Conference Session

Career Decisions and Faculty Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

manual for qualitative researchers, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2015.[30] J. W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research: Choosing among five approaches, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.[31] A. Tashakkori, and C. Teddlie, Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, Volume 46, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.[32] A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191-215, 1977.[33] S. Bubany, T. Krieshock, M. D. Black, and R. McKay, College students’ perspectives on their career decision-making, Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 177-197, 2008.[34] G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, H. L. Chen, K

Conference Session

Social Dialogue on Diversity and Inclusion

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno; Justin Charles Major, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Relationship Between Self- Efficacy and Retention in Introductory Physics,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1096–1121, 2012.[21] B. Rienties and D. Tempelaar, “Turning Groups Inside Out: A Socail Network Perspective,” no. November, 2017.[22] M. L. Loughry, M. W. Ohland, and D. J. Woehr, “Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of Learning Using CATME Team Tools,” 2014.[23] Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg, “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing,” J. R. Stat. Soc., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 289–300, 1995.[24] A. Dinno, “Nonparametric Pairwise Multiple Comparisons in Independent Groups Using Dunn ’ s Test,” Stata J., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 292–300, 2015.[25] C. Smith and S

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 1: Retention and Student Success Strategies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth R. Kurban, University of Maryland, College Park; Paige E. Smith, University of Maryland, College Park; Kurubel Belay, University of Maryland

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

representation bygender and by race (Gleason, Boykin, Johnson, Bowen, Whitaker, Micu, & Slappey, 2010;Raines, 2012). For example, the work of Ackermann (1990; 1991), Cabrera et al. (2013), Garcia (1991),Kezar (2000), Strayhorn (2011) and Walpole et al. (2008) document the impacts of first-yearsummer bridge programs on students’ transition into college. In particular, these scholars notethat such programs can positively impact the academic, social, and personal development ofunderrepresented student populations (Ackermann, 1990; Garcia, 1991; Strayhorn, 2011). Inaddition to impacting these areas of student development, first-year summer programs canpositively influence students self-efficacy and sense of belonging (Cabrera et al., 2013; Stolle

Conference Session

Motivation, Identity, and Belongingness

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Purdue University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Geoff Potvin, Florida International University; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

inform ways that students evaluate their belongingness in engineering, as well asways in which educators can help their students feel like they belong.IntroductionBelongingness typically describes a sense of community or affinity towards a certain group, asexpressed by an individual. In this article, we use the term to represent an individual’s judgementof whether they feel welcomed and wanted in engineering. Stronger feelings of belongingnessresult in higher self-efficacy [1], engagement [2], and ability [3]. Conversely, a lack ofbelongingness has been identified as one of the top reasons that students leave a university [4, 5].Belongingness is imbued throughout a student’s educational experience, at both the classroomand university levels [1

Conference Session

Around the Water Cooler: Ideas and Issues in Civil Engineering Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cassandra J. McCall, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech; Ashley Shew, Virginia Tech; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida; Courtney Zongrone, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. 371–395, 2010.[10] C. C. Samuelson and E. Litzler, “Community Cultural Wealth: An Assets-Based Approach to Persistence of Engineering Students of Color,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 93–117, 2016.[11] D. Malicky, “A literature review on the under-representation of women in undergraduate engineering: Ability, self-efficacy, and the ‘chilly climate,’” in Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2003.[12] T. C. Dennehy and N. Dasgupta, “Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 114, no. 23, pp. 5964–5969, 2017.[13] K. L. Tonso, “Engineering

Conference Session

ET Pedagogy II

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Vigyan Jackson Chandra, Eastern Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

construct through the semester and serves tomotivate their activities.The mid-term and final assessments in the Network Switches & Routers class include a scenario-based section wherein a portfolio of notes and text resources is permitted. It encourages studentsto organize their course portfolios ahead of time, including the feedback received from theinstructor on in-class and written lab activities. As observed in [2], permitting students to useself-developed notes on quizzes motivates them to complete the readings.By observing student work both in class and the laboratory, along with their written labsubmissions, provide clear indications about the self-efficacy of students in the computernetwork area. Students are developing annotated

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Renee M. Desing, The Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

