. Page 22.592.2 This paper outlines and explores the Montessori method of creating meaningful context and highlights the ways in which the engineering design process deepens the Montessori instructional approach, illustrating how the collaboration between Montessori pedagogy and engineering experiences will inspire and prepare our next generation of engineers.1 Integrating Engineering into a Montessori CurriculumIn 2008 Medtronic funded a three year study of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics) coursework for Montessori elementary educators at St. Catherine University. Thegoal was to create courses on three distinct topics within the STEM matrix: Science, Engineeringand Mathematics (with Technology
) in Greece, for this type of content in the K-12 level. In searches thatfollowed “ηετνολογικές δραζηηριόηηηες για παιδιά” (technological activities for kids) was usedas well as a the third keyword “Επιζηήμη για παιδιά” (science for kids). .Five websites with K-12 engineering related content were identified. In regards to earlyeducation content curriculum and activities are proposed by just 1 website, and all information ispresented under the terms science, math, and technology.KoreanAccording to Digest of Education Statistics 20096, Korea was the country that had the highestpercentage (25.4%) of bachelor’s degrees in engineering among the 29 OECD countries in 2006.However, like the other countries, engineering in Korea is a discipline for
ActivitiesCentrifugal Pumps Many students do not have exposure tocentrifugal pumps, so this hands-on activity isdesigned to allow the students to learn how to operatedifferent types of pumps and discover how they work.Students first watch a video which demonstrates theproper technique to connect, prime and start upvarious pumps. The students are split into groups andfollow the instructions from the video to get anunderstanding of how to operate different pumps,including centrifugal pumps.Experiencing Heat Transfer Part 1 In this hands-on activity, students learn about how contact area and temperature gradientaffect heat transfer. Students first set up five different stations to prepare for this activity. The
Engineering in Technology Education: A Longitudinal View, 1966-2011For the past 15 years, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE/NRC) has strongly advocatedincluding technology/engineering content in K-12 educatio1n. In 1996, the NRC’s NationalScience Education Standards introduced the “Science & Technology” standard, whichencouraged the study of technology within the science curriculum1. In 2000, NAE PresidentWilliam Wulf wrote the following in his Foreword to Standards for Technological Literacy:“Thankfully… the ITEA has distilled an essential core of technological knowledge and skills wemight wish all K-12 students to acquire”2. Recommendation #1 in the NAE’s TechnicallySpeaking: Why All Americans Need to Know more
. Page 22.596.2IntroductionEngineering students are expected to understand the social, environmental and economic impactsof engineering at local, national and global levels. In their report, “Engineer of 2020”, theNational Academy of Engineering, envisions “a future where engineers are prepared to adapt tochanges in global forces and trends and to ethically assist the world in creating a balance in thestandard of living for developing and developed countries alike” 1. More specifically, the ABETAccreditation Criteria for Engineering programs require that accredited engineering programsdemonstrate students have “the broad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal
varying forms, however Lenning and Ebbers [1] have identified 4 commonforms (1) curricular learning communities that enroll a cohort of students in two or morecommon courses paired or clustered courses; (2) classroom learning communities where a cohortof students enrolled in a large lecture are broken into smaller cohorts for cooperative learningand group process learning opportunities (3) residential living and learning communities wherestudents with a common major live in the same area of a residential hall increasing theopportunity for out-of-class learning experiences; (4) student type learning communities whichenroll a targeted group, for example academically at risk students, honors students or minoritiesin engineering. Several published
education backgrounds, oftenaccompanied by additional years of engineering experience.The Model Law 2020 education requirements for engineering licensure specify: 1) a master’sdegree from a master’s program accredited by EAC/ABET, or a baccalaureate degree from a Page 22.598.2program accredited by EAC/ABET plus either: 1) a master’s degree in engineering from aninstitution which offers EAC/ABET programs, or; 2) 30 additional semester credits of upperlevel undergraduate or graduate level coursework in engineering, math, science and professionalpractice topic areas. NCEES is currently considering additional pathways to licensure for theModel Law 2020
