. Austin, M. Jilland Rust, Dianna Zeh. 1, 2015, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in HigherEducation, Vol. 27, pp. 143-153.4. Integrative Activities for First Year Engineering Students - Fuel Cell Cars as a Linking ProjectBetween Chemistry, Mechatronics Concepts and Programming. Hulls, Carol C.W., et al.Canmore, AB : Canadian Engineering Education Association, 2014. CEEA 14. June 8-11. p. 9.5. Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases.Prince, Michael J. and Felder, Richard M. 2006, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 123-138.6. Ambrose, S. A., et al. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching.San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass, 2010.7. Engineering Education and the
sharing the topic with current and future students. Our interdisciplinary approachgave us perspectives from each other’s disciplines we could not have gained by studying thesubject individually. Additionally, we are modelling this interdisciplinary behavior for ourstudents. REFERENCES[1] K. Frydenborg, Chocolate Sweet Science and Dark Secrets of the World’s Favorite Treat. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2015.[2] C. Teubner, The Chocolate Bible. Chartwell Books Inc, 1997.[3] S. Beckett, The Science of Chocolate. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2008.[4] “Code of Federal Regulations Title 21” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, April 1, 2015. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov
sessions. Typically, one or two students willmake a significant mistake(s) that will require re-work and help; but the vast majority of studentscomplete an error-free, working-board on their first attempts. Figure 6 shows a finished solderedboard. Figure 6. Completed printed circuit board.Locomotion for the robot is provided by two standard servos that are modified for continuousrotation. Inexpensive metal gear servos (MG996R) have proven to be the easiest low cost servofor students to successfully modify. Again, I provide a detailed manual to students in order tohelp walk them through the process which involves disassembling the servo, removing thelimiting pin from the final output gear, removing the potentiometer, and
findings align with Kember et al.’s [11] observation that critical reflection requires engagement with and change of a perspective over time, making it inherently less frequent. The most common downward change was from critical reflection to reflection. In total, 28 students moved up the reflective scale while 6 moved down. The results from using the de Figueiredo [2] framework to code the reflections
(future) engineer? Developing an innovative solution & considering its impact on the energy/water issues Category case/CASE 1 – survey analysis results: Figures 4 Designing/developing system/device & its working principle(s) with and 5 show the distributions of different keywords obtained some degree of entrepreneurial aspect to the products/system Developing virtual (UGS NX) models and building & testing (small- from the survey category case/CASE 1 shown in Table VIII. scale) prototype (mock-up) system/device The statistical data displays information about some
and analyzing construction failures,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 128, no. 1, 2002. [5]. M. Ayub, “Structural collapses during construction.” Structures Magazine, 2010. [6]. P. Chronowski, M. Modares, and J. Mohammadi, “Data-driven investigation into causes of collapse in scaffolds,” Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ASCE, vol. 22, no. 2, 2017 [7]. C. Souder, Temporary Structure Design. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2015. [8]. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016). National census of fatal occupational injuries 2015. Available: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf, 2016 [9]. G. M. Waehrer, X. S. Dong, T. Miller, E. Haile and Y. Men, “ Costs of occupational
section, which include continuedrecruitment from identified sources, development of data collection materials (e.g. questionnairesand supplemental visual aids), as well as scheduling interviews with more students.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNo. 1733636. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] E.W. Kimball et al, “Students with Disabilities in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature and Agenda for Future Research,” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, M.B. Paulsen, Ed. Springer
applying criteria to undergraduate student learning,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 705-719, February 2017. [Online] Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1289507. [Accessed: Oct. 18, 2017].[10] K. D. Gutiérrez, J. D. Hunter and A. Arzubiaga, “Re-mediating the university: Learning through sociocritical literacies,” Pedagogies: An International Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1- 23, January 2009. [Online] Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800802557037. [Accessed: Nov. 14, 2017].[11] J. Debes, “The loom of visual literacy: An overview,” Audiovisual Instruction, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 25-27, 1969.[12] S. E. Metros, “The educator’s role in preparing visually literate learners,” Theory into Practice
-Project.pdf .8. Dimitriu, D. and Karimi, A., 2005, “Exploring the Engineering Profession-A Freshman Engineering Course,” ASEE 2004-1793, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, June 12-15. Portland, Oregon.9. Karimi, A., 2002, “Does Problem Solving Recitation Session Improve Student Retention and Success?,” ASEE 2002-2793, ASEE Annual Conference, June 16-19, Montréal, Quebec Canada.10. Karimi, A., 2001, “Implementing a New Mechanical Engineering Curriculum to Improve Student Retention,” ASEE 2001-1566, ASEE Annual Conference, June 24-27, Albuquerque, New Mexico.11. Karimi, A., Bench, S., and Hodges, Susan, 2001, “Improving Engineering Student Retention in an Urban University,” Annual Meeting of the Gulf-Southwest
