U Math N Wednesday Administrative Placement Pre-Calculus Project Lab C Prep H Written & Oral Thursday Field Trip Communication Math
dependency analysis.In this paper, different styles of hardware descriptions will be provided to address theimpact of design specification to dataflow scheduling.The aforementioned methodology was presented to the senior and first year graduatestudents taking “Advanced Digital Design” and “Computer Architectures” courses. Thelaboratory was assigned to students taking “Advanced Digital Design” as one of theirterm projects. The “Advanced Digital Design” course covers VHDL [2], digital systemdesign using micro-architectural modeling techniques, and advanced topics in logicoptimization. The main objective of the course was to train students the capability ofperforming system-level design. The knowledge of scheduling was introduced for thepurpose of
counselors according to the guidelines identified byBlum & Frieze2 and by Boudria3. Further, capitalizing on the success of mentoring younger girlsby older girls shown in the BUGS project by Harrell et al.7, the event uses young women in twoIT careers in the convergence technology area to conduct the workshops; the workshop also usesthe adult teachers in the convergence technology program as lab assistants to assist the parents,teachers, and counselors in the event. Following the best practices for providing enjoyabletechnical experiences detailed by Nicoletti8 and Denner5, the event includes hands-on, funactivities. Throughout the half-day event, the young women leaders of the event highlight howthey have prepared for their jobs and how their
information, and cannot critically evaluate the information they retrieve”3.In 2001, faculty/librarian collaborators at X University at Y, including a chemistry professor, anEnglish professor, and two librarians, met regularly to learn more about information fluency, andto coordinate instruction across the English curriculum, including technical writing. Thisfaculty/ librarian group applied for a regional fellowship in 2005, to support collaboration onresearch or teaching projects and expand networks of professional colleagues at other regionalinstitutions. Two University of X instructional and one subject librarian (chemistry) participated,as well as two teaching faculty, one from English and one from American Studies.The resulting discussions
education provides agreater understanding of the multifaceted nature of civil engineering.(7,8) They can be used tosimulate a variety of learning protocols such as: design and analysis experiences,interdisciplinary issues and concerns, costs, hazards, owner preferences, and compliance withstandards and guidelines. Cases, by and large, describe situations, projects, problems, decisions,etc., and are primarily derived from actual experience, and do reflect thoughts, outlook, andconcerns of: managers, professionals, regulatory agencies, communities, and owners. Cases arealso widely used in other disciplines such as: education, medicine, and law.This paper describes the steps taken in planning, developing, and executing a case study/ casehistory course
understand the conditions that mayencourage engineering students to be more entrepreneurial and innovative. Among Epicenter’s severalresearch projects is an ongoing longitudinal survey study of the development of engineering students’career goals around innovation and engineering, referred to as the Engineering Majors Survey (EMS -2016). The EMS study follows a nationally representative sample of engineering students from theirundergraduate experiences through graduation and into the workplace (Gilmartin et al. 2017). Withinthis survey are measures of engineering task self-efficacy and innovation self-efficacy, as well as 39background learning experiences and extra-curricular activities spanning high school throughundergraduate education, which form
offer in case another one does notfollow. We found that those who listed ‘only job offer’ as an important factor in their jobdecision were less likely to be satisfied with their employed position. On the other hand,some listed ‘only job offer’ more positively, often as a result of securing their idealposition early in their search process or receiving a full-time offer following a prior workexperience. How are students being supported during the job search and negotiationprocess? A recent report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that engineering andarchitecture jobs are projected to increase only 3% between 2014 and 2024, which is thelowest increase of any job sector.17 Therefore, faculty and advisers can play anincreasingly
who needStatics. Flipped classes work best with teams of students who can attack a problem together.7 Weknow that about 3% of students at NCSU are nonresident aliens, many with English as a secondlanguage; language difficulties can can hinder the effectiveness of the group for the flippedclass.8 Returning students who are much older than their peers, parents with young children, andstudents with disabilities can struggle to succeed in a group of 19-year-olds. More than 55% ofour sophomores hold job; 81% of those work off campus.1 Students with social anxiety can alsostruggle.9This project sought to determine whether a student who was released from the need to come toclass could be just as effective as one who was forced to come to class and