. Pers. Assess., vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 261– 269, 2008.[36] R. Day and T. D. Allen, “The relationship between career motivation and self-efficacy with protégé career success,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 72–91, 2004.[37] J. J. VanAntwerp and D. Wilson, “Difference between engineering men and women: How and why they choose what they do during early career,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015.[38] N. A. Fouad, R. Singh, K. Cappaert, W. Chang, and M. Wan, “Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 92, pp. 79–93, 2016.[39] M. Brouwer, “Q is accounting for tastes,” J. Advert. Res., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 35–39, 1999.[40] G. W. K

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Annmarie Elizabeth Hoch, Tufts University; Karen Miel, Tufts University; Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Rebecca Deborah Swanson, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

recorded during their classroom activities, and alsointerviewed about their participation at the end of the semester. The recorded and transcribedinterviews are the primary sources of data for this paper. During the semi-structured one-on-oneinterviews, students were asked approximately 20 questions regarding interest, identity, self-efficacy, and their relationship to their undergraduate ambassadors. These interviews typicallylasted 10 - 20 minutes. In this study, we focus on two questions asked, in which students ratedtheir enjoyment and perceived success in engineering: 1) Think about yourself doing engineeringin STOMP. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, how much doyou like doing engineering? and 2) Think

Conference Session

Choice and Persistence in Engineering Education and Careers

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon University; Beth A. Powell, Tennessee Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, Z. Dangerous Curves. 2013 February 12, 2013 [cited 2014 22 March]; Available from: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/02/12/students-boycott-final-challenge-professors-grading- policy-and-get.14. Eliot, A.J. and M.A. Church, A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997. 72(1): p. 218-232.15. Hutchison, M.A., et al., Factors Influencing the Self‐Efficacy Beliefs of First‐Year Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. 95(1): p. 39-47.16. Patrick, H., A. Ryan, and P. Pintrich, The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males' and females' self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual

Conference Session

Communication and Engineering Careers: Motivating Our Students

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine Golder, British Columbia Institute of Technology; Deanna Gail Levis, British Columbia Institute of Technology; Darlene B Webb, British Columbia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

presentations in “regular” communication classes and those who have participated in Idol  students’ attitudes and self-efficacy about public speaking  factors that motivate students to participate.Literature reviewOnce we saw how well-received Idol was, we put together some quick survey questions,gathered some data from students, and then went back to see where our research fit in theexisting literature. We knew from the beginning that Idol could add important contributions toresearch into communication skills in engineering, and research on student motivation andpersistence. We also recognized that Idol is a good example of faculty and student collaboration,interdisciplinary initiatives, and that it shared many of the qualities of

Conference Session

Design Teamwork

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto; Lobna El Gammal, Institute For Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto; Jennie Phillips MA, University of Toronto; Greg Evans, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

competency was removed as the focus groupdata demonstrated that it was a difficult competency to assess due to interpretation and itsassessments were highly correlated with those of motivate others on the team to do their best,and encourage progress to meet goals and deadlines. Since the essence of this competency wasalready encompassed in other competencies it was deemed redundant and eliminatedWithin the relational aspect, two competencies were removed: accept feedback about strengthsand weaknesses and collaborate effectively. The accept feedback competency was removed asfeedback is a form of suggestion for improvement, and this competency was seen as the self-efficacy component that is a precursor to the competency adopt suggestions from other

Conference Session

Developing Young MINDs

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Doreen Lawrence; Broderick Boxley; Chris Kobus; Barbara Oakley

://www.msnbc.com/news/645566.asp?cp1=1. Page 8.1262.1215. Bandura A. "Self-efficacy: the Exercise of Control," New York: W. H. Freeman, 1997.16. Ausubel DP. "The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning." New York: Grune & Stratton, 1963. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session 117017. Chatterji M, Kwon Y. "A Summative Evaluation Report of the Kumon Supplemental Instructional Program at P.S. 180," New

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wei Zheng, Jackson State University; Huiru Shih P.E., Jackson State University; Gordon W Skelton, Jackson State University; Jianjun Yin, Jackson State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

questionnaires with course quizzes and tests on the specified topics.Several types of instrument are adapted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed instruction,including the pre- and post- test questionnaire for measuring change of students’ academicdispositions and the quality of students’ quizzes and exams. Through these deliberately designedprocesses, students have the opportunity to learn how to use different learning strategies, trackand assess more effectively their academic learning, make adjustment for improvement, andeventually enhance their self-confidence and self-regulation skills.In this paper, literature across cognitive science and education is first briefly reviewed. Relevantcognitive science development and educational practice

