effectively ona team, integrate information from multiple sources, communicate with written and visualmaterial, and make connections across disciplines 18 .PBL is not inherently transdisciplinary or convergent, but PBL can be used to teach and addressconvergent problems. While PBL is not the only way to learn convergence methodologies, it canbe an efficient “means” to the “end” which is understanding and implementing convergencemethodologies. It emphasizes the process of question identification and framing as much asproblem solving, encouraging students to iterate and seek feedback, and to reflect on theirapproach and proposed solution. Additionally, outcomes of PBL are similar to the skills neededfor the future of convergence research in industry
streamline undergraduate STEM education.Vidya Reddy Madana, Purdue University Vidya Madana is an undergraduate student in the Department of Computer Science at Purdue University, concentrating on machine intelligence and software engineering. She is expected to graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree in May 2027. Vidya’s research interests include artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data visualization. In addition to her academic pursuits, she has experience in STEM education, robotics, and journalism, reflecting her broad interests and diverse skill set. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Gender Differences in Global Identity Development: Implications for
providing an avenuefor open dialogue, mentors enable their mentees to develop self-awareness, confidence, and a senseof purpose [11]. These skills are important in ensuring success not only in academics orprofessional settings but also in general life satisfaction and mental health [17]. Mentorship allowsfor the opportunity to develop important life skills like communication, critical thinking, and timemanagement. These forms of success are developed through seeking and receiving guidance,reflecting on feedback, and applying learned principles in real situations [18]. By supportingstudents' pursuits, mentorship helps individuals handle challenges independently and equips themwith skills necessary for success in whichever situations they meet [19
students with a sense of purpose and agency. This alignmentwith real-world issues has been shown to enhance long-term engagement in STEM careers,particularly for underrepresented groups who may not see themselves reflected in traditionalSTEM narratives [8], [9].This study investigates the dual outcomes of engagement and self-efficacy within the context ofthe “United We End Racism” STEM Fair. Specifically, it addresses the following researchquestions: 1. How do themed STEM activities, such as Ducks and Diversity, foster engagement and self-efficacy among underrepresented K-12 students? 2. What impacts do these experiences have on students’ interest in STEM careers and their self-confidence in applying engineering concepts?To explore
Province, China, into decision-making for regional development. In their seminal work, Wang and Burris (1997) describe thephotovoice method and how it was developed. They state photovoice has three primary goals,“(1) to enable people to record and reflect their community's strengths and concerns, (2) topromote critical dialogue and knowledge about important issues through large and small groupdiscussion of photographs, and (3) to reach policymakers” (p. 370). The method has since beenadopted across several disciplines, including engineering education, to allow participants tocapture their experiences and communicate ways to change their circumstances. Photovoice is acritical methodology that centers the voice of the participants, allowing them to
. Instructors can activate students’ funds ofknowledge, helping them understand that their prior everyday experiences are a valuableresource in their formal learning [8]. While this can be challenging in higher education settings,where it is not typically possible for instructors to visit students’ home communities tounderstand their cultural and everyday experiences and then design curricula that connect tothose experiences, there are ways to identify such funds of knowledge [9]. For instance, facultymay survey their students [6] or ask students to write reflections that connect their funds ofknowledge to course activities [10].Querencia, a specific form of place-based learning, refers to attachment to a place that signalsreciprocity with place [11
-based learning contexts.Dr. Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Andrew Olewnik is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. His research includes undergraduate engineering education with focus on engineering design, problem-based learning, co-curricular involvement and its impact on professional formation, and the role of reflection practices in supporting engineering undergraduates as they transition from student to professional. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 An emerging assessment framework for problem-based learning environments based on Jonassen’s design theory of
Mission for a Holistic Education: Pilot ImplementationAbstractThe evolution of engineering education over the past few decades reflects the growingcomplexity of the challenges engineers encounter in today’s world. Where once technicalproficiency was the primary emphasis of engineering education, there is now a growingrecognition of the distinct but complementary role that professional formation plays in shapingwell-rounded engineers [1] [2] [3]. A holistic approach to engineering education will help usshape future engineers who possess the foundational knowledge and applied skills in theirdiscipline, as well as across disciplinary boundaries, along with global and cultural awareness,social responsibility, ethical leadership, and sustainability
, treating them asperipheral to the core responsibilities of engineers [1], [2].The foundations of engineering ethics can be traced back to early professional codes developedto address the responsibilities of engineers in ensuring public safety and reliability. For example,the Canons of Ethics by the American Society of Civil Engineers emphasized technicalcompetence, safety, and accountability [5]. Over time, engineering ethics evolved to includebroader societal concerns, such as environmental stewardship during the environmentalmovements of the 1960s and 1970s. Frameworks like sustainable design and corporate socialresponsibility emerged, reflecting a growing recognition of the interconnectedness betweenengineering practices and societal impacts [4
applied to non-competitive fields of use. Feedbackfrom key stakeholders including industry, business, educational, and commercial mentors,technology providers, and student participants, will be used to assess the effectiveness of thisapproach. Reflections and insights gathered from these stakeholders will inform potential futureiterations of the program with additional student teams. The preliminary findings from this studywill also guide the development of future full-scale studies and curriculum improvements, with afocus on assessing the generalizability of the approach.Additionally, this study contributes to workforce development by equipping students with theinterdisciplinary skills and problem-solving capabilities that align with the
and achieve higher goals [15]. Resilience,closely related to self-efficacy, reflects the ability to cope with stress and rebound from adversity.It encompasses personal resources such as optimism, coping strategies, and social support [16,17]. Together, self-efficacy and resilience form a dynamic interplay that helps individualsnavigate academic and life challenges [18-20].This study builds on these theoretical foundations to investigate how achievement goals shapemotivational profiles and their impact on self-efficacy and resilience among undergraduateengineering students. By employing cluster analysis, we identify distinct motivational profilesthat reveal nuanced patterns in how students balance mastery-oriented growth and performance
interdisciplinary. Second, desire (mapping to FPScongruence), reflects students' motivation to develop an interdisciplinary identity. Third,perceived possibility of attaining interdisciplinary scholar status (mapping to FPS perception ofdifficulty), captures how students assess their ability to achieve this identity within theiracademic context.Purpose Statement and Research QuestionThe challenges inherent in fostering interdisciplinary scholarly development among STEMgraduate students necessitate a deeper understanding of how their motivations and identitiesevolve. This study begins to address this through longitudinal analysis of graduate students'developmental trajectories to answer the question: How do STEM graduate students' (a)self-perceived progress
construction industry, where he has led innovative educational initiatives and community engagement projects. His research interests center on educational innovation, reflecting his commitment to enhancing learning experiences through the integration of technology. His leadership in aligning academic activities with community needs highlights his proactive approach to educational research and innovation.Prof. Maria Elena Truyol, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile Mar´ıa Elena Truyol, Ph.D., is full professor and researcher of the Universidad Andr´es Bello (UNAB). She graduated as a physics teacher (for middle and high school), physics (M.Sc.), and a Ph.D. in Physics at Universidad Nacional de C´ordoba, Argentina. In
these, 1,165 records were removed as they did not meet the basic criteria, including 240 works outside the ASEE collection, 915 not belonging to the WIED division, and 10 from sessions unrelated to WIED. 2. Screening: A total of 361 records were screened in detail. Eight additional records were excluded as they were part of panel sessions. 3. Eligibility: From the remaining 353 records, 16 were manually excluded. This included nine posters not indexed in Scopus and seven posters from years outside the analysis scope.Finally, 337 works met the inclusion criteria and were selected for systematic review. Thisrigorous process ensures that the results reflect a comprehensive and accurate overview of thestudies published
, 2025 Barriers and Innovations: Promoting Inclusion in South Dakota's Engineering EducationAbstract This paper is a systematic critical review focused on secondary sources that reflect how inclusionin engineering education has advanced in South Dakota for the last ten years, a region distinguished by itsvaried population that is not reflected in the student body statistics. As the research design focuses onsynthesizing existing evidence to evaluate inclusive engineering education policies and practices in SouthDakota, it is derived from academic publications, institutional reports, and policy documents. This studyseeks to identify gaps and educational practices hindering inclusivity in engineering education. We alsowant to make