. Page 22.599.2ABET, Inc., has been the recognized accreditor for college and university programs in appliedscience, computing, engineering, and technology for more than 75 years. Among the purposes ofABET, Inc. (ABET) are two that relate to accreditation. ABET intends to 1) organize and carryout a comprehensive process of accreditation of pertinent programs leading to degrees, and assistacademic institutions in planning their educational programs, and 2) promote the intellectualdevelopment of those interested in applied science, computing, engineering, and technologyprofessions (ABET Policy, 2008). The Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) evaluatesand accredits individual degree programs with the word “engineering” in their title
contribute to science identity formation, particularly in physics. Itwas concluded that physics courses can be used as arenas in which to develop science identity,with the ultimate goal of increasing inflow and persistence in engineering career paths.IntroductionThe Engineering PipelineMuch of the work examining the migration in and out of engineering career trajectories (i.e.recruitment and retention) has focused on the post-secondary and graduate levels.1-8 Forexample, Ohland and colleagues, using two large databases to examine the persistence andmigration in and out of engineering as well as other college majors, found that engineering notonly suffered a dearth of females entering the programs but also a low overall rate of migrationinto the
students‘ perspective. Observations and emerging trendsof this work in progress will be presented in this paper.IntroductionHistorically, engineering occupations have grown faster than other professions (1). But whileengineering job opportunities have increased, the number of degrees earned in these fields hasnot matched the demand. Twenty-six percent of employees in engineering are over the age of 50;in the coming decade society will be losing a quarter of its skilled workers (1).For Canada to increase its economic development through innovation, a change must occur thatdraws more students into engineering. As stated by Mr. Boivin, chief operating officer of theAssociation of Canadian Engineering Companies, ―We have growth in numbers, but the
AC 2011-2750: ENGINEERING PREPAREDNESS FOR GLOBAL WORK-FORCES: CURRICULAR CONNECTIONS AND EXPERIENTIAL IMPACTSGisele Ragusa, Ph.D., University of Southern California Gisele Ragusa is an associate professor in the Viterbi School of Engineering and the Rossier School of Education at the University of Southern California. She has expertise in engineering education, precollege engineering and in assessment and measurement. Page 22.602.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 1
teach study and learning skills in the form of programs. A review of theretention literature also shows that when colleges address the issue programmatically, they havea positive effect on students’ persistence. A major objective of retention programs is to booststudents’ academic skills while also helping to develop important social networks5. To furtherexplain, Tinto identifies three principles for institutions to consider when implementing effectiveretention programs6. Effective retention programs are committed to: (1) The students they serve. They put student welfare ahead of other institutional goals. (2) The education of all, not some, of their students. (3) The development of supportive social and educational
, University of Texas, ArlingtonDr. K.J. Rogers P.E., University of Texas, Arlington Page 22.604.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Engineering Sustainable Civil EngineersAbstractEngineering Sustainable Engineers (ESE) was designed to infuse curricula in the Departments ofCivil (CE), Industrial and Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington withsustainability. The overarching aim is to improve student knowledge of and competency inaddressing sustainability issues in engineering design and problem solving. Three key programelements are (1
their matriculation through the program. This translatesthat the students are supposed to attain the above qualifications at the time of their graduation.This statement has clear scope of reducing faculty burden by emphasizing assessment on somekey courses rather than spending energy and time on many preparatory courses, like, AC, DC,Logic Circuits, and Computer Applications on MS Office, etc., offered particularly at thefreshman and sophomore levels. In fact, these fundamental courses at the preparatory level donot have adequate scope to measure the student outcomes.Mapping a-k Outcomes to CoursesFigure 1 is an example of mapping a-k outcomes to courses for some arbitrary degree plan. Asexplained in the last sentence of the previous section
one to understand the holistic experiences ofcommunity college transfer students in Engineering majors.Purpose of the study and Research QuestionsThis study seeks to build on current research regarding the experiences of community collegetransfer students in Engineering at a Midwestern university. The experiences of 157 transferstudents are highlighted. The purpose of this study was to understand the backgroundcharacteristics as well as the community college and university experiences of communitycollege transfer students in Engineering majors. The following research questions guided thisstudy.1. What are the background characteristics of community college transfer students in Engineering at a Midwestern university?2. What are