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul C. Lynch, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA; Cynthia Bober, Penn State University; Jennifer Louise Mines, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

assessments that measure students’ thought processesand level comprehension of class material1, 9-10.Questions J through N: Instructor Approachability, Passion, and FairnessA large-scale study by Austin (1993) discovered that the interaction between faculty and studentswas one of the most predictive factors of beneficial change in students’ academic advancement,personal growth, and satisfaction14,16. Another study by Atman et. al, “Enabling engineeringstudent successes,” found that senior students’ behavioral motivation, psychological motivation,motivation from a mentor, and motivation to do social good were related to how often studentsinteracted with instructors and how satisfied students were with instructors14. Clearly, studentand instructor

Conference Session

Graduate Student Experience

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine E. Winters, Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, Student

. Pressure from the administration or from students decreased teachers‟ motivation.Using the same instrument as well as surveying the students, Roth et al. found that moreautonomy lead to greater feelings of personal accomplishment, less exhaustion, increased studentreports of autonomy supportive teaching, and increased student autonomy for learning 14. Againusing Pelletier‟s instrument, with others, Leroy et al. found that teachers with more self-efficacy,more experience in the classroom, and less external pressure provided more autonomy support totheir students 15. Deci and Ryan10 reported that teachers who perceived a lack of interest and lowlevels of self determination in their students responding by behaving in a more controllingmanner. The

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jack L. Beuth, Carnegie Mellon University; Rohit Kumar, Carnegie Mellon University; Carolyn Penstein Rose, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

engineering problems18, 19, 20. However,engineering and science curricula are typically structured in such a way that the mathematicscurriculum is offered in a largely decontextualized way so that it can be offered in a uniform,cost effective manner, to students in a variety of disciplines18.Since the mid-80s, research in increasing success with university level mathematics andretention in engineering majors has drawn from the literature on collaborative learning,especially in connection with motivation and self-efficacy issues21. Collaborative learning,classroom discussion, and development of math explanation skills have also traditionally been afocus within the math reform movements in the field of education22. Research in problem-basedlearning at

Conference Session

Curriculum Exchange II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sharie Kranz, Coronado High School; Catherine Tabor, El Paso ISD; Art Duval, University of Texas, El Paso; Kien H. Lim, University of Texas, El Paso; Amy Elizabeth Wagler, University of Texas, El Paso; Eric A. Freudenthal, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

procedural fluency and enumerates three new attributes– conceptual understanding,strategic competence, and adaptive reasoning—that constitute conceptual depth in our math-computation proficiency framework (see Figure 4). Together, they can enable students todevelop productive disposition, an affective trait related to self-efficacy resulting from acombination of fluency at applying standard computational techniques with a deep understandingof how and why they can be applied.Stigler and Hiebert32 characterized current U.S. teaching as “learning terms and practicingprocedures”, as opposed to Japanese teaching’s “structured problem solving.” Ma’s study ofU.S. and Chinese elementary math teaching26 observed related phenomena. More than 60% ofU.S

Conference Session

Retention of Women Students

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University; Kaitlyn J. Bunker; Nilufer Onder, Michigan Technological University; Raven Rachaun Rebb; Laura E. Brown, Michigan Technological University; Leonard J. Bohmann, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

to persist within a given major or switch to anotherare complex. The factors that affect student decisions can be broadly classified into three groupsas (a) academic resources, (b) internalization and perceptions of the major and career, and (c)climate and experiential effects. The academic resources include lectures, recitations, andlaboratories; faculty and teaching assistants; university services such as advisors and careerplacement; and academic services such as study centers and academic progress monitoring.Internalization refers to perceptions of the self including confidence, self-efficacy, anddetermination to succeed. Perceptions of the major and career include students’ interest inchoosing and retaining engineering as a major and a

Conference Session

Innovating Inclusivity: Rethinking Access and Empowerment in STEM Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hilda Cecilia Contreras Aguirre, New Mexico State University; Patricia Nicole Delgado, New Mexico State University; Luis Rodolfo Garcia Carrillo, New Mexico State University

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

education; diverse students approach problem-solving in innovativeways when collaboration is not only supported but expected as an integral part of the learningprocess [13]. Additionally, educators and mentors should assess students' skills, prior knowledge,and experiences and use that information to tailor their teaching strategies to individual needs.The strengths students display such as resilience and persistence are often expected personalattributes, however, as [14] would contend, they are attributes that educators need to help buildup and support.Educators that learn about their student’s strengths have an opportunity to encourage deeperlearning, heightened levels of self-efficacy, and persistence in engineering programs that lead tothe

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emmanuella Obiageli Ejichukwu, University of Michigan, Dearborn; DeLean Tolbert Smith, University of Michigan, Dearborn; Hanadi Matar, University of Michigan, Dearborn

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

underrepresentedstudents still face despite ongoing intervention measures [6]. These obstacles include lateexposure to STEM career pathways, overrepresentation of historically underrepresented studentsin under resourced school districts, implicit biases in the educational system, socio-economicbarriers to participation in extracurricular activities, a lack of easily accessibly STEM rolemodels, historically unwelcoming academic culture in STEM disciplines, and low perceptions ofthe aptitude and drive by educators along their educational [7,8].Past research has provided evidence that intentionally introducing black students into STEMfrom an early age can increase their motivation, self-efficacy, and perseverance in STEM field[9]. Additionally, culturally relevant

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Ben Jelen, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

engineering and students’ expected success inengineering were found to decrease over the first year of study for first-year engineeringstudents, especially for women students [19]. Reasons for these feelings could be related toidealistic expectations of college or engineering in general, more difficult assignments thanexperienced in high school, or comparing to peers in a high-achieving peer group. In addition,students’ self-efficacy decreased over the first year of study, particularly for women students.However, both men and women experienced similar decreases in their value-related beliefs ofengineering [19].Importantly, researchers suggest that the potential impacts of the decrease in these expectanciesand value-related constructs on students

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division (WIED) Technical Session 2 - Personal Situations

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Cook-Chennault, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

Studies."[64] P. Moen, J. Robison, and V. Fields, "Women's work and caregiving roles: A life course approach," Journal of Gerontology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. S176-S186, 1994.[65] C. Marlow, "Coping with multiple roles: Family configuration and the need for workplace services," Affilia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 40-55, 1993.[66] G. H. Coetzer, B. Hanson, and R. Trimble, "The mediating influence of role stress on the relationship between adult attention deficit and self-efficacy," Journal of Business and Management, 2009.[67] G. H. Coetzer and L. Richmond, "An empirical examination of the relationships between adult attention deficit, personal task management systems and role stress," Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, vol

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Weihang Zhu, University of Houston; Tomika W. Greer, University of Houston; Paige Evans, University of Houston; LEI Fan, University of Houston; Driss Benhaddou, University of Houston

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

their knowledge of IotFtechnologies and their perceptions of self-efficacy and intentions towards high school STEMteaching. The pre-program and post-program data allowed for within-subjects comparisons toassess the changes in IotF knowledge and skills between orientation (“pre-program”) and the endof the summer program (“post-program). Due to the small sample size, we can only reportdescriptive statistics to compare the survey results within a given year. For the summer 2023 cohort, all eight participants complete the pre-program surveyduring the first week of the program. Five of the participants completed the post-program surveyat the conclusion of the program. Therefore, we report pre-program and post-program data forthose five RE-PST

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 2: Enhancing Learning through Hands-On Design

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, American Institutes for Research; Alexander John De Rosa, University of Delaware; Heather Doty, University of Delaware

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

was one of few studies to examine whether astructures themed PBL exercise boosts student performance on textbook statics problems. Priorstudies [1, 2, 5] have focused mainly on students’ analytical and design self-efficacy. Our studyadds to prior research by connecting the PBL experience to improved understanding of specificstatics concepts like two-force members, action-reaction pairs, and internal loads.There are several strengths and some limitations to our study. First, we used a robust, mixed-methods approach that allowed us to measure qualitative and quantitative changes in students’structural analysis skills. One limitation of the study is that we did not determine causality; inother words, we cannot definitively claim that the PBL

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division (EMD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chun Kit Chui, University of Hong Kong; Norman C. Tien, University of Hong Kong

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management Division (EMD)

