unlikely that new more effective teaching-learning strategies would be deployed anytime soon, unless drastic measures are

Conference Session

K-12 Programs (Co-sponsored by K-12 Division)

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Virnoche, Humboldt State University; Elizabeth Eschenbach, Humboldt State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Educational Software

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeff Joines, North Carolina State University; Stephen Roberts, North Carolina State University; Dianne Raubenheimer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

students having the sameprogramming language, let alone a uniform programming experience. To complicate mattersfurther many of our students took their introductory programming course at regional communitycolleges. It has been observed that anyone foolish enough to make a programming assignmentalmost surely risks lowering their course evaluation. Borrowing an idiom “the more computingchanges, the more the introductory programming course remains the same.” Can theintroductory programming course be changed to render it more beneficial both to the studentsand the faculty? Can we identify a rationale that allows us to create a more relevant computingexperience? In this paper we make several s regarding the computing experience for engineersand suggest

Conference Session

Engineering and Math Potpouri

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S.K. Sen, Florida Institute of Technology; Gholam Ali Shaykhian, NASA

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

. during300,000 BC-250 BC. Section 3, on the other hand, is an exposition of mathematical ingenuityto perform computation during pre-computer era, i.e., during 200 BC till the birth of anelectronic digital computer during early twentieth century. Section 4, on the other hand,presents the impact of ever increasing power of computing on the computing scenario since theappearance of the first digital computer during 1940’s. Section 5 comprises conclusions.2. Computing Scenario During Pre-historic Era (300,000 BC – 250 BC)Universe is a gigantic errorless never-stoppable parallel computer with infinite precisionBefore 15 trillion BC, the universal errorfree computer boots up with a Big Bang. Since thenthe computing in nature/universe is going on continuously

Conference Session

Experiential and Service Learning

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Larry Bland, John Brown University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering