experience wherestudents from each of the participating institutions worked collaboratively in support of theoverall research project. To enhance the students’ education, they spent several weeks in afocused experience at two of the universities with visits to the others. The intent was to broadentheir perspectives on the operations at different schools and promote interest in graduate schoolwhile learning about product platform planning. We describe the structure of the program alongwith the activities undertaken by the students. We also include an assessment of the program bythe students and plans for improving our future offering of this program.NomenclatureBOM Bill of MaterialsDSM Design Structure MatrixEBOM Enhanced Bill of
- Page 9.283.4ess, initially utilizing the first three of four sequential levels proposed by Jones in his “model for Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationethical decision making”: recognizing a moral issue, making a moral judgment, and establishingmoral intent [48]. In doing this, we drew upon Pinkus, Chi, McQuaide and Pollack’s experiencegained in the cognitive study they conducted to understand how students learn ethics using acase-based reasoning approach [49]. This study was part of a larger initiative that developedPETE (Project Professional Ethics Tutoring Environment) a web-based tutoring
. Configure VLANs c. Configure routing subnets and VLAN bindings d. Test and troubleshoot connectivity 7. Network Management a. Programmatically access MIBs on Workstations b. Programmatically access MIBs on network Devices. c. Do simple monitoring of variables d. Do threshold based alarm notification. 8. Final Team Project counts as 3 Labs.We have created a table that helps to focus our thinking on the relationships between thetheoretical and the applied. The extract below includes two of the fundamental conceptswith their associated instances and the experiential learning in the lab. A more completetable is included as Appendix C.Fundamental Concept
their compatriots at university? Page 22.776.7It is against this cultural/historical background that the Ministry of Education detailed itsrecommendations in circular 323 under the following headings: (a) The inclusion of additional subjects in programmes. (b) The broadening of the treatment of technical and scientific subjects. (c) Increased use of the college library, of seminars, of discussion groups, directed study periods, and projects; and in general the fostering of a tutorial relationship between teaching staff and students on the lines of that used in universities. (d) The encouragement of corporate life in
boundaries.Underrepresented Populations in Engineering EducationAmerica is becoming an increasingly diverse nation. Many minority groups and women havebeen underrepresented in the engineering education path and workforce. It is projected that moreengineering challenges will affect this broader population, and thus these individuals are neededwithin engineering.1 The demand today for employees who speak foreign languages and areinternationally savvy is also greater than ever. However, relatively few minorities enroll incollege international programs, and few choose careers that involve global work.2There is large and growing literature examining women’s and minorities experience with theengineering education process. Beddoes, Borrego, and Jesiek3 performed a
, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Alice L. Pawley is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a Ph.D. minor in Women’s Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s ADVANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist Engineering (RIFE) group, whose projects are described at the group’s website, http://feministengineering.org/. She is interested in creating new
cells, new materials and experimental cells, and the theoretical efficiency ofnanocrystal-based systems. Apart from these imagined theoretical data, the report does notexplain the net-gains of each solar energy project, the overall costs per unit energy generationand delivery, or the political landscape that shapes America’s renewables energy policy (e.g.,Obama Administration support for renewables on the affirmative side and fossil-fuel lobbyists onthe negative).As we question the sensibility and viability of limiting understandings of engineering to thenarrowly technical, we do not also question the sensibility or viability of narrowly technicalexpertise within engineering. To the contrary, we believe traditional technical skills are
in P-12 career and technical educa- tion for the Illinois State Board of Higher Education/Illinois State University; research and evaluation for the Illinois Assessment and Accountability Project (Illinois State Board of Higher Education/University of Illinois); and the Entrepreneurial Leadership in STEM Teaching and Learning (Project EnLiST - Na- tional Science Foundation/University of Illinois). Her research focus and area of expertise is personal development, sustainable transformative learning environments, and curricular change. She has worked with curriculum/programs in a variety of areas, including teaching centers, engineering, business, honors, national scholarship advising, animal sciences, human
