, and the National Science Foundation.References1. Felder, R.M. and R. Brent. Learning by Doing. In Chemical Engineering Education, Volume 37 No. 4, 2003, pp 282–283.2. Bertini, R.L. and M. Lasky. Frontier Project Evaluation of Video Recognition Travel Time System (Draft). Portland State University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Portland, OR, 2004.3. Bertini, R.L. and S. Tantiyanugulchai. Transit Buses as Traffic Probes: Empirical Evaluation Using Geo- Location Data. In Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003. (In Press).BiographiesROBERT L. BERTINIDr. Robert L. Bertini is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental
for Research on Learningand Teaching at the University Of Michigan for valuable advice and conducting the midtermstudent feedback session. The authors would also like to thank the EECS Dept. Chair Prof. DavidMunson for his encouragement of this project.Bibliography1 http://www.engin.umich.edu/dept/cheme/people/montgomery.html2 Wankat, P. C. and Oreovicz, F. S., Teaching Engineering, available online at https://engineering.purdue.edu/ ChE/News_and_Events/Publications/teaching_engineering/index.html.3 http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html4 R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman, J. Engr. Education, 78(7), 674 (1988).5 http://jas.eng.buffalo.edu
International SUN Conference on Teaching andLearning: “Cooperative, Collaborative, and Team-Based Learning,” University of Texas at El Paso, Session #50,March 5 – 6, 2004.8. Corwin, S., and Chase, J., Peer Instruction for Student Engagement, NSF # 0229652, May 01, 2003.Astin, A. W., "The Measured Effects of Higher Education," Annals of the American Academy of Political andSocial Science, Vol. 404, pp. 1-20, 1972.9. Bohrson, W.A., Kurtz, M.J., Piacsek, A.W., Glasby, S.P., and Gellenbeck, E.M., In Answer to a NationalChallenge: A Pilot Program to Increase Participation in Science, Technology, and Mathematics [STEM] Fields,NSF # 0230395, January 01, 2003
& Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”[3] Foertsch, J.A., Alexander, B.B., and Penberthy, D.L. (1997). Evaluation of the UW-Madison’s SummerUndergraduate Research Programs, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsion-Madison, LEAD Center.[4] May, G.S. (1997) An Evaluation of the Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program at the GeorgiaInstitute of Technology, Proceedings of the Frontiers In Engineering Conference, Pittsburg, PA.[5] Alexander, B.B., Foertsch, J.A., Daffinrud, S. and Tapia, R. (1998). The Spend a Summer with a Scientist (SaS)Program at Rice University: A Study of Program Outcomes and Essential Elements, 1991-1997, Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin-Madison
Academic Achievement of Engineering Students”, Journal of Engineering Education, v. 86, n. 2. 1997, pp125-132.[3] Bradley, W. L., and S. Bradley, “Increasing Retention by Incorporating Time Management and Study Skills into A Freshman Engineering Course," Proc. of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conf. and Expo., Salt Lake City, UT.[4] Blowers, P., “A Course in Freshman Survival Skills,” Proc. of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conf. and Expo., Montréal, Quebec, Canada.[5] Carter, R. L., M. Hoit, and T. Anderson, “Factors Influencing Freshmen Retention in Engineering Programs,” Proc. of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conf. and Expo., Nashville, TN.[6] Minitab User’s Guide 2: Data Analysis and Quality Tools, Minitab, Inc, 2003.Biographical InformationRICK T. OLSON is an
commitments,yet she was retained in the University as a part-time student. Interestingly, hercircumstances have changed and she is currently a CSEMS recipient for the 2004-2005academic year, meaning she has been able to return to her studies on a full-time basis.Goal 2’s objective to decrease the average time to degree completion for CSEM studentsalso compares favorably within the Herff College of Engineering, and The University ofMemphis total student body as well. Seven (7) of the initial twenty-five (25) recipientsgraduated within the first year of the program, and nine (9) graduated within the secondyear of the program.Program data revealed that Goal 3 was met as the 2002-2004 CSEMS graduates reflect ahigher percentage of underrepresented
meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.20 Hong, N.S., Jonassen, D.H., & McGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (1), 6-33. Page 10.598.10 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference& Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education
in theirlearning contract. This brings finally to the nature of the use of project method, which is in contrast toexaminations. In a nutshell, one of the most appropriate teaching and learning methods forstudents’ all-round development is group project-based learning. Page 10.699.12 “Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society of Engineering Education”Bibliography1. Nightingale, P., TeWiata, I., Toohey, S., Hughes, C., Ryan, G. & Magin, D. (1995). A resource for improving the practice of assessment in
