student immersion and growth in mind, the programhas developed to include an engineering cornerstone project in which students work in teams todesign, build, and program autonomous robots to complete tasks on an interactive roboticscourse. In support of the project, a variety of technologies were designed and polished as theprogram grew. Classroom methodologies were also evaluated and improved with time inresponse to student feedback and research on best practices.This paper provides a historical review of practice for the program with an emphasis on thetechnologies and methodologies that have been most effective in the program as it hasdeveloped.IntroductionFor 23 years researchers in autonomous robot design have worked on the advancement of
Innovative Intervention to Infuse Diversity and Inclusion in a Statics CourseAbstractEngineering educators strive to prepare their students for success in the engineering workforce.Increasingly, many career paths will require engineering graduates to work in multidisciplinaryteams with individuals possessing a diversity of skill sets, backgrounds, and identities. Therefore,it is important not only for future engineers to have the opportunity to work in teams as students,but also to have specific instruction that teaches them about teamwork skills and the valuediversity and inclusion bring to engineering practice. Furthermore, it is important that thisinstruction occurs throughout their engineering coursework, giving
educator since 2008, and curently works in the College of Engineering and Engineering Education department at the University of Tehran.Hannah Budinoff, The University of Arizona Hannah Budinoff is an Assistant Professor of Systems and Industrial Engineering at the University of Arizona. Her research interests include additive manufacturing, geometric manufacturability analysis, design for manufacturing, and engineering education.Philipp Gutruf, The University of ArizonaDr. K. ”Larry” Larry Head, The University of Arizona ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A pathway to create and validate an engineering design rubric across all engineering programs 1
not unusual for discrepancies to exist when a senior plans to spendan extra semester or year as an undergraduate or when a graduating student completed therequired senior course in a previous term.Administering the survey in the month prior to commencement, while the students are still oncampus and in contact with their faculty members, obviously allows for increased opportunitiesfor contact and leverage, both increasing response rate. The disadvantage is that some studentswill not seek or obtain placement until after commencement. Thus, surveys administered sixmonths after commencement, a common practice, will typically always report higher placementthan those administered on campus before students leave. However, response rates are
Paper ID #22147Building Your Change-agent Toolkit: The Power of StoryDr. Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now a research professor of integrated engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato, and the managing partner of Kaizen Academic.Prof. Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical
psychologist with twenty years experience leading research and development initiatives and applied re- search studies focused on equitable, high quality teaching and learning for all young people. At the New York Hall of Science, Dr. Culp leads collaborative, multidisciplinary teams to design, develop, implement and study experiences, tools, and media that help highly diverse groups of young people discover their own identities as scientists and engineers. Her research has been funded by the National Science Founda- tion, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the U.S. Department of Education and the Intel Foundation. Dr. Culp is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Amherst College (1988) and holds a PhD in developmental
undergraduate and graduate levels. His tremendous re- search experience in manufacturing includes environmentally conscious manufacturing, Internet based robotics, and Web based quality. In the past years, he has been involved in sustainable manufacturing for maximizing energy and material recovery while minimizing environmental impact. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project to Develop a Teaching Tool: Extruder Tutor Plastic InjectionMolding MachineIn recent years there has been a big push to get students into the STEM fields. However, what seems to be lackingin this academic push is the hands on side of it. Engineering simply just isn’t about equations, but
Tech, and Director of the Frith First Year Makers program and of the Minecraft Museum of Engineering. His research focuses include creativity-based pedagogy, the interactions of non-humans with the built environment, and the built environment as a tool for teaching at the nexus of biology and engineering. He earned his graduate degrees from Virginia Tech, including an M.S. Civil Infrastructure Engineering, M.S. LFS Entomology, and a Ph.D. in Environmental Design and Planning. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Student Engagement with a Nontraditional First-Year Engineering Project ThemeAbstractFor many
professionals in the U.K. have been required to explicitly consider thesafety of construction workers in their designs since 1994, and PtD is now required throughoutthe European Union1, in Singapore, South Africa and Australia.14 The recognition of the valueof PtD and the diffusion of PtD practices has been much slower (due to factors that willdiscussed shortly), but there are signs the concept is gaining recognition among researchers,project owners,31 32 and design professionals.12 16 21 The Occupational Safety and HealthAdministration’s (OSHA) Construction Alliance Roundtable has had a working group thatfocuses on designing for construction safety since 2005 while the National Institute forOccupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has had a significant
AC 2011-2808: SOFTWARE-BASED ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR STU-DENT LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMESMehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Dr. Mehrubeoglu received her B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, and her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bioengineering and Electrical Engineering, respectively, from Texas A&M University. After working as a research engineer and software engineer at Electroscientific Industries, where she developed new algorithms for machine vision problems, she joined Cyprus Interna- tional University as the Chair of Department of Computer Engineering. After returning to Texas she taught at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. She has
Electrical Engineering concentration. His research work focuses on the use of wireless sensor networks, microcontrollers, and physiological data collection for a variety of applications. His primary interest is in the area of adaptive tutorial systems, but he has ongoing projects in the area of hospital patient health monitoring. He is actively engaged in K-12 outreach through several venues.Dr. Chris Venters, East Carolina University Chris Venters is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University in Greenville, North Carolina, USA. He teaches introductory courses in engineering design and mechanics and upper-level courses in fluid mechanics. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering
significance of team culture and inclusivity within design teamsunderscores the pivotal role they play in the optimal functioning of engineering teams [2].Moreover, there is a growing body of evidence emphasizing the positive impact of diversity onteam performance and student learning outcomes [3]. To provide a more comprehensiveunderstanding of these implications for engineering educators, it is useful to delve deeper intothe specific ways in which diversity and inclusion contribute to the enhanced effectiveness ofengineering teams. Exploring concrete examples, case studies, or empirical data that highlightthe tangible benefits of diverse perspectives and inclusive practices within engineering contextswould serve to fortify the argument and elucidate
) of Efficient Dynamic Simulation of Robotic Mechanisms (Kluwer), an Associate Editor of IEEE’s Robotics and Automation Magazine, and a member of the Executive Committee of ASME’s Technology and Society Division. Dr. Jablokow has developed four courses based on Adaption-Innovation theory at the graduate level and is currently investigating the relationship between cognitive style and invention.Matt Bass, Siemens Corporate Research Matthew Bass is currently a Member of the Technical Staff for the Software Architecture Program at Siemens Corporate Research. In this role, Matt conducts research and consults with Siemens business units in the areas of Geographically Distributed
been implemented. In the remainder of this paper,we will compare and contrast these two project paradigms and examine their impact on studentlearning. The project structure described in the left-hand column is that used in BiologicalProcess Engineering. The structure described on the right-hand side is that used in teachingBiological Responses to Environmental Stimuli.The Motivations and Benefits for the Project StructuresA major motivation for the structure of our projects is to, within the confines of an academicsetting, provide design experiences and develop skills that are directly applicable to our studentsneeds after graduation. Career choices for Biological Resources Engineering graduates are asdiverse as the program. Our graduates have
, 9Course Organization and StructureWhether the course is one semester or two will significantly impact how the course isorganized, the content that can be covered, and the scope of the design project.According to a recent survey conducted by John Wiley based on a response from 50departments, US chemical engineering departments are split down the middle – half teachone design course, and half teach a two-semester design sequence.10Instructors have several challenges related to the structure and organization of the course.Departments who teach one design course must be very selective and choose whichcontent is most important for its graduates. Design projects for a one-semester offeringmight be best structured as multiple smaller problems that
Accreditation Cycle,” Approved October 29, 2005.(4) Mertens, D., and J. A. McLaughlin, Research and Evaluation Methods in Special Education. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, 2003.(5) Wholey, J., “Evaluability Assessment.” Chapter in Wholey, et. al., Handbook of Practical Evaluation, Jossey-Bass, 2004.(6) McLaughlin, J. A. and G. B. Jordan, “Logic Models: A Tool for Describing Program Theory and Performance,” Chapter in Wholey, et. al., Handbook of Practical Evaluation, Jossey-Bass, 2004.(7) Stufflebeam, D. “Evaluation Models. New Directions for Program Evaluation,” no. 89. San Francisco, Jossey- Bass, 2001.(8) Bickman, L., “The Functions of Program Theory,” In L. Bickman (ed.), Using Program Theory in Evaluation
)techniques for motivating students unsure of “why they need…”, and (4) a better understandingof where their future students are coming from.The North Texas-STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) center is a partnership ofour university and a Dallas Independent School District (DISD) that establishes a center forSTEM education that will research, create, and provide information on best practices forinnovative teaching and learning. Our strategy is to create campus design teams, bringingtogether school administrators, teachers, students, STEM professors, STEM business partners,community-based informal STEM institutions such as museums and existing science networks inorder to provide opportunity for interaction between all of these
biosensorrequire the cooperation of professors and graduate students in biology, chemistry, computerscience, electrical and computer engineering, and mathematics.To mirror the practice of this interdisciplinary research students participating in this study werechallenged to design and test “sensing” related problems of their choice. For example, teams made up of math, anatomy/physiology, and engineering and technology students designed bicycle helmets fitted with sensors to test impact absorption and collect data related to helmet materials and design
to gain inspiration for a future design oras an initial step in revising a prior design for improvement. However, in construction, site andcode constraints make this practice less common, although it can be argued that constructionrenovation projects must fully research and document the existing design before proposingchanges to it. Nonetheless, terminology can become an obstacle in a multidisciplinary setting.Another difference between sectors is in how design methods are applied. At a high level,construction projects tend to be very similar, i.e. in the design of a building, foundations, floors,walls and roofs are all present. However, at a detailed level, construction projects all essentiallyunique, owing to differences in local soil
mobilize social and economic change. He has graduate degrees in Aero- nautics and Astronautics (space systems design, astrodynamics and propulsion), Electrical and Computer Engineering (artificial intelligence, fields and optics) and Engineering Education (design cognition and human communication inquiry) all from Purdue University. He also has an undergraduate degree in Me- chanical Engineering (design) from the University of Jordan, and an undergraduate degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue. He taught courses in use-inspired design at ASU and in transforming ideas to innovations at Purdue. Prior to joining ASU, Hadi worked at the University of Jordan as a facilitator for curricular change and design
-Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I work with a group of wonderful and talented people at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates our practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and informal learning environments. My Research focuses on studying students’ collaborative problem solving processes and the role of the teacher in facilitating these processes in STEM classrooms.Nicholas Robert PozzaDr. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor
Evaluation of Interactive Multidisciplinary Curricula in a Residential Summer ProgramAbstract Previous studies have indicated that women account for about 18% of the engineeringdegrees awarded in the United States. Consistently low populations of women in engineering areoften attributed to discrimination, the perception that engineering is a masculine domain, and alack of understanding about the roles and responsibilities of an engineer. In order to increaseparticipation of women in engineering, universities develop outreach programs designed to bettereducate students (and the public) about engineering. Programs in the form of informationsessions, seminars or research activities are informative but often are not
environment to industry by providing designproblems originating from industry, and a setting for graduating engineers to work in designteams. Industry-sponsored projects not only provide a link between practicing engineers andgraduating students, but also give students a deeper understanding for how they will use theirdiscipline specific knowledge and skills in industry. Thus, although a few concerns areraised 11-12, there is overwhelming evidence for the success of capstone design courses thatemploy industry-sponsored design projects 2-10. Page 10.25.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
Paper ID #37430A Balancing Act: Elementary Teachers and their StudentsBalancing Trade-offs in Engineering Design Projects(Fundamental)Matthew Johnson (Assistant Professor) Matt Johnson is an Associate Professor of Science Education with the Center for Science and the Schools (CSATS). In this role, he collaborates with scientists and engineers to propose and facilitate teacher professional development opportunities for K-12 STEM teachers, often as broader impacts components of research grants. He is also PI of an NSF grant focused on learning how rural teachers learn about engineering through participation in
theMS degree in Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (1983). He is aformer editor of the RESNA journal Assistive Technology (1992-1998).DAVID RINGHOLZDavid Ringholz, MID, is the Coordinator for Design Development at The Center for Universal Design (CUD) and aResearch Assistant Professor in the School of Design at NCSU. He graduated with honors with a BA in DesignStudies with a concentration in Universal Design from SUNY Buffalo. He joined the center after receiving a Masterof Industrial Design degree from NCSU in 1997. His research interests focus on meeting user needs through newproduct design
day.One major goal of the mechanical engineering program is to identify best practices throughassessment of the courses and program. Another goal of the faculty is to ensure the studentshave a positive experience in each course. STEM disciplines are traditionally taught bydisseminating information and content, making them particularly fit for lecture [5], but in thecase of this course, the instructors wanted to gage the students’ opinions regarding the evolvingopen-ended lab approach and evaluate how it impacted their learning. To assess these goals,students complete course evaluations after every semester, which assess for trends andopportunities to improve the course. These surveys include an institution-level survey to revealstudent
camp and the HSTA summerinstitute were introduced on the WVU Tech campus offering an additional 100 students asummer STEM experience.This paper will focus on a tenure-track faculty’s perspective on the designing and developmentof STEM summer camps for both K-12 students and teachers. The paper will discuss fundingopportunities that faculty can pursue if they are interested in funding summer or other outreachprograms. These pursuits of funding opportunities should be counted towards tenure-trackfaculty’s scholarship/research requirements as it directly approaches a solution to a problem thatmany universities face. Challenges of hosting camps include increased time to service orientedactivities, finding and hiring student mentors, camp
minors. o Technology Leadership and Communication: one graduate studentThe goals for this project were twofold: to design and configure a real-time DSP platform for themusic effects system and to provide an experiential learning environment where students couldapply best practices in engineering design. The students concentrated on the technical goals: • Choose a few common D.J. music effects to focus upon and develop algorithms for the effects • Select a real-time Digital Signal Processing (DSP) platform to implement the effects. (Three sample evaluation boards were purchased before the beginning of the summer for the students to test, but in the end, none of these were used. The students found a better solution
) found variations in time expenditures in teaching, service, andresearch for faculty at four-year institutions depending on their gender, race/ethnicity, and familystatus. A more nuanced conclusion is that these results are sensitive to the definitions of totalwork hours and research productivity, which has implications on institutional policy inevaluation and reward structures and their potential impacts on faculty groups. Link et al. (2008)investigated the time allocation teaching, research, grant writing, and service activities ofengineering and science faculty at 150 Extensive Doctoral/Research Universities and thevariations based on tenure status/rank, years in rank, gender, race, and family status. The studyindicated that time allocations
, Iowa State University Dr. Yilmaz is an Associate Professor of Industrial Design. She teaches design studios and lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of differ- ent factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different universities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site Director