Studies: Methodological Briefs - Impact Evaluation No.9,” UNICEF-IRC, 2014, Accessed: Apr. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/754-comparative-case-studies-methodological-briefs-impact-evaluation-no-9.html[19] B. J. Beatty, Z. Merchant, and M. Albert, “Analysis of Student Use of Video in a FlippedClassroom,” TechTrends, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 376–385, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11528-017-0169-1.[20] B. K. Morris and S. Savadatti, “Analysis of Basic Video Metrics in a Flipped StaticsCourse,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[21] “ChatGPT.” OpenAI.
. Brogan, and D. Basu, Insights andchallenges in developing a remote real-time watershed monitoring lab,” Proc. 121st AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[3] P. Delgoshaei, “Design and implementation of a real-time environmental monitoring lab withapplications in sustainability education,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of EngineeringEducation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 2012.[4] D. Brogan, “Development and evaluation of the Online Watershed Learning System(OWLS),” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Engineering Education, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg,VA, 2017.[5] C. Davis and A. Yadav, Case studies in engineering, in Cambridge Handbook of EngineeringEducation Research, A. Johri and B
distribution of graduate and undergraduate students. The undergraduatestudents had an average grade of 88% and the graduate students had an average grade of 94%. Table 3: Grade distribution of graduate and undergraduate students Graduate Students Undergraduate Students A 93+ 5 5 A- 90+ 2 B+ 86.7+ 1 B 83.3+ 2 B- 80+ C+ 76.7+ 1 1 C 73.3+ C- 70
works with the TA Development Program, and the HTF hire diverse TFs who areselected based on several factors including teaching ability, departmental affiliation,personality, gender, cultural background, and TA Development Program experience. TF duties include: (a) working with Cornell's Office of Instructional Support to developand present workshops in the TA Development Program offered to all new TAs during the first threeweeks of the semester, (b) leading small group discussions on selected topics such as teaching,grading, teaching labs, and leading recitations, (c) conducting microteaching sessions withsmall groups of TAs, which entails videotaping their teaching and facilitating feedbacksessions, and (d) providing support to new TAs
Session 2793 A Strategy for Faculty Enhancement Related to Scientific Publications Luis A. Godoy, B. Nora Valeiras Department of Civil Engineering, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez, PR 00681-9041 / Department of Science and Technology Education, FCEFyN, National University of Cordoba, ArgentinaAbstractThis paper reports on an initiative to strengthen the research activities of engineeringfaculty at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez. As a specific objective the projectattempts to improve the number and quality of publications in peer-reviewed journals byyoung
questions on study guide studied with friends – quizzing each other and similar other (please specify) 3. What grade do you think you will get on this exam? A B C D FResults and DiscussionOver the two semesters studied for this project, each student took six exams and was asked tocomplete the questionnaire six times. As noted above, the first question on the questionnaireasked how much time they had spent studying for that particular exam. The overall response ratefor this first question was 82.8%. Students indicated that they spent between zero and 15 hoursof study time for a single test with an
). The exams are set such that 70% of the classshould be able to make at least a B. Then there are few questions to differentiate the A’s and theB’s. A possible assessment of learning for the class is provided in Table 2. Mandatory Class Attendance 50 Discussion Board Participation 50 In-Class Quizzes 100 Homework Assignments 150 Project 250 Midterm Exam 200 Final Exam 200 Total
course in several ways,including: 1) large freshman enrollment, 2) increased emphasis on cooperative learning,and 3) integration of microeconomics and engineering economy. Our course evaluationdealt with these three topics.Freshman Performance in Engineering EconomyAs noted earlier, the integrated course (EGR 120) is part of the standard curriculum forengineering freshmen. Part of the motivation for the revision in teaching techniques was aconcern about how freshmen would perform in the course. We have offered theintegrated course over a period of two semesters: Spring 1998 (6 sections), Fall 1998 (1section). Thus, many of the students who enrolled in the course were second-termfreshmen. Mercer’s grading system is as follows: A, B+, B, C+, C, D
