cultivation of innovation and creative ability in engineering education [1]. It is strategic important to engineering construction and personnel training fordevelopment of accreditation of engineering education under this background. The goal ofaccreditation of engineering education is to construct quality control system for engineeringeducation in China, and promote the reform of engineering education and further improve thequality of engineering education. To establish accreditation system for engineering educationwhich is linked up with the registered engineer, construct contact mechanism of engineeringeducation and business, enhance adaptability that of personnel training of engineeringeducation for industry development; To promote mutual
will continue in a larger student population.1. IntroductionResearch studies previously conducted by the author and other researchers find that today’ssuccessful and innovative educational approaches must focus on critical thinking, logicreasoning, and problem solving.1,15 Higher education institutions in the US have made enormousefforts to use newly designed curricula and adopt new techniques in teaching and learning inorder to significantly improve student’s learning outcomes and educate students to become wellinformed critical thinkers and deeply motivated problem solvers who can think critically, analyzeproblems, and discover innovative solutions. This effort also helps meet ever changing demandsfrom rapidly changing business and working
Leadership of Science and Engineering Education in AfghanistanAbstractManagers and leaders, with the required skills and levels of competency are essential for anyorganization, especially for educational institutions and specifically in countries that have beendevastated by decades of war and instability. This paper presents the results of an investigationon the leadership and management practices at higher education in the subject of Science andEngineering in Afghanistan.1. IntroductionThe development in Science, Engineering and Technology has revolutionized the world and hassignificantly improved the quality of life in more developed countries. However, the realbenefits of these developments have not reached the people
knowledge, skills andunderstanding to choose the appropriate research method or mixture of methods in anyparticular context.The nature of research methods and methodologies courses has come in for intensescrutiny across many disciplines over many years. Scientific based research is widelyviewed by engineers, to be rigorous and objective driven, using empirical methods inexperiment driven systemic methods that test hypotheses and justify conclusions. Suchpositivist traditions sometimes argue that such a truth can never be confirmed, onlydisconfirmed, i.e. the concept of falsifiability [1]. This paper effectively raises a number ofepistemological issues and questions the absence of qualitative research withinengineering education.Petroski [2] refers
achieve success would have a very differentprofile and relational structure from the previous one.Spiral DynamicsIn the ‘50s, a different approach toward understanding relational dynamics was pioneeredby Clare Graves, a professor at Union College, and further advanced by Don Beck andChris Cowan, students of Graves and authors of [1]. Graves, originally performingresearch to validate Maslow’s Hierachy of Needs in a relational context, found thatMaslow’s Hierarchy was incomplete. He found that societies and individuals traversedwell-defined relational modes dependent on the challenges faced by those societies attheir particular moments of crisis. Further, these modes were split into two dominantforms – “I” modes, where some aspect of an individual
, Austria, IGIP’2010 in Trnava, Slovakia, ICECE’2005 in Madrid, INTERTECH’2004 in Ba-hamas, INTERTECH’2006 in New Jersey, USA, EDUCON’2010 in Madrid. Abroad she has taughtcourses and lectures in five continents over 30 different Countries. Page 22.1442.4 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The discussions after the Bologna Process in Europe: The Global Engineer Claudio da Rocha Brito1, Melany M. Ciampi2 1 President of Science and Education Research Council 2 President of Safety, Health and Environment Research
authorscontacted the office of International Science and Engineering (OISE) at NSF. The OISE supportsprograms to expand and enhance leading edge international research and education opportunitiesfor U.S. scientists and engineers, especially at the early career stage. It specifically works to build Page 22.1264.3and strengthen effective institutional partnerships throughout the global science and engineeringresearch and education community, and it supports international collaborations in NSF's nationalpriority research areas 1.While keeping this objective in mind, a proposal was submitted to NSF office of InternationalScience and Engineering for holding
Longitudinal StudyAbstractThe Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE) and the University of Applied Sciences Lübeck/Germany (FHL) have a well-established, dual-accredited, bi-directional exchange program inElectrical Engineering that is completely integrated into the curricula of both institutions. Thebasic layout of this tuition-neutral exchange program is shown in Figure 1. MSOE and FHLstudents spend the first two years at their home institution. During the first half of the secondyear, the students express their desire to participate in the exchange program. After fulfilling allacademic requirements, students from both universities spend their third (Junior) year together atFHL and their fourth (Senior) year together at MSOE. The full academic year
stagnation and low growth” and find “a highproportion of their educated emigrate” 1.Furthermore, around the globe schools of engineering have become significant economicplayers. Engineering departments at MIT, Stanford, or Caltech are a main sourc of innovationand technology emergence of their region, and significant contributors to local and nationalwelfare 8,9. Accordingly, current theories of innovation assign an active, quasi-entrepreneurialrole for universities in the national innovation system (see e.g. 10). This global shift towards anentrepreneurial university paradigm has led to a re-thinking of engineering education along thelines of innovation, entrepreneurship, socio-economic systems and university-industry linkages.In 2005, the