adultlearning theories of Knowles and Lawler, the experiential learning theory of Kolb, therecommendations of the Veterans’ Education for Engineering and Science workshop report, andthe recommendations developed from a case study completed by the University of KentuckyMilitary Veterans of America. The three focus areas of our approach are: 1) Recruitment andSupport Constructs, 2) Transition, and 3) Integration of Technical Experience. Recruitment andRetention strategies include development of “dummy proof” advertising and structuredcurriculum plans which incorporate BCTCblue+, a transfer/dual enrollment program betweenBCTC and UK that includes advising, guaranteed admission, UK courses at BCTC tuition rates,and more. This program offers pathways for
assumed. The hope is that byworking through this exercise before seeing the theoretical and mathematical details of theselaws in class, the students will gain a greater appreciation for the practical aspect of these laws.Experimental KitThis learning experience is based around a kit which consists of a modified off-the-shelf“electromagnetic flashlight”1, a custom-made circuit board, and a pair of connecting wires. Thecomponents of this kit are shown in Figure 1. The flashlight was modified slightly by adding aconnector to the side of the flashlight, which enabled a direct connection to one of the coils Page 22.608.2inside the body of the
Pedagogical, Curricular, and Institutional ReformIntroductionThis paper surveys and analyzes a range of progressive engineering reform efforts that extendfrom explicit concerns with social justice, or what Joe Herkert has usefully called questions of“macro-ethics” in engineering. 1 The paper categorizes these efforts and shows how they work atvarious levels of reform: material change through reforms in how and for whom technologies aredesigned; situated educational interventions, including both pedagogical and curricularexperiments; professional community-building interventions; and lastly scholarly contributionschallenging how “engineering” is typically understood and how new understandings mightprompt better attention to questions of social
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 ENGINEERS ON WHEELSIntroductionThere is a growing concern among educators that the science and mathematics knowledge of K-12 students needs to be made exciting and relevant [1-3]. Most school districts are faced withfinancial constraints especially in providing students enriching experiences via field trips andteachers with opportunities for educational workshops for STEM (Science TechnologyEngineering Mathematics) exposure. As such there is a dire need to reach out to the teachersand students on site to offer exposure to STEM careers via innovative hands on learningactivities. One such way would be to take engineering workshops onsite to school districts
ofunderrepresented minority students. The project goals are three folds: 1) Establish a cyber-infrastructure to enable remote learning which significantly improve the learning efficiency ofstudents on a commuter campus; 2) Foster students’ hands-on design and implementation skillsin networking field; 3) Improve teaching and learning efficiency by integrating project-based andinquiry-based learning pedagogy.This paper presents our current progress on the CCLI project, which is focused on thedevelopment of a sequence of scalable remote labs using OPNET to enable the integration ofcollaborative project-based and inquiry-based based learning into existing computer networkingcourses in both Computer Science and Electrical Engineering departments. The remote
efficient in increasing studentengagement and supporting teachers’ instructional needs. The key strategy of the project is todevelop innovative math learning modules and use them to enhance students’ performance. Byapplying cutting-edge computer graphics and virtual reality technologies, these modules can: (1)make mathematics learning interesting while still retaining the underlying contents; (2) makeabstract and non-intuitive mathematics concepts “visible” and “touchable”, and thereby, easy tounderstand; and (3) bridge mathematics and engineering and motivate students to pursueengineering careers.The goal of the project is to ensure that students, especially freshmen and sophomores, canbenefit from the instructional strategies and develop a solid
operationalefficiency and increase their bottom line.1. IntroductionThis paper discusses both the educational aspects, in terms of pedagogical approach to teach thecapstone design course and assessment of the course learning outcomes, and the technicalaspects of the 2006- 2007 Systems Engineering Capstone Design course at the University ofArkansas at Little Rock (UALR). Teaching systems engineering, in general, and systemsengineering capstone design course, in particular, is a subject of continuous debate due to themultidisciplinary nature of the systems engineering discipline and the expectations of thestakeholders involved in the capstone design course1-2. This work presents the UALR SystemsEngineering Department successful experience in teaching the
typical engineering design text books, concept selection is taught after concept generationbut before detailed design 1, 2, 3. Most texts present a variation of the Pugh Concept SelectionProcess. However, the Pugh concept selection method has many drawbacks that are aggravatedwhen inexperienced designers use the process. Inexperienced designers tend to use the method Page 22.614.2to justify the selection of a low risk solution without the benefit of a technical analysis or even anestimate of the capabilities of the alternatives.Inexperienced designers tend to select familiar concepts without properly considering alternativedesigns that may meet