. Additional funding for undergraduate research was provided by the 2014 Seattle UniversityFr. Woods Fellowship Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1 National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.2 ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluation During the 2009-2010 Accredidation Cycle," ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2008.3 American Society for Civil Engineering, "Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century
thispaper would not have been possible:Nancy A. Cherim, Analytical Instrumentation Scientist (SEM), UNH University InstrumentationCenterMark A. Townley, Ph.D., Analytical Instrumentation Scientist, UNH University InstrumentationCenterJohn S. Wilderman, Manager, UNH University Instrumentation CenterBenjamin T. Wood, Bachelor of Science, UNH Engineering Technology ProgramReferences 1. 2017-2018 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, ABET, Baltimore MD, 2017. 2. Autodesk ReCap, Autodesk 2018. Accessed at https://www.autodesk.com/products/recap/overview, September 1, 2018. 3. Compucentric Stage, TESCAN Corp., Accessed at https://www.tescan.com/en- us/technology/accessories/compucentric-stage, Accessed
undergraduate education asproduct and systems development through sponsorship of well as other industry segments such as oil & gas.Capstone project(s). Although the specific industry 2.2 Schneider Electric Building Simulatorsegment can vary widely, a number of recent partnerships Another example of a sponsored Capstone projecthave been formed to pursue opportunities in the area of was the HVAC Building simulator funded by Schneiderspace-based products and systems. Electric. Schneider Electric is a company that specializes in Small companies such a Texas Space Technology building automation and control products and services. TheApplications and Research (T
2004.WIMS LSAMP REU Ancillary ComponentsAncillary activities to enrich the REU experience consists of tours of laboratories, museumvisit(s), social/camaraderie activities, and REU group meetings.Social opportunities and events are arranged for WIMS LSAMP REU students to interactwith students in other related programs and to build a larger community of undergraduate Page 12.729.8research scholars. At UM, LSAMP REU students have research interactions with otherundergraduates in another WIMS Undergraduate Research (WUGR) program for UMstudents, and they share housing and personal social activities with WUGR students, as wellas National Nanotechnology
., “Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response”, JAMA. 2002; 287:898-900. 7. The White House Report, “The National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets”, February (2003). 8. Moehle, J.P. (editor). Preliminary Report on the Seismological and Engineering Aspects of the January 17, 1994, Northridge Earthquake, Report No. UCB/EERC 94.01, University of California-Berkeley, January 1994. 9. Viswanathan, S., Eria, L., Diunugala, N., Johnson, J and McClean, C., “An Analysis of Effects of San Diego Wildfire on Ambient Air Quality”, Air and Waste Management Journal, 56:56-67 (2005
and Informing Instruction”, International J of Science Education, 28.[8] Hawkins, S., M.B. Coney, and K. Bystrom (1996): “Incidental Writing in the Engineering Classroom”, J Engineering Education, 85.[9] ECET Students. (2006). Pressure Sensor Project Survey,Topics of Applied Design Lecture at the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.[10]Kolikant, Y.B.D, D.W. Gatchell, P.L Hirsch, & R.A. Linsenmeier. (2006). “A Cognitive-Apprenticeship- Inspired Instructional Approach for Teaching Scientific Writing and Reading,” J of College Science Teaching, 36.3. Page 12.1597.20
Development. In addition, she has developed numerous tools to mentor young women considering engineering as a career and has been involved in the development of a women in engineering role model book for K-12 students.Patricia Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology PATRICIA A. CARLSON is professor of rhetoric at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is a long-time advocate of writing in engineering education. Carlson has been a National Research Council Senior Fellow for the U. S. Air Force, as well as having had several research fellowships with NASA (Langley and Goddard) and the Army's Aberdeen Proving Ground. She has also been a research fellow at NASA's Classroom
Mechanical Engineering Obsolete?, in ASMENews. 2003.3. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, I., A Vision of the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education. 2004, ASME.4. Beeckmans, J.M., Viewpoint: General Practice Engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 1996. 12(6): p. 396-400.5. Caldwell, S.R., Educating the Engineer of the Future. 2006, ASCE: Dallas, Tx.6. Nelson, J. and S. Napper. Ramping Up an Integrated Egineering Curriculum to Full Implementation. in 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 1999. San Juan, Puerto Rico: IEEE. Page 12.908.15
Table 5 Meeting Task Assignment and Deliverables Use this table to document task assigned and deliverables completed/submitted by each group member at this meeting If deliverables were not completed, indicate the actions taken by the group on this individual. Deliverables completed & Actions taken by Name Task Assigned to team submitted from tasks group on non- members at this meeting assigned in previous performing meeting(s) memberThe Assessment Process for ABET OutcomesIn the advent of EC 2000, several
