/esploro-research-services-platform/esploro-customer-community/ (accessed March 21, 2022).[2] A. Martin-Martin, M. Thelwall, E. Orduna-Malea, and E. D. Lopez-Cozar, "Google Scholar,Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: Amultidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations," (in English), Scientometrics, vol. 126,no. 1, pp. 871-906, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4.[3] S. Ritchie, K. Banyas, and C. Sevin, "A comparison of selected bibliographic database searchretrieval for agricultural information," Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no. 93,2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.29173/istl48.[4] E. D. Lopez-Cozar, E. Orduna-Malea, and A. Martin-Martin, "Google Scholar as a
, passions, ideas they might have, etc.What is one thing is they have learned so far that they want to learn more about--something thathas struck them as interesting and engaging.Ask them how their teamwork is going: what step are they on in the workbook? What chapter(s)did they read in the course textbook? Any updates on their project idea?Ask them if they have any questions for you (as alluded to above, this should be a part of everyteam meeting).Snip of course schedule for Weeks 1-4:References[1] J. E. Wilbanks, "Mentoring and Entrepreneurship: Examining the Potential for Entrepreneurship Education and for Aspiring New Entrepreneurs," Journal of Small Business Strategy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 93-101, 2015.[2] E. St-Jean, "Mentor functions for
between the groups, additional face-to face course and COIL courses could be run tocollect further data for comparison.Citations[1] Tejada, A. H., & Stanton, S. (2021). An Impact Study of the 100,000 Strong in the AmericasInnovation Fund.[2] A. Brown and L. De Regil Sanchez, “Structure and Outcomes of a Virtual InternationalHumanitarian Engineering Collaborative Program with Workshop,” Diversity Abroad, 21-Dec-2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.diversitynetwork.org//DIVaPublic/Articles/Article-Items/Structure-and-Outcomes-Intl-Humanitarian-Engineering-Program.aspx. [Accessed: 08-Feb-2023].[3] Boretti, A., & Rosa, L. (2019). Reassessing the projections of the world water developmentreport. NPJ Clean Water, 2(1), 15.[4] World Health
be turnedinto opportunities and weaknesses could be transformed into strength with sustained teamspirit and if worked on each specific threat and weaknesses deliberately.AcknowledgmentThis study is part of the work that was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant #1915615 titled “Adapting an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach to Increase StudentAchievement in Multiple STEM Disciplines”. It should be noted that the opinions, results,conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] H. Taylor, E. Artman, and J. P. Woelfer, “Information Technology Project RiskManagement: Bridging the Gap between Research and Practice
every engineer needs,” Harvard Business School Online’sBusiness Insights Blog, January 5, 2023. [Online]. Available:https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/business-skills-for-engineers. [Accessed February 10, 2023].[4] M. Hirudayaraj, R. Baker, F. Baker and M. Eastman, “Soft skills for entry-level engineers:What employers want,” Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 641-375, 2021.[5] L. Reave, “Technical communication instruction in engineering schools: A survey of top-ranked U.S. and Canadian Programs,” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.18, no. 4, pp. 452-490, 2004.[6] S. Conrad, “A comparison of practitioner and student writing in civil engineering,” Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 191-217, 2017.[7] J.D
," Advances in motivation and achievement, vol. 10, pp. 213-250, 1997.[4] M. Svinicki, "A guidebook on conceptual frameworks for research in engineering education," Rigorous Research in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 1-53, 2010.[5] A. Bahar and C. Maker, "Cognitive backgrounds of problem solving: A comparison of open-ended vs. closed mathematics problems," Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1531-1546, 2015.[6] R. Foshay and J. Kirkley, "Principles for teaching problem solving," PLATO Learning, Bloomington, MN, 1998.[7] B. Linder, Understanding estimation and its relation to engineering education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.[8] S. Shakerin, "The art of
. 75, no. 3, pp. 203–220, Apr. 2007.[2] M. Becker, S. Dong, J. Kronholz, and C. Brownson, “Relationships between stress and psychosocial factors with sources of help-seeking among international students,” Journal of International Students, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1636–1661, 2018.[3] P. Caligiuri, C. L. Z. DuBois, K. Lundby, and E. A. Sinclair, “Fostering international students’ sense of belonging and perceived social support through a semester-long experiential activity,” Res. Comp. Int. Educ., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 357–370, Dec. 2020.[4] R. F. Baumeister and M. R. Leary, “The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation,” in Interpersonal Development, Routledge, 2017, pp. 57–89.[5] C
Q T AE AE AF AF S X X I P R Figure 3: Detail of PHX assembly (rear view). Labels reference Table 1. I H AK A Z H
Engineering Faculty is a special event thathelps Chemical Engineering faculty be and become a community. It works with ASEE andAIChE conferences, yet isn’t the same thing as either due to its focus on community buildingalong with the sharing of valuable experience and information. As we approach the centennialChESS, the organizers of ChESS 2022 are happy to have contributed positively to thiscollective effort.Acknowledgement: This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant CBET-2204362.Disclaimer: Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.ReferencesHanesian, D
/fluids5020095. [Accessed February 12, 2023].[9] O. Ayala, K. Gutierrez, F. Cima, J. Noginova, M. J. Lee, S. Ringleb, P. Pazos, K. Kaipa, andJ. Kidd. "Experiences during the implementation of two different project-based learningassignments in a fluid mechanics course". 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Minneapolis, MN, June 26-29, 2022. [Online] Available: https://peer.asee.org/41801. [AccessedFebruary 12, 2023].
