Tanyel & Adams, On the Aesthetics of Computer Aided Tools for Signal Processing, p. 9 of 10LabVIEW. We have simply given an argument as to why one professor finds working with LabVIEWmore rewarding.Students also appreciate the exposure to LabVIEW. We have noted that almost all the senior designprojects have incorporated LabVIEW in one way or another this year. In fact, one of the seniordesign project teams has combined the strengths of both LabVIEW and MATLAB, using theLabVIEW interface to call MATLAB scripts. As Tanyel notes in [12]: “Part of the enthusiasm isdue to the aesthetics of LabVIEW virtual instruments. I have seen many a student revisiting andperfecting the way the front panel looks long after his/her VI has achieved its
the College of Engineering at the Ohio State University where theyredeveloped the freshman engineering casses to a combined course with hands-on laboratoryelements3. Teamwork, project management, report writing, and oral presentations were the mainparts of this program.Recently, in their research, Smith et al. focused on classroom-based pedagogy of engagement1.The authors recognized the active and collaborative learning as better ways for students to learnby being intensely involved in the educational process. These learning methods can further beimplemented by encouraging the students to apply their knowledge in many situations. Thearticle, as illustrated in Figure 1, also indicates the superiority of the problem-based learningover the
equation (2).The implementation and manipulation of the stoichiometric constraints renders equilibriumdidactically challenging: the Lagrange multipliers strategy discussed in Ref. [7] is effective butcumbersome. We propose a singular value decomposition of the stoichiometric matrix as a viablesolution strategy, because of its lean and straightforward implementation. The algorithm startswith identifying the effective number of constraints as the codimension of the nullspace of A(N(A)), which is, as a consequence, mapped by the right singular vectors corresponding to zerosingular values. Hence, A USV T dn V :, nelement 1: nspecies dc, (3)where dc is the projection of dn on the nullspace N(A), and
reading assignmentover the material to be covered. Reading assessment quizzes are then administered toindividuals and teams to assess their level of preparedness as well as to identify areas ofconfusion (similar to Readiness Assessment Testing (RAT)). In practice, these quizzes areweighted relatively heavily to further encourage students to actually read and prepare. Followingthe preparation period, a cyclical application period is used to provide in-depth materialcoverage. Individual assignments (homework or projects) are completed by the students outsideof class, while in-class time is divided between lecture and team exercises. The team exercisesare gauged to present increasingly complex ideas and challenging exercises as the moduleprogresses
of the 2009 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 4Table 3 summarizes the features and shortcomings of the Year 1 institute. The teachers enjoyedthe hands-on experimentation, rated the workshop as a great learning experience and invitedseveral of the professors from the U of A for follow-up visits to their classrooms. While thesummer institute gave the teachers eight hands-on experiments for use in their classrooms (notbad for last minute work due to late funding of the project), the teachers did not actually usemany of the experiments in their classrooms because they did not feel comfortable with
lecture notesto be saved, projected on a computer screen, and transmitted over the internet. The digital tabletalso has the “cut and paste” ability so that textbook pictures can be pasted into the lecture. Thisallows the teacher to use high quality graphics in the lecture, which is especially helpful whenexplaining the three dimensional problems, and other problems where it is difficult to draw agood picture by hand.Homework, quizzes and exams for the classes are traditional. Students are assigned to workproblems out of the textbook for homework, and work similar problems for quizzes and examsduring class. The goal is to use the distance technology to help the students perform better onthe traditional homework, quizzes and exams. The primary
ensure validity of the model, all cases with incomplete data were excluded. In otherwords, only students with known values for each variable were used for this project; if thestudent did not have an ACT score on record, for example, that student was excluded from thestudy. This reduced the 2001 cohort from 252 data sets to 125 data sets and reduced the 2011cohort from 230 data sets to 145 data sets. The two cohorts were merged together and put inProceedings of the 2013 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 5random order, resulting in a total of 270 student data sets. The first 135 students of the
Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2This last paper, “Incorporating Inquiry-Based Projects into the Early Lab Experience” byServoss and Clausen6 was presented at the 2012 ASEE Midwest Conference held at MissouriUniversity of Science and Technology describes a methodology with several similarities to theone independently developed by the current author and used in a sophomore level ChemicalEngineering lab course to address student attention and interest in the course.As further background to the method described here, a short history of the various approachesused within our department is in order. Mechanical
Fall 2018 (projected) Class Enrollment Class Enrollment BIOL 2013, Microbiology 475 BIOL 2013, Microbiology 453 BIOL 1543, Biology 381, 314 BIOL 1543, Biology 300-468 PHYS 2074, Physics II 265, 220 CHEM 1103, Chemistry I 215-265 CSCE 2014, Programming II 164 PHYS 2054/2054H, Physics I 280, 361 CHEG 4423, Process Control 102 CSCE 2004, Programming I 121 MEEG 2013, Dynamics 95 MEEG 2003, Statics 174There are developing problems in engineering education that are at least partially associated withthese
and Patrick Little, Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999 (1st Edition), 2004 (2nd Edition), 2008 (3rd Edition, with E. J. Orwin and R. E. Spjut); Spanish translation, Limusa Wiley, Balderas, Mexico, 2002; Korean translation, Info-Tech Corea, Seoul, South Korea, 2008; Portugese translation Artmed Editora, S.A., Porto Alegre RS, Brazil, 2010.9. Philip D. Cha, James J. Rosenberg, and Clive L. Dym, Fundamentals of Modeling and Analyzing Engineering Systems, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000.10. Clive L. Dym, Principles of Mathematical Modeling, 2nd Edition, Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 2004. (First edition, 1980, co-authored by Elizabeth S. Ivey.)11. Jennifer Stroud
Program of the National Science Foundationunder Award Number EEC-9986866.REFERENCES[1] Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education.New York: Cambridge University Press.[2] CTGV. (1992). The jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 291-315.[3] Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313-350.[4] Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. The Journal of the
avariety of concepts are addressed in interactive fashion such as ruler and measurement error,minimizing random error, error bars, and balance calibration. How do you compare data fromtwo difference sources? This could be two different methods or the same method and twodifferent analysts. Figure 5 illustrates the comparison and difference plots where the studentexplores the three errors to examine the behavior of the data especially as it compares to the y =x line. An instructor could pose questions in a lecture and elicit discussion from students orassign exploration as an in-class activity or out-of-class project. The difference in the behaviorof the absolute and relative (percentage) errors is also demonstrated in Figure 5
application of relevant standards and design codes is integrated into project work and design theory. Section2A.23 deals with industrial relations and asks programs to describe any participation in “multi-stakeholder forums for the developmentof technical standards, codes, regulations or guidelines.” Programs must provide, as part of the sections dealing with facultyinformation, information on memberships in standards developing organizations and on participation on standards developmentcommittees. There are no comparable specific requests in the ABET self-study guidance [7]Canadian engineering colleges are asked to provide information relating to staff participation in standards development work at thenational or international level. With respect to
specific goalsrelated to increasing diversity and inclusion in enrollment and degree attainment. The pledgecommits the signatory programs to engage in four activities to promote diversity in enrollment,retention, and graduation rates which will lead to increased diversity in the workforce andengineering faculty. Applicants must be members of the ASEE Engineering Deans Council(EDC) or the Engineering Technology Council (ETC). The program is projected to have threelevels of recognition: Bronze, Silver and Gold. Currently applicants can apply for bronze status,reaffirmation of bronze status, direct to silver status or silver status (for current bronzeinstitutions).Literature ReviewSelection and persistence of STEM majors has been attributed to four
Paper ID #42249Board 97: Work-in-Progress: TextCraft: Automated Resource Recommendationfor Custom Textbook CreationXinyuan Fan, University of Toronto Xinyuan (Elva) Fan is currently pursuing a Master’s degree in Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Toronto, following her Honours Bachelor in Computer Science from the University of Waterloo. At the University of Toronto, she worked on a research project focusing on web crawler-driven automated textbook creation. She can be reached at elva.fan@mail.utoronto.ca or elvafan625@gmail.com.Dr. Hamid S Timorabadi P.Eng., University of Toronto Hamid Timorabadi
investigate this as theexperiment was to observe if the critical reading of the paper resulted in students suspecting this.In this section, we will describe the fake paper experience in both 2018 and 2021.2018 - Fake Paper ClassIn 2018, we used the work by SCIgen project(https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/) to create a fake paper purelywith the tool. The paper is titled ”Exploring Routing Using Optimal Architectures”, and theauthor was Moshe Krieger (a tribute to my undergraduate advisor). The citations in this paper areall made up using researchers’ names in the FPGA research space. Additionally, there are notables or figures in this generated publication. The fake publication can be viewed athttp://drpeterjamieson.com/html_papers
complex, technical information. 3) Revise documents for content, organization, and writing style. 4) Using library research skills and knowledge of citation practices, conduct self-directed inquiry to identify, critically evaluate, and cite relevant literature. 5) Provide feedback to others on their writing, speaking, and teamwork abilities. 6) Demonstrate ability to work in teams and manage team projects. 7) Design and deliver effective oral presentations. 8) Understand ethics and sustainability in engineering.The students completed four major assignments where they used our scaffolded approach torevision: Job Documents, Research Poster, Lab Protocol, and Technical Report. (Detaileddescriptions of all major assignments are
, project-based designcourse, and students often are forced to attempt more difficult designs without having a solidunderstanding of the fundamentals. To help address this gap between course supports andexpectations, in 2021, student leaders were empowered to offer a co-curricular CAD course thatwas open to students of all years in the Sustainable Design Engineering degree. The course wasoffered through the Engineering Success Centre, a help centre that seeks to support studentlearning, train student leaders, and foster a welcoming, inclusive university experience [2].The course has been taught by undergraduate students employed by the Engineers SuccessCentre who have previously received their CSWA certification. The instruction is typically
, parents and others interested in what students know and are able to do(Dawson, 2017). They also provide a clear statement as to what is considered important and worthlearning (evaluation criteria), even before learning has occurred. The use of rubrics is now embedded inthe education sector student assessment and learning practices (Brookhart & Chen, 2015).Why use rubrics in evaluation? Evaluation has been defined as the systematic determination of thequality, value, or importance of something (Scriven, 1991). Rubrics are powerful tools for assessing theseaspects and help stakeholders draw evaluative conclusions about performance. When evaluation criteriaand rubrics are established at the start of a project and its evaluation, it is clear to
down from God on stone tablets. Fixed hardcopy textbooks are limited topresenting text and static images; whereas well designed online course allows forlinear and interactive animations as well as virtual instruments and tools thatpermit data input/output that demonstrate the process of programming in a waythat is impossible for any static text.How will your students practice programming? Will they simply re-type theexamples from the textbook (or worse, copy/paste them from an online text)?Using a professional IDE has the advantage of ecological validity, but may resultin an excessive cognitive load [13] for the student. Does an introductory studentreally need to select one of the seven different project types, just to create a“Hello, World
will cause the LEDs on the selected device toresearchers working in a distributed manner on device blink once. This is the default way of viewing Device status –development, deployment and monitoring with an API (not yet clicking the Network icon (12) will return to this view. Clickingwell-documented unfortunately) to create cloud-based services of the Device Info (13) icon allows more fine-grained examinationtheir own. Researchers have the ability to participate directly in for all of the deployed devices and offers the ability to set andthe development of the open source project including the inspect device variables including LED state and sensor readings.provision of advanced security features
. consumption, many effective analysis tools and simulation software were utilized, such as DOE2, eQUEST (Quick Energy Simulation III. Scientific Methodology Tool), Energy Plus, and TRACETM 700 etc. TRACETM 700 (Trane Air Conditioning Economics) software is a load design-and- energyA significant goal of this project is how to reduce a commercial analysis software program that helps building designers to optimizebuilding’s energy consumption by using design of experiment the building’s envelope, heating, ventilating and air-conditioning(DOE
numerousto list here. Major areas of focus include healthcare, women’s outreach and professionaldevelopment, and education. One well-established organization which provides opportunities forengineering faculty to volunteer their time or make monetary contributions is Engineers WithoutBorders (EWB). EWB “supports community-driven development programs worldwide by Copyright ASEE Middle Atlantic Regional Conference, April 29-30, 2011, Farmingdale State College, SUNYcollaborating with local partners to design and implement sustainable engineering projects, whilecreating transformative experiences and responsible leaders” [12]. EWB-USA membersparticipate in professional or student chapters on a wide
felt that this course didn't teach me how to write programs only a few key algorithms. I feel that the course shouldbe more focused on the coding and not the algorithmsNO MORE ONLINE CLASSES, I PAY MY TUITION TO LEARN FROM A HUMAN NOT ACOMPUTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!This is an excellent introductory course in programming for any non computer engineering student. I think thestructure of the exams should be changed; I think the exams should be more like project-oriented.This is a great course overall, but there has to be a class before this at least to show us how programming works; toteach us the basics of programming and getting familiar with it. This course just jumps ahead and you can fall backvery easily.go a little slower in the beginning, since
tailored toward the companies’ products.Normally these processes concentrate on in-company data management and dimensional synthesis morethan they do on type synthesis. Also, while theoretical techniques for product redesign exist, they are notnormally included in these design processes, thus making the potential redesign process informal and notstandardized.A new comprehensive design process for mechanisms with planar coupler curves for linear motion slideswas developed during conducting the senior project in China. It is targeted at small to medium sizecompanies, and incorporates tools from several general as well as specific design processes. The processconcentrates on conceptual design, includes elements of redesign based on modified design
include the development of activecollaborations with education researchers for the formal conduction of education research which will be reported infuture publication.Acknowledgement This work was partly supported by the Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundationunder Award Number EEC-9986866.REFERENCES[1] Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education.New York: Cambridge University Press.[2] CTGV. (1992). The jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 291-315.[3] Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial
include the development of activecollaborations with education researchers for the formal conduction of education research which will be reported infuture publication.Acknowledgement This work was partly supported by the Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundationunder Award Number EEC-9986866.REFERENCES[1] Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education.New York: Cambridge University Press.[2] CTGV. (1992). The jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 291-315.[3] Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial
material;assessment techniques have been put forth to grade students’ ecology, health, energy, and pollution. The debate served asperformance in an in-class debate. Typically, teachers utilize the block’s nexus by helping students connect all of thea rubric divided into categories such as analysis, concepts using a realistic situation.communication, organization, etc. to assess the students’performance [4]. This type of assessment only accounts forthe teacher’s viewpoint on the students’ performance and does III. METACOGNITION ASSESSMENT MODELnot include peer or self-assessments. Walker & Warhurst The main objective of this project was to assess a student’s(2010) [10] attempted to include self
introducing and exhibiting the most creative, market-ready,spaciousness through two bedrooms, an office space, and an open residential solar applications. Over its ten-year development,living space for lounging, cooking, and gathering—offering a the Solar Decathlon competition organizers have continuallymodel for affordable and sustainable living. This paper will adjusted and refined the competition criteria in an effort topresent design and construction details of Norwich University keep a fine balance between making the competition solely anΔT90 house which allowed it meet the project design objectives. exploratory design exercise and a pragmatic, hammer-ready
Paper ID #45761A Gender-based Comparative Analysis of Motivations and Challenges in ConstructionEducationDr. Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University Saeed Rokooei is an associate professor in the Department of Building Construction Science at Mississippi State University. Dr. Rokooei’s primary research interests include community resilience, engineering education, simulation and serious games, project management methodologies, data analytics, creativity and innovation, and emerging technologies.Mr. George D Ford P.E., Mississippi State University Dr. George Ford P.E. is the Director of Mississippi Stateˆa C™s Building