AC 2012-3617: DIFFERENCES IN EDUCATIONAL GOALS WITHIN THEFIELD OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERINGDiana G. de la Rosa-Pohl, University of Houston Diana de la Rosa-Pohl has been a lecturer in the Cullen College of Engineering at the University of Hous- ton since 2003. She has worked with the PROMES program to develop project-based learning courses for the first-year curriculum. Currently, she is developing and evaluating project-based multidisciplinary courses for the engineering honors program. Page 25.468.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 DIFFERENCES IN EDUCATIONAL
Page 25.70.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Model for the Development of Personal and Professional Social Responsibility for EngineersAbstractImportant attributes for engineering professionals include an understanding of the global andsocietal impacts of engineering projects and a well-developed professional and ethical code ofresponsibility; these attributes must be developed in engineering students. Furthermore, the roleof an engineer is becoming increasingly global, requiring an international perspective and cross-cultural skills. The core foundation for these skills can be found in a well-developed sense ofsocial responsibility, contextualized by the
is often only a supplement to science or social studieslessons.33,34,40 The engineering-based science units in our research were intended toreplace existing science units, and they incorporated inquiry and science content withinthe framework of a grand engineering-design challenge. These challenges includedbuilding a sturdy and insulated model house (properties of materials), designing amusical instrument (sound), constructing a people mover for an airport (simplemachines), and creating a model of a rainforest animal (animal structure and behavior).MethodsResearch questions. This paper is the first from our research program to focusexclusively on the teachers involved in the project and their perceptions and experiencesin implementing
AC 2012-3987: SPATIAL ABILITY IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTSMs. Kristin L. Brudigam, Lake Travis High School Kristin Brudigam is a mathematics and engineering teacher at Lake Travis High School in Austin, Texas. She earned her undergraduate degree in mathematics education from Wayne State College and her mas- ter’s degree in science education with an emphasis in engineering education from the University of Texas, Austin. Additionally, Brudigam is certified to teach civil engineering/architecture and Introduction to En- gineering Design as part of the Project Lead the Way curriculum at Lake Travis High School. Brudigam developed a curriculum entitled ”Careers Involving Mathematics” as an undergraduate in the John G
virtually ignored the multitude ofeffective technologies generated by the nation’s graduate engineers in industry and governmentservice, which was brought forth through the needs-driven creative engineering method forresponsible leadership of innovation and technology development. Page 3.91.3Findings presented in the U.S. Department of Defense study, “Project Hindsight”, indicate thatinnovative technology development is primarily a deliberate and systematic needs-drivencreative practice of engineering.4 The purpose of the investigation was to determine thecontributions of the science-driven approach and of the needs-driven engineering approach
investigating different methodsto teach and learn linear algebra, we aim to pick up those resources that are applicable forengineering students in this paper.After reviewing many linear algebra textbooks such as [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], werecommend “Linear Algebra and Its Application” [24] for engineering students. This book hasgarnered significant praise from instructors and is widely adopted in current teaching practices.In comparison to other reviewed textbooks, "Linear Algebra and Its Applications" offers severalnotable advantages: • It features a wealth of practical applications spanning various fields, with seven comprehensive Case Studies and 20 Application Projects. • The book prioritizes visualization of concepts
thestrategies used by the students at each stage of the creative process The results suggest thatcreative students used different techniques to sustain through all the tasks exhibiting a lowneed for cognitive closure while students with low creativity exhibited convergent thinkingand saturation and tried to complete the project as early as possible with a lack of motivationand commitment exhibiting a high need for cognitive closure. The synthesis across thesestudies underscores a consistent pattern: as task complexity increases students tend to exhibita high need for cognitive closure, and trade−off creativity for an instant problem−solvingapproach, while students tend to exhibit a low need for cognitive closure sustained throughthe complex tasks and
consultant for Engineering for One Planet with The Lemelson Foundation. Cindy specializes in innovative sustainability-focused research and curriculum projects for academic institutions, non-profits, government and corporations. Cindy has taught thousands of people through courses and workshops, around the world and online, in the fields of biology, sustainability and biomimicry. She is honored to be a collaborative partner on the Engineering for One Planet initiative since its inception, co-author of the EOP Framework and framework companion teaching guides, and active EOP Network Member. Cindy holds a MS from Oregon State University, a MEd from Griffith University (Queensland, Australia), and a BSc in biology from the