the course topics.” (LeDoux and Waller, 2016) In this approach, students workin small groups (typically dyads) to analyze problems and develop solutions through interactionwith their peers. The interaction with instructors is intended to provide positive reinforcementand “just in time” intervention using the principles of being a reflective teacher outlined byBrookfield (1995). In the PSS, the interactions meet the criteria defined by Chi et al and providefor increased formative assessment opportunities within the learning environment from peers andinstructors “in the moment.” Furthermore, LeDoux and Waller (2016) measured the impact ofthis approach on student learning with summative assessments and conclude that “no matterwhat level of
Alignment Model,In this paper, the authors attempted to investigate current engineering entrepreneurship educationthrough the lens of Constructive Alignment. We want to understand if this framework can capturethe nuts and bolts of the abovementioned diverse entrepreneurship education program designs. Theauthors proposed a modified model for the existing constructive alignment model to reflect thefeedback we received from the field.2. Methodology2.1 Data SourceTo obtain a comprehensive view of Canadian entrepreneurship education, we accessed the list ofdesignated educational institutions from the Canadian Federal government’s web tool provided byEmployment and Social Development Canada. We limited the scope of the project to educationalinstitutions
[2,3] showed that students have high self-reported IL skills but are in factlacking in their academic ability; finding, evaluating, citing, and synthesizing information.Providing a way to link IL to the field makes it more relevant and worthwhile for students. Thisalso is a way to support students in the development of their writing skills in a supportive,content-related way.ObjectivesLearning objectives for the collaboration between the engineering faculty and librarian includedteaching the first-year engineering students information literacy skills; the set of integratedabilities encompassing the reflective discovery of information, the understanding of howinformation is produced and valued, and the use of information in creating new
accreditation procedure using one study program case study. Thirdly, theexperience and practices of the Faculty of Applied Sciences (APPS) at the Ukrainian CatholicUniversity (UCU) are shared concerning the set of central stakeholders (Academic programdirectors, professors, students, internal supporting departments, and external stakeholders). Finally, the paper contains the reflection part and further improvements to continuousimprovement and a shortlist of suggestions for a broad audience. There is an improveddashboard designed, and the build-in markers are presented to improve the experience of themain stakeholders. Background National system of HEI accreditation in Ukraine experienced several years ofstagnation motivated by the low
assignments with lower stakes were duethroughout the week: a reading/lecture quiz, a survey to submit questions, and a shortenedhomework assignment. Finally, we changed some content near the end of the course to allowstudents to connect the course to their own career aspirations, which we expect can aid in long-term retention. Specifically, students chose among several possible topics to cover in the finalweeks, covered via typical pre-recorded lectures and reading, and also guest lectures. They wrotean abstract-length reflection on how they could use what they learned in this course later in theircareers. Overall, students remained engaged with the course throughout the semester andprovided favorable comments and evaluations of the course, including
the results and achieve a conclusion with higherconfidence.IntroductionLearning happens in many ways, such as seeing, hearing, reflecting, acting, reasoning,memorizing, and visualizing. Teaching methods, materials, and activities also vary. Someinstructors lecture, others demonstrate or discuss, some focus on principles, and others onapplications. There are studies arguing that the most effective teaching can be achieved when thematerials and activities overlap with the students' learning styles [1], [2]. There are several methodsand indexes categorizing learning styles [3]. This case study aims to improve the teachingeffectiveness within the context of engineering courses and is based on the hypothesis that studentshave a set of preferred
collective experiences made with others. Through the increasedunderstanding of mentorship, one can gain the experiences and understanding of how to guideand support others around them. Across different models of mentorship is the focus on self-reflection, identification of personal goals, and creation of pathways to provide bothpsychological support and role modeling [2, 5].2.1 Characteristics of Mentorship ProgramsMentorship programs are built and supported by individuals based on the direction ofcommunication, degree of exchange, and intention. These three characteristics define anddetermine how models of mentorship are different, as they emphasize and promote the levels oflearning for both individuals in what they hope to take away from the