. Levy, C. Forest, R. L. Nagel, W. C. Newstetter, K. G. Talley and J. S. Linsey, “Relating Student Participation in University Maker Spaces to their Engineering Design Self-Efficacy,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[34] Passow, Honor J., and Christian H. Passow. “What competencies should undergraduate engineering programs emphasize? A systematic review,” Journal of Engineering Education 106.3 (2017): 475-526.[35] Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology, University of California, Berkeley. https://scet.berkeley.edu/[36] Harvard Innovation Labs, Harvard university. https://innovationlabs.harvard.edu/[37] Chun Kit Chui, Lei Yang, Ben Kao. “Empowering Students in Emerging Technology: A Framework for

Conference Session

Technical Sessions 4

Collection

2024 Fall ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Bryan James Higgs, University of the District of Columbia; Gulen Ozkula, University of the District of Columbia

Tagged Topics

Professional Papers

students whoderive a sense of self-efficacy from demonstrating their capabilities, while students not in thatcohort may experience discouragement due to their perceived lack of the necessary skill level.The primary consideration is that the educational environment should foster students' autonomousskill development and provide them with the requisite feedback to facilitate personal growth. Thestructure of the engineering curriculum is such that, for numerous courses, there are prerequisitecourses in which students must attain a specified grade to be eligible for enrollment in advanced-level courses. This structure is predicated on the principle of knowledge acquisition, wherein thegrade serves as a criterion, with students above the threshold

Conference Session

Engineering and Engineering Technology Transfer and the Two-Year College Student Part 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Ford, University of Washington, Tacoma; Aleya Dhanji, Highline Community College; Kira Glynn King; Jie Sheng, University of Washington; Skyler Roth, Highline Community College; Emese Hadnagy, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

and financial aidplanning, but also self efficacy, transfer shock and feelings of connectedness. As such, apartnership with UWT has great potential to increase the effectiveness of interventions initiated atHighline by leveraging the knowledge, data, and resources of both institutions and boostingstudent retention rates and reducing graduation timelines at the 2-year and 4-year levels.Guided Pathways Implementation at Highline: In April 2019, Highline joined a cohort ofWashington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges (SBCTC) in implementingGuided Pathways. As a student-centered framework designed to increase and diversify thestudents and communities accessing and earning high-value credentials, using data and solicitingstudent

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 1: Foundations of Engineering Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Hiram Cover, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

socialunrest, as well as fires, hurricanes, floods, and other emergencies [1] may also cause disruptions.Such disruptions, on the student side, may lead to, among other things, feelings of isolation,anxiety, and stress [2]; reduced motivation, self-efficacy, and achievement [3]; and retentionissues [4]. The use of a learning management system (LMS) has been shown to mitigatechallenges associated with disruptions, prompting researchers to better understand the degree towhich LMS features are used and how they can be used more effectively. This study wasconducted to discover how instructors utilized a LMS before, during, and after a disruption.Findings from this study can be used by policy makers and educators to plan how best to useLMS features given

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wonki Lee, Purdue University; Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University; Amiah Clevenger; Andrew Jackson, University of Georgia; Scott R Bartholomew, Brigham Young University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Paper ID #42725Board 68: Integration of Learning by Evaluating (LbE) within the 5E InstructionalModel in Engineering-Design EducationDr. Wonki Lee, Purdue University Wonki Lee received a Ph.D. in Education, Curriculum Instruction, Language and Literacy at Purdue University. She received her bachelor’s and master’s, specializing in Korean language education as a second/foreign language, from Seoul National University, South Korea. Her research interests are self-efficacy, culturally responsive teaching, and machine learning in a diverse educational setting.Prof. Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University Nathan Mentzer is a

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 7: Teaching and Learning Practices

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isabel A Boyd, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Kaitlyn Anne Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kelly J Cross, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

. Differences in self- efficacy among women and minorities in stem. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(1), 2015.[20] Francesca Dupuy, Elliot P Douglas, and Paul G Richardson. Isolation, microaggressions, and racism: Black engineers in technology companies. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[21] Ebony O McGee and Danny B Martin. “you would not believe what i have to go through to prove my intel- lectual value!” stereotype management among academically successful black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6):1347–1389, 2011.[22] Thomas F Pettigrew. Intergroup contact theory. Annual review of psychology, 49(1):65–85, 1998.[23] John F Dovidio