advisor also guides the summer work. During the senior year, Robotics Academy work becomes more regular and morespecialized. The team(s) meet once a week to assign responsibilities and report on theirprogress during the previous week. These team meetings are organized and run by theRobotics Academy graduate student coordinator. The role of the graduate studentcoordinator is to help answer basic questions, coordinate meetings, and keep track of thematerial procurement and budget related tasks. The graduate student coordinator alsomakes sure that the team keeps on schedule to hit major deadlines, but the team membersthemselves handle most time management. The final product of Robotics Academy projects has two components: a robot anda
, ACSA Inc, Washington DC, Pp 268- 271.BERMUDEZ J, KING K (1998). “Media Interaction and Design Process: Establishing a Knowledge Base”, Eds Seebohm T, Van Wyk S, Digital Design Studios: Do Computers Make a Difference? Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture Conference Proceedings. Pp. 6-25.CHENG N (1999). “Playing with Digital Media: Enlivening Computer Graphics Teaching”. ACADIA 99 Proceedings, University of Utah. Pp 96-109.CRAMER N AND GUINEY A (2000). “The computer school: in only six years, Columbia University's grand experiment in digital design has launched a movement”, Architecture Sept 2000, Vol 89, No 9. Pp.94-107CUFF D (2001). “Digital Pedagogy
presented in this paper.References 1. Flanders, J. R., “ How much of the content in mathematics textbooks is new?” Arithmetic Teacher, 35,18- 23, 1987. Page 7.688.9 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education 2. Schmidt, W.; McKnight, C.; and Raizen, S., A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 1997. 3. National Science and Technology Council. “Ensuring a Strong U.S. Scientific
and similarity ratings of some potato chipcomponents, J. Food Sci., 23(12), 1972, pp. 1435 - 1444.12. Welty, J.R., Wicks, C.E., Wilson, R.E., and G. Rorrer, Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer,4th Ed., J. Wiley & Sons, NY, 2001.13. Yamada, T., Thermal properties of potato, Nippon Nogei Kagaku Kaishi, 44(12), 1970, pp. 587 - 590.14. Tomkins, R.G., Mapson, L.W., and R.J. L. Allen, Drying of vegetables. III. Storage of dried vegetables, J. Soc.Chem. Ind. (1944), 63, pp. 225 - 231.15. Sahin, S. and S.K. Sastry, Heat transfer during frying of potato slices, Food Sci. Technol., 32(1), 1970, pp. 19 -24.J.L. SMARTJim Smart is Assistant Professor of Chemical and Materials Engineering with the University of Kentucky. Hereceived his BS
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Wells’s Island of Dr. Moreau “depict[s] the takeover ofnatural female function by crazed male science.” 2 Frankenstein uses technology to create lifewhile Moreau uses it to metamorphose animal into human life, and both play the role of parent totheir creatures. Indeed, the only females on the island are some of Moreau’s subjects.Curiously, though, as Moreau first introduces Prendick to the island, he suggests that all of thecreatures are female in some sense: “Our little establishment here contains a secret or so, is a kind of Blue-Beard’s chamber, in fact. Nothing very dreadful, really, to a sane man.” (20)The reference to Bluebeard places Moreau in the position of a serial wife slayer, which in
http://www.asee.org/conferences/search/ 6. Corum, Christine L, “Evolution of Assessment within a Mechanical Engineering Technology Department,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, St. Louis, Mo., June 18-21, 2000, Session 2548. The North Central Association of Schools and Colleges (NCA) is one of the six regional bodies described in this paper. 7. Neff, G., S. Scachitti, and M. Zahraee, “Closing the Loop: The Difference between Making Improvements and Continuous Improvement”, 2001 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June 24-27, 2001, Session 2647. 8. The “Course Update Form” is at http://www.calumet.purdue.edu/public/mets
), 2001. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/martch01/03zia.html.2 McMartin, F. “Preliminary findings from Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education Digital Library Use Study Focus Groups, URL: http://www.smete/info/survey/user_study_dl.html, 1999.3 Inman, E. & L. Mayes. “Educatioanl Technology: A Survey of Faculty Use and Need,” Journal of Staff, Program, & Organization Development. 16(1), Summer, 1998.4 Tabor, L. Faculty Development for Instructional Technology: A Priority for the New Millennium,” Journal of Staff, Program, & Organization Development. 15(4), 1998.5 Chen, J. C., M. Ellis, J. Lockhart, S. Hamoush, C. Brawner, J. Tront, “Technology in Engineering Education: What do the