Dickinson andCompany (BD Medical-Medical Surgical Systems); Otis Elevator; Pratt and Whitney/ UnitedTechnologies; and Producto and Moore Tool Company. The DVD also included interviews withindustry CEOs; the Community College Chancellor; deans; faculty and students from the CTCommunity Colleges and COT 4-year partner institutions. The DVD was designed in 5 to 8minute sections. This allowed educators the flexibility to view particular segment(s) withouthaving to watch the entire DVD. The DVD was distributed statewide and nationally and wasvideo streamed on the COT RCNGM website (www.nextgenmfg.org)Another statewide initiative was an ad that highlighted a Hispanic, female COT EngineeringTechnology alumnus from Norwalk CC who completed her A.S. degree
Thought to Thing. Harvard University Press12. Johnston S. (1996), http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v1_n3n4/Johnston.html13. Bucciarelli L. (2003), Engineering Philosophy. Delft University Press.14. The Royal Academy of Engineering: Ingenia, March 2006, Issue 26 Page 12.1453.14
time, students have a theoretical understanding of the operation of these gates, havingderived truth tables in lecture. In this activity, students wire up pushbuttons to the input(s) ofeach gate and connect the output of the gate to an LED. Stepping through all possible inputcombinations, the truth table for each gate is verified. This not only reinforces the theoreticalconcepts, especially for those students who have a more sensory, active learning style, butintroduces students to wiring and illustrates how a simple device such as an LED can be veryuseful in verifying circuit operation and in debugging a circuit.In order to complete the Exploration component of this laboratory exercise (a scrolling 7-segment display), students must be able to
unique to Michigan Tech’sapproach. Key responsibilities of these positions include: identification of projects ofappropriate scope, cost and duration, management of sponsor expectations related to projectoutcomes and deliverables, and overall management of sponsor relationships. Furthermore,these positions are organizationally housed within academic unit(s), as opposed to reportingdirectly through the University’s development or corporate relations offices. This structuremaintains the emphasis on Senior Design and Enterprise as educational programs, and allows thestaff to objectively address the needs and interests of the University, the students, and the projectsponsor. Moreover, Michigan Tech faculty can focus their efforts on the activities
designers. In T. Hewett & T. Kavanagh(Eds.), Creativity and cognition. New York: ACM Press.13 ----- (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427-441.14 Middleton, H. (2005). Creative thinking, values and design and technology education. International Journal ofTechnology and Design Education, 15, 61-71.15 Ho, C.-H. (2001). Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking: Differences betweennovices and experts. Design Studies, 22, 27-45.16 Ertas, A. & Jones, J. C. (1993) The engineering design process. (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.17 Arora, J. S. (1989). Introduction to optimum design. New York: McGraw-Hill.18 Statnikov, R. B. (1999). Multicriteria design: Optimization
, W. C. (2004). Construction project planning and scheduling. Pearson Education / Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.10. Mubarak, S. (2005). Construction project scheduling and control. Pearson Education / Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.11. Feigenbaum, L. H. (2002). Construction scheduling with Primavera Project Planner®. 2nd ed., Pearson Education / Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.12. Hegazy, T. (2002). Computer-based construction project management. Pearson Education / Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.13. Buttelwerth, J. W. (2005). Computer integrated construction project scheduling. Pearson Education / Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.14. Lucko, G. (2005). “Reviving a mechanistic
. Todd, R. and Magelby, S. “Creating Successful Capstone Programs by Considering the Needs of Stakeholders” Journal of Engineering Education, 19934. Kirschman, J. and Greenstein, J. “The use of groupware for collaboration in distributed student engineering design teams,” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct 20025. Latcha, M. and Oakley, B. “Toying with a capstone design course,” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct 20016. Hargreaves, D.J., "Addressing Transition to Tertiary Education in Engineering," European Journal of Engineering Education, 1998, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 79-89.7. Hansen, J. and Andersen, A., “Engineers of Tomorrow and Beyond: Knowledge, Insight and Skills Needed to Work Across Borders”, Proceedings of
9 10 s ts ut pu np ut -i
AC 2007-1351: A PORTFOLIO OF STUDY ABROAD OPTIONS FORENGINEERING STUDENTS TO GAIN INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCEDonna Reese, Mississippi State University Donna S. Reese. Professor Reese is currently the Associate Dean for Academics and Administration for the James Worth Bagley College of Engineering at Mississippi State University and a Professor of Computer Science and Engineering. She has been on the faculty at MSU for 17 years. She may be reached via email at dreese@engr.msstate.edu.Allen Greenwood, Mississippi State University Allen G. Greenwood. Dr. Greenwood is a Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Hearin Eminent Scholar. He is also the International Programs Coordinator for the