importance of facilitating note taking for students towards improved studentlearning.ApproachApproximately 72 students at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown participated in thisresearch to determine the effectiveness of lecture worksheets facilitating the learning of Statics.An Experimental group consisting of 38 students was given lecture worksheets and was taughtby the instructor who developed them. A Control group consisting of 24 students who did notuse the worksheets was taught by another instructor. A typical lecture worksheet is shown inFigure 1. Lecture worksheets consisted of pre-drawn diagrams, sketches and problem statements.It included an average of two problems that were solved by the instructor and one in-classproblem solved by
causes. Hence, a survey tool was developed with possible causes for low enrollment ofminority students in technology, particularly minority black students, and shown in Table 1. Thesurvey tool was circulated among the minority students of Engineering Technology departmentat AAMU. The students were asked to rate their responses on a scale of 1 – 4. The studentresponses were compiled, averaged and presented in Fig. 1. In this figure, the horizontal axisdenotes the item number for various causes as described in Table 1, and the vertical axis denotesthe average rating for that particular item.Table 1. Survey Tool for possible causes of low Enrollment of African American students in Technology & Construction.Survey Tool for causes of low
Page 22.617.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Enhancement of Student Learning in Experimental Design using Virtual Laboratories – Year 3IntroductionCapstone courses in which students have an opportunity to practice engineering are an importantaspect of undergraduate engineering curriculum. In the last 20 years, capstone courses have beenintegrated into engineering curricula nationwide in response to ABET accreditation requirementsand feedback from industry.1 In addition to providing students the opportunity to practiceengineering, capstone courses facilitate the development of creative and critical thinking, whichare crucial in the practice of engineering. By design
for each during his or heracademic experience, a number of very clear benchmarks that indicate that a student is on trackfor success, and the metrics utilized by the university to assess progress. Each year of theBlueprint clearly delineates the “Engage, Challenge, and Support” activities. One year of thatBlueprint is shown in Figure 1. Page 22.618.4 Figure 1: Blueprint for Success – Junior YearCritical to the success of the Blueprint for Success has been establishing high visibility of thisprogram among students and parents, faculty and staff. Getting this information in front of eachaudience and creating high
describes our efforts in renovating an existing non-required mechatronicscourse to upgrade the contents of the course and to improve the students’ learning experience.The main efforts include developing lecture materials, demo tools, and laboratory projectmodules employing model-based design approach, using Matlab, Simulink, and a number ofother Mathworks toolboxes. These tools simplify the process of system modeling, control design,and embedded microcontroller programming for rapid prototyping and design verification.1. IntroductionIt has long been known that teaching through examples and hands-on laboratory exercisesimprove the students’ learning experience, especially in technical multi-domain subjects such asMechatronics. However, the
Hungary have this partnership concept and would be able to conduct classes with a globalperspective which is an intangible benefit for all students.The ability to combine technology and institutional partnerships provides a significantopportunity to economically solve the low class size enrollment issue.[1] 2009 ASEE data search of member institutions for student enrollment by degree program, R. Pozzi[2] Douglas Benson, Julie Rodriguez, TEL8: The Development of a Transportation Video Conference Network, Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State University, Staff Paper No. 149, NDSU, November 2002.[3] Z. Balogh, M. Ivanyi, R. Gutkowski, Telecourses in Engineering Education, ASEE World Congress, Budapest, 2004. [4
teaching style could lead to student’s discouragement and change to othercurricula 1, 2. Due to a large number of students with different majors, it was clear that more thanone learning style needed to be implemented in this course in order to achieve successfullearning experience for students of any major. Richard Felder and Linda Silverman suggestseveral teaching techniques to address all learning styles, one of which is to providedemonstrations for students with sensing and visual learning styles and hands-on experiments forstudents with active learning styles1. Edgar Dale’s cone of learning shows that participating indiscussions or other active experiences may increase retention of material by up to 90% 3.Furthermore, the importance of