two decades, they have increasingly become anaccessible way for K-12 students to learn about engineering design.1 Simple robots provide aconcrete form for younger students to explore issues related to structures, mechanisms, andbehaviors through the design of the robots using building blocks, motors, sensors, andprogrammable bricks.2Increasingly a common context for learning with robots has been in robot competitions.3 Aprimary goal of these competitions is to build students’ interests in engineering, but also theirskills in engineering as well. Especially in robot competition settings that aren’t specifically tiedto a formal course, the theory is that students will be motivated to test and learn about moregeneral ideas by building a robot to
model for an effective partnership to stimulate K-12 participation in STEM extra-curricularactivities between industry, engineering college, and K-12 schools is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Model of Industry, Engineering College, K-12 School PartnershipA corporate foundation finds a mechanism for empowering K-12 extra-curricular STEMprograms using the resources of an engineering college. As a result, funding and humanresource support can be used to empower student groups and their teachers / mentors to start andmore effectively participate in extra-curricular STEM programs such as National ScienceOlympiad and FIRST Robotics. Human resource support includes funds administration,assistance with mentoring, and assistance with program
reveals the consistent ways that teachers and students produce cohesion (1) byprojecting to past and future modal engagements, and (2) by coordinating representations andmaterials that are simultaneously present during modal engagements. Together, projection andcoordination create cohesion-producing opportunities to thread the mathematics throughdisparate representations, material forms and events. This work alerts us to the importance ofexplicitly addressing the need to produce and enforce cohesion across the range of materialforms, representations and activities that students confront in typical learning experiences.MotivationThe pool of engineers in the United States is neither large enough nor diverse enough to meet thecurrent needs of a
. Page 22.1139.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Parents’ Perceptions of and Familiarity with EngineeringIntroductionThere is a growing concern in the engineering community that the interest among youngpeople in engineering is declining. There is a need to strategically plan how a strongerengineering workforce in the United States can be accomplished 1. While some efforts hadbeen made in improving undergraduate education and recruitment, other efforts, like thisstudy, focus on K-12 education and how we can improve students’ understanding ofengineering at early ages. Furthermore, recent studies have provided evidence that learningengineering content, especially engineering design, can
engineering design Information Solutionprocess (see Figure 1) as a model fordeveloping an appropriate solution, the Communicateworking group first sought to clearly identifythe issue and define the problem to be Identify Alternatives Implement Solutionsolved. As a matter of primary importance,the collaborators first defined the learninggoals for the students1 – to increase students’ Select Best
effectiveness ofSTEM education priorities of the country.1 An effective STEM education effort will provide thetechnical skills and quantitative literacy needed for individuals to earn livable wages and makebetter decisions for themselves, their families and their communities. In the new global andchallenging economy, the country will need a well-educated STEM workforce that isscientifically, mathematically and technologically literate in order to compete against othernations.1Despite its excellent prior record, the United States now lags behind other nations ininternational comparisons of student performances in science and mathematics. Reportedly, thereis an interest and achievement gap among groups such as African Americans, Hispanics
. Participants in this study were Fellows and the teachers with whom they worked.Both groups are described in detail in this section. The Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of boththe university and participating school systems approved this study. All participants signed IRB-approved informed consent documents. Pseudonyms are used throughout this paper to protect theidentity of the participants. SLIDER Fellows: Cohort 1, 2010-2011. A joint application was developed to allowgraduate students to apply for both programs, SLIDER and STEP Fellows, or to select to focuson only one if they had a firm preference. Although some applicants chose to be considered forboth programs, some experience with or knowledge of robotics, LEGOS, and/or applied
, 2003. Page 22.1552.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Translating Research Experiences into Classroom Practice: An RET ProjectIntroductionMost K-12 teachers have not been trained to incorporate engineering and technology topics intotheir classroom lessons and there is a lack of high-quality curricular materials in these areas 1.Comprehensive professional development programs are needed for teachers to address the newskills and knowledge needed for improved classroom teaching and learning 2,3 if we expect themto integrate engineering concepts into their
feedback for CPCC as a central location to the unique experience.Survey ResultsThe survey results presented are in the same order as outlined above in the Survey section. Sixout of nine questions are shown due to their relevance to the paper. The results are shown in twoforms: the graph form represents the number of students on the vertical axis and the Likert scaleon the horizontal axis. The graph provides both visual and numerical data representation. Thetable represents the same data in percentage form to give the reader the actual percentagenumbers. Page 22.1201.6Teamwork and communication skills 1
tobecome an engineer in the future. The key demographics of the respondents are shown in Table1. Average Age 38.3 Average Years Teaching 13.4 Average Number of Students in Your School 212.3 Table 1: Key demographics of the respondentsThe respondents taught a range of science courses from several levels of General Science,Mathematics, Chemistry, Biology, Physics, Environmental Science, Health, Physical Education,Earth Systems to Technology and Robotics. In response to the question asking respondents todescribe in general what engineers do, or to define what “Engineering” is, the results revealed