were LCA can illustrate adequate resourcescomparative to figure it out, Idifferences in environmental disliked the software exercises and healthimpacts, such hard to stay as whether interested product A or B has a greater likely impact upon climate change, as in materialshown in the previous examples. The incompatibility of some software with certain computers made it difficult to work on some of the assignments.ThereWhat are however significant suggestions do you have limitations to LCA results
Page 26.805.12 transformative learning: A dialogue between John M. Dirkx and Jack Mezirow.” Journal of Transformative Education, 4(2), 123–39.2. Downey, G. L., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M., Parkhurst, R., Bigley, T., Hays, C., … Nichols-Belo, A. 2006. The globally competent engineer: Working effectively with people who define problems differently.” Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 1–16.3. Downey, G. 2011. Epilogue beyond global competence: Implications for engineering pedagogy. In G. L. Downey and K. Beddoes (Eds.), What is global engineering for? The making of international educators (pp. 415–432). Morgan & Claypool.4. Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., Guido, F. M., Patton, L. D., & Renn, K. A. 2010
section describes the method involved in building the model. It should be noted that beforeproceeding to work in Unreal, the required textures and static meshes must be ready for use. Thissection focuses on the procedure used for building the model in Unreal for this research.Prior to working directly on the model in Unreal, the following actions have to be implemented.These steps though basic in nature will prove influential in the final appearance and performanceof the model.(a) Develop a good understanding on how game engine software works: its tools, running methods, requirements, compatibility with other software’s etc. A lot of tutorials are available online to provide assistance for budding game designers.(b) Install the latest
. 565-570. 3. Creed, C.J., Suuberg, E.M., Crawford, G.P., “Engineering Entrepreneurship: An Example of A Paradigm Shift in Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 2002, pp. 185-195. 4. Porter, J.R., Zoghi, B., Morgan, J.A., “Integrating Project Management into the Capstone Senior Design Course,” 2002 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 16-19, 2002 5. Morgan, J.A.., Wright, G., Porter, J.R., “Managing Senior Design Projects to Maximize Success: The TAT Team,” 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon, June 12
AC 2007-292: 4D CONSTRUCTION VISUALIZATION: TECHNIQUES WITHEXAMPLESMohammed Haque, Texas A&M University MOHAMMED E. HAQUE, Ph.D., P.E. Dr. Mohammed E. Haque is the holder of Cecil O. Windsor, Jr. Endowed Professorship in Construction Science at Texas A&M University at College Station, Texas. He has over fifteen years of professional experience in analysis, design, and investigation of building, bridges and tunnel structural projects of various city and state governments and private sectors. Dr. Haque is a registered Professional Engineer in the states of New York, Pennsylvania and Michigan, and members of ASEE, ASCE, and ACI. Dr. Haque received a BSCE from Bangladesh University of Engineering and
methods of heat transfer. Heat transfer will be analyzed at two reaction time periods: (a) Transient state period (heating period) (b) Steady state period (period at constant reaction temperature). Transient state analysis: This calculation involves the energy needed to bring reactor to the desired reaction temperature of 65°C. Basic equation introduced: 𝑄 = 𝑚 ∙ 𝐶! ∙ Δ𝑇 where
. O'Brien, "The science and art of science demonstrations," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 68, no. 11, p. 933, 1991, doi: 10.1021/ed068p933.10. L. S. Meyer, D. Panee, S. Schmidt, and F. Nozawa, "Using Demonstrations to Promote Student Comprehension in Chemistry," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 80, no. 4, p. 431, 2003, doi: 10.1021/ed080p431.11. W. M. Roth, C. J. McRobbie, K. B. Lucas, and S. Boutonné, "Why May Students Fail to Learn from Demonstrations? A Social Practice Perspective on Learning in Physics," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 509-533, 1997.A. Amador-Perez and R. A. Rodriguez-Solis, “Analysis of a CPW-fed annular slot ring antenna using DOE,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas
Biosciences Courses in the Higher Education Setting,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, no. August, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.711619.[9] R. Hill, “The Future of STEM in Higher Education is Hybrid,” pp. 2022–2023, 2022.[10] H. C. Lane et al., “Triggering STEM interest with Minecraft in a hybrid summer camp.,” Technol. Mind, Behav., vol. 3, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.1037/tmb0000077.[11] W. Wang, K. B. Ewoldt, M. Xie, A. M. Mestas-Nuñez, S. Soderman, and J. Wang, “Virtual Summer Camp for High School Students with Disabilities - An Experience Report,” SIGCSE 2023 - Proc. 54th ACM Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, pp. 458–464, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3545945.3569818.[12] LIYSF, “The Best Virtual STEM Camp During the
and Use of Verbal Protocols in the Study of Music Teacher Cognition," Contributions to Music Education, vol. 44, pp. 127-144, 2019.[14] M. W. v. Someren, Y. F. Barnard and J. A. Sandberg, The Think Aloud Method, London: Academic Press, 1994.[15] M. v. d. Haak, M. D. Jong and P. J. Schellens, "Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue," Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 339-351, 2003.[16] T. R. Kelley, B. M. Capobianco and K. J. Kaluf, "Concurrent think-aloud protocols to assess elementary design students," International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 36, pp. 521-540, 2015.[17] M. E. Grubbs, G. J. Strimel and E
methods of heat transfer. Heat transfer will be analyzed at two reaction time periods: (a) Transient state period (heating period) (b) Steady state period (period at constant reaction temperature). Transient state analysis: This calculation involves the energy needed to bring reactor to the desired reaction temperature of 65°C. Basic equation introduced: 𝑄 = 𝑚 ∙ 𝐶! ∙ Δ𝑇 where
calculations are onlycomponents. Students were challenged to consider more than just the mechanical or electronicdesign aspects of their project; they must also think about how technologies would be used in aparticular social and cultural setting, and how their solution would scale up to a population ofmany thousands of people. Individuals learned to function as team members and to learn fromone another. The success of this approach in honing critical thinking skills will no doubt bestrengthened by a supportive curriculum. Adaptations such as pairing “Introduction toEngineering Design” directly with a general education humanities course should be considered.References[1] B. W. Packard, J. L. Gagnon, O. LaBelle, K. Jeffers, K., & E. Lynn, “Women's
, negative $25, and $100 per ton for P, P2, and P3, respectively. (Note that this means producing P2 actually results in a financial loss.) The direct treatment option costs $300 per ton of W. Raw materials arrive to the plant at a rate of 7,500 tons of X and 10,000 tons of Y per day. Assume all reactions run to completion. Determine how much of each product and treated waste should be created per day to maximize refinery profits.Process Control Example Develop the set of dynamic equations that describe two isothermal CSTRs in series, depicted in Figure 1 on the next page, using an actuator/process/sensor model approach. Assume that a single irreversible reaction A→B occurs in this system where the rate of reaction is given by r=kC
students’ understanding of this topic. Submissions per student Number of submissions by each student 30 100 25 80 20 60 15 40 10 5 20 0 0 (a) (b)Figure 1: Submission data. In (a), the bars indicate the average per-student number of
Written Communication e,g 6 Project Management b,e 6,7 Visual Communication e,g 6 Math Skills b 3 Creative Problem Solving d 1,2 System Thinking d,e 4 Ethics and Professionalism a,i 8 Self-Learning h 5 Technology Skills a,f 1,2 Respect for diversity j 8
all tasks efficiently is important to most users. mistake easily [19], which requires high patience and plenty of However, certain operating deals with hardware are time. better than other operating systems which make them unique and different [11]. B. Windows • FACTOR 3: Security level is one side of an effective Window is an operating system developed by the Microsoft decision, and it ranges from personal use to business Corporation as closed-source and they launched the first managing. Sometimes the operating system is known version on November 20, 1985 [20]. Which is one year after for a high standard of security
Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, 5-8 April, 2003, Dallas, TX, USA.4. Okogu, B. E.: “The Middle East and North Africa in a Changing Oil Market,” © 2003 International Monetary Fund, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/med/2003/eng/okogu/okogu.htm5. Miller, R. J.: “Economic Cycles and the Valuation of Oil and Gas Properties,” paper SPE 82007 presented at the SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, 5-8 April, 2003, Dallas, TX, USA.6. Parent, L.: “Natural Gas: Igniting New Markets - Part 2: North America Outlook,” World Oil Magazine, Vol. 222, No. 2, February 2001.7. Kazemi, H. et al.: “The Fifth Colloquium on Petroleum Engineering Education – An Industry Perspective,” paper SPE 64308 presented at the
Assessment Form Indicate Assessment Instrument: Exam Question, Report, Quiz, etc Date of Assessment Performance Expectation: X % of Students Should Achieve a Grade of at least Y% Based Upon Assessment Instrument Grading Rubric. ME XXX Number of Students ABET Student Course Outcomes Exceeding Criteria Meeting Criteria Below Criteria Outcomes a b cA similar process is underway to align the course outcomes for the remaining courses and isanticipated to be completed spring 2016.Administration and Organization While there are
semesters. The work is designed to test two hypotheses: 1. A long-term design project that integrates knowledge from multiple courses strengthens student knowledge retention. 2. A large-scale design project requiring tools from many courses improves student problem-solving and design skills.By integrating five semesters of the mechanical engineering curriculum into a cohesive whole,this project has the potential to transform the way undergraduate education is delivered. Beforeand after testing is being conducted to assess: a) Change in retention between courses and b)Change in student problem-solving and design skills.Students at Rowan University have built almost all of the “hardware” for the HPT (air engine,planetary gearset
committed to seeking external funding sources through endowments to support E4.• Formalizing ET/Businesses Teams – It is anticipated that by the Fall of 2007, a formal process for the creation of ET/Business student teams will be in place where all students can receive course credit for participation.Bibliography1. Porter, J.R., J.A. Morgan, and B. Zoghi. Integrating project management into the capstone senior design course. in 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2002. Montreal, Que., Canada: American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC 20036, United States.2. Morgan, J.A., G. Wright, and J.R. Porter. Managing senior design projects to maximize success: The TAT team. in 2005 ASEE Annual
with hardware at the end of the semesterwere minimized in terms of their impact on student course grades, and significant learningoccurred regardless of whether the final product was functional in all aspects.Therefore, for this paper, the authors chose instead to focus on assessments that relate to studentperceptions of the learning experience as determined from (a) differential scoring on pre/post-project surveys and (b) student responses to open-ended questions offered as part of the post-project survey. The survey itself is attached as Appendix 1, where comparative pre/post ratingsare included to save space. In each tabular listing, the last four columns represent the following: Pre ̅ : Pre-survey mean (average of the responses for
]. b. Organic Evolution of the Two-Part FormatThe next planning committee was formed in January of 2022 when it was determined that theConference would be in person. The planning committee, led by co-chairs Lynn Albers (Multi),Micah Lande (ERM), and Bala Maheswaren (EPP), met regularly and decided to revisit the eighttopics previously prepared for 2020. The committee combined the eight topics into four andplanned a two-part ITH whereby the first half involved a roundtable discussion of the four topicsand the second half was led by a team conducting an NSF-funded study on ProfessionalDevelopment for Faculty. The two-part format worked well and the use of a two-minute video tointroduce the four topics for Part 1 was well received [4]. The same
compared to Computer Science and other engineering disciplines. The data shows 29% of the programs have 25 or fewer students and 71% have 100 or fewer. • The admission requirements vary widely. Some will accept anyone with any bachelors degree and a B average while others require a computer science degree and two years of relevant experience. • There is a wide variation in the depth and breadth of SWEBOK coverage in required and semi-required (those which a student has at least a 50% chance of taking) courses. Page 13.34.7 • On average, students take 11.6 courses for their degree, 8.3 of