engineers. In her courses, she employs active learning techniques and project-based learning. Her previous education research, also at Stanford, focused on the role of cultural capital in science education. Her current in- terests include the study of engineering students’ development of social responsibility and the impact of students’ backgrounds in their formation as engineers.Dr. Vibhuti Dave, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Vibhuti Dave joined Penn State Erie, The Behrend College as an Assistant Professor in the Electrical, Computer, and Software Engineering program in Fall 2007. She received her undergraduate engineering degree in the field of Electronics and Communication from Nirma Institute of Technology, India in
(STEM) engagement, participation and achievement at the K-16 level. As a recognized ”STEM Expert”, Chris serves in advisory roles for National Science Foundation, National Academy of Engineering and other private and publically funded STEM projects, is a published author on various educational strategies and techniques for delivering classroom-based instruction and has served as an expert on multiple STEM panels and through other media outlets. As a former classroom teacher, Chris received peer and student-based recognition through honors such as school district-wide Teacher of the Year. Chris strives to bring his classroom experience into all efforts designed to deliver high-quality integrated STEM
asterisk).A brief survey of motivation literature provided guidance for developing the assessment plan ofstudent motivation (part 3). Several theories exist for describing factors contributing to studentmotivation [7]. Among some of the popular motivation theories in the engineering educationliterature are those of Self-Determination, Expectancy-Value, and Social-Cognitive theories ofstudent motivation. The Self-Determination Theory of motivation assumes that students aremotivated intrinsically by their feelings of competence, autonomy, and relatedness in theirlearning [8-9]. Stolk and Martello, for example, used this theory of motivation to assess theimpact of disciplinary integration in a project based engineering course [10]. The Expectancy
paintactivity, the ambassador team seemed to recognize the possibility that the activity was toochallenging. The ambassador said “we realized that what we were thinking about was probably alot to ask for and just a lot of stuff to do and maybe a little bit too much at times.” Sub-theme: Consideration of technical constraints. Whereas sometimes the activitychoices seemed to be very open, one ambassador discussed the need to incorporate projects ortechnology that are peculiar to the institution. One ambassador explained that her group was“trying to expand on something that we had found but also tie it in with some of the projects thatwe do at [Institution] and some research in [Institution]. They were creating a small robot thatmoved around out of
Paper ID #18202Digitizing and Remediating Engineering Assessments: An Immersive andTransportable Faculty Development WorkshopDr. Ronald F. DeMara P.E., University of Central Florida Ronald F. DeMara is a Professor in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) at the Uni- versity of Central Florida with 24 years of experience in Electrical and Computer Engineering disciplines. His educational research interests focus on classroom and laboratory instructional technology, and the digitization of STEM assessments. He has completed over 200 technical and educational publications, 34 funded projects as PI/Co-I, and
, engineeringethics, statistics, engineering economics and computational tools such as MATLAB. Othertopics that are touched on over the course of the semester include intellectual property, dataacquisition and engineering graphics. The course itself consists of two class meetings per weekwith one class meeting focused upon content reinforcement through active learning strategiessuch as think-pair-share, group discussions and case studies. The second class meeting isprimarily focused upon the design project and includes lab based experiments, data analysis andgroup discussions.Course grades for the Freshman Engineering course include a variety of lab based assignments inconjunction with the semester long design project (literature review, lab reports, final
Engineering at Ohio University.Arshan Nazempour, Washington State University Arshan Nazempour completed his undergraduate study at University of Tehran in Tehran, Iran in Chemical Engineering. Currently, he is a PhD candidate in Chemical Engineering at Washington State University and working under Professor Van Wie’s supervision on two projects, synergistic influences of oscillating pressure and growth factor on chondrogenesis in a novel centrifugal bioreactor and hands-on learning solution for students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Examining Student Misconceptions of Conservation of Mass and Energy in Pipe Flow using Very Low Cost ExperimentsAbstractMisconceptions