. Page 22.1468.2MethodsDesign of Study 1The first study, conducted in Year 1, featured a quasi-experimental study design in which oneexperimental group of teachers taught science with the new engineering-design-based curriculumunits, while another group of comparison teachers taught the same science content with theirtypical district-selected curriculum units. For this study, 14 third- and fourth-grade teachers fromsix urban public schools in the northeastern United States volunteered to implement at least oneof the four new engineering-design-based science units. They attended a 30-hour workshop onthe content and pedagogy of these units. Before and after unit enactment, their studentscompleted identical paper-and-pencil science content tests as
allowed us to focus on how teacher/studentinteraction occurs, how students work with technology and to gain insight on how projectwork is done in the classroom setting. In applied work, such as was observed for thisresearch, a study of what the students are doing in the classroom is especially rich.Students used a variety of skills and concepts in a number of settings, includingprogramming robots, designing circuits in the Multisims simulation environment, andbreadboarding to create and troubleshoot circuits. In these contexts, one can observe howstudents are taught lessons that involve mathematics and subsequently use those tocomplete their projects.The analyses were motivated by three research questions: 1. How is class time distributed
appropriate for any given program requiresspecifying an evaluation logic model that is based on theory and/or knowledge of the behaviorbeing addressed, i.e. pursuing education and careers in STEM. The WE@RIT has specified abasic logic model shown in Figure 1. This model assumes that young women who areintroduced to science will have an interest in STEM and gain knowledge and competency aboutSTEM and STEM career options will commit to STEM education and pursue STEM careers.The behavioral logic model also specifies a number of variables that have been shown toinfluence each of the major areas of the model. Interest is influenced by the individual‟sperceptions of norms related to science. For young girls the most notable is the persistent genderbias
, access to cognitive tools and resources, and appropriate and timelyscaffolding29. Students perceive matter as continuous or static. This might be reflected in theirdrawings as indistinguishable markings (lines or colored region) mixed together to represent asubstance30. Matter is thought to be appearing and disappearing which is counter to the theory ofthe conservation of mass. The graphical shape, proximity and arrangement of particles is anindication of students wrestling with particle ideas. Formal representation of particles is oftenconceived in terms of a ratio of molecular spacing between a solid-liquid-gas as being 1:1:10(the difference between a solid and liquid representation is in configuration and not proximity).Students have similar
required to function in work and homeenvironments characterized by increasing technological sophistication. A decade ago, the GlennCommission Report 1 voiced grave concern that declining performance and interest in STEMsubjects among U.S. students would significantly impact efforts to increase the size of atechnical workforce already too small to meet the hiring needs of the nation’s firms, that werepoised to face drastic reductions as Baby Boomers reach retirement age. Since the release of thatreport, STEM education reform has been a growing priority of both government and privatesector agencies, as reflected by a proliferation of STEM initiatives at national, state, and locallevels
highschool students.I. IntroductionSensors are ubiquitous in everyday life in the modern world. From motion-sensing light switchesto environmental observatories, we are always connected to our physical world in real time. Thesensor revolution is, in effect, giving the world its first electronic nervous system [1]. Theclassroom integration of sensor development is topical and offers highly interdisciplinary subjectmatter, providing motivating scenarios for teaching a multitude of science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects and skill sets.This paper describes the development and implementation of a carefully scaffolded set of highschool curriculum modules, tied to the state and national standards in science, math, andtechnology
dayevent at PSU, each student has been involved in several hands-on, applied science and mathprojects that have reinforced their understanding of S.T.E.M topics. Page 22.1647.6Bibliography 1. Audo, Dennis; Seth O’Brien. Construction-Related Activities for Students in 1st-8th Grade. ASEE 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, June 20, 2010, Louisville, Kentucky. Page 22.1647.7
Secondary Level Engineering Education Numerous K-12 engineering initiatives have emerged across the U.S.1 These initiativeshave generated considerable interest within the science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) education community and beyond. Potential positive outcomes includeenhanced student achievement, increased awareness of engineering, and increased levels oftechnological literacy.2 However, a recent study of engineering-oriented teacher professionaldevelopment projects detected some significant concerns.3 One disturbing finding was the lackof a well-defined concept base. In the absence of a conceptual foundation, pre-collegeengineering tends to focus on engaging design-based activities without an appropriate
as co-teachers, mentors, and role models in the academic year and summer portions of the program. Page 22.1514.2The mission of the VDP is to: (1) increase the numbers of domestic students, particularlystudents from under-represented groups, pursuing STEM degrees by enhancing student interest in and attitudes toward math and science, (2) strengthen peer, family and school support for suchinterests, (3) ensure long-term inclusiveness of women and minorities in STEM programs, and(4) increase the number of students taking advanced-level mathematics and science courses. Byincreasing students’ interest in STEM content in their middle-school years
and monitoring as an outcome of portfolioconstruction by engineering students in the context of a studio environment.IntroductionIn comparing what you have with what you want to have, whether it is something learned or amaterial product acquired, there is a mutually informative relationship between your reflectionsand actions taken toward achieving goals and the continued definition and re-definition of goalsover time.1-3 In this paper, we describe the relationship between goal setting and goal monitoringin its various instantiations as a dialectic; that is, an exchange of arguments and counter-arguments about students’ goals and their progress toward achieving them.Goal setting and monitoring are activities that can lead to increased levels