techniques, project management and critical thinking skills necessary tosolve real world problems.References1. Kline, R. A., and Egle, D.M., 1995, “Creativity and the Undergraduate Laboratory Experience,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 11, Nos. 4 and 5, pp 264-268.2. Lang, J., Cruse, S., McVey, F., McMasters, J., “Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers”, Journal of Engineering Education, Jan 1999, pp. 43-51.3. Sharp, J. E., “Combining Kolb Learning Styles and Writing to Learn in Engineering Classes”, Journal of Engineering Education, April 1997, pp. 93-101.4. Bidanda, B. and Billo, R. E., “On the Use of Students for Developing Engineering
.) They were met and hosted in Germany by Mr. Ferdinand Walbaum of Muelheim andMr. Werner Franz (formerly of Lake Mary Siemens Telecommunications) of Krefeld.Selection criteria was developed and prioritized for U. S. student participation in the program. Itwas determined that the prime criteria should be engineering technology majors (3.0 GPA orhigher) in design or manufacturing operations with Metrology, CAD/CAM, Machining, andLogistics courses completed. The interval of training should be in the Summer of the Junior year,with provisions for additional coursework and part-time internship with Siemens-Westinghouseduring the Senior year. Students could look forward to a potential offer of full-time employmentupon graduation
to monitor student behaviors as werefine the existing materials and expand the computer resources for this thermodynamics course.References[1] Chambers, E. Studies in Higher Education,1992, 17, 141-153.[2] Thomas, J., Bol, L., Warkentin, R., Wilson, M., Strage, A., & Rohwer Jr., W. Applied CognitivePsychology,1993, 7, 499-532.[3] Taraban, R., & Hayes, M. Measuring Study Time in College. Manuscript submitted for review.[4] Cengel, Y. A. and Boles, M. A. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill: Boston,MA, 2001.[5] Anderson, E. E., Sharma, M. P., Taraban, R. Application of Active Learning Technique s. Manuscriptsubmitted to the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
, Joseph S., Joey F. George, and Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design, PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001. BiographyDr. John H. Ristroph is a Professor of Engineering and Technology Management and a registered professional engi-neer in Louisiana. His B.S. and M.S. are from LSU, and his Ph.D. is from VPI&SU, all in industrial engineering. Hehas been active in the information systems area as an analyst, teacher, and researcher for over thirty years. Appendix: Example Illustrating DBMS Functions Employees of a company work on ma ny projects for different clients, and it is necessaryto track the number of hours that each employee works and
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationDr. Mohamed AttawiaEducation : 1978: M.B.B.Ch., Cairo Medical School, Cairo, Egypt.Professional Experience: 1994-1998, Research Assistant Professor (Department of Orthopaedics): Allegheny University Hospital. Philadelphia PA 1998-2001, Research Associate Professor (Department of Chemical Engineering), Drexel University 2001-Present Orthobiologics, DepuyAcromed, Johnson & Johnson Company.Dr. Dhirendra S. KattiEducation: 1999, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Chemistry, Bombay University. 1993, Bachelor of Science in Technology (B.Sc. Tech.), Chemical Technology, Bombay University. 1990, Bachelor of Science
engineeringdesign of different classical bus architectures, and discuss various CPU’s and peripherals. In thelaboratory students’s design and build their own custom microprocessor projects using thepopular and versatile 68HC11, an embedded CISC (“complex instruction set computer”) CPU.This laboratory particularly needs an adroit understanding of the HC11’s software architecture,i.e. its unique assembly language. Giving students a better introduction to HC11 assemblylanguage would allow us to concentrate more on hardware system architecture and advancedsoftware programming techniques like mixed assembly and C, which has routinely been taughtin the laboratory since 1995.Based on these diverse needs, we took the unusual step of deciding to teach two
Educationcompleted the lab without the multimedia. I look forward to continuing my experimentation andhope that students will continue to benefit from them.Bibliography1. AppDev Training, Eden Prairie, MN, http://www.appdev.com.2. Makedon, F., and Others, “Issues and Obstacles with Multimedia Authoring,” Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 94,British Columbia, Canada, 1994.3. Logitech QuickCam Camera, Logitech, Inc., Freemont, CA, http://www.logitech.com.4. Umax 2200 Scanner, Umax Technologies, Inc., Freemont, CA, http://www.umax.com.5. Billups, S., “Digital Moviemaking,” Michael Wiese Productions, Studio City, CA, 2001.6. Haines, R., “Digital Audio,” Coriolis, Scottsdale, AZ, 2001.7. Windows Media Play, Microsoft Corporation, http