2020 degree share 24%), race (sample white 33% vs 2020 degreeshare 56%), and nationality (including participants residing in Canada, Turkey, and thePhilippines). Aligned with the goals of the larger study, participants were drawn from Aerospace,Civil, and Mechanical engineering disciplines. Demographics are summarized in Table 1.Our sample size of n=24 is in line with recommendations for qualitative research [22], and iscomparable with other peer-reviewed qualitative research projects [23], [24], [25].Table 1. Summary of participant demographics. Experience 2 years: 3 3 years: 2 4 years: 8 5+ years: 11 Race Asian: 10 Black: 2 White: 8 Other: 4 Subfield Aerospace
a multi-year, mixed-methods research project funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) to understand factors contributing to the attrition and retention of studentsfrom racially minoritized and marginalized groups in engineering doctoral programs, wedeveloped a survey to assess engineering doctoral students’ experience of department-levelorganizational climate. We aimed to survey engineering doctoral students using a valid andreliable instrument that focuses on the climate constructs that contribute to the retention orattrition of students from historically excluded or underrepresented groups. Here, climateconstructs, in general, refer to the theoretical concepts or dimensions as organization members’shared perceptions of climates
enter academia after graduation are incentivized to take a research-first career, though they likely would also be in instructional positions. However, some doctoralstudents go out of their way to gain experience as course instructors. This research project aims atunderstanding engineering doctoral students’ expectations, reflections, and concerns regardingtheir future in academia. To understand engineering doctoral students’ expectations, reflections,and concerns regarding future in academia, a survey instrument was designed with questionspertaining to participants’ expectations and concerns for a career in academia, interpersonalinteractions’ influence on their teaching preparedness, and help from their PhD program inteaching preparedness
education is understood to beinherently valuable, institutions continue to inadequately center the inclusion, retention, andthriving of engineering students from historically minoritized groups. The intentionaldevelopment of critical consciousness in engineering students may be one important tool foradvancing this greater project. Holly [10] proposes that “CC presents itself as a useful concept tobetter understand why these efforts have not been successful in transforming the quality ofexperiences and statistical representation of people [from] groups that have been marginalized inengineering throughout history.” The elusive goal of “broadening participation in engineering”may in fact be strongly supported by the development of critical
Software Developers, Quality Assurance Analysts, and Testers, theaverage growth rate is expected to surge by 25% (much higher than the 3% for all occupations).For Computer and Information Research Scientists, the growth rate is projected to be 23%.Despite clear needs to fill such roles, obtaining a computing job can be challenging, somethingoften attributed to, at least partially, the expectations of the hiring process and graduates’performance on technical interviews [2].Technical interviews, also referred to as coding interviews or programming interviews, are acomponent of the hiring process frequently employed for computing roles [3]. They entail askingjob candidates to solve problems on a whiteboard or using a text editor to evaluate
began to focus more on strategies for cultivating teachers’ abilities and competencies using AI technologies, highlighting the role of AI in enhancing teaching effectiveness. Example: Teachable Machine by Google is an AI project that allows users, including educators, to create machine learning models without coding. This tool can be used by teachers to introduce students to the concepts of machine learning, demonstrating AI’s adaptability and its role in educational innovation. • Future Directions and Multidisciplinary Integration: Looking ahead, the research is expected to move towards practical knowledge and multidisciplinary integration. The emphasis is on the role of AI in enhancing teachers
development of engineering education curriculum.Education researchers unequivocally identified the importance of incorporating laboratoryexercise in engineering course curriculum design, offering valuable insights to optimize theefficacy of laboratories through several case studies [1–5]. Researchers effectively argue the casefor incorporating practical components into engineering classes, emphasizing the value ofproblem-based or project-based learning (PBL) which aims to bridge theoretical knowledge withreal-world applications [6].Numerous literatures present some innovative designs of hands-on laboratory practice under theengineering course curriculum. Kilula et al. [7] developed experimental facilities for the upper-level engineering undergraduate