their practical course-support needs and industry practitioners can post theirofferings (e.g., specialization(s), ongoing innovative projects, type of support, and availability),and the instructors will be intelligently matched with industry practitioners who can meet theirneeds. We hypothesize that by intelligently matching the practice needs of students (andinstructors) with the potential offerings of industry practitioners, students’ noticing andawareness can be disciplined in the practice of construction engineering, and they can begin toidentify with the construction CoP. The key question to be addressed in this research is: Howdoes the accessibility, facilitated by ConPEC, translate into improved disciplined perception andstrengthen
Engineering Design Applications," NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. E Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 16, p. 7570, Aug. 2021.[7] E. Welsh, D. Li, A. J. Hart, and J. Liu, "Scaling Hands-On Learning Principles in Manufacturing through Augmented Reality Disassembly and Inspection of a Consumer Product," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021.[8] H.-K. Wu, S. W.-Y. Lee, H.-Y. Chang, and J.-C. Liang, "Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education," Comput. Educ., vol. 62, pp. 41–49, Mar. 2013.[9] T. Lavric, E. Bricard, M. Preda, and T. Zaharia, "An AR Work Instructions Authoring Tool for Human-Operated Industrial Assembly Lines," in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial
in healthcare teams: a systematic review and meta- analysis." BMJ open 9.9 (2019): e028280. 6. Khawam, Ashley M., Toni DiDona, and Brenda S. Hernández. "Effectiveness of teamwork in the workplace." International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) 32.3 (2017): 267- 286. 7. Kørnøv, L., Johannsen, H.H.W. and Moesby E., Experiences with integrating individuality in Project- Oriented and Problem-Based Learning POPBL. Inter. J. of Engng. Educ., 23, 5, 947-953 (2007). 8. Kommula, Venkata P., Jacek Uziak, and M. Tunde Oladiran. "Peer and self-assessment in engineering students' group work." World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 8.1 (2010): 56-60. 9. Goodwin
, “The development and validation of a new multidimensional test anxiety scale (mtas),” European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2020.[23] R. Driscoll, “Westside test anxiety scale validation.” Online submission, 2007.[24] J. Taylor and F. P. Deane, “Development of a short form of the test anxiety inventory (tai),” The Journal of General Psychology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2002.[25] C. D. Spielberger, “Manual for the state-trait anxietry, inventory,” Consulting Psychologist, 1970.[26] E. S. Cerino, “Relationships between academic motivation, self-efficacy, and academic procrastination.” Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, vol. 19, no. 4, 2014.[27] P. Steel, “The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and
. 10.18260/1-2--4578 2. K. Reeves, B. Blank, V. Hernandez-Gantes, and M. Dickerson, “Using constructivist teaching strategies in probability and statistics,” in 2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2010, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2--16660 3. D. Tougaw, “Integration of active learning exercises into a course on probability and statistics,” in 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2005, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--15579 4. N. S. Vidic, R. M. Clark, and E. G. Claypool, “Flipped classroom approach: probability and statistics course for engineers,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2015, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.241195. R. Al-Hammoud, “Molding the interactive
: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.(2006)[11] Kirkpatrick, D.L.; Kirkpatrick, J.D. “Evaluating: Part of a ten-step process”. In: Evaluating Training Programs; Berrett-Koehler Publishers: San Francisco, CA, USA, (2009), pp. 3–20[12] Praslova L . “Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education”. In: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (2010), 22(3), pp.215-225[13] Yardley S , Dornan T . “Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’”. In: Medical Education (2012), 46(1), pp. 97-106[14] Praslova L . “Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning
). Maintaining Industry Partnerships In Integrated Product And Process Design Education. 7.826.1-7.826.13. 10.18260/1-2--10737.10. S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen and R. H. Todd, "Integrated product and process design: a capstone course in mechanical and manufacturing engineering," Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 1991, pp. 469-474, doi: 10.1109/FIE.1991.187527.11. Goldberg, Jay & Cariapa, Vikram & Corliss, George & Kaiser, Kate. (2014). The Benefits of Industry Involvement in the Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Course at Marquette University. 30.12. Howe, Susannah & Goldberg, Jay. (2019). Engineering Capstone Design
stress environment. Studentsimmediately reflected on the experience and shared profound learnings that they intended toimplement beyond the event.The event itself did not appear to alter the way students self-identify as team players, but manydid admit that they needed to work on their own communication and planning skills to be moreeffective team players.References[1] Stress Tolerance. Job requiring accepting criticism and dealing calmly with high-stress situations. ONET. Available: https://www.onetonline.org/find/descriptor/result/1.C.4.b[2] D. S. F. Chong, W. V. Eerde, K. H. Chai and C. G. Rutte, "A Double-Edged Sword: The Effects of Challenge and Hindrance Time Pressure on New Product Development Teams," in IEEE
*,” 1996.[2] I. Uyanik and B. Catalbas, “A low-cost feedback control systems laboratory setup via Arduino–Simulink interface,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 718–726, May 2018, doi: 10.1002/cae.21917.[3] G. C. Goodwin, A. M. Medioli, W. Sher, L. B. Vlacic, and J. S. Welsh, “Emulation-based virtual laboratories: A low-cost alternative to physical experiments in control engineering education,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 48–55, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1109/TE.2010.2043434.[4] N. Nise et al., Control Systems Engineering 7th Edition, vol. 7th. 2014.[5] K. Ogata and J. W. Brewer, “Modern Control Engineering,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and
integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment,” Computers & Education, (2001), 163-178, 37Perkins, Katherine; Adams, Wendy; Dubson, Michael; Finkelstein, Noah; Finkelstein, Noah ; Reid, Sam; Wieman, Carl ; LeMaster, Ron , “PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics,” The Physics Teacher, (2006), 18-23, 44(1)Pratt, Clara C ; McGuigan, William M ; Katzev, Aphra R ,“Measuring program outcomes: using retrospective pretest methodology,” The American Journal of Evaluation, (2000), 341- 349, 21(3)Rockwell, S. Kay , Kohn, Harriet , “Post-Then-Pre Evaluation,” Journal of Extension, (1989), 19-21, 27(2)Samia Khan, Samia, “New Pedagogies on Teaching Science with
how different question types influenced both time to complete an examand exam performance by classifying each problem on every exam according to the followingfive question types.• Calculation – questions that require the student to calculate a value as the solution to the problem.• Multiple Choice & True/False – questions that offer the student the ability to select the correct answer(s) from a defined list.• Short Answer – questions that require the student to explain a concept, describe a scenario, or set up a problem without solving it.• Software – questions that require the student to solve a problem using software taught as part of the course. For this analysis, the software used in exams was Microsoft Excel.• Drawing
101: Where Robots Go ... Students Follow”, ASEEJ. Engineering Education, Jan. 2003, pp. 85 – 89.13. F. Martin, 2001, Robotic Explorations: A Hands-on Introduction to Engineering, Prentice-Hall.14. D.S. Bernstein, 2003, “Setting Up and Running a Control Research Laboratory”, IEEE Control SystemsMagazine, 23, pp. 14 – 19.15. J. Duffy, E. Tsang, and S. Lord, 2000, “Service Learning in Engineering: What, Why, and How”, Proc.ASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC.16. Special Report, 2000, “The State of Technical Literacy: The fight to improve math and scienceeducation in U.S. schools”, IEEE Spectrum, June 2000, pp. 18 – 33.17. K. Hashimoto, M.K. Dery, R. Victor, and S.R. Pandian, 2002, "Internet-based Teleoperation of anUnderwater Robot", Proc
still involves the capturing of images for data analysis.Based upon the results of these alternate experiments, an experimental heat transfercoefficient could be solved for and then placed alongside the results from the transientliquid crystal technique to either verify the occurrence of a natural force or blatantly pointout a wrong calculation.Based upon data from the Hydra Logger temperature values, the buoyant forces can bedisregarded as an extra source of energy for this flow rate. Buoyancy is not viable in theexperiment because the flow in the test section is moving in the 2 m/s range. Also, theupstream and downstream temperatures, as measured by the thermocouples and HydraLogger, are within a tenth of a degree of one another. When the
Pandemic,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2768–2772, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00785.[7] S. Asgari, J. Trajkovic, M. Rahmani, W. Zhang, R. C. Lo, and A. Sciortino, “An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 4, p. e0250041, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250041.David C. Jensen, PhDDr. Jensen is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arkansas.His teaches courses in the design of engineered systems and products as well as dynamics andsystem modeling. His research focus is on tools and methods to support the design of resilientand adaptive manufacturing systems and engineering education.James A. Davis, Jr., PhDDr. Davis is
14, 2022).[2] A. Wiek, L. Withycombe, and C.L. Redman, “Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development,” Sustainability Science, vol. 6, pp. 203-218, 2011.[3] J. Lönngren and M. Svanström, “Systems thinking for dealing with wicked sustainability problems: Beyond functionalist approaches,” in New Developments in Engineering Education for Sustainable Development, W. L. Filho and S. Nesbit, Eds. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 151-160.[4] National Research Council (NRC), Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290[5] C.M. Cunningham and G.J
instructor with recommended breakouttimes.17 Farrell, J.J., R.S. Moog, and J.N. Spencer, “A guided-inquiry, general chemistry course”, Journal of ChemicalEducation, 76(4), 570-574, 1999.18 Simonson, S.R. and S. Shadle, “Implementing process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) in undergraduatebiomechanics”, Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(1), 56-63, 2013. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID35745 POGIL vs Non-POGIL Grade Distributions 60.0% % of Students in Each Grade
(6624), 1092-1097.7 Daniël Heres and Jurriaan Hage. 2017. A Quantitative Comparison of Program Plagiarism Detection Tools. In Proceedings of the 6th Computer Science Education Research Conference (CSERC '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3162087.31621018 Saul Schleimer, Daniel S. Wilkerson, and Alex Aiken. 2003. Winnowing: local algorithms for document fingerprinting. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data (SIGMOD '03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/872757.8727709 K. W. Bowyer and L. O. Hall, "Experience using "MOSS" to detect cheating on
? Diversity constructs as separation,variety, or disparity in organizations” The Academy of Management Review, 32 (4)http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096Haveman, Heather A. (1995). “Structural Contexts of Opportunities. Peter M. Blau”. AmericanJournal of Sociology, 101, 1, July 1995 https://doi.org/10.1086/230704McCarthy, J. J., & Parker, R. S. (2011, June), “Evaluation and Results for an IntegratedCurriculum in Chemical Engineering” Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--17931Simpson, E.H. (1949) “Measurement of diversity”. Nature, 163:688Trytten, Deborah A; Pan, Rui; Foor, Cindy E.; Shehab, Randa l.; Walden, Susan E. (2015). 122ndASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. #1763, June 14
. In the first scenario, the goal is to acquire the most points (α = 0.5, β = 0.35, γ =0.15), so the UGV is unused because bricks moved by UAVs are more points. In scenario two, thegoal was to prioritize the cost (α = 0.35, β = 0.15, γ = 0.50). Both scenarios took about 120s tocomplete3. The third scenario was fully focused on minimizing the cost (s α = 0, β = 0, γ = 1), andit took about 160s to complete3. The authors added a third UAV to the robotic team for thisscenario, so the multi-robot system could complete a more complex task. They used the samecriteria as scenario two (α = 0.35, β = 0.15, γ = 0.5) for this simulation. Since the mission wasmore complex, the time it took for the simulation to run was around 220s. The results in
: recent trends and their historical background,” European Journal of Education, no. 32, pp.111-128, 1997.[12] C. Campbell and C. Rozsnyai, “Quality assurance and the development of course programmes,” Papers on Higher Education Regional University Network, UNESCO, pp. 133, 2002.[13] J. Ben, E. Jurgen, S. Carlo, “Higher education and its communities: interconnections, 12 interdependencies and a research agenda,”Higher Education, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 303-324, 2008.[14] A. Jackson, M. Johnson, D. Horton, “Integrating internal and external stakeholders into a successful ABET accreditation team,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for