Paper ID #19502Exploring the Effects of a Visual Thinking Strategies Workshop on the Re-flective Thinking of Undergraduate Engineering StudentsDr. Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University Having recently completed his Ph.D. through the University of Washington’s interdisciplinary Individ- ual Ph.D. Program (see bit.ly/uwiphd), Ryan is now a Postdoctoral Research Associate at Texas Tech University. He currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering educa- tion, art in engineering
from othercolleges are frequently enrolled. Although the course is intended for freshmen, it is equallyattended by sophomores, and juniors. Some senior and graduate students (primarily outside theCollege of Engineering) are also enrolled.The class is taught in a CLS with a maximum capacity of 260 students. Students are organized inround tables of up to six persons. Each table is equipped with 1-2 whiteboards and a tablenumber. An A-type whiteboard is also available per three tables. The space is further equippedwith over 20 screens placed around the room so that projected material is visible from everytable and angle. The CLS layout, as it is seen from the instructor’s station point of view, isshown in Figure 1.Fig. 1. Instructor view of the
engineering mathematics courses and continuing his dissertation research in cyber security for industrial control systems. In his teaching, Dr. Hieb focuses on innovative and effective use of tablets, digital ink, and other technology and is currently investigating the use of the flipped classroom model and collaborative learning. His research in cyber security for industrial control systems is focused on high assurance field devices using microkernel architectures.Mr. William B. Corley, University of Louisville William B. Corley, M.S., is the graduate research assistant on this project. He is an experimental psychol- ogy graduate student with the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at University of Louisville
EcologyTeachers were asked to select their top three preferred topics and email these to the team. Again,differing from the process in the previous professional development days, teachers requested toreceive a brief description of what the workshop would entail. As seen in Table 6, a workshopdescription included an introduction to the topic, background information, materials, andimportant questions to consider throughout the workshop. The STAR team then provided theselected topics to the professors who then created a more inclusive description (see Table 6) tobe shared with the teachers.Table 6. Sample of Project Description for 3rd Professional Development DayMathematical Curves and GearsProfessor: Saboori – Mechanical EngineeringIntroduction: Gears are
, includingpotential future collaboration. (1)Some of the adjunct faculty-particularly those who are seniors in specific industries- could offerimportant linkages for the development of industrial affiliate programs, co-op activities, summertraining opportunities, and employment opportunities for new graduates. They may also providenew ideas for senior design projects, topics for graduate theses, or render help in theestablishment of collaborative research programs.When a choice has been made and the candidate has accepted, it is important that he/ she feelswelcome and be assisted in becoming familiar with his/ her new surroundings. To expedite theprocess, new adjuncts should sit together with their new colleagues and go over all relevantmatters related to
environment interacts with human development and behavior.Dr. Yitong Zhao, California State Polytechnic University Pomona Dr. Yitong Zhao is an Assistant Professor at the Mechanical Engineering Department of Cal Poly Pomona (California State Polytechnic University Pomona). After gained her B.S in MEMS from Tsinghua Uni- versity in China, she joined in Dr. Chih-Ming Ho’s lab at UCLA in 2009. Later she completed her Ph.D in Biomedical Engineering there in 2014. Her was engaged in the project of biofuel and later developed a unique cell-free system from microalgae that could dramatically increase the production rate of lipids, and used a unique optimization tool to urther increase the performance of the cell-free
EMS3.0 survey conducted post-graduation. A list of the 71 variables from EMS 1.0 included in thisstudy is shown in Appendix A.1.The measurement of interest in societal impact was included as part of the Innovation Interestconstruct question (see Appendix A.2.c). Inspired by previous research comparing engineeringstudents’ interest in work that pursues societal impact to work that pursues financial potential(Lintl et al., 2016), two items were appended to the innovation interests question:How much interest do you have in: 1. Working on products, projects, or services that address societal challenges 2. Working on products, projects, or services that have significant financial potentialRespondents selected a response from a five point (0-4
. According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, “US datacenter electricity consumption is projected to increase to roughly 140 billion kilowatt-hoursannually by 2020, the equivalent annual output of 50 power plants, costing American businesses$13 billion annually in electricity bills and emitting nearly 100 million metric tons of carbonpollution per year.” [13] How may we reduce electric consumption while increasing capacity instorage and communication? Finding the right data involves not only increased search capacitybut also involves advanced artificial intelligence (AI). Can we find a more effective andpowerful AI scheme than traditional computing can offer? Shor’s algorithm has shown thatquantum computers can break cryptographic protocols