] include: “using ratings systemssuch as Greenroads, ENVISION, and/or LEED to introduce students to metrics related to societalwell-being”, and case studies of past CE projects that “failed to address the needs of anunderserved community (e.g., the 2014 Flint, Michigan, water supply crisis)” [11, 12]. There arean increasing number of examples of efforts to introduce issues of equity in concert withinfrastructure in the literature. Sanford et al. conducted a systematic review of literaturedescribing interventions that have been implemented in practice [13]. Examples include Casperet al.’s efforts to integrate social justice into first and third year civil engineering courses [14],case studies developed by Judge [15], and Castaneda et al.’s
been used by researchers to understand how teaching andlearning occur in classrooms [22]-[27]. In the context of engineering education, classroomobservations have become more common to conduct research related to curricular practices [28].As our research questions centered on how engineering practices were taught and understandinghow classroom time was utilized, classroom observations served as an ideal method throughwhich to collect data.To guide the data collection, the project leadership team (EM, LL, JLM, and SD) developed anditerated an observation protocol. The observation protocol consisted of 35 practices, which weredrawn from literature on engineering competencies [1], [5], insights from student interviewsprobing the emphasized skills
at the state and local level for over 35 years. He is the Evaluation Consultant for the Rochester Institute of Technology Women in Engineering Project and for the Rochester Area Colleges Center for Excellence in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM). He also provides evaluation services for school districts for a variety of special programs including 21st Century Learning Center programs, after-school mentoring programs and environmental education programs. Mr. Lillis has served as the evaluator for numerous community substance abuse prevention and intervention programs and has conducted outcome studies for the Yes Pa Foundation, character education program.Betsy Khol, Women in EngineeringRobert D. Garrick
majority of undergraduate degrees in certain STEM-related disciplines.4However, there is evidence that what are known as leaky pipeline and glass-ceiling effectsremain especially strong in STEM fields.5 Psychologists and educational policy researchers areurged to turn attention to the later stages of career development where women’s careeraspirations often plummet and where women get stuck or drop out of STEM all together.6 Thispaper presents the preliminary results of a qualitative research project, with an analysis thatfocused particularly on isolating aspects that these female STEM doctoral students experiencedduring one academic year.The graduate school period along the academic science and engineering career pathway hasreceived little
education. A second set of challenges has interrogated the contents of the engineering sciences and engineering design. Social philosophers have long mapped engineers as technological intelligentsia whose success depends upon a wide range of social, ethical, and epistemological criteria (Goldman 1984; Lenk 1984; Davis 1996). Micro-‐ethicists have made visible contrasts between formal codes and actual practices (Baum and Flores 1982; Martin and Schinzinger 1983). More recently, macro-‐ethicists make visible a range of broader material projects that engineering formation and engineering work could serve or, in some cases, does serve (Herkert 2009
(Fleming, Garcia, & Morning, 1995). Through a NASA-sponsored program called Project Reserve, a two year initiative, theauthors Fleming, Garcia, and Morning (1995) studied 31 correlates, such as social class, aptitude,and critical thinking skills. They used three instruments, with a sample of African American andLatino students majoring in engineering at Xavier University in Louisiana, California StateUniversity, Northridge (CSUN), and City College of New York (CCNY). These students(N=79) came from predominantly White engineering schools where they failed in their first yearand were invited to participate in Project Reserve. Project Reserve was designed to retain thesestudents in the engineering pipeline by providing them with academic
Technology contains a variety of resources that support the differentproblems students have in the doing of and learning about design through experience. Throughthe Design Learning Simulator research, we have been exploring issues about what resources toprovide to students and how to make them available. In the Spring, 1996 quarter, the DesignLearning Simulator was implemented in a Web-based platform and included model designreports, electronic versions of class documents, resources to support team formation, resources tonegotiate project requirements, and an on-line parts catalog. During this period, we receivedgenerally positive feedback from the students through survey questions, exit interviews, andtestimonials. In this paper, we explore a