., 1988 The Art of Children's Drawings. 18. Journal of Aesthetic Education, Vol.22, No. 1, Spring, 1988.20. Witelson, 1985, in Graham R.B. 1990, Physiological Psychology, Wadsworth21. Talley, L.H., 1973, The Use Of Three-Dimensional Visualisation: as a moderator in higher cognitive learning in College level chemistry.22. Garner S., 1992, 'The Undervalued Role of Drawing in Design', in Thistlewood D (Ed), Drawing Research and Development, Longmans, London, pp 98-109.23. Cross, A., 1986, Design Intelligence: the use of codes and language systems in design, Design Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, January 1986.24. McKim, R.H., 1980, Experiences in Visual Thinking, BWS Engineering, Boston25. Levy, J., 1976, Cerebral
common purpose or the file type(s) that they use to storetheir results. This is presented in figure 1 where five groups or applications are being formed : > Group 1 – Part design (files *.CatPart) > Group 2 – Assembly design (files *.CatProduct) > Group 3 – Part analysis (files *.CatAnalysis) > Group 4 – Digital Mock-up (*.model (V4), *.CatPart, *.CatProduct, *.cgr, etc.) > Group 5 – Knowledge Advisor (*.CatPart, *.CatProduct) 1. Part design Decompose part to design into elementary features Determine
understand why someone would deliberately choose a non-tenured position unless he or she had failed in their pursuit of tenure.· The value of industrial experience. Each of these individuals had worked in industry for periods ranging from five to eleven years and brought their experience to their new jobs. Their industrial background may have been seen as an asset to the department and made them more attractive candidates than new Ph.D.’s coming straight out of graduate school. In addition, their experience may have allowed them to negotiate for a higher starting salary than a new Ph.D. graduate could command.· The importance of maintaining contacts within the engineering community. Two of the three individuals replaced
that the size of the testingfacility may be much smaller than the size of the class. On the other hand, if it is difficult todevelop a large number of good questions, then large numbers of students may need to take anon-line test simultaneously. This requires a very large on-campus laboratory that can be madeavailable for testing when needed. A particularly successful example of the use of a largelaboratory using on-line course materials with on-line testing is the Math Emporium at VirginiaTechnical University2.Our experience points to differences in the ease of creating large question banks for on-linetesting. There are many numerical types of problems that can be infinitely varied by s implychanging the numbers. Rather than specific
, Prentice Hall 3. Thomas, K. 1996. How To Keep ISO 9000, Kogan Page Limited. 4. Schlickman, J.J. 1998. Quality Management System Design, Lancaster Press Inc. 5. Rao, S.S., Ragunathan ,T .S and Solis, L.E. 1997. Does ISO 9000 have an effect on quality? An Page 7.962.8 international empirical study. Total Quality Management. 8 (6): 335 -346 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for E ngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education 6. Calingo, L.M.R., Leong, Y.M., Chia, M.P. and Mohamed, H. 1995. Achieving total quality
/easy5/12 http://www.mathworks.com/products/connections/product_main.shtml?prod_id=212/13 http://www.mathworks.com/products/connections/product_main.shtml?prod_id=169/14 Karnopp, D. C., Margolis, D. L., Rosenberg, R.C. (1990) System Dynamics: A unified Approach, John Wiley & Sons, New York.15 Dijk, J. D. (1994), On the role of bond graph causality in modelling mechatronic systems. PhD dissertation, University of Twente, CIP-Gegevens.16 Khalil, H. K. (1992), Nonlinear Systems, Macmillan, New York.17 Giordan, A., de Vecchi, G. (1987), Les origines du savoir; des conceptions des apprenants aux concepts scientifiques. Delachaux & Niestlé S. A., Paris.18 Sommerville, I. (2001), Software
your subscribed channels. By copying the URL for your new channel and presenting it as alink on a subscription page on your main web site, visitors can add your channel to theirhandheld content with just a click of the mouse. As an example, the following URL wasgenerated for the handheld version of the ONU ECCS web site:http://avantgo.com/mydevice/autoadd.html?title=ONU%20ECCS&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onu.edu%2Fengineering%2Feccs%2Fpda%2Findex.html%20&max=125&depth=5&images=1&links=0&refresh=always&hours=2&dflags=127&hour=0&quarter=00&s=00 Page 7.378.6 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for
] “Identifying and Measuring Quality in a Software Requirements Specification”, Alan Davis, Scott Overmayer et. al., Software Requirements Engineering, Second Edition, IEEE Computer Society, pp 194 – 205.[4] Software Engineering: Principles and Practice, Hans Van Vliet, Second Edition, John Wiley 2000.[5] Exploring Requirements: Quality Before Design, Donald Gause and Gerald Weinberg, Dorset House Publishing 1989.[6] Software Requirements, Karl E. Weigers, Microsoft Press 1999.[7] Software Engineering, Ian Sommerville, Sixth Edition, Addison Wesley 1984.[8] Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap, B. A. Nuseibeh and S. M. Easterbrook, In A. C. W. Finkelstein (ed) "The Future of Software Engineering". (Companion volume to the proceedings of the