program from most to leastimportant. The survey also contains open-ended items so that the scholar may explain theirrankings in their own words.ResultsData collected from 20 Scholars in the first two cohorts across 4 surveys indicates that thefaculty and peer mentoring are the most valued and important components of the HEATScholarship program. Specifically, by the end of the Spring 2021 semester, 95% of HEATScholars reported that either faculty mentoring (60%), or peer mentoring (35%) are the mostvaluable aspects of the HEAT Program while none of the Scholars indicated that the financialsupport or academic experiences are the most valuable aspects of HEAT.A representative selection of HEAT Scholar’s reflections are shown in Tables 1 and 2
agreed thatthey did while 36.4% agreed. Teachers also responded positively when asked if they feltprepared to teach their maker club session; 45.5% of respondents strongly agreed that they feltprepared, 48.1% of respondents agreed that they felt prepared, and 5.2% of respondents feltneutral when reflecting on their level of preparedness When asked if their students made social connections during maker club, 44.2 % ofteachers strongly agreed and 37.7% of teachers agreed that social connections were made.Overall, 9.1% of teachers felt neutral about whether their students made social connections, 6.5%disagreed, and 2.6% strongly disagreed. When asked if they felt their students improved theirunderstanding of the EDP after participating in a
York University TandonSchool of Engineering is a one-semester design course. Approximately 100 UGTAs support theprogram through content delivery, grading, curriculum development, and administrative tasks.Typically, UGTAs are hired as second-years and are retained until their graduation.We are currently piloting the following schedule for training (Table 1). In the fall semester oftheir first year, UGTAs learn foundational concepts related to GIDBEA; in the second year,power and privilege; and in the third year, strategies for engaging GIDBEA in their futurecareers. The spring semesters offer time for concept reinforcement and reflection on the fallsemester. By scaffolding the training over the UGTAs’ three-year tenure in the program, we seek
includecase studies, cooperative groups, jigsaw teams, discussion forums, and rich media contentcreation and sharing [4],[5],[6]. These approaches are more reflective of what students wouldencounter in real-life scenarios and workplaces, where problems are not always fully defined,choices are not totally clear, and effective team communication and collaboration are essential [7],[8].Table 1: Learning Objective 1: Demonstrate ability to transmit, receive, and collect health data withinstruments, devices, and software tools.Key active learning interventions: case study, brainstorming, cooperative groupsTask: Teams of three to four students have three weeks to design a health informatics system toaddress a challenging global health scenario of relevance
, error, significance, and agreement and agreement and agreement significance, and agreement with with with and agreement with hypothesis. hypothesis. hypothesis. with hypothesis. hypothesis.Present results Presentation of Presentation of Presentation is Presentation Presentation results is results is clear and has errors, is has significant detailed, well detailed, and reflects some not detailed, errors, is not organized and clear, and thought
by their ability to provide greatertechnology innovation management and leadership.In essence, the more education one acquires, the greater the likelihood for continued gainfulemployment and the greater the financial rewards. As is the case with any entrepreneuriallyoriented individual, the acquisition of a doctoral level education is highly sought after. Currentwait lists reflect this backed-up demand.Job Role Differentiation and Rewards –In business/industry titles and roles map to product life cycle phases. As a project evolves fromConcept Exploration to Operations and Support, different skill sets are required. In the earlyphases of the product life cycle, research and systems thinking/engineering are dominant. As theproduct life cycle
to be 190µm.Three printed microwave components were characterized over the X-band of 8.2-12.4 GHz. The straightwaveguide section and the coax to waveguide adapter were examined for S11 (reflection coefficient) andS21 (insertion loss). Both are important performance characteristics. S11 is a measure of impedancematching, which is necessary to minimize reflections. S21 is a measure of ohmic losses that reduce signalintensity. The waveguide horn antenna was characterized for 3D radiation pattern and for gain in dBi.These data are presented in figures 4 through 10.Figure 4: Comparison of measured reflection coefficient S11 on commercial straight waveguide sectionvs. 3D printed and silver painted straight waveguide section. Horizontal axis is
Integrating Metacognitive Practices and Research toEnsure Student Success (IMPRESS) summer program, which is a two-week program formatriculating Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) students who are first generation studentsand/or deaf/hard of hearing students (DHH) [8].This program is designed to serve as a bridge program forstudents to learn how to reflect on, evaluate, and changetheir own thinking through intensive laboratoryexperiments, reflective practices, and discussion both insmall groups (3-4 students) and with the whole class (20students).The main objectives of the IMPRESS program are toengage students in authentic science practice, to facilitatethe development of a supportive community, and to helpthe students reflect on science and