Paper ID #18512Integrated Science and Engineering Design Assessment to Support Teachingand Learning (Fundamental)Debra Brockway, Educational Testing Service Ms. Brockway is a Senior Research Associate at Educational Testing Service (ETS) in Princeton, NJ, where she leads and contributes to projects exploring innovative approaches to assessment and integrat- ing the STEM subjects. She has M.S. degrees in educational statistics and measurement from Rutgers University and environmental science from NJIT. Prior to joining ETS, Brockway led research focused on incorporating engineering in K-12 science while Assistant Director at
4, 2019].7. Pociask, S., Gross, D., and Shih, M.-Y., “Does team formation impact student performance, effort and attitudes in a college course employing collaborative learning?” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 17(3):19-33. doi: 10.14434/josotl.v17i3.21158, 2017.8. Allen, T.E. and Blackman, B.R. “Integrative Design and Experimental Analysis: A yearlong laboratory course in Biomedical Engineering.” Paper presented at 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI. https://peer.asee.org/2477, 2007.9. Comer, D.R., “A model of social loafing in real work groups,” Human Relations, 48(6):647- 667, 1995.10. Strong, J.T. and Anderson, R.E., “Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and
Paper ID #24869Student Perceptions of Their Abilities and Learning Environment in LargeIntroductory Computer Programming Courses - Underrepresented Minori-tiesDr. Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan Laura K. Alford is a Lecturer and Research Investigator at the University of Michigan. She researches ways to use data-informed analysis of students’ performance and perceptions of classroom environment to support DEI-based curricula improvements.Dr. Andrew DeOrio, University of Michigan Andrew DeOrio is a teaching faculty member at the University of Michigan and a consultant for web and machine learning projects. His research
because “everything's very tied together and it's better to have a wide base of knowledge.”Within engineering contexts, Caleb recognized reflection as necessary to making sure projectsteps were documented and that students were reflecting on how they have grown through aproject because it is one of the things he has been asked to do in his classes. When asked abouthis fellow students’ reactions to professors prompting students to reflect, he said, “when it comesto non-engineering things, I’ve certainly witnessed if not experienced it myself, why are wedoing this.” Caleb suggested students tend to focus on the end product rather than the means andprocesses of a project. He hypothesized this focus on the end product, could be related to someof the
miserably at cooking.Dr. Elizabeth Reddy, Colorado School of Mines Elizabeth Reddy is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Division of Engineering, Design & Society at Colorado School of Mines. She is a social scientist, holding a PhD in cultural anthropology from the University of California at Irvine and an MA in Social Science from the University of Chicago. She is Co-Chair of the Committee for the Anthropology of Science, Technology and Computing in the American Anthropological Association. She studies experts and their work in relation to environments, technolo- gies, and human lives. Her current research projects deal with earthquake risk management technology in Mexico and the United States, environmental
in the other analyses, it was not included in the DFWanalysis because the DFW rate for the semester was not available at the time of writing thispaper.Student Perception: Surveys were given in order to understand student opinions about theoperation of the flipped classroom model. The survey was administered online using Qualtrics.The survey was not anonymous, because students were given extra credit for completing it.However students were informed that the results of the survey would only be seen by the post-doctoral teaching fellow assisting with this project, and the instructor of the course would onlysee the aggregated results. Surveys asked students Likert-scale questions about theeffectiveness/usefulness of each course component, and
:________________________ Classification: _____________________ GPA: ______ Indicator Points GPA – 4.00 (30 pts.); 3.75 (27 pts.); 3.50 (24); 3.25 (21 pts.); 3.00 (18 pts); 2.75 (15 pts.); 2.50 (12 pts.): 2.25 (9 pts.); 2.0 (6 pts.); less 2.00 (0 pts.) Personal Statement – Consider grammar, clarity of ideas and how well applicant wrote statement based upon the following instructions, as well as other information found in application: On a separate paper describe the academic and professional goals you would like to achieve. Be as specific as possible about research projects of particular interest to you. Be sure to include the route that you have taken